Text-Critical and Intertextual Remarks on 1 Tim 2:8-10
After reassessing the various ways of dealing with the ellipsis in 1 Tim 2:9, it is argued that βούλομαι προσεύχεσθαι offers a plausible resolution. Yet the ambiguity of the text suggests that 1 Tim 2:8-15 resulted from using several sources. The intertextual analysis shows that 1 Timothy very likel...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Novum Testamentum 2008-01, Vol.50 (4), p.376-406 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 406 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 376 |
| container_title | Novum Testamentum |
| container_volume | 50 |
| creator | Zamfir, Korinna Verheyden, Joseph |
| description | After reassessing the various ways of dealing with the ellipsis in 1 Tim 2:9, it is argued that βούλομαι προσεύχεσθαι offers a plausible resolution. Yet the ambiguity of the text suggests that 1 Tim 2:8-15 resulted from using several sources. The intertextual analysis shows that 1 Timothy very likely used as a pre-text the cultic rule found in 1 Cor 11 and its context. A second pre-text consists of a station code tradition and of Neo-Pythagorean exhortations. This complex intertextual enterprise allows 1 Tim to "correct" Paul's more permissive attitude regarding the role men and women can play in public worship. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1163/156853608X297703 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_156853608X297703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25442616</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25442616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b342t-ddbadd80412dd58625bd81ae829361f0ae77f2f82b8b219887172a48e095dd353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j0tLxDAUhYMoOI7u3Qj9A9Gbd-pOxse8UBgqugvpJIWOnVaSDui_N0NlFoKrC-eeczgfQpcErgmR7IYIqQWToN9prhSwIzTaSzhp4hiNALjGBCA_RWcxbgBAcVAjJAv_1eNJqPt6bZvMti6btb0PfZJ3SVj5rQ0fMevajGRFvc3o7b7nHJ1Uton-4veO0evjQzGZ4uXL02xyt8Ql47THzpXWOQ2cUOeEllSUThPrNc2ZJBVYr1RFK01LXVKSa62IopZrD7lwjgk2RjD0rkMXY_CV-Qx1WvRtCJg9t_nLnSJXQ2QT-y4c_FRwTmVKjBEe_nVMkId_ojRSMSXMfFGY57fpvGD3C7NK_uvBX4a6acym24U2If8_4AdoQm6H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Text-Critical and Intertextual Remarks on 1 Tim 2:8-10</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zamfir, Korinna ; Verheyden, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Zamfir, Korinna ; Verheyden, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>After reassessing the various ways of dealing with the ellipsis in 1 Tim 2:9, it is argued that βούλομαι προσεύχεσθαι offers a plausible resolution. Yet the ambiguity of the text suggests that 1 Tim 2:8-15 resulted from using several sources. The intertextual analysis shows that 1 Timothy very likely used as a pre-text the cultic rule found in 1 Cor 11 and its context. A second pre-text consists of a station code tradition and of Neo-Pythagorean exhortations. This complex intertextual enterprise allows 1 Tim to "correct" Paul's more permissive attitude regarding the role men and women can play in public worship.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-1009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-5365</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0048-1009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/156853608X297703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: BRILL</publisher><subject>1 COR 11:3-15 ; 1 TIM 2:8-10 ; Apostolic letters ; Christianity ; ELLIPSIS ; Gender roles ; Grammatical clauses ; Infinitives ; INTERTEXTUALITY ; Men ; Prayer ; Prophecy ; TEXTUAL CRITICISM ; Theology</subject><ispartof>Novum Testamentum, 2008-01, Vol.50 (4), p.376-406</ispartof><rights>2008 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>Copyright 2008 Koninklijke Brill NV</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b342t-ddbadd80412dd58625bd81ae829361f0ae77f2f82b8b219887172a48e095dd353</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25442616$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25442616$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zamfir, Korinna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verheyden, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>Text-Critical and Intertextual Remarks on 1 Tim 2:8-10</title><title>Novum Testamentum</title><addtitle>NT</addtitle><description>After reassessing the various ways of dealing with the ellipsis in 1 Tim 2:9, it is argued that βούλομαι προσεύχεσθαι offers a plausible resolution. Yet the ambiguity of the text suggests that 1 Tim 2:8-15 resulted from using several sources. The intertextual analysis shows that 1 Timothy very likely used as a pre-text the cultic rule found in 1 Cor 11 and its context. A second pre-text consists of a station code tradition and of Neo-Pythagorean exhortations. This complex intertextual enterprise allows 1 Tim to "correct" Paul's more permissive attitude regarding the role men and women can play in public worship.</description><subject>1 COR 11:3-15</subject><subject>1 TIM 2:8-10</subject><subject>Apostolic letters</subject><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>ELLIPSIS</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>Grammatical clauses</subject><subject>Infinitives</subject><subject>INTERTEXTUALITY</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Prayer</subject><subject>Prophecy</subject><subject>TEXTUAL CRITICISM</subject><subject>Theology</subject><issn>0048-1009</issn><issn>1568-5365</issn><issn>0048-1009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j0tLxDAUhYMoOI7u3Qj9A9Gbd-pOxse8UBgqugvpJIWOnVaSDui_N0NlFoKrC-eeczgfQpcErgmR7IYIqQWToN9prhSwIzTaSzhp4hiNALjGBCA_RWcxbgBAcVAjJAv_1eNJqPt6bZvMti6btb0PfZJ3SVj5rQ0fMevajGRFvc3o7b7nHJ1Uton-4veO0evjQzGZ4uXL02xyt8Ql47THzpXWOQ2cUOeEllSUThPrNc2ZJBVYr1RFK01LXVKSa62IopZrD7lwjgk2RjD0rkMXY_CV-Qx1WvRtCJg9t_nLnSJXQ2QT-y4c_FRwTmVKjBEe_nVMkId_ojRSMSXMfFGY57fpvGD3C7NK_uvBX4a6acym24U2If8_4AdoQm6H</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Zamfir, Korinna</creator><creator>Verheyden, Joseph</creator><general>BRILL</general><general>Brill</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Text-Critical and Intertextual Remarks on 1 Tim 2:8-10</title><author>Zamfir, Korinna ; Verheyden, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b342t-ddbadd80412dd58625bd81ae829361f0ae77f2f82b8b219887172a48e095dd353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>1 COR 11:3-15</topic><topic>1 TIM 2:8-10</topic><topic>Apostolic letters</topic><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>ELLIPSIS</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>Grammatical clauses</topic><topic>Infinitives</topic><topic>INTERTEXTUALITY</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Prayer</topic><topic>Prophecy</topic><topic>TEXTUAL CRITICISM</topic><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zamfir, Korinna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verheyden, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Novum Testamentum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zamfir, Korinna</au><au>Verheyden, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Text-Critical and Intertextual Remarks on 1 Tim 2:8-10</atitle><jtitle>Novum Testamentum</jtitle><addtitle>NT</addtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>376</spage><epage>406</epage><pages>376-406</pages><issn>0048-1009</issn><eissn>1568-5365</eissn><eissn>0048-1009</eissn><abstract>After reassessing the various ways of dealing with the ellipsis in 1 Tim 2:9, it is argued that βούλομαι προσεύχεσθαι offers a plausible resolution. Yet the ambiguity of the text suggests that 1 Tim 2:8-15 resulted from using several sources. The intertextual analysis shows that 1 Timothy very likely used as a pre-text the cultic rule found in 1 Cor 11 and its context. A second pre-text consists of a station code tradition and of Neo-Pythagorean exhortations. This complex intertextual enterprise allows 1 Tim to "correct" Paul's more permissive attitude regarding the role men and women can play in public worship.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>BRILL</pub><doi>10.1163/156853608X297703</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0048-1009 |
| ispartof | Novum Testamentum, 2008-01, Vol.50 (4), p.376-406 |
| issn | 0048-1009 1568-5365 0048-1009 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_156853608X297703 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | 1 COR 11:3-15 1 TIM 2:8-10 Apostolic letters Christianity ELLIPSIS Gender roles Grammatical clauses Infinitives INTERTEXTUALITY Men Prayer Prophecy TEXTUAL CRITICISM Theology |
| title | Text-Critical and Intertextual Remarks on 1 Tim 2:8-10 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A11%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Text-Critical%20and%20Intertextual%20Remarks%20on%201%20Tim%202:8-10&rft.jtitle=Novum%20Testamentum&rft.au=Zamfir,%20Korinna&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=376&rft.epage=406&rft.pages=376-406&rft.issn=0048-1009&rft.eissn=1568-5365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/156853608X297703&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E25442616%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25442616&rfr_iscdi=true |