Discourse on Knowledge, Dialogue and Diversity: Peasant Worldviews and the Science of Nature Conservation

This article suggests that people endowed with an ecosystem operate within their own tradition of knowledge and can offer a useful critique of the increasingly globalised schemes of nature conservation such as parks, sanctuaries and biodiversity preserves. I compare and contrast two competing propos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology Culture, and Ecology, 1997, Vol.1 (3), p.189-210
1. Verfasser: Parajuli, Pramod
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 210
container_issue 3
container_start_page 189
container_title Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology
container_volume 1
creator Parajuli, Pramod
description This article suggests that people endowed with an ecosystem operate within their own tradition of knowledge and can offer a useful critique of the increasingly globalised schemes of nature conservation such as parks, sanctuaries and biodiversity preserves. I compare and contrast two competing proposals for nature conservation. While one is the conservation strategy based upon in-farm nurturing of the biodiversity that adheres to the cultural diversity of people residing in an ecosystem, the other is a strategy that excludes the ecosystem people in order to conserve nature. But the contest between the two is not about whether nature should be kept pristine or be made available for human use; it is about the scale of use and the mode of use. It is about who should use, how much, and for what purpose. The debate is also about what kinds of technologies are going to be used in preserving as well as harvesting, using as well as enhancing nature. Ultimately, it is about the very nature of the relationship between human collectivity and non-human collectivity.
doi_str_mv 10.1163/156853597X00128
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_156853597X00128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43809649</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43809649</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b252t-6dbafa6d15ea694a74bf68fae57136c626cea5c9ebfb1996db051bde892aeb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZoXkDyA0TmInZocayqPlIVEBYmM5yaS4BBvZaUv_HpeiIiGxmsc9M6O5CB2S8IQQFvcIZRmNKU-fw5BE2RbqrDqBb6XbPo9ZHNAoSXfRnnNTj2SEhh2kcuVKM7MOsNF4qM2igWoCxzhXsjGTGWCpK1_MwTrVLk_xPUgndYufjG2quYKF-ybaV8APpQJd-kU1vpXtzALuG-3AzmWrjN5HO7VsHBz8xC4aD87H_ctgdHdx1T8bBUVEozZgVSFrySpCQTKeyDQpapbVEmjqfyhZxEqQtORQ1AXh3OMhJUUFGY8kFFncRb312tIa5yzU4sOqd2mXgoRiZZT4Y5SfOFpPTF1r7AZP4izkLOFeD9a6ci18bnRp3wRL45SK6-FYPL5E-egmHwj6yxdWNY2Yene1f_jf-1_vD4Oz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discourse on Knowledge, Dialogue and Diversity: Peasant Worldviews and the Science of Nature Conservation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Parajuli, Pramod</creator><creatorcontrib>Parajuli, Pramod</creatorcontrib><description>This article suggests that people endowed with an ecosystem operate within their own tradition of knowledge and can offer a useful critique of the increasingly globalised schemes of nature conservation such as parks, sanctuaries and biodiversity preserves. I compare and contrast two competing proposals for nature conservation. While one is the conservation strategy based upon in-farm nurturing of the biodiversity that adheres to the cultural diversity of people residing in an ecosystem, the other is a strategy that excludes the ecosystem people in order to conserve nature. But the contest between the two is not about whether nature should be kept pristine or be made available for human use; it is about the scale of use and the mode of use. It is about who should use, how much, and for what purpose. The debate is also about what kinds of technologies are going to be used in preserving as well as harvesting, using as well as enhancing nature. Ultimately, it is about the very nature of the relationship between human collectivity and non-human collectivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-5247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-5357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1363-5247</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/156853597X00128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: BRILL</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Biodiversity conservation ; Ecological sustainability ; Ecosystems ; Environmental conservation ; Forest ecology ; Nature ; Nature conservation ; Peasant class ; Sustainable agriculture</subject><ispartof>Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 1997, Vol.1 (3), p.189-210</ispartof><rights>1997 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b252t-6dbafa6d15ea694a74bf68fae57136c626cea5c9ebfb1996db051bde892aeb83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43809649$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43809649$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parajuli, Pramod</creatorcontrib><title>Discourse on Knowledge, Dialogue and Diversity: Peasant Worldviews and the Science of Nature Conservation</title><title>Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology</title><addtitle>WO</addtitle><description>This article suggests that people endowed with an ecosystem operate within their own tradition of knowledge and can offer a useful critique of the increasingly globalised schemes of nature conservation such as parks, sanctuaries and biodiversity preserves. I compare and contrast two competing proposals for nature conservation. While one is the conservation strategy based upon in-farm nurturing of the biodiversity that adheres to the cultural diversity of people residing in an ecosystem, the other is a strategy that excludes the ecosystem people in order to conserve nature. But the contest between the two is not about whether nature should be kept pristine or be made available for human use; it is about the scale of use and the mode of use. It is about who should use, how much, and for what purpose. The debate is also about what kinds of technologies are going to be used in preserving as well as harvesting, using as well as enhancing nature. Ultimately, it is about the very nature of the relationship between human collectivity and non-human collectivity.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Ecological sustainability</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Nature</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Peasant class</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><issn>1363-5247</issn><issn>1568-5357</issn><issn>1363-5247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZoXkDyA0TmInZocayqPlIVEBYmM5yaS4BBvZaUv_HpeiIiGxmsc9M6O5CB2S8IQQFvcIZRmNKU-fw5BE2RbqrDqBb6XbPo9ZHNAoSXfRnnNTj2SEhh2kcuVKM7MOsNF4qM2igWoCxzhXsjGTGWCpK1_MwTrVLk_xPUgndYufjG2quYKF-ybaV8APpQJd-kU1vpXtzALuG-3AzmWrjN5HO7VsHBz8xC4aD87H_ctgdHdx1T8bBUVEozZgVSFrySpCQTKeyDQpapbVEmjqfyhZxEqQtORQ1AXh3OMhJUUFGY8kFFncRb312tIa5yzU4sOqd2mXgoRiZZT4Y5SfOFpPTF1r7AZP4izkLOFeD9a6ci18bnRp3wRL45SK6-FYPL5E-egmHwj6yxdWNY2Yene1f_jf-1_vD4Oz</recordid><startdate>1997</startdate><enddate>1997</enddate><creator>Parajuli, Pramod</creator><general>BRILL</general><general>The White Horse Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1997</creationdate><title>Discourse on Knowledge, Dialogue and Diversity: Peasant Worldviews and the Science of Nature Conservation</title><author>Parajuli, Pramod</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b252t-6dbafa6d15ea694a74bf68fae57136c626cea5c9ebfb1996db051bde892aeb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Ecological sustainability</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Nature</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Peasant class</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parajuli, Pramod</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parajuli, Pramod</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discourse on Knowledge, Dialogue and Diversity: Peasant Worldviews and the Science of Nature Conservation</atitle><jtitle>Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology</jtitle><addtitle>WO</addtitle><date>1997</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>189-210</pages><issn>1363-5247</issn><eissn>1568-5357</eissn><eissn>1363-5247</eissn><abstract>This article suggests that people endowed with an ecosystem operate within their own tradition of knowledge and can offer a useful critique of the increasingly globalised schemes of nature conservation such as parks, sanctuaries and biodiversity preserves. I compare and contrast two competing proposals for nature conservation. While one is the conservation strategy based upon in-farm nurturing of the biodiversity that adheres to the cultural diversity of people residing in an ecosystem, the other is a strategy that excludes the ecosystem people in order to conserve nature. But the contest between the two is not about whether nature should be kept pristine or be made available for human use; it is about the scale of use and the mode of use. It is about who should use, how much, and for what purpose. The debate is also about what kinds of technologies are going to be used in preserving as well as harvesting, using as well as enhancing nature. Ultimately, it is about the very nature of the relationship between human collectivity and non-human collectivity.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>BRILL</pub><doi>10.1163/156853597X00128</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1363-5247
ispartof Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 1997, Vol.1 (3), p.189-210
issn 1363-5247
1568-5357
1363-5247
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_156853597X00128
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biodiversity
Biodiversity conservation
Ecological sustainability
Ecosystems
Environmental conservation
Forest ecology
Nature
Nature conservation
Peasant class
Sustainable agriculture
title Discourse on Knowledge, Dialogue and Diversity: Peasant Worldviews and the Science of Nature Conservation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A51%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discourse%20on%20Knowledge,%20Dialogue%20and%20Diversity:%20Peasant%20Worldviews%20and%20the%20Science%20of%20Nature%20Conservation&rft.jtitle=Worldviews:%20Global%20Religions,%20Culture,%20and%20Ecology&rft.au=Parajuli,%20Pramod&rft.date=1997&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=189-210&rft.issn=1363-5247&rft.eissn=1568-5357&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/156853597X00128&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E43809649%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43809649&rfr_iscdi=true