Discourse on Knowledge, Dialogue and Diversity: Peasant Worldviews and the Science of Nature Conservation
This article suggests that people endowed with an ecosystem operate within their own tradition of knowledge and can offer a useful critique of the increasingly globalised schemes of nature conservation such as parks, sanctuaries and biodiversity preserves. I compare and contrast two competing propos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology Culture, and Ecology, 1997, Vol.1 (3), p.189-210 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 210 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 189 |
container_title | Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Parajuli, Pramod |
description | This article suggests that people endowed with an ecosystem operate within their own tradition of knowledge and can offer a useful critique of the increasingly globalised schemes of nature conservation such as parks, sanctuaries and biodiversity preserves. I compare and contrast two competing proposals for nature conservation. While one is the conservation strategy based upon in-farm nurturing of the biodiversity that adheres to the cultural diversity of people residing in an ecosystem, the other is a strategy that excludes the ecosystem people in order to conserve nature. But the contest between the two is not about whether nature should be kept pristine or be made available for human use; it is about the scale of use and the mode of use. It is about who should use, how much, and for what purpose. The debate is also about what kinds of technologies are going to be used in preserving as well as harvesting, using as well as enhancing nature. Ultimately, it is about the very nature of the relationship between human collectivity and non-human collectivity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1163/156853597X00128 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_156853597X00128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>43809649</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43809649</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b252t-6dbafa6d15ea694a74bf68fae57136c626cea5c9ebfb1996db051bde892aeb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZoXkDyA0TmInZocayqPlIVEBYmM5yaS4BBvZaUv_HpeiIiGxmsc9M6O5CB2S8IQQFvcIZRmNKU-fw5BE2RbqrDqBb6XbPo9ZHNAoSXfRnnNTj2SEhh2kcuVKM7MOsNF4qM2igWoCxzhXsjGTGWCpK1_MwTrVLk_xPUgndYufjG2quYKF-ybaV8APpQJd-kU1vpXtzALuG-3AzmWrjN5HO7VsHBz8xC4aD87H_ctgdHdx1T8bBUVEozZgVSFrySpCQTKeyDQpapbVEmjqfyhZxEqQtORQ1AXh3OMhJUUFGY8kFFncRb312tIa5yzU4sOqd2mXgoRiZZT4Y5SfOFpPTF1r7AZP4izkLOFeD9a6ci18bnRp3wRL45SK6-FYPL5E-egmHwj6yxdWNY2Yene1f_jf-1_vD4Oz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discourse on Knowledge, Dialogue and Diversity: Peasant Worldviews and the Science of Nature Conservation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Parajuli, Pramod</creator><creatorcontrib>Parajuli, Pramod</creatorcontrib><description>This article suggests that people endowed with an ecosystem operate within their own tradition of knowledge and can offer a useful critique of the increasingly globalised schemes of nature conservation such as parks, sanctuaries and biodiversity preserves. I compare and contrast two competing proposals for nature conservation. While one is the conservation strategy based upon in-farm nurturing of the biodiversity that adheres to the cultural diversity of people residing in an ecosystem, the other is a strategy that excludes the ecosystem people in order to conserve nature. But the contest between the two is not about whether nature should be kept pristine or be made available for human use; it is about the scale of use and the mode of use. It is about who should use, how much, and for what purpose. The debate is also about what kinds of technologies are going to be used in preserving as well as harvesting, using as well as enhancing nature. Ultimately, it is about the very nature of the relationship between human collectivity and non-human collectivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1363-5247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-5357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1363-5247</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/156853597X00128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: BRILL</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Biodiversity conservation ; Ecological sustainability ; Ecosystems ; Environmental conservation ; Forest ecology ; Nature ; Nature conservation ; Peasant class ; Sustainable agriculture</subject><ispartof>Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 1997, Vol.1 (3), p.189-210</ispartof><rights>1997 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b252t-6dbafa6d15ea694a74bf68fae57136c626cea5c9ebfb1996db051bde892aeb83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43809649$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43809649$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parajuli, Pramod</creatorcontrib><title>Discourse on Knowledge, Dialogue and Diversity: Peasant Worldviews and the Science of Nature Conservation</title><title>Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology</title><addtitle>WO</addtitle><description>This article suggests that people endowed with an ecosystem operate within their own tradition of knowledge and can offer a useful critique of the increasingly globalised schemes of nature conservation such as parks, sanctuaries and biodiversity preserves. I compare and contrast two competing proposals for nature conservation. While one is the conservation strategy based upon in-farm nurturing of the biodiversity that adheres to the cultural diversity of people residing in an ecosystem, the other is a strategy that excludes the ecosystem people in order to conserve nature. But the contest between the two is not about whether nature should be kept pristine or be made available for human use; it is about the scale of use and the mode of use. It is about who should use, how much, and for what purpose. The debate is also about what kinds of technologies are going to be used in preserving as well as harvesting, using as well as enhancing nature. Ultimately, it is about the very nature of the relationship between human collectivity and non-human collectivity.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>Ecological sustainability</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Nature</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Peasant class</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><issn>1363-5247</issn><issn>1568-5357</issn><issn>1363-5247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWwZoXkDyA0TmInZocayqPlIVEBYmM5yaS4BBvZaUv_HpeiIiGxmsc9M6O5CB2S8IQQFvcIZRmNKU-fw5BE2RbqrDqBb6XbPo9ZHNAoSXfRnnNTj2SEhh2kcuVKM7MOsNF4qM2igWoCxzhXsjGTGWCpK1_MwTrVLk_xPUgndYufjG2quYKF-ybaV8APpQJd-kU1vpXtzALuG-3AzmWrjN5HO7VsHBz8xC4aD87H_ctgdHdx1T8bBUVEozZgVSFrySpCQTKeyDQpapbVEmjqfyhZxEqQtORQ1AXh3OMhJUUFGY8kFFncRb312tIa5yzU4sOqd2mXgoRiZZT4Y5SfOFpPTF1r7AZP4izkLOFeD9a6ci18bnRp3wRL45SK6-FYPL5E-egmHwj6yxdWNY2Yene1f_jf-1_vD4Oz</recordid><startdate>1997</startdate><enddate>1997</enddate><creator>Parajuli, Pramod</creator><general>BRILL</general><general>The White Horse Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1997</creationdate><title>Discourse on Knowledge, Dialogue and Diversity: Peasant Worldviews and the Science of Nature Conservation</title><author>Parajuli, Pramod</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b252t-6dbafa6d15ea694a74bf68fae57136c626cea5c9ebfb1996db051bde892aeb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>Ecological sustainability</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Nature</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Peasant class</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parajuli, Pramod</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parajuli, Pramod</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discourse on Knowledge, Dialogue and Diversity: Peasant Worldviews and the Science of Nature Conservation</atitle><jtitle>Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology</jtitle><addtitle>WO</addtitle><date>1997</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>189-210</pages><issn>1363-5247</issn><eissn>1568-5357</eissn><eissn>1363-5247</eissn><abstract>This article suggests that people endowed with an ecosystem operate within their own tradition of knowledge and can offer a useful critique of the increasingly globalised schemes of nature conservation such as parks, sanctuaries and biodiversity preserves. I compare and contrast two competing proposals for nature conservation. While one is the conservation strategy based upon in-farm nurturing of the biodiversity that adheres to the cultural diversity of people residing in an ecosystem, the other is a strategy that excludes the ecosystem people in order to conserve nature. But the contest between the two is not about whether nature should be kept pristine or be made available for human use; it is about the scale of use and the mode of use. It is about who should use, how much, and for what purpose. The debate is also about what kinds of technologies are going to be used in preserving as well as harvesting, using as well as enhancing nature. Ultimately, it is about the very nature of the relationship between human collectivity and non-human collectivity.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>BRILL</pub><doi>10.1163/156853597X00128</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1363-5247 |
ispartof | Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 1997, Vol.1 (3), p.189-210 |
issn | 1363-5247 1568-5357 1363-5247 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_156853597X00128 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biodiversity Biodiversity conservation Ecological sustainability Ecosystems Environmental conservation Forest ecology Nature Nature conservation Peasant class Sustainable agriculture |
title | Discourse on Knowledge, Dialogue and Diversity: Peasant Worldviews and the Science of Nature Conservation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A51%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discourse%20on%20Knowledge,%20Dialogue%20and%20Diversity:%20Peasant%20Worldviews%20and%20the%20Science%20of%20Nature%20Conservation&rft.jtitle=Worldviews:%20Global%20Religions,%20Culture,%20and%20Ecology&rft.au=Parajuli,%20Pramod&rft.date=1997&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=189-210&rft.issn=1363-5247&rft.eissn=1568-5357&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/156853597X00128&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E43809649%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=43809649&rfr_iscdi=true |