Decomposing Decision Components in the Stop-signal Task: A Model-based Approach to Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control

The stop-signal task, in which participants must inhibit prepotent responses, has been used to identify neural systems that vary with individual differences in inhibitory control. To explore how these differences relate to other aspects of decision making, a drift-diffusion model of simple decisions...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cognitive neuroscience 2014-08, Vol.26 (8), p.1601-1614
Hauptverfasser: White, Corey N., Congdon, Eliza, Mumford, Jeanette A., Karlsgodt, Katherine H., Sabb, Fred W., Freimer, Nelson B., London, Edythe D., Cannon, Tyrone D., Bilder, Robert M., Poldrack, Russell A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1614
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1601
container_title Journal of cognitive neuroscience
container_volume 26
creator White, Corey N.
Congdon, Eliza
Mumford, Jeanette A.
Karlsgodt, Katherine H.
Sabb, Fred W.
Freimer, Nelson B.
London, Edythe D.
Cannon, Tyrone D.
Bilder, Robert M.
Poldrack, Russell A.
description The stop-signal task, in which participants must inhibit prepotent responses, has been used to identify neural systems that vary with individual differences in inhibitory control. To explore how these differences relate to other aspects of decision making, a drift-diffusion model of simple decisions was fitted to stop-signal task data from go trials to extract measures of caution, motor execution time, and stimulus processing speed for each of 123 participants. These values were used to probe fMRI data to explore individual differences in neural activation. Faster processing of the go stimulus correlated with greater activation in the right frontal pole for both go and stop trials. On stop trials, stimulus processing speed also correlated with regions implicated in inhibitory control, including the right inferior frontal gyrus, medial frontal gyrus, and BG. Individual differences in motor execution time correlated with activation of the right parietal cortex. These findings suggest a robust relationship between the speed of stimulus processing and inhibitory processing at the neural level. This model-based approach provides novel insight into the interrelationships among decision components involved in inhibitory control and raises interesting questions about strategic adjustments in performance and inhibitory deficits associated with psychopathology.
doi_str_mv 10.1162/jocn_a_00567
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_00567</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3365225651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c601t-3708dc426f41299f35b7108fb69be9538190d08c147d75a6fc4c6a03858410433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktvEzEQgFcIREPhxhlZ4tIDC-PXrs2hIkp5RCriQJG4WV6vN3HY2Iu9iVQu_HWcpFShqsRpLM-nb2bsKYrnGF5jXJE3q2C80gqAV_WDYoI5hVIIKR4WE8ihlER-PymepLQCAMIr9rg4IYwBx4JPit8X1oT1EJLzC5TPLrng0Wx35a0fE3IejUuLvo5hKJNbeN2jK51-vEVT9Dm0ti8bnWyLpsMQgzZLNAY0963bunaT0QvXdTZab-zeNPdL17gxxOtcwo8x9E-LR53uk312E0-Lbx_eX80-lZdfPs5n08vSVIDHktYgWsNI1TFMpOwob2oMomsq2VjJqcASWhAGs7qtua46w0ylgQouGAZG6WlxfvAOm2ZtW5Nni7pXQ3RrHa9V0E79m_FuqRZhqxjOauBZcHYjiOHnxqZRrV0ytu-1t2GTFBaUEE4qqP-PcoZpzcje-vIOugqbmB95T1EqJa5xpl4dKBNDStF2t31jULslUMdLkPEXx7Pewn9_PQPvDsDaHRXcObakckJRoIzVigDBWa9Aql9uuFvj7B7Fve38AXV00E0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1543399171</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decomposing Decision Components in the Stop-signal Task: A Model-based Approach to Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>MIT Press Journals</source><creator>White, Corey N. ; Congdon, Eliza ; Mumford, Jeanette A. ; Karlsgodt, Katherine H. ; Sabb, Fred W. ; Freimer, Nelson B. ; London, Edythe D. ; Cannon, Tyrone D. ; Bilder, Robert M. ; Poldrack, Russell A.</creator><creatorcontrib>White, Corey N. ; Congdon, Eliza ; Mumford, Jeanette A. ; Karlsgodt, Katherine H. ; Sabb, Fred W. ; Freimer, Nelson B. ; London, Edythe D. ; Cannon, Tyrone D. ; Bilder, Robert M. ; Poldrack, Russell A.</creatorcontrib><description>The stop-signal task, in which participants must inhibit prepotent responses, has been used to identify neural systems that vary with individual differences in inhibitory control. To explore how these differences relate to other aspects of decision making, a drift-diffusion model of simple decisions was fitted to stop-signal task data from go trials to extract measures of caution, motor execution time, and stimulus processing speed for each of 123 participants. These values were used to probe fMRI data to explore individual differences in neural activation. Faster processing of the go stimulus correlated with greater activation in the right frontal pole for both go and stop trials. On stop trials, stimulus processing speed also correlated with regions implicated in inhibitory control, including the right inferior frontal gyrus, medial frontal gyrus, and BG. Individual differences in motor execution time correlated with activation of the right parietal cortex. These findings suggest a robust relationship between the speed of stimulus processing and inhibitory processing at the neural level. This model-based approach provides novel insight into the interrelationships among decision components involved in inhibitory control and raises interesting questions about strategic adjustments in performance and inhibitory deficits associated with psychopathology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-929X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-8898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00567</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24405185</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Decision making ; Decision Making - physiology ; Executive Function - physiology ; Functional Neuroimaging - methods ; Humans ; Individuality ; Information processing ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Middle Aged ; Models, Psychological ; Neurons ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Prefrontal Cortex - physiology ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Psychopathology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2014-08, Vol.26 (8), p.1601-1614</ispartof><rights>Copyright MIT Press Journals Aug 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c601t-3708dc426f41299f35b7108fb69be9538190d08c147d75a6fc4c6a03858410433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c601t-3708dc426f41299f35b7108fb69be9538190d08c147d75a6fc4c6a03858410433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://direct.mit.edu/jocn/article/doi/10.1162/jocn_a_00567$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmit$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27922,27923,54007,54008</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24405185$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>White, Corey N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Eliza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Jeanette A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlsgodt, Katherine H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabb, Fred W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freimer, Nelson B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>London, Edythe D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannon, Tyrone D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilder, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poldrack, Russell A.</creatorcontrib><title>Decomposing Decision Components in the Stop-signal Task: A Model-based Approach to Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control</title><title>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Cogn Neurosci</addtitle><description>The stop-signal task, in which participants must inhibit prepotent responses, has been used to identify neural systems that vary with individual differences in inhibitory control. To explore how these differences relate to other aspects of decision making, a drift-diffusion model of simple decisions was fitted to stop-signal task data from go trials to extract measures of caution, motor execution time, and stimulus processing speed for each of 123 participants. These values were used to probe fMRI data to explore individual differences in neural activation. Faster processing of the go stimulus correlated with greater activation in the right frontal pole for both go and stop trials. On stop trials, stimulus processing speed also correlated with regions implicated in inhibitory control, including the right inferior frontal gyrus, medial frontal gyrus, and BG. Individual differences in motor execution time correlated with activation of the right parietal cortex. These findings suggest a robust relationship between the speed of stimulus processing and inhibitory processing at the neural level. This model-based approach provides novel insight into the interrelationships among decision components involved in inhibitory control and raises interesting questions about strategic adjustments in performance and inhibitory deficits associated with psychopathology.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision Making - physiology</subject><subject>Executive Function - physiology</subject><subject>Functional Neuroimaging - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individuality</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Neurons</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Prefrontal Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0898-929X</issn><issn>1530-8898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktvEzEQgFcIREPhxhlZ4tIDC-PXrs2hIkp5RCriQJG4WV6vN3HY2Iu9iVQu_HWcpFShqsRpLM-nb2bsKYrnGF5jXJE3q2C80gqAV_WDYoI5hVIIKR4WE8ihlER-PymepLQCAMIr9rg4IYwBx4JPit8X1oT1EJLzC5TPLrng0Wx35a0fE3IejUuLvo5hKJNbeN2jK51-vEVT9Dm0ti8bnWyLpsMQgzZLNAY0963bunaT0QvXdTZab-zeNPdL17gxxOtcwo8x9E-LR53uk312E0-Lbx_eX80-lZdfPs5n08vSVIDHktYgWsNI1TFMpOwob2oMomsq2VjJqcASWhAGs7qtua46w0ylgQouGAZG6WlxfvAOm2ZtW5Nni7pXQ3RrHa9V0E79m_FuqRZhqxjOauBZcHYjiOHnxqZRrV0ytu-1t2GTFBaUEE4qqP-PcoZpzcje-vIOugqbmB95T1EqJa5xpl4dKBNDStF2t31jULslUMdLkPEXx7Pewn9_PQPvDsDaHRXcObakckJRoIzVigDBWa9Aql9uuFvj7B7Fve38AXV00E0</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>White, Corey N.</creator><creator>Congdon, Eliza</creator><creator>Mumford, Jeanette A.</creator><creator>Karlsgodt, Katherine H.</creator><creator>Sabb, Fred W.</creator><creator>Freimer, Nelson B.</creator><creator>London, Edythe D.</creator><creator>Cannon, Tyrone D.</creator><creator>Bilder, Robert M.</creator><creator>Poldrack, Russell A.</creator><general>MIT Press</general><general>MIT Press Journals, The</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Decomposing Decision Components in the Stop-signal Task: A Model-based Approach to Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control</title><author>White, Corey N. ; Congdon, Eliza ; Mumford, Jeanette A. ; Karlsgodt, Katherine H. ; Sabb, Fred W. ; Freimer, Nelson B. ; London, Edythe D. ; Cannon, Tyrone D. ; Bilder, Robert M. ; Poldrack, Russell A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c601t-3708dc426f41299f35b7108fb69be9538190d08c147d75a6fc4c6a03858410433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision Making - physiology</topic><topic>Executive Function - physiology</topic><topic>Functional Neuroimaging - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individuality</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Neurons</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Prefrontal Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>White, Corey N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Eliza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mumford, Jeanette A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karlsgodt, Katherine H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabb, Fred W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freimer, Nelson B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>London, Edythe D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannon, Tyrone D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilder, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poldrack, Russell A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>White, Corey N.</au><au>Congdon, Eliza</au><au>Mumford, Jeanette A.</au><au>Karlsgodt, Katherine H.</au><au>Sabb, Fred W.</au><au>Freimer, Nelson B.</au><au>London, Edythe D.</au><au>Cannon, Tyrone D.</au><au>Bilder, Robert M.</au><au>Poldrack, Russell A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decomposing Decision Components in the Stop-signal Task: A Model-based Approach to Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Cogn Neurosci</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1601</spage><epage>1614</epage><pages>1601-1614</pages><issn>0898-929X</issn><eissn>1530-8898</eissn><abstract>The stop-signal task, in which participants must inhibit prepotent responses, has been used to identify neural systems that vary with individual differences in inhibitory control. To explore how these differences relate to other aspects of decision making, a drift-diffusion model of simple decisions was fitted to stop-signal task data from go trials to extract measures of caution, motor execution time, and stimulus processing speed for each of 123 participants. These values were used to probe fMRI data to explore individual differences in neural activation. Faster processing of the go stimulus correlated with greater activation in the right frontal pole for both go and stop trials. On stop trials, stimulus processing speed also correlated with regions implicated in inhibitory control, including the right inferior frontal gyrus, medial frontal gyrus, and BG. Individual differences in motor execution time correlated with activation of the right parietal cortex. These findings suggest a robust relationship between the speed of stimulus processing and inhibitory processing at the neural level. This model-based approach provides novel insight into the interrelationships among decision components involved in inhibitory control and raises interesting questions about strategic adjustments in performance and inhibitory deficits associated with psychopathology.</abstract><cop>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><pmid>24405185</pmid><doi>10.1162/jocn_a_00567</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-929X
ispartof Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2014-08, Vol.26 (8), p.1601-1614
issn 0898-929X
1530-8898
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_00567
source MEDLINE; MIT Press Journals
subjects Adult
Decision making
Decision Making - physiology
Executive Function - physiology
Functional Neuroimaging - methods
Humans
Individuality
Information processing
Inhibition (Psychology)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Middle Aged
Models, Psychological
Neurons
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Prefrontal Cortex - physiology
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Psychopathology
Young Adult
title Decomposing Decision Components in the Stop-signal Task: A Model-based Approach to Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T20%3A43%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decomposing%20Decision%20Components%20in%20the%20Stop-signal%20Task:%20A%20Model-based%20Approach%20to%20Individual%20Differences%20in%20Inhibitory%20Control&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cognitive%20neuroscience&rft.au=White,%20Corey%20N.&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1601&rft.epage=1614&rft.pages=1601-1614&rft.issn=0898-929X&rft.eissn=1530-8898&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/jocn_a_00567&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3365225651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1543399171&rft_id=info:pmid/24405185&rfr_iscdi=true