The Problem with Briefs, in Brief
Policy briefs written by academics—the kind typically published in Education Finance and Policy—should be a crucial source of information for policy makers. Yet too frequently these briefs fail to garner the consideration they deserve. Their authors are too focused on the potential objections of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Education finance and policy 2013-07, Vol.8 (3), p.287-299 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 299 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 287 |
container_title | Education finance and policy |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Conaway, Carrie L. |
description | Policy briefs written by academics—the kind typically published in Education Finance and Policy—should be a crucial source of information for policy makers. Yet too frequently these briefs fail to garner the consideration they deserve. Their authors are too focused on the potential objections of their fellow academics, who are concerned with rigor and internal validity, instead of the objections of policy makers, who are concerned with generalizability, understandability, and utility. And researchers too often believe that simply publishing a brief is sufficient to communicate its results. By focusing briefs on topics on the policy agenda, helping policy makers see their constituents in the results, writing clearly, studying implementation and not just outcomes, weighing evidence and drawing conclusions, and reaching out to policy makers beyond publication, researchers have the greatest potential to see their work influence public policy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1162/EDFP_a_00096 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1162_EDFP_a_00096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1016273</ericid><jstor_id>educfinapoli.8.3.287</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>educfinapoli.8.3.287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-153b466c05cca13199684ab34194e3696212f0c2c03808ca53b4e401b08194d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j81LAzEUxIMoWKs3r8J6U-jqe0k2m5yk1tYPCvZQzyGbZmlK212yW0X_ereulB709Abm94YZQs4RbhAFvR0-jCbaaABQ4oB0MEnSmEGqDndawDE5qaoFAE-oTDrkcjp30SQU2dKtog9fz6P74F1e9SK_buUpOcrNsnJnv7dL3kbD6eApHr8-Pg_649hyZHWMCcu4EBYSaw0yVEpIbjLGUXHHhBIUaQ6WWmASpDVb3HHADGRDzJB1Sa_NtaGoquByXQa_MuFTI-jtPL0_r8EvWtwFb3fo8AWhQVPW-Fetv_K1XhSbsG7K_xd19wfqZnn5Lj3TDKhIUVOg2DxrUPrLlz_2XsJ1m7Co6iLs2rjZxuZ-bcpi6bXUTFOZsm8P33kT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Problem with Briefs, in Brief</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Conaway, Carrie L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Conaway, Carrie L.</creatorcontrib><description>Policy briefs written by academics—the kind typically published in Education Finance and Policy—should be a crucial source of information for policy makers. Yet too frequently these briefs fail to garner the consideration they deserve. Their authors are too focused on the potential objections of their fellow academics, who are concerned with rigor and internal validity, instead of the objections of policy makers, who are concerned with generalizability, understandability, and utility. And researchers too often believe that simply publishing a brief is sufficient to communicate its results. By focusing briefs on topics on the policy agenda, helping policy makers see their constituents in the results, writing clearly, studying implementation and not just outcomes, weighing evidence and drawing conclusions, and reaching out to policy makers beyond publication, researchers have the greatest potential to see their work influence public policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1557-3060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-3079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/EDFP_a_00096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>55 Hayward St., Cambridge, MA 02142-1315, USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Comprehension ; Difficulty Level ; Educational Finance ; Educational Research ; Educational Researchers ; Policy Briefs ; Program Implementation ; Public Officials ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Education finance and policy, 2013-07, Vol.8 (3), p.287-299</ispartof><rights>2013 MIT Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-153b466c05cca13199684ab34194e3696212f0c2c03808ca53b4e401b08194d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-153b466c05cca13199684ab34194e3696212f0c2c03808ca53b4e401b08194d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/educfinapoli.8.3.287$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/educfinapoli.8.3.287$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1016273$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conaway, Carrie L.</creatorcontrib><title>The Problem with Briefs, in Brief</title><title>Education finance and policy</title><description>Policy briefs written by academics—the kind typically published in Education Finance and Policy—should be a crucial source of information for policy makers. Yet too frequently these briefs fail to garner the consideration they deserve. Their authors are too focused on the potential objections of their fellow academics, who are concerned with rigor and internal validity, instead of the objections of policy makers, who are concerned with generalizability, understandability, and utility. And researchers too often believe that simply publishing a brief is sufficient to communicate its results. By focusing briefs on topics on the policy agenda, helping policy makers see their constituents in the results, writing clearly, studying implementation and not just outcomes, weighing evidence and drawing conclusions, and reaching out to policy makers beyond publication, researchers have the greatest potential to see their work influence public policy.</description><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Educational Finance</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Researchers</subject><subject>Policy Briefs</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Public Officials</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1557-3060</issn><issn>1557-3079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j81LAzEUxIMoWKs3r8J6U-jqe0k2m5yk1tYPCvZQzyGbZmlK212yW0X_ereulB709Abm94YZQs4RbhAFvR0-jCbaaABQ4oB0MEnSmEGqDndawDE5qaoFAE-oTDrkcjp30SQU2dKtog9fz6P74F1e9SK_buUpOcrNsnJnv7dL3kbD6eApHr8-Pg_649hyZHWMCcu4EBYSaw0yVEpIbjLGUXHHhBIUaQ6WWmASpDVb3HHADGRDzJB1Sa_NtaGoquByXQa_MuFTI-jtPL0_r8EvWtwFb3fo8AWhQVPW-Fetv_K1XhSbsG7K_xd19wfqZnn5Lj3TDKhIUVOg2DxrUPrLlz_2XsJ1m7Co6iLs2rjZxuZ-bcpi6bXUTFOZsm8P33kT</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Conaway, Carrie L.</creator><general>MIT Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>The Problem with Briefs, in Brief</title><author>Conaway, Carrie L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-153b466c05cca13199684ab34194e3696212f0c2c03808ca53b4e401b08194d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Educational Finance</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Researchers</topic><topic>Policy Briefs</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Public Officials</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conaway, Carrie L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Education finance and policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conaway, Carrie L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1016273</ericid><atitle>The Problem with Briefs, in Brief</atitle><jtitle>Education finance and policy</jtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>299</epage><pages>287-299</pages><issn>1557-3060</issn><eissn>1557-3079</eissn><abstract>Policy briefs written by academics—the kind typically published in Education Finance and Policy—should be a crucial source of information for policy makers. Yet too frequently these briefs fail to garner the consideration they deserve. Their authors are too focused on the potential objections of their fellow academics, who are concerned with rigor and internal validity, instead of the objections of policy makers, who are concerned with generalizability, understandability, and utility. And researchers too often believe that simply publishing a brief is sufficient to communicate its results. By focusing briefs on topics on the policy agenda, helping policy makers see their constituents in the results, writing clearly, studying implementation and not just outcomes, weighing evidence and drawing conclusions, and reaching out to policy makers beyond publication, researchers have the greatest potential to see their work influence public policy.</abstract><cop>55 Hayward St., Cambridge, MA 02142-1315, USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><doi>10.1162/EDFP_a_00096</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1557-3060 |
ispartof | Education finance and policy, 2013-07, Vol.8 (3), p.287-299 |
issn | 1557-3060 1557-3079 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1162_EDFP_a_00096 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Comprehension Difficulty Level Educational Finance Educational Research Educational Researchers Policy Briefs Program Implementation Public Officials Validity |
title | The Problem with Briefs, in Brief |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A49%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Problem%20with%20Briefs,%20in%20Brief&rft.jtitle=Education%20finance%20and%20policy&rft.au=Conaway,%20Carrie%20L.&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=299&rft.pages=287-299&rft.issn=1557-3060&rft.eissn=1557-3079&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/EDFP_a_00096&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3Eeducfinapoli.8.3.287%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1016273&rft_jstor_id=educfinapoli.8.3.287&rfr_iscdi=true |