The Problem with Briefs, in Brief

Policy briefs written by academics—the kind typically published in Education Finance and Policy—should be a crucial source of information for policy makers. Yet too frequently these briefs fail to garner the consideration they deserve. Their authors are too focused on the potential objections of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Education finance and policy 2013-07, Vol.8 (3), p.287-299
1. Verfasser: Conaway, Carrie L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 299
container_issue 3
container_start_page 287
container_title Education finance and policy
container_volume 8
creator Conaway, Carrie L.
description Policy briefs written by academics—the kind typically published in Education Finance and Policy—should be a crucial source of information for policy makers. Yet too frequently these briefs fail to garner the consideration they deserve. Their authors are too focused on the potential objections of their fellow academics, who are concerned with rigor and internal validity, instead of the objections of policy makers, who are concerned with generalizability, understandability, and utility. And researchers too often believe that simply publishing a brief is sufficient to communicate its results. By focusing briefs on topics on the policy agenda, helping policy makers see their constituents in the results, writing clearly, studying implementation and not just outcomes, weighing evidence and drawing conclusions, and reaching out to policy makers beyond publication, researchers have the greatest potential to see their work influence public policy.
doi_str_mv 10.1162/EDFP_a_00096
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1162_EDFP_a_00096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1016273</ericid><jstor_id>educfinapoli.8.3.287</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>educfinapoli.8.3.287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-153b466c05cca13199684ab34194e3696212f0c2c03808ca53b4e401b08194d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j81LAzEUxIMoWKs3r8J6U-jqe0k2m5yk1tYPCvZQzyGbZmlK212yW0X_ereulB709Abm94YZQs4RbhAFvR0-jCbaaABQ4oB0MEnSmEGqDndawDE5qaoFAE-oTDrkcjp30SQU2dKtog9fz6P74F1e9SK_buUpOcrNsnJnv7dL3kbD6eApHr8-Pg_649hyZHWMCcu4EBYSaw0yVEpIbjLGUXHHhBIUaQ6WWmASpDVb3HHADGRDzJB1Sa_NtaGoquByXQa_MuFTI-jtPL0_r8EvWtwFb3fo8AWhQVPW-Fetv_K1XhSbsG7K_xd19wfqZnn5Lj3TDKhIUVOg2DxrUPrLlz_2XsJ1m7Co6iLs2rjZxuZ-bcpi6bXUTFOZsm8P33kT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Problem with Briefs, in Brief</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Conaway, Carrie L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Conaway, Carrie L.</creatorcontrib><description>Policy briefs written by academics—the kind typically published in Education Finance and Policy—should be a crucial source of information for policy makers. Yet too frequently these briefs fail to garner the consideration they deserve. Their authors are too focused on the potential objections of their fellow academics, who are concerned with rigor and internal validity, instead of the objections of policy makers, who are concerned with generalizability, understandability, and utility. And researchers too often believe that simply publishing a brief is sufficient to communicate its results. By focusing briefs on topics on the policy agenda, helping policy makers see their constituents in the results, writing clearly, studying implementation and not just outcomes, weighing evidence and drawing conclusions, and reaching out to policy makers beyond publication, researchers have the greatest potential to see their work influence public policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1557-3060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-3079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/EDFP_a_00096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>55 Hayward St., Cambridge, MA 02142-1315, USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Comprehension ; Difficulty Level ; Educational Finance ; Educational Research ; Educational Researchers ; Policy Briefs ; Program Implementation ; Public Officials ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Education finance and policy, 2013-07, Vol.8 (3), p.287-299</ispartof><rights>2013 MIT Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-153b466c05cca13199684ab34194e3696212f0c2c03808ca53b4e401b08194d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-153b466c05cca13199684ab34194e3696212f0c2c03808ca53b4e401b08194d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/educfinapoli.8.3.287$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/educfinapoli.8.3.287$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1016273$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Conaway, Carrie L.</creatorcontrib><title>The Problem with Briefs, in Brief</title><title>Education finance and policy</title><description>Policy briefs written by academics—the kind typically published in Education Finance and Policy—should be a crucial source of information for policy makers. Yet too frequently these briefs fail to garner the consideration they deserve. Their authors are too focused on the potential objections of their fellow academics, who are concerned with rigor and internal validity, instead of the objections of policy makers, who are concerned with generalizability, understandability, and utility. And researchers too often believe that simply publishing a brief is sufficient to communicate its results. By focusing briefs on topics on the policy agenda, helping policy makers see their constituents in the results, writing clearly, studying implementation and not just outcomes, weighing evidence and drawing conclusions, and reaching out to policy makers beyond publication, researchers have the greatest potential to see their work influence public policy.</description><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Educational Finance</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Researchers</subject><subject>Policy Briefs</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Public Officials</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1557-3060</issn><issn>1557-3079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j81LAzEUxIMoWKs3r8J6U-jqe0k2m5yk1tYPCvZQzyGbZmlK212yW0X_ereulB709Abm94YZQs4RbhAFvR0-jCbaaABQ4oB0MEnSmEGqDndawDE5qaoFAE-oTDrkcjp30SQU2dKtog9fz6P74F1e9SK_buUpOcrNsnJnv7dL3kbD6eApHr8-Pg_649hyZHWMCcu4EBYSaw0yVEpIbjLGUXHHhBIUaQ6WWmASpDVb3HHADGRDzJB1Sa_NtaGoquByXQa_MuFTI-jtPL0_r8EvWtwFb3fo8AWhQVPW-Fetv_K1XhSbsG7K_xd19wfqZnn5Lj3TDKhIUVOg2DxrUPrLlz_2XsJ1m7Co6iLs2rjZxuZ-bcpi6bXUTFOZsm8P33kT</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Conaway, Carrie L.</creator><general>MIT Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>The Problem with Briefs, in Brief</title><author>Conaway, Carrie L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-153b466c05cca13199684ab34194e3696212f0c2c03808ca53b4e401b08194d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Educational Finance</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Researchers</topic><topic>Policy Briefs</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Public Officials</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Conaway, Carrie L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Education finance and policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Conaway, Carrie L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1016273</ericid><atitle>The Problem with Briefs, in Brief</atitle><jtitle>Education finance and policy</jtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>299</epage><pages>287-299</pages><issn>1557-3060</issn><eissn>1557-3079</eissn><abstract>Policy briefs written by academics—the kind typically published in Education Finance and Policy—should be a crucial source of information for policy makers. Yet too frequently these briefs fail to garner the consideration they deserve. Their authors are too focused on the potential objections of their fellow academics, who are concerned with rigor and internal validity, instead of the objections of policy makers, who are concerned with generalizability, understandability, and utility. And researchers too often believe that simply publishing a brief is sufficient to communicate its results. By focusing briefs on topics on the policy agenda, helping policy makers see their constituents in the results, writing clearly, studying implementation and not just outcomes, weighing evidence and drawing conclusions, and reaching out to policy makers beyond publication, researchers have the greatest potential to see their work influence public policy.</abstract><cop>55 Hayward St., Cambridge, MA 02142-1315, USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><doi>10.1162/EDFP_a_00096</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1557-3060
ispartof Education finance and policy, 2013-07, Vol.8 (3), p.287-299
issn 1557-3060
1557-3079
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1162_EDFP_a_00096
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Comprehension
Difficulty Level
Educational Finance
Educational Research
Educational Researchers
Policy Briefs
Program Implementation
Public Officials
Validity
title The Problem with Briefs, in Brief
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T10%3A49%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Problem%20with%20Briefs,%20in%20Brief&rft.jtitle=Education%20finance%20and%20policy&rft.au=Conaway,%20Carrie%20L.&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=299&rft.pages=287-299&rft.issn=1557-3060&rft.eissn=1557-3079&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/EDFP_a_00096&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3Eeducfinapoli.8.3.287%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1016273&rft_jstor_id=educfinapoli.8.3.287&rfr_iscdi=true