Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity
How objects are represented and processed in the brain is a central topic in cognitive neuroscience. Previous studies have shown that knowledge of objects is represented in a featurebased distributed neural system primarily involving occipital and temporal cortical regions. Research with nonhuman pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cognitive neuroscience 2004-04, Vol.16 (3), p.351-362 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 362 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 351 |
container_title | Journal of cognitive neuroscience |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Tyler, L. K. Stamatakis, E. A. Bright, P. Acres, K. Abdallah, S. Rodd, J. M. Moss, H. E. |
description | How objects are represented and processed in the brain is a central topic in cognitive neuroscience. Previous studies have shown that knowledge of objects is represented in a featurebased distributed neural system primarily involving occipital and temporal cortical regions. Research with nonhuman primates suggest that these features are structured in a hierarchical system with posterior neurons in the inferior temporal cortex representing simple features and anterior neurons in the perirhinal cortex representing complex conjunctions of features (Bussey & Saksida, 2002; Murray & Bussey, 1999). On this account, the perirhinal cortex plays a crucial role in object identification by integrating information from different sensory systems into more complex polymodal feature conjunctions. We tested the implications of these claims for human object processing in an event-related fMRI study in which we presented colored pictures of common objects for 19 subjects to name at two levels of specificity-basic and domain. We reasoned that domain-level naming requires access to a coarsergrained representation of objects, thus involving only posterior regions of the inferior temporal cortex. In contrast, basic-level naming requires finer-grained discrimination to differentiate between similar objects, and thus should involve anterior temporal regions, including the perirhinal cortex. We found that object processing always activated the fusiform gyrus bilaterally, irrespective of the task, whereas the perirhinal cortex was only activated when the task required finer-grained discriminations. These results suggest that the same kind of hierarchical structure, which has been proposed for object processing in the monkey temporal cortex, functions in the human. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1162/089892904322926692 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1162_089892904322926692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71813333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3e07f98e90dc0ac7cdd9413613d0dc6432ee74d47c563b958bdae3a6d497f07e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0F1LWzEYB_AwlLW6fYFdjIMw747m_eVSdFWhoLANdhfSnCcj5fScmpwW9NOb0oIyi-YmkPyef548CH0j-IwQSc-xNtpQgzmj1FApDf2ExkQwXOtyc4DGG1AX8XeEjnKeY4ypkPwzGhGBFZWKjJG4T72HnGP3r7qbzcEPuXJDdRVDgATdUE1hDW2u-lD9WoKPIfo4PH5Bh8G1Gb7u9mP0Z_Lz9-VNPb27vr28mNaeazPUDLAKRoPBjcfOK980hhMmCWvKiSx9AyjecOWFZDMj9KxxwJxsuFEBK2DH6HSbu0z9wwryYBcxe2hb10G_ylYRTdhmfQSJUoISTgs8-Q_O-1XqyicspQwrwY0uiG6RT33OCYJdprhw6dESbDejt29HX4q-75JXswU0LyW7WRfwYwdc9q4NyXU-5ldOGC24Ku5s6xbxVXfvvjzZUzDvfbcmMjLLMCVaWVq2klES7FNc7gt6BoV4q0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223075498</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>MIT Press Journals</source><creator>Tyler, L. K. ; Stamatakis, E. A. ; Bright, P. ; Acres, K. ; Abdallah, S. ; Rodd, J. M. ; Moss, H. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tyler, L. K. ; Stamatakis, E. A. ; Bright, P. ; Acres, K. ; Abdallah, S. ; Rodd, J. M. ; Moss, H. E.</creatorcontrib><description>How objects are represented and processed in the brain is a central topic in cognitive neuroscience. Previous studies have shown that knowledge of objects is represented in a featurebased distributed neural system primarily involving occipital and temporal cortical regions. Research with nonhuman primates suggest that these features are structured in a hierarchical system with posterior neurons in the inferior temporal cortex representing simple features and anterior neurons in the perirhinal cortex representing complex conjunctions of features (Bussey & Saksida, 2002; Murray & Bussey, 1999). On this account, the perirhinal cortex plays a crucial role in object identification by integrating information from different sensory systems into more complex polymodal feature conjunctions. We tested the implications of these claims for human object processing in an event-related fMRI study in which we presented colored pictures of common objects for 19 subjects to name at two levels of specificity-basic and domain. We reasoned that domain-level naming requires access to a coarsergrained representation of objects, thus involving only posterior regions of the inferior temporal cortex. In contrast, basic-level naming requires finer-grained discrimination to differentiate between similar objects, and thus should involve anterior temporal regions, including the perirhinal cortex. We found that object processing always activated the fusiform gyrus bilaterally, irrespective of the task, whereas the perirhinal cortex was only activated when the task required finer-grained discriminations. These results suggest that the same kind of hierarchical structure, which has been proposed for object processing in the monkey temporal cortex, functions in the human.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-929X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-8898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/089892904322926692</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15072671</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCONEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anatomical correlates of behavior ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain ; Brain Mapping ; Brain research ; Cerebral Cortex - pathology ; Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology ; Cognition & reasoning ; Computer Graphics ; Dementia - physiopathology ; Discrimination Learning ; Dominance, Cerebral - physiology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Mental Processes - physiology ; Names ; Neurology ; Neurons ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Primates ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Semantics ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2004-04, Vol.16 (3), p.351-362</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright MIT Press Journals Apr 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3e07f98e90dc0ac7cdd9413613d0dc6432ee74d47c563b958bdae3a6d497f07e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3e07f98e90dc0ac7cdd9413613d0dc6432ee74d47c563b958bdae3a6d497f07e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://direct.mit.edu/jocn/article/doi/10.1162/089892904322926692$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmit$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,54014,54015</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15598547$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15072671$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tyler, L. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stamatakis, E. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bright, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acres, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdallah, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodd, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, H. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity</title><title>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Cogn Neurosci</addtitle><description>How objects are represented and processed in the brain is a central topic in cognitive neuroscience. Previous studies have shown that knowledge of objects is represented in a featurebased distributed neural system primarily involving occipital and temporal cortical regions. Research with nonhuman primates suggest that these features are structured in a hierarchical system with posterior neurons in the inferior temporal cortex representing simple features and anterior neurons in the perirhinal cortex representing complex conjunctions of features (Bussey & Saksida, 2002; Murray & Bussey, 1999). On this account, the perirhinal cortex plays a crucial role in object identification by integrating information from different sensory systems into more complex polymodal feature conjunctions. We tested the implications of these claims for human object processing in an event-related fMRI study in which we presented colored pictures of common objects for 19 subjects to name at two levels of specificity-basic and domain. We reasoned that domain-level naming requires access to a coarsergrained representation of objects, thus involving only posterior regions of the inferior temporal cortex. In contrast, basic-level naming requires finer-grained discrimination to differentiate between similar objects, and thus should involve anterior temporal regions, including the perirhinal cortex. We found that object processing always activated the fusiform gyrus bilaterally, irrespective of the task, whereas the perirhinal cortex was only activated when the task required finer-grained discriminations. These results suggest that the same kind of hierarchical structure, which has been proposed for object processing in the monkey temporal cortex, functions in the human.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anatomical correlates of behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - pathology</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Computer Graphics</subject><subject>Dementia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Dominance, Cerebral - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Processes - physiology</subject><subject>Names</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurons</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0898-929X</issn><issn>1530-8898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0F1LWzEYB_AwlLW6fYFdjIMw747m_eVSdFWhoLANdhfSnCcj5fScmpwW9NOb0oIyi-YmkPyef548CH0j-IwQSc-xNtpQgzmj1FApDf2ExkQwXOtyc4DGG1AX8XeEjnKeY4ypkPwzGhGBFZWKjJG4T72HnGP3r7qbzcEPuXJDdRVDgATdUE1hDW2u-lD9WoKPIfo4PH5Bh8G1Gb7u9mP0Z_Lz9-VNPb27vr28mNaeazPUDLAKRoPBjcfOK980hhMmCWvKiSx9AyjecOWFZDMj9KxxwJxsuFEBK2DH6HSbu0z9wwryYBcxe2hb10G_ylYRTdhmfQSJUoISTgs8-Q_O-1XqyicspQwrwY0uiG6RT33OCYJdprhw6dESbDejt29HX4q-75JXswU0LyW7WRfwYwdc9q4NyXU-5ldOGC24Ku5s6xbxVXfvvjzZUzDvfbcmMjLLMCVaWVq2klES7FNc7gt6BoV4q0g</recordid><startdate>20040401</startdate><enddate>20040401</enddate><creator>Tyler, L. K.</creator><creator>Stamatakis, E. A.</creator><creator>Bright, P.</creator><creator>Acres, K.</creator><creator>Abdallah, S.</creator><creator>Rodd, J. M.</creator><creator>Moss, H. E.</creator><general>MIT Press</general><general>MIT Press Journals, The</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040401</creationdate><title>Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity</title><author>Tyler, L. K. ; Stamatakis, E. A. ; Bright, P. ; Acres, K. ; Abdallah, S. ; Rodd, J. M. ; Moss, H. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3e07f98e90dc0ac7cdd9413613d0dc6432ee74d47c563b958bdae3a6d497f07e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anatomical correlates of behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - pathology</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Computer Graphics</topic><topic>Dementia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Dominance, Cerebral - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Processes - physiology</topic><topic>Names</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurons</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tyler, L. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stamatakis, E. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bright, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acres, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdallah, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodd, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moss, H. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tyler, L. K.</au><au>Stamatakis, E. A.</au><au>Bright, P.</au><au>Acres, K.</au><au>Abdallah, S.</au><au>Rodd, J. M.</au><au>Moss, H. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Cogn Neurosci</addtitle><date>2004-04-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>362</epage><pages>351-362</pages><issn>0898-929X</issn><eissn>1530-8898</eissn><coden>JCONEO</coden><abstract>How objects are represented and processed in the brain is a central topic in cognitive neuroscience. Previous studies have shown that knowledge of objects is represented in a featurebased distributed neural system primarily involving occipital and temporal cortical regions. Research with nonhuman primates suggest that these features are structured in a hierarchical system with posterior neurons in the inferior temporal cortex representing simple features and anterior neurons in the perirhinal cortex representing complex conjunctions of features (Bussey & Saksida, 2002; Murray & Bussey, 1999). On this account, the perirhinal cortex plays a crucial role in object identification by integrating information from different sensory systems into more complex polymodal feature conjunctions. We tested the implications of these claims for human object processing in an event-related fMRI study in which we presented colored pictures of common objects for 19 subjects to name at two levels of specificity-basic and domain. We reasoned that domain-level naming requires access to a coarsergrained representation of objects, thus involving only posterior regions of the inferior temporal cortex. In contrast, basic-level naming requires finer-grained discrimination to differentiate between similar objects, and thus should involve anterior temporal regions, including the perirhinal cortex. We found that object processing always activated the fusiform gyrus bilaterally, irrespective of the task, whereas the perirhinal cortex was only activated when the task required finer-grained discriminations. These results suggest that the same kind of hierarchical structure, which has been proposed for object processing in the monkey temporal cortex, functions in the human.</abstract><cop>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><pmid>15072671</pmid><doi>10.1162/089892904322926692</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-929X |
ispartof | Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2004-04, Vol.16 (3), p.351-362 |
issn | 0898-929X 1530-8898 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1162_089892904322926692 |
source | MEDLINE; MIT Press Journals |
subjects | Adult Anatomical correlates of behavior Behavioral psychophysiology Biological and medical sciences Brain Brain Mapping Brain research Cerebral Cortex - pathology Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology Cognition & reasoning Computer Graphics Dementia - physiopathology Discrimination Learning Dominance, Cerebral - physiology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Mental Processes - physiology Names Neurology Neurons Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology Photic Stimulation - methods Primates Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Semantics Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T02%3A18%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Processing%20Objects%20at%20Different%20Levels%20of%20Specificity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cognitive%20neuroscience&rft.au=Tyler,%20L.%20K.&rft.date=2004-04-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=362&rft.pages=351-362&rft.issn=0898-929X&rft.eissn=1530-8898&rft.coden=JCONEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/089892904322926692&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E71813333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223075498&rft_id=info:pmid/15072671&rfr_iscdi=true |