Necessity of Intraoperative Level IIA Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carotid Body Tumors: A Retrospective Study of 126 Cases

Background: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are relatively uncommon neoplasms that rarely have malignant potential. However, malignant CBTs (MCBTs) are still associated with a poor prognosis and the treatment is still challenging clinically. Therefore, we evaluated the necessity of intraoperative level I...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:O.R.L. Journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties 2022-07, Vol.84 (4), p.271-277
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Heng, Wei, Minghui, Wang, Xiaolei, Bahetibieke, Huerman, Liu, Wan, Wang, Xiaoliang, Zeng, Jiaomei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 277
container_issue 4
container_start_page 271
container_title O.R.L. Journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties
container_volume 84
creator Ma, Heng
Wei, Minghui
Wang, Xiaolei
Bahetibieke, Huerman
Liu, Wan
Wang, Xiaoliang
Zeng, Jiaomei
description Background: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are relatively uncommon neoplasms that rarely have malignant potential. However, malignant CBTs (MCBTs) are still associated with a poor prognosis and the treatment is still challenging clinically. Therefore, we evaluated the necessity of intraoperative level IIA lymph node dissection in patients with CBT. Methods: The clinical characteristics, intraoperative details, and pathological diagnosis of 126 CBT patients who had undergone surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether level IIA lymph node dissection was performed. The prognosis was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox model multivariate survival analysis. Results: Among the 126 patients, 7 patients (10.3%) in the selective lymph node dissection (SLND) group (68 patients) were diagnosed with MCBTs with evidence of lymph node metastasis. Two patients (3.4%) in the lymph node nondissection (LNND) group (58 patients) were diagnosed with MCBTs later after the second operation because they could not be diagnosed as malignant initially because of the lack of lymph node pathology results although the pathology of the primary lesion showed features of malignancy. The SLND group had a significantly higher relapse-free survival rate than the LNND group (94.1% vs. 79.3%, p = 0.021). Patients with a confirmed diagnosis had a better prognosis than those with insufficient evidence of a malignancy due to the lack of lymph node information. Twenty-nine patients in the SLND group and 26 patients in the LNND group had postoperative nerve injuries, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.879). Conclusion: Intraoperative dissection of level IIA lymph nodes around the tumor in CBT patients can help improve the diagnosis and prognosis of MCBTs without causing additional cranial nerve injury.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000519046
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000519046</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2579629817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-eb5fa15e9b2f9d43eb225a498f90a33cdc239a1deedbc0993b793e58e87eef4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0M9P2zAUB3BrAo1SduA-TZZ2GYcw_4iTmFtXYFSKCmJwjpz4ZXg0cWY7nXLnDyelpaed3uXzvu_pi9ApJeeUCvmdECKoJHHyAU1ozHhEWCoO0IRwQiMqEnmEjr3_s2EsSz-iIx4nlCSETdDLEirw3oQB2xov2uCU7cCpYNaAc1jDCi8WM5wPTfeEl1YDvjTeQxWMbbFp8d0ooQ0e_zPhCc-Vs8Fo_MPqAT_0jXX-As_wPQRnfbfZGlN_hV6_XaMsGTc8-BN0WKuVh0-7OUWP11cP85sov_25mM_yqOKJDBGUolZUgCxZLXXMoWRMqFhmtSSK80pXjEtFNYAuKyIlL1PJQWSQpQB1rPgUfdvmds7-7cGHojG-gtVKtWB7XzCRyoTJjKYjPdvSavzcO6iLzplGuaGgpNiUXuxLH-2XXWxfNqD38r3lEXzdgmflfoPbg9v7fBtRdLoe1ef_qt2VV8mnkf4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2579629817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Necessity of Intraoperative Level IIA Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carotid Body Tumors: A Retrospective Study of 126 Cases</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Karger:Jisc Collections:ORL, Ophthalmology, Dental Medicine, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Psychology, Psychiatry Archive Collection (2012-2112)</source><creator>Ma, Heng ; Wei, Minghui ; Wang, Xiaolei ; Bahetibieke, Huerman ; Liu, Wan ; Wang, Xiaoliang ; Zeng, Jiaomei</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Heng ; Wei, Minghui ; Wang, Xiaolei ; Bahetibieke, Huerman ; Liu, Wan ; Wang, Xiaoliang ; Zeng, Jiaomei</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are relatively uncommon neoplasms that rarely have malignant potential. However, malignant CBTs (MCBTs) are still associated with a poor prognosis and the treatment is still challenging clinically. Therefore, we evaluated the necessity of intraoperative level IIA lymph node dissection in patients with CBT. Methods: The clinical characteristics, intraoperative details, and pathological diagnosis of 126 CBT patients who had undergone surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether level IIA lymph node dissection was performed. The prognosis was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox model multivariate survival analysis. Results: Among the 126 patients, 7 patients (10.3%) in the selective lymph node dissection (SLND) group (68 patients) were diagnosed with MCBTs with evidence of lymph node metastasis. Two patients (3.4%) in the lymph node nondissection (LNND) group (58 patients) were diagnosed with MCBTs later after the second operation because they could not be diagnosed as malignant initially because of the lack of lymph node pathology results although the pathology of the primary lesion showed features of malignancy. The SLND group had a significantly higher relapse-free survival rate than the LNND group (94.1% vs. 79.3%, p = 0.021). Patients with a confirmed diagnosis had a better prognosis than those with insufficient evidence of a malignancy due to the lack of lymph node information. Twenty-nine patients in the SLND group and 26 patients in the LNND group had postoperative nerve injuries, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.879). Conclusion: Intraoperative dissection of level IIA lymph nodes around the tumor in CBT patients can help improve the diagnosis and prognosis of MCBTs without causing additional cranial nerve injury.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-1569</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000519046</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34610602</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland</publisher><subject>Review Article</subject><ispartof>O.R.L. Journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties, 2022-07, Vol.84 (4), p.271-277</ispartof><rights>2021 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-eb5fa15e9b2f9d43eb225a498f90a33cdc239a1deedbc0993b793e58e87eef4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-eb5fa15e9b2f9d43eb225a498f90a33cdc239a1deedbc0993b793e58e87eef4a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2429,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34610602$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Heng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Minghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaolei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahetibieke, Huerman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Jiaomei</creatorcontrib><title>Necessity of Intraoperative Level IIA Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carotid Body Tumors: A Retrospective Study of 126 Cases</title><title>O.R.L. Journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties</title><addtitle>ORL</addtitle><description>Background: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are relatively uncommon neoplasms that rarely have malignant potential. However, malignant CBTs (MCBTs) are still associated with a poor prognosis and the treatment is still challenging clinically. Therefore, we evaluated the necessity of intraoperative level IIA lymph node dissection in patients with CBT. Methods: The clinical characteristics, intraoperative details, and pathological diagnosis of 126 CBT patients who had undergone surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether level IIA lymph node dissection was performed. The prognosis was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox model multivariate survival analysis. Results: Among the 126 patients, 7 patients (10.3%) in the selective lymph node dissection (SLND) group (68 patients) were diagnosed with MCBTs with evidence of lymph node metastasis. Two patients (3.4%) in the lymph node nondissection (LNND) group (58 patients) were diagnosed with MCBTs later after the second operation because they could not be diagnosed as malignant initially because of the lack of lymph node pathology results although the pathology of the primary lesion showed features of malignancy. The SLND group had a significantly higher relapse-free survival rate than the LNND group (94.1% vs. 79.3%, p = 0.021). Patients with a confirmed diagnosis had a better prognosis than those with insufficient evidence of a malignancy due to the lack of lymph node information. Twenty-nine patients in the SLND group and 26 patients in the LNND group had postoperative nerve injuries, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.879). Conclusion: Intraoperative dissection of level IIA lymph nodes around the tumor in CBT patients can help improve the diagnosis and prognosis of MCBTs without causing additional cranial nerve injury.</description><subject>Review Article</subject><issn>0301-1569</issn><issn>1423-0275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0M9P2zAUB3BrAo1SduA-TZZ2GYcw_4iTmFtXYFSKCmJwjpz4ZXg0cWY7nXLnDyelpaed3uXzvu_pi9ApJeeUCvmdECKoJHHyAU1ozHhEWCoO0IRwQiMqEnmEjr3_s2EsSz-iIx4nlCSETdDLEirw3oQB2xov2uCU7cCpYNaAc1jDCi8WM5wPTfeEl1YDvjTeQxWMbbFp8d0ooQ0e_zPhCc-Vs8Fo_MPqAT_0jXX-As_wPQRnfbfZGlN_hV6_XaMsGTc8-BN0WKuVh0-7OUWP11cP85sov_25mM_yqOKJDBGUolZUgCxZLXXMoWRMqFhmtSSK80pXjEtFNYAuKyIlL1PJQWSQpQB1rPgUfdvmds7-7cGHojG-gtVKtWB7XzCRyoTJjKYjPdvSavzcO6iLzplGuaGgpNiUXuxLH-2XXWxfNqD38r3lEXzdgmflfoPbg9v7fBtRdLoe1ef_qt2VV8mnkf4</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Ma, Heng</creator><creator>Wei, Minghui</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaolei</creator><creator>Bahetibieke, Huerman</creator><creator>Liu, Wan</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaoliang</creator><creator>Zeng, Jiaomei</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Necessity of Intraoperative Level IIA Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carotid Body Tumors: A Retrospective Study of 126 Cases</title><author>Ma, Heng ; Wei, Minghui ; Wang, Xiaolei ; Bahetibieke, Huerman ; Liu, Wan ; Wang, Xiaoliang ; Zeng, Jiaomei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-eb5fa15e9b2f9d43eb225a498f90a33cdc239a1deedbc0993b793e58e87eef4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Review Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Heng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Minghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaolei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahetibieke, Huerman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Jiaomei</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>O.R.L. Journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Heng</au><au>Wei, Minghui</au><au>Wang, Xiaolei</au><au>Bahetibieke, Huerman</au><au>Liu, Wan</au><au>Wang, Xiaoliang</au><au>Zeng, Jiaomei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Necessity of Intraoperative Level IIA Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carotid Body Tumors: A Retrospective Study of 126 Cases</atitle><jtitle>O.R.L. Journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties</jtitle><addtitle>ORL</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>271-277</pages><issn>0301-1569</issn><eissn>1423-0275</eissn><abstract>Background: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are relatively uncommon neoplasms that rarely have malignant potential. However, malignant CBTs (MCBTs) are still associated with a poor prognosis and the treatment is still challenging clinically. Therefore, we evaluated the necessity of intraoperative level IIA lymph node dissection in patients with CBT. Methods: The clinical characteristics, intraoperative details, and pathological diagnosis of 126 CBT patients who had undergone surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether level IIA lymph node dissection was performed. The prognosis was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox model multivariate survival analysis. Results: Among the 126 patients, 7 patients (10.3%) in the selective lymph node dissection (SLND) group (68 patients) were diagnosed with MCBTs with evidence of lymph node metastasis. Two patients (3.4%) in the lymph node nondissection (LNND) group (58 patients) were diagnosed with MCBTs later after the second operation because they could not be diagnosed as malignant initially because of the lack of lymph node pathology results although the pathology of the primary lesion showed features of malignancy. The SLND group had a significantly higher relapse-free survival rate than the LNND group (94.1% vs. 79.3%, p = 0.021). Patients with a confirmed diagnosis had a better prognosis than those with insufficient evidence of a malignancy due to the lack of lymph node information. Twenty-nine patients in the SLND group and 26 patients in the LNND group had postoperative nerve injuries, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.879). Conclusion: Intraoperative dissection of level IIA lymph nodes around the tumor in CBT patients can help improve the diagnosis and prognosis of MCBTs without causing additional cranial nerve injury.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pmid>34610602</pmid><doi>10.1159/000519046</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-1569
ispartof O.R.L. Journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties, 2022-07, Vol.84 (4), p.271-277
issn 0301-1569
1423-0275
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000519046
source Karger Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Karger:Jisc Collections:ORL, Ophthalmology, Dental Medicine, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Psychology, Psychiatry Archive Collection (2012-2112)
subjects Review Article
title Necessity of Intraoperative Level IIA Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Carotid Body Tumors: A Retrospective Study of 126 Cases
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A35%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Necessity%20of%20Intraoperative%20Level%20IIA%20Lymph%20Node%20Dissection%20in%20Patients%20with%20Carotid%20Body%20Tumors:%20A%20Retrospective%20Study%20of%20126%20Cases&rft.jtitle=O.R.L.%20Journal%20for%20oto-rhino-laryngology%20and%20its%20related%20specialties&rft.au=Ma,%20Heng&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=271-277&rft.issn=0301-1569&rft.eissn=1423-0275&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000519046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2579629817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2579629817&rft_id=info:pmid/34610602&rfr_iscdi=true