Effectiveness and Safety of Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Low-Dose Oral Immunotherapy with Low Allergen Egg-Containing Cookies for Severe Hen’s Egg Allergy: A Single-Center Analysis

Introduction: The usefulness of low-dose oral immunotherapy (OIT) for the treatment of egg allergy has been unclear. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of OIT with low allergen cookies (LACs) containing a low dose of hen’s egg. Method: Thirty-three patients with severe hen’s egg allergy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International archives of allergy and immunology 2019-11, Vol.180 (4), p.244-249
Hauptverfasser: Takaoka, Yuri, Maeta, Akihiro, Takahashi, Kyoko, M. Ito, Yoichi, Takahashi, Shinichi, Muroya, Takahiro, Shigekawa, Amane, Tsurinaga, Yuki, Iba, Norihito, Yoshida, Yukinori, Kameda, Makoto, Doi, Satoru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 249
container_issue 4
container_start_page 244
container_title International archives of allergy and immunology
container_volume 180
creator Takaoka, Yuri
Maeta, Akihiro
Takahashi, Kyoko
M. Ito, Yoichi
Takahashi, Shinichi
Muroya, Takahiro
Shigekawa, Amane
Tsurinaga, Yuki
Iba, Norihito
Yoshida, Yukinori
Kameda, Makoto
Doi, Satoru
description Introduction: The usefulness of low-dose oral immunotherapy (OIT) for the treatment of egg allergy has been unclear. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of OIT with low allergen cookies (LACs) containing a low dose of hen’s egg. Method: Thirty-three patients with severe hen’s egg allergy were randomly administered either OIT with LACs (n = 21) or placebo (n = 12). Two patients in the LACs group withdrew before completing OIT. The primary endpoint was the number of good responders (G-R), patients with negative results in the oral food challenge (OFC) with a final dose of 2 g hard-boiled egg whites after 4 months of OIT, in each group. Total OFC Aichi score for anaphylaxis/cumulative protein dose (TS/Pro) as the marker of severity of food allergy was also compared. Adverse events during OIT were evaluated using patients’ diaries. Results: The proportion of G-R in the LACs group was higher than in the placebo group (7/19 [37%] vs. 1/12 [8%], χ 2 test; p = 0.077). The TS/Pro after OIT in the LACs group was lower than in the placebo group (median score, 44.2 vs. 104.1, p = 0.059; Mann-Whitney U test). The threshold and TS/Pro before and after OIT significantly improved in the LACs group (p = 0.015, p = 0.027, respectively; Wilcoxon signed-rank test). There were 99 recorded incidences of symptoms of 1,938 intake events in the LACs group during OIT. Of these, 90 were mild; no severe symptoms occurred. Conclusions: OIT with LACs potentially increases the OFC threshold and decreases allergy severity and is a relatively safe treatment modality.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000502956
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000502956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A643566546</galeid><sourcerecordid>A643566546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-f00ddf96300116f417b563e55cc9f48131e303c3093b773e09a9ee24bbd06d883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0tGK1DAUBuAiiruOXngvEhBEwa5J06atd7U7ugsDK4xel7Q96cRNkzFJd-mdr-Gz-DY-iRlnHFyQXCQcvv-QkBNFTwk-IyQr32KMM5yUGbsXnZI0oTHGZX4_nDEp4iSlxUn0yLmvGAdcsIfRCSVZXuCEnkY_l0JA5-UNaHAOcd2jNRfgZ2QEOjdTqyB-r6Tu36BPinfQmrg22lujFITaytzG58YBurJcoctxnLTxG7B8O6Nb6Tc7gKpg7QAaLYfhT5pLLfWAamOuJTgkjEVruAEL6AL0r-8_3E4eYvM7VKF14OEiNWgPFlWaq9lJ9zh6ILhy8OSwL6IvH5af64t4dfXxsq5WcZfi1McC474XJaPh_YSJlORtxihkWdeVIi0IJUAx7SguaZvnFHDJS4Akbdses74o6CJ6te-7tebbBM43o3QdKMU1mMk1SeiclQyHLovoxZ4OXEEjtTDe8m7Hm4qlNGMsS1lQZ_9RYfUwys5oEDLU7wRe_hPYAFd-44yavDTa3YWv97CzxjkLotlaOXI7NwQ3u1lpjrMS7PPDs6Z2hP4o_w5HAM_24JqH77NHcMj_BksMwVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2300596030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness and Safety of Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Low-Dose Oral Immunotherapy with Low Allergen Egg-Containing Cookies for Severe Hen’s Egg Allergy: A Single-Center Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Takaoka, Yuri ; Maeta, Akihiro ; Takahashi, Kyoko ; M. Ito, Yoichi ; Takahashi, Shinichi ; Muroya, Takahiro ; Shigekawa, Amane ; Tsurinaga, Yuki ; Iba, Norihito ; Yoshida, Yukinori ; Kameda, Makoto ; Doi, Satoru</creator><creatorcontrib>Takaoka, Yuri ; Maeta, Akihiro ; Takahashi, Kyoko ; M. Ito, Yoichi ; Takahashi, Shinichi ; Muroya, Takahiro ; Shigekawa, Amane ; Tsurinaga, Yuki ; Iba, Norihito ; Yoshida, Yukinori ; Kameda, Makoto ; Doi, Satoru</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: The usefulness of low-dose oral immunotherapy (OIT) for the treatment of egg allergy has been unclear. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of OIT with low allergen cookies (LACs) containing a low dose of hen’s egg. Method: Thirty-three patients with severe hen’s egg allergy were randomly administered either OIT with LACs (n = 21) or placebo (n = 12). Two patients in the LACs group withdrew before completing OIT. The primary endpoint was the number of good responders (G-R), patients with negative results in the oral food challenge (OFC) with a final dose of 2 g hard-boiled egg whites after 4 months of OIT, in each group. Total OFC Aichi score for anaphylaxis/cumulative protein dose (TS/Pro) as the marker of severity of food allergy was also compared. Adverse events during OIT were evaluated using patients’ diaries. Results: The proportion of G-R in the LACs group was higher than in the placebo group (7/19 [37%] vs. 1/12 [8%], χ 2 test; p = 0.077). The TS/Pro after OIT in the LACs group was lower than in the placebo group (median score, 44.2 vs. 104.1, p = 0.059; Mann-Whitney U test). The threshold and TS/Pro before and after OIT significantly improved in the LACs group (p = 0.015, p = 0.027, respectively; Wilcoxon signed-rank test). There were 99 recorded incidences of symptoms of 1,938 intake events in the LACs group during OIT. Of these, 90 were mild; no severe symptoms occurred. Conclusions: OIT with LACs potentially increases the OFC threshold and decreases allergy severity and is a relatively safe treatment modality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1018-2438</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000502956</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31578023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Allergens - administration &amp; dosage ; Allergy desensitization ; Allergy in children ; Animals ; Care and treatment ; Chickens ; Child ; Cookies ; Desensitization, Immunologic - adverse effects ; Desensitization, Immunologic - methods ; Double-Blind Method ; Egg Hypersensitivity - therapy ; Eggs ; Eggs - adverse effects ; Experimental Immunology – Research Article ; Food allergy ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Methods ; Testing</subject><ispartof>International archives of allergy and immunology, 2019-11, Vol.180 (4), p.244-249</ispartof><rights>2019 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 S. Karger AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-f00ddf96300116f417b563e55cc9f48131e303c3093b773e09a9ee24bbd06d883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-f00ddf96300116f417b563e55cc9f48131e303c3093b773e09a9ee24bbd06d883</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9410-2670 ; 0000-0003-4592-6619</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,2423,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31578023$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takaoka, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeta, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M. Ito, Yoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muroya, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shigekawa, Amane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsurinaga, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iba, Norihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Yukinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kameda, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doi, Satoru</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness and Safety of Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Low-Dose Oral Immunotherapy with Low Allergen Egg-Containing Cookies for Severe Hen’s Egg Allergy: A Single-Center Analysis</title><title>International archives of allergy and immunology</title><addtitle>Int Arch Allergy Immunol</addtitle><description>Introduction: The usefulness of low-dose oral immunotherapy (OIT) for the treatment of egg allergy has been unclear. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of OIT with low allergen cookies (LACs) containing a low dose of hen’s egg. Method: Thirty-three patients with severe hen’s egg allergy were randomly administered either OIT with LACs (n = 21) or placebo (n = 12). Two patients in the LACs group withdrew before completing OIT. The primary endpoint was the number of good responders (G-R), patients with negative results in the oral food challenge (OFC) with a final dose of 2 g hard-boiled egg whites after 4 months of OIT, in each group. Total OFC Aichi score for anaphylaxis/cumulative protein dose (TS/Pro) as the marker of severity of food allergy was also compared. Adverse events during OIT were evaluated using patients’ diaries. Results: The proportion of G-R in the LACs group was higher than in the placebo group (7/19 [37%] vs. 1/12 [8%], χ 2 test; p = 0.077). The TS/Pro after OIT in the LACs group was lower than in the placebo group (median score, 44.2 vs. 104.1, p = 0.059; Mann-Whitney U test). The threshold and TS/Pro before and after OIT significantly improved in the LACs group (p = 0.015, p = 0.027, respectively; Wilcoxon signed-rank test). There were 99 recorded incidences of symptoms of 1,938 intake events in the LACs group during OIT. Of these, 90 were mild; no severe symptoms occurred. Conclusions: OIT with LACs potentially increases the OFC threshold and decreases allergy severity and is a relatively safe treatment modality.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Allergens - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Allergy desensitization</subject><subject>Allergy in children</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cookies</subject><subject>Desensitization, Immunologic - adverse effects</subject><subject>Desensitization, Immunologic - methods</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Egg Hypersensitivity - therapy</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Eggs - adverse effects</subject><subject>Experimental Immunology – Research Article</subject><subject>Food allergy</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>1018-2438</issn><issn>1423-0097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0tGK1DAUBuAiiruOXngvEhBEwa5J06atd7U7ugsDK4xel7Q96cRNkzFJd-mdr-Gz-DY-iRlnHFyQXCQcvv-QkBNFTwk-IyQr32KMM5yUGbsXnZI0oTHGZX4_nDEp4iSlxUn0yLmvGAdcsIfRCSVZXuCEnkY_l0JA5-UNaHAOcd2jNRfgZ2QEOjdTqyB-r6Tu36BPinfQmrg22lujFITaytzG58YBurJcoctxnLTxG7B8O6Nb6Tc7gKpg7QAaLYfhT5pLLfWAamOuJTgkjEVruAEL6AL0r-8_3E4eYvM7VKF14OEiNWgPFlWaq9lJ9zh6ILhy8OSwL6IvH5af64t4dfXxsq5WcZfi1McC474XJaPh_YSJlORtxihkWdeVIi0IJUAx7SguaZvnFHDJS4Akbdses74o6CJ6te-7tebbBM43o3QdKMU1mMk1SeiclQyHLovoxZ4OXEEjtTDe8m7Hm4qlNGMsS1lQZ_9RYfUwys5oEDLU7wRe_hPYAFd-44yavDTa3YWv97CzxjkLotlaOXI7NwQ3u1lpjrMS7PPDs6Z2hP4o_w5HAM_24JqH77NHcMj_BksMwVA</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Takaoka, Yuri</creator><creator>Maeta, Akihiro</creator><creator>Takahashi, Kyoko</creator><creator>M. Ito, Yoichi</creator><creator>Takahashi, Shinichi</creator><creator>Muroya, Takahiro</creator><creator>Shigekawa, Amane</creator><creator>Tsurinaga, Yuki</creator><creator>Iba, Norihito</creator><creator>Yoshida, Yukinori</creator><creator>Kameda, Makoto</creator><creator>Doi, Satoru</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9410-2670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4592-6619</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Effectiveness and Safety of Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Low-Dose Oral Immunotherapy with Low Allergen Egg-Containing Cookies for Severe Hen’s Egg Allergy: A Single-Center Analysis</title><author>Takaoka, Yuri ; Maeta, Akihiro ; Takahashi, Kyoko ; M. Ito, Yoichi ; Takahashi, Shinichi ; Muroya, Takahiro ; Shigekawa, Amane ; Tsurinaga, Yuki ; Iba, Norihito ; Yoshida, Yukinori ; Kameda, Makoto ; Doi, Satoru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-f00ddf96300116f417b563e55cc9f48131e303c3093b773e09a9ee24bbd06d883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Allergens - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Allergy desensitization</topic><topic>Allergy in children</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cookies</topic><topic>Desensitization, Immunologic - adverse effects</topic><topic>Desensitization, Immunologic - methods</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Egg Hypersensitivity - therapy</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Eggs - adverse effects</topic><topic>Experimental Immunology – Research Article</topic><topic>Food allergy</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takaoka, Yuri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeta, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M. Ito, Yoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muroya, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shigekawa, Amane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsurinaga, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iba, Norihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Yukinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kameda, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doi, Satoru</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International archives of allergy and immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takaoka, Yuri</au><au>Maeta, Akihiro</au><au>Takahashi, Kyoko</au><au>M. Ito, Yoichi</au><au>Takahashi, Shinichi</au><au>Muroya, Takahiro</au><au>Shigekawa, Amane</au><au>Tsurinaga, Yuki</au><au>Iba, Norihito</au><au>Yoshida, Yukinori</au><au>Kameda, Makoto</au><au>Doi, Satoru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness and Safety of Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Low-Dose Oral Immunotherapy with Low Allergen Egg-Containing Cookies for Severe Hen’s Egg Allergy: A Single-Center Analysis</atitle><jtitle>International archives of allergy and immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Int Arch Allergy Immunol</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>180</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>244</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>244-249</pages><issn>1018-2438</issn><eissn>1423-0097</eissn><abstract>Introduction: The usefulness of low-dose oral immunotherapy (OIT) for the treatment of egg allergy has been unclear. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of OIT with low allergen cookies (LACs) containing a low dose of hen’s egg. Method: Thirty-three patients with severe hen’s egg allergy were randomly administered either OIT with LACs (n = 21) or placebo (n = 12). Two patients in the LACs group withdrew before completing OIT. The primary endpoint was the number of good responders (G-R), patients with negative results in the oral food challenge (OFC) with a final dose of 2 g hard-boiled egg whites after 4 months of OIT, in each group. Total OFC Aichi score for anaphylaxis/cumulative protein dose (TS/Pro) as the marker of severity of food allergy was also compared. Adverse events during OIT were evaluated using patients’ diaries. Results: The proportion of G-R in the LACs group was higher than in the placebo group (7/19 [37%] vs. 1/12 [8%], χ 2 test; p = 0.077). The TS/Pro after OIT in the LACs group was lower than in the placebo group (median score, 44.2 vs. 104.1, p = 0.059; Mann-Whitney U test). The threshold and TS/Pro before and after OIT significantly improved in the LACs group (p = 0.015, p = 0.027, respectively; Wilcoxon signed-rank test). There were 99 recorded incidences of symptoms of 1,938 intake events in the LACs group during OIT. Of these, 90 were mild; no severe symptoms occurred. Conclusions: OIT with LACs potentially increases the OFC threshold and decreases allergy severity and is a relatively safe treatment modality.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>31578023</pmid><doi>10.1159/000502956</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9410-2670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4592-6619</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1018-2438
ispartof International archives of allergy and immunology, 2019-11, Vol.180 (4), p.244-249
issn 1018-2438
1423-0097
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000502956
source MEDLINE; Karger Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Administration, Oral
Allergens - administration & dosage
Allergy desensitization
Allergy in children
Animals
Care and treatment
Chickens
Child
Cookies
Desensitization, Immunologic - adverse effects
Desensitization, Immunologic - methods
Double-Blind Method
Egg Hypersensitivity - therapy
Eggs
Eggs - adverse effects
Experimental Immunology – Research Article
Food allergy
Health aspects
Humans
Methods
Testing
title Effectiveness and Safety of Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Low-Dose Oral Immunotherapy with Low Allergen Egg-Containing Cookies for Severe Hen’s Egg Allergy: A Single-Center Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T09%3A23%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20and%20Safety%20of%20Double-Blind,%20Placebo-Controlled,%20Low-Dose%20Oral%20Immunotherapy%20with%20Low%20Allergen%20Egg-Containing%20Cookies%20for%20Severe%20Hen%E2%80%99s%20Egg%20Allergy:%20A%20Single-Center%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20archives%20of%20allergy%20and%20immunology&rft.au=Takaoka,%20Yuri&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=180&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=244&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=244-249&rft.issn=1018-2438&rft.eissn=1423-0097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000502956&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA643566546%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2300596030&rft_id=info:pmid/31578023&rft_galeid=A643566546&rfr_iscdi=true