Attitudes of Physicians towards Different Types of Euthanasia in Kuwait

Objective: Although in recent years the world has witnessed great advances in the medical field, much ambiguity still surrounds the issue of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, with increasingly favorable attitudes among physicians around the world. In our study, we aimed to assess the attitu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical Principles and Practice 2019-01, Vol.28 (3), p.199-207
Hauptverfasser: Abohaimed, Shaikhah, Matar, Basma, Al-Shimali, Hussain, Al-Thalji, Khalid, Al-Othman, Omar, Zurba, Yasmin, Shah, Nasra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 207
container_issue 3
container_start_page 199
container_title Medical Principles and Practice
container_volume 28
creator Abohaimed, Shaikhah
Matar, Basma
Al-Shimali, Hussain
Al-Thalji, Khalid
Al-Othman, Omar
Zurba, Yasmin
Shah, Nasra
description Objective: Although in recent years the world has witnessed great advances in the medical field, much ambiguity still surrounds the issue of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, with increasingly favorable attitudes among physicians around the world. In our study, we aimed to assess the attitudes of physicians in Kuwait towards different types of euthanasia and examine whether physicians’ frequent encounters with terminally ill patients were associated with their approval. Subjects and Methods: We conducted a cross- sectional study on 464 physicians employed in government hospitals (6 general and 3 specialty hospitals). A self-administered questionnaire adapted from previous studies was used. Results: Of the physicians in our study, 43.9% reported that the Ministry of Health should legalize euthanasia under certain restricted conditions. In addition, 29.1% of our population was willing to perform euthanasia. After controlling for several characteristics in logistic regression analysis, approval of passive euthanasia was significantly associated with the following 2 factors: frequent exposure to terminally ill patients (AOR = 2.45) and obtention of the basic medical degree from Asia (AOR = 4.36) or North America/Europe (AOR = 3.24) compared to Kuwait. Male gender was significantly associated with willingness to perform euthanasia. Religion was the major reason for opposing euthanasia. Conclusion: The attitudes of physicians towards euthanasia are diverse, and therefore the Ministry of Health should provide guidelines for physicians dealing with situations where patients or their families request euthanasia.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000497377
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000497377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A597715254</galeid><sourcerecordid>A597715254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-9ab70e47398a14a6f095bee0df9c8efb1e3d2240bf2cf47c3e9b6259ec1d3ce83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1vEzEQxS0Eol8cuCO0Epdy2OKPdby-IEWllIqi5lDOltc7Tlw2dmp7qfLf42pDgAr5YGv8m_dm9BB6TfAZIVx-wBg3UjAhnqFD0lBWY8LJ8_LGhNSCC3KAjlK6K1jLGH6JDhgWuOD0EF3Oc3Z57CFVwVaL1TY547RPVQ4POvap-uSshQg-V7fbzURdjHmlvU5OV85XX8cH7fIJemH1kODV7j5G3z9f3J5_qa9vLq_O59e14S3PtdSdwNAIJltNGj2zWPIOAPdWmhZsR4D1lDa4s9TYRhgGsptRLsGQnhlo2TH6OOluxm4NvSmDRT2oTXRrHbcqaKf-_fFupZbhp5px2WJGisDpTiCG-xFSVmuXDAyD9hDGpCgRsmGC4Uevd0_QuzBGX9ZTlGEisSAtL9TZRC31AMp5G4qvKaeHtTPBg3WlPudSCMIpb0rD-6nBxJBSBLufnmD1mKfa51nYt3-vuyd_B_hnxh86LiHugW-LxSShNr0t1Jv_UjuXXw3er9U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2301907185</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attitudes of Physicians towards Different Types of Euthanasia in Kuwait</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Karger Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Abohaimed, Shaikhah ; Matar, Basma ; Al-Shimali, Hussain ; Al-Thalji, Khalid ; Al-Othman, Omar ; Zurba, Yasmin ; Shah, Nasra</creator><creatorcontrib>Abohaimed, Shaikhah ; Matar, Basma ; Al-Shimali, Hussain ; Al-Thalji, Khalid ; Al-Othman, Omar ; Zurba, Yasmin ; Shah, Nasra</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Although in recent years the world has witnessed great advances in the medical field, much ambiguity still surrounds the issue of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, with increasingly favorable attitudes among physicians around the world. In our study, we aimed to assess the attitudes of physicians in Kuwait towards different types of euthanasia and examine whether physicians’ frequent encounters with terminally ill patients were associated with their approval. Subjects and Methods: We conducted a cross- sectional study on 464 physicians employed in government hospitals (6 general and 3 specialty hospitals). A self-administered questionnaire adapted from previous studies was used. Results: Of the physicians in our study, 43.9% reported that the Ministry of Health should legalize euthanasia under certain restricted conditions. In addition, 29.1% of our population was willing to perform euthanasia. After controlling for several characteristics in logistic regression analysis, approval of passive euthanasia was significantly associated with the following 2 factors: frequent exposure to terminally ill patients (AOR = 2.45) and obtention of the basic medical degree from Asia (AOR = 4.36) or North America/Europe (AOR = 3.24) compared to Kuwait. Male gender was significantly associated with willingness to perform euthanasia. Religion was the major reason for opposing euthanasia. Conclusion: The attitudes of physicians towards euthanasia are diverse, and therefore the Ministry of Health should provide guidelines for physicians dealing with situations where patients or their families request euthanasia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1011-7571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0151</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000497377</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30703772</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Assisted suicide ; Attitudes ; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes ; Cancer ; Clinical decision making ; Criminal law ; Death ; Decision making ; Euthanasia ; Hospitals ; Original Paper ; Palliative care ; Patients ; Physicians ; Public hospitals ; Public opinion ; Regression analysis ; Religion ; Right to die ; Suicide ; Suicides &amp; suicide attempts ; Terminally ill persons</subject><ispartof>Medical Principles and Practice, 2019-01, Vol.28 (3), p.199-207</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2019 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 S. Karger AG</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 by S. Karger AG, Basel 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-9ab70e47398a14a6f095bee0df9c8efb1e3d2240bf2cf47c3e9b6259ec1d3ce83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-9ab70e47398a14a6f095bee0df9c8efb1e3d2240bf2cf47c3e9b6259ec1d3ce83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598031/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6598031/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27635,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30703772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abohaimed, Shaikhah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matar, Basma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Shimali, Hussain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Thalji, Khalid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Othman, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zurba, Yasmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Nasra</creatorcontrib><title>Attitudes of Physicians towards Different Types of Euthanasia in Kuwait</title><title>Medical Principles and Practice</title><addtitle>Med Princ Pract</addtitle><description>Objective: Although in recent years the world has witnessed great advances in the medical field, much ambiguity still surrounds the issue of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, with increasingly favorable attitudes among physicians around the world. In our study, we aimed to assess the attitudes of physicians in Kuwait towards different types of euthanasia and examine whether physicians’ frequent encounters with terminally ill patients were associated with their approval. Subjects and Methods: We conducted a cross- sectional study on 464 physicians employed in government hospitals (6 general and 3 specialty hospitals). A self-administered questionnaire adapted from previous studies was used. Results: Of the physicians in our study, 43.9% reported that the Ministry of Health should legalize euthanasia under certain restricted conditions. In addition, 29.1% of our population was willing to perform euthanasia. After controlling for several characteristics in logistic regression analysis, approval of passive euthanasia was significantly associated with the following 2 factors: frequent exposure to terminally ill patients (AOR = 2.45) and obtention of the basic medical degree from Asia (AOR = 4.36) or North America/Europe (AOR = 3.24) compared to Kuwait. Male gender was significantly associated with willingness to perform euthanasia. Religion was the major reason for opposing euthanasia. Conclusion: The attitudes of physicians towards euthanasia are diverse, and therefore the Ministry of Health should provide guidelines for physicians dealing with situations where patients or their families request euthanasia.</description><subject>Assisted suicide</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Euthanasia</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Public hospitals</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Right to die</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>Suicides &amp; suicide attempts</subject><subject>Terminally ill persons</subject><issn>1011-7571</issn><issn>1423-0151</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M--</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1vEzEQxS0Eol8cuCO0Epdy2OKPdby-IEWllIqi5lDOltc7Tlw2dmp7qfLf42pDgAr5YGv8m_dm9BB6TfAZIVx-wBg3UjAhnqFD0lBWY8LJ8_LGhNSCC3KAjlK6K1jLGH6JDhgWuOD0EF3Oc3Z57CFVwVaL1TY547RPVQ4POvap-uSshQg-V7fbzURdjHmlvU5OV85XX8cH7fIJemH1kODV7j5G3z9f3J5_qa9vLq_O59e14S3PtdSdwNAIJltNGj2zWPIOAPdWmhZsR4D1lDa4s9TYRhgGsptRLsGQnhlo2TH6OOluxm4NvSmDRT2oTXRrHbcqaKf-_fFupZbhp5px2WJGisDpTiCG-xFSVmuXDAyD9hDGpCgRsmGC4Uevd0_QuzBGX9ZTlGEisSAtL9TZRC31AMp5G4qvKaeHtTPBg3WlPudSCMIpb0rD-6nBxJBSBLufnmD1mKfa51nYt3-vuyd_B_hnxh86LiHugW-LxSShNr0t1Jv_UjuXXw3er9U</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Abohaimed, Shaikhah</creator><creator>Matar, Basma</creator><creator>Al-Shimali, Hussain</creator><creator>Al-Thalji, Khalid</creator><creator>Al-Othman, Omar</creator><creator>Zurba, Yasmin</creator><creator>Shah, Nasra</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>M--</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Attitudes of Physicians towards Different Types of Euthanasia in Kuwait</title><author>Abohaimed, Shaikhah ; Matar, Basma ; Al-Shimali, Hussain ; Al-Thalji, Khalid ; Al-Othman, Omar ; Zurba, Yasmin ; Shah, Nasra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c585t-9ab70e47398a14a6f095bee0df9c8efb1e3d2240bf2cf47c3e9b6259ec1d3ce83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Assisted suicide</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Euthanasia</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Public hospitals</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Right to die</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>Suicides &amp; suicide attempts</topic><topic>Terminally ill persons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abohaimed, Shaikhah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matar, Basma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Shimali, Hussain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Thalji, Khalid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Othman, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zurba, Yasmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Nasra</creatorcontrib><collection>Karger Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical Principles and Practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abohaimed, Shaikhah</au><au>Matar, Basma</au><au>Al-Shimali, Hussain</au><au>Al-Thalji, Khalid</au><au>Al-Othman, Omar</au><au>Zurba, Yasmin</au><au>Shah, Nasra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attitudes of Physicians towards Different Types of Euthanasia in Kuwait</atitle><jtitle>Medical Principles and Practice</jtitle><addtitle>Med Princ Pract</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>199-207</pages><issn>1011-7571</issn><eissn>1423-0151</eissn><abstract>Objective: Although in recent years the world has witnessed great advances in the medical field, much ambiguity still surrounds the issue of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, with increasingly favorable attitudes among physicians around the world. In our study, we aimed to assess the attitudes of physicians in Kuwait towards different types of euthanasia and examine whether physicians’ frequent encounters with terminally ill patients were associated with their approval. Subjects and Methods: We conducted a cross- sectional study on 464 physicians employed in government hospitals (6 general and 3 specialty hospitals). A self-administered questionnaire adapted from previous studies was used. Results: Of the physicians in our study, 43.9% reported that the Ministry of Health should legalize euthanasia under certain restricted conditions. In addition, 29.1% of our population was willing to perform euthanasia. After controlling for several characteristics in logistic regression analysis, approval of passive euthanasia was significantly associated with the following 2 factors: frequent exposure to terminally ill patients (AOR = 2.45) and obtention of the basic medical degree from Asia (AOR = 4.36) or North America/Europe (AOR = 3.24) compared to Kuwait. Male gender was significantly associated with willingness to perform euthanasia. Religion was the major reason for opposing euthanasia. Conclusion: The attitudes of physicians towards euthanasia are diverse, and therefore the Ministry of Health should provide guidelines for physicians dealing with situations where patients or their families request euthanasia.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>30703772</pmid><doi>10.1159/000497377</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1011-7571
ispartof Medical Principles and Practice, 2019-01, Vol.28 (3), p.199-207
issn 1011-7571
1423-0151
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000497377
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Karger Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Assisted suicide
Attitudes
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
Cancer
Clinical decision making
Criminal law
Death
Decision making
Euthanasia
Hospitals
Original Paper
Palliative care
Patients
Physicians
Public hospitals
Public opinion
Regression analysis
Religion
Right to die
Suicide
Suicides & suicide attempts
Terminally ill persons
title Attitudes of Physicians towards Different Types of Euthanasia in Kuwait
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T10%3A54%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attitudes%20of%20Physicians%20towards%20Different%20Types%20of%20Euthanasia%20in%20Kuwait&rft.jtitle=Medical%20Principles%20and%20Practice&rft.au=Abohaimed,%20Shaikhah&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=199-207&rft.issn=1011-7571&rft.eissn=1423-0151&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000497377&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA597715254%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2301907185&rft_id=info:pmid/30703772&rft_galeid=A597715254&rfr_iscdi=true