The Effect of Intrauterine Lidocaine and Rectal Indomethacin on Pain during Office Vaginoscopic Hysteroscopy: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study
Backgrounds/Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of rectal and intrauterine anesthesia during vaginoscopic hysteroscopy. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized to rectal indomethacin, intrauterine lidocaine and placebo gr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gynecologic and obstetric investigation 2016-01, Vol.81 (3), p.280-284 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 284 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 280 |
container_title | Gynecologic and obstetric investigation |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Senturk, Mehmet Baki Guraslan, Hakan Babaoğlu, Bülent Yaşar, Levent Polat, Mesut |
description | Backgrounds/Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of rectal and intrauterine anesthesia during vaginoscopic hysteroscopy. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized to rectal indomethacin, intrauterine lidocaine and placebo groups. Patients with conditions that could cause or contribute to pelvic pain were excluded. Pain was evaluated with Visual Analog Scale, when the cervical canal was passed, while within the cavity and at 10 min after procedure. The Analog Pain Scale scores of the 3 groups were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance test. A value of p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Results: The study included a total of 206 patients. No difference was seen between the groups in respect of indication, age, gravid and duration of procedure. While the anesthesia was determined as superior to the placebo in reducing pain at all 3 stages (p < 0.05), intrauterine lidocaine was determined to be more effective than rectal indomethacin in reducing pain within the cavity and 10 min after the procedure (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Rectal or intrauterine anesthesia applied with the vaginoscopic technique is useful in hysteroscopy. However, intrauterine anesthesia is more effective in reducing pain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000441787 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000441787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1788539834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-cd28a287b10d5a71be9e6c8fd87d8aa0dc6756d168904b608d80f721cf750c483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0btu2zAUBmAiaJE4aYbuRUGgSzMoORQl8ahb6yRNAAMpckM3geLFYSqLLikN7oP0eUPXrodMvOA7Py-HkPcMThkr6zMAKAomUOyRCStyngHkP9-QCXCBmeBFdUAOY3wGSBiLfXKQVyVyLuoJ-Xv_ZOiFtUYN1Ft63Q9BjoMJrjd05rRXcj2Tvaa3icguCe0XZniSyvXU9_RHAlSPqWBOb6x1ytBHOXe9j8ovnaJXq5ji_q1WX-itXJe7P0bTcz-2ncm-dS6FT3062Hdd2r8bRr16R95a2UVzvB2PyMPlxf30KpvdfL-efp1lilcwZErnKHMULQNdSsFaU5tKodUoNEoJWlWirDSrsIairQA1ghU5U1aUoArkR-TzJncZ_O_RxKFZuKhM18ne-DE26VOx5DXyItFPr-izH0OfbtcwZHkuahSQ1MlGqfTmGIxtlsEtZFg1DJp1s5pds5L9uE0c24XRO_m_Owl82IBfMsxN2IFt_Qt-l5kz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1812279870</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Intrauterine Lidocaine and Rectal Indomethacin on Pain during Office Vaginoscopic Hysteroscopy: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals Complete</source><creator>Senturk, Mehmet Baki ; Guraslan, Hakan ; Babaoğlu, Bülent ; Yaşar, Levent ; Polat, Mesut</creator><creatorcontrib>Senturk, Mehmet Baki ; Guraslan, Hakan ; Babaoğlu, Bülent ; Yaşar, Levent ; Polat, Mesut</creatorcontrib><description>Backgrounds/Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of rectal and intrauterine anesthesia during vaginoscopic hysteroscopy. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized to rectal indomethacin, intrauterine lidocaine and placebo groups. Patients with conditions that could cause or contribute to pelvic pain were excluded. Pain was evaluated with Visual Analog Scale, when the cervical canal was passed, while within the cavity and at 10 min after procedure. The Analog Pain Scale scores of the 3 groups were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance test. A value of p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Results: The study included a total of 206 patients. No difference was seen between the groups in respect of indication, age, gravid and duration of procedure. While the anesthesia was determined as superior to the placebo in reducing pain at all 3 stages (p < 0.05), intrauterine lidocaine was determined to be more effective than rectal indomethacin in reducing pain within the cavity and 10 min after the procedure (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Rectal or intrauterine anesthesia applied with the vaginoscopic technique is useful in hysteroscopy. However, intrauterine anesthesia is more effective in reducing pain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-7346</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-002X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000441787</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26583379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Anesthetics, Local ; Double-Blind Method ; Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Hysteroscopy - adverse effects ; Indomethacin - administration & dosage ; Lidocaine - administration & dosage ; Middle Aged ; Original Article ; Pain - etiology ; Pain - prevention & control ; Placebos ; Polyps - diagnosis ; Rectum - drug effects ; Uterus - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic and obstetric investigation, 2016-01, Vol.81 (3), p.280-284</ispartof><rights>2015 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-cd28a287b10d5a71be9e6c8fd87d8aa0dc6756d168904b608d80f721cf750c483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-cd28a287b10d5a71be9e6c8fd87d8aa0dc6756d168904b608d80f721cf750c483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2422,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26583379$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Senturk, Mehmet Baki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guraslan, Hakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babaoğlu, Bülent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaşar, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polat, Mesut</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Intrauterine Lidocaine and Rectal Indomethacin on Pain during Office Vaginoscopic Hysteroscopy: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study</title><title>Gynecologic and obstetric investigation</title><addtitle>Gynecol Obstet Invest</addtitle><description>Backgrounds/Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of rectal and intrauterine anesthesia during vaginoscopic hysteroscopy. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized to rectal indomethacin, intrauterine lidocaine and placebo groups. Patients with conditions that could cause or contribute to pelvic pain were excluded. Pain was evaluated with Visual Analog Scale, when the cervical canal was passed, while within the cavity and at 10 min after procedure. The Analog Pain Scale scores of the 3 groups were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance test. A value of p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Results: The study included a total of 206 patients. No difference was seen between the groups in respect of indication, age, gravid and duration of procedure. While the anesthesia was determined as superior to the placebo in reducing pain at all 3 stages (p < 0.05), intrauterine lidocaine was determined to be more effective than rectal indomethacin in reducing pain within the cavity and 10 min after the procedure (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Rectal or intrauterine anesthesia applied with the vaginoscopic technique is useful in hysteroscopy. However, intrauterine anesthesia is more effective in reducing pain.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysteroscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Indomethacin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Lidocaine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pain - prevention & control</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Polyps - diagnosis</subject><subject>Rectum - drug effects</subject><subject>Uterus - drug effects</subject><issn>0378-7346</issn><issn>1423-002X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0btu2zAUBmAiaJE4aYbuRUGgSzMoORQl8ahb6yRNAAMpckM3geLFYSqLLikN7oP0eUPXrodMvOA7Py-HkPcMThkr6zMAKAomUOyRCStyngHkP9-QCXCBmeBFdUAOY3wGSBiLfXKQVyVyLuoJ-Xv_ZOiFtUYN1Ft63Q9BjoMJrjd05rRXcj2Tvaa3icguCe0XZniSyvXU9_RHAlSPqWBOb6x1ytBHOXe9j8ovnaJXq5ji_q1WX-itXJe7P0bTcz-2ncm-dS6FT3062Hdd2r8bRr16R95a2UVzvB2PyMPlxf30KpvdfL-efp1lilcwZErnKHMULQNdSsFaU5tKodUoNEoJWlWirDSrsIairQA1ghU5U1aUoArkR-TzJncZ_O_RxKFZuKhM18ne-DE26VOx5DXyItFPr-izH0OfbtcwZHkuahSQ1MlGqfTmGIxtlsEtZFg1DJp1s5pds5L9uE0c24XRO_m_Owl82IBfMsxN2IFt_Qt-l5kz</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Senturk, Mehmet Baki</creator><creator>Guraslan, Hakan</creator><creator>Babaoğlu, Bülent</creator><creator>Yaşar, Levent</creator><creator>Polat, Mesut</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>The Effect of Intrauterine Lidocaine and Rectal Indomethacin on Pain during Office Vaginoscopic Hysteroscopy: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study</title><author>Senturk, Mehmet Baki ; Guraslan, Hakan ; Babaoğlu, Bülent ; Yaşar, Levent ; Polat, Mesut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-cd28a287b10d5a71be9e6c8fd87d8aa0dc6756d168904b608d80f721cf750c483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysteroscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Indomethacin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Lidocaine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pain - prevention & control</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Polyps - diagnosis</topic><topic>Rectum - drug effects</topic><topic>Uterus - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Senturk, Mehmet Baki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guraslan, Hakan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babaoğlu, Bülent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaşar, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polat, Mesut</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic and obstetric investigation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Senturk, Mehmet Baki</au><au>Guraslan, Hakan</au><au>Babaoğlu, Bülent</au><au>Yaşar, Levent</au><au>Polat, Mesut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Intrauterine Lidocaine and Rectal Indomethacin on Pain during Office Vaginoscopic Hysteroscopy: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic and obstetric investigation</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Obstet Invest</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>280</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>280-284</pages><issn>0378-7346</issn><eissn>1423-002X</eissn><abstract>Backgrounds/Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of rectal and intrauterine anesthesia during vaginoscopic hysteroscopy. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomized to rectal indomethacin, intrauterine lidocaine and placebo groups. Patients with conditions that could cause or contribute to pelvic pain were excluded. Pain was evaluated with Visual Analog Scale, when the cervical canal was passed, while within the cavity and at 10 min after procedure. The Analog Pain Scale scores of the 3 groups were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance test. A value of p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Results: The study included a total of 206 patients. No difference was seen between the groups in respect of indication, age, gravid and duration of procedure. While the anesthesia was determined as superior to the placebo in reducing pain at all 3 stages (p < 0.05), intrauterine lidocaine was determined to be more effective than rectal indomethacin in reducing pain within the cavity and 10 min after the procedure (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Rectal or intrauterine anesthesia applied with the vaginoscopic technique is useful in hysteroscopy. However, intrauterine anesthesia is more effective in reducing pain.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>26583379</pmid><doi>10.1159/000441787</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-7346 |
ispartof | Gynecologic and obstetric investigation, 2016-01, Vol.81 (3), p.280-284 |
issn | 0378-7346 1423-002X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000441787 |
source | MEDLINE; Karger Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Anesthetics, Local Double-Blind Method Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnosis Female Humans Hysteroscopy - adverse effects Indomethacin - administration & dosage Lidocaine - administration & dosage Middle Aged Original Article Pain - etiology Pain - prevention & control Placebos Polyps - diagnosis Rectum - drug effects Uterus - drug effects |
title | The Effect of Intrauterine Lidocaine and Rectal Indomethacin on Pain during Office Vaginoscopic Hysteroscopy: Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A35%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Intrauterine%20Lidocaine%20and%20Rectal%20Indomethacin%20on%20Pain%20during%20Office%20Vaginoscopic%20Hysteroscopy:%20Randomized%20Double-Blind%20Controlled%20Study&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20and%20obstetric%20investigation&rft.au=Senturk,%20Mehmet%20Baki&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=280&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=280-284&rft.issn=0378-7346&rft.eissn=1423-002X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000441787&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1788539834%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1812279870&rft_id=info:pmid/26583379&rfr_iscdi=true |