A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Anti-Caries Efficacy of 5,000 Compared to 1,450 ppm Fluoridated Toothpaste on Root Caries Lesions in Elderly Disabled Nursing Home Residents

Root caries is prevalent in elderly disabled nursing home residents in Denmark. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of tooth brushing with 5,000 versus 1,450 ppm of fluoridated toothpaste (F-toothpaste) for controlling root caries in nursing home residents. The duration of the study was 8...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Caries research 2013-01, Vol.47 (5), p.391-398
Hauptverfasser: Ekstrand, K.R., Poulsen, J.E., Hede, B., Twetman, S., Qvist, V., Ellwood, R.P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 398
container_issue 5
container_start_page 391
container_title Caries research
container_volume 47
creator Ekstrand, K.R.
Poulsen, J.E.
Hede, B.
Twetman, S.
Qvist, V.
Ellwood, R.P.
description Root caries is prevalent in elderly disabled nursing home residents in Denmark. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of tooth brushing with 5,000 versus 1,450 ppm of fluoridated toothpaste (F-toothpaste) for controlling root caries in nursing home residents. The duration of the study was 8 months. Elderly disabled residents (n = 176) in 6 nursing homes in the Copenhagen area consented to take part in the study. They were randomly assigned to use one of the two toothpastes. Both groups had their teeth brushed twice a day by the nursing staff. A total of 125 residents completed the study. Baseline and follow-up clinical examinations were performed by one calibrated examiner. Texture, contour, location and colour of root caries lesions were used to evaluate lesion activity. No differences (p values >0.16) were noted in the baseline examination with regards to age, mouth dryness, wearing of partial or full dentures in one of the jaws, occurrence of plaque and active (2.61 vs. 2.67; SD, 1.7 vs.1.8) or arrested lesions (0.62 vs. 0.63; SD, 1.7 vs. 1.7) between the 5,000 and the 1,450 ppm fluoride groups, respectively. Mean numbers of active root caries lesions at the follow-up examination were 1.05 (2.76) versus 2.55 (1.91) and mean numbers of arrested caries lesions were 2.13 (1.68) versus 0.61 (1.76) in the 5,000 and the 1,450 ppm fluoride groups, respectively (p < 0.001). To conclude, 5,000 ppm F-toothpaste is significantly more effective for controlling root caries lesion progression and promoting remineralization compared to 1,450 ppm F-toothpaste.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000348581
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000348581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1443377806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-11ce74d8c1f0ddb2ed74a5818f9203c179d2e79fbff72cc54ae39e24b2db96163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UFv0zAUB3ALgVgZHLgjZGkXkBawEyd2jlXoNqRqSFWRuEWO_bx5JHawk0P5UvuK89SuB8RhF1vO-71nxX-E3lPyhdKy_koIKZgoBX2BFpTlNKt59eslWqTvIqvKSpygNzHeEUJZVYnX6CQvyppxwRbofok30mk_2L-gcdNbZ5Xs8TbYtHqDp1vASzfZrJHBQsQrYxJQu8daeZ4uwI0fRhlS8-QxPWclweM44It-9sFqOaXC1vvpdpRxAuwd3qQTPkxbQ7TeRWwdXvUaQr_D32yUXZ-6rucQrbvBV34AvElQg5viW_TKyD7Cu8N-in5erLbNVbb-cfm9Wa4zxSo6ZZQq4EwLRQ3RustBcybTAwlT56RQlNc6B16bzhieK1UyCUUNOety3dUVrYpT9Gk_dwz-zwxxagcbFfS9dODn2FLGioJzQZ5DC8YZp7VI9Owfeufn4NKPtLQkrOQpHprU571SwccYwLRjsIMMu5aS9jHw9hh4sh8PE-duAH2UTwkn8GEPfstwA-EIjv1n_y03m9VetKM2xQNU-rkf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504576681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Anti-Caries Efficacy of 5,000 Compared to 1,450 ppm Fluoridated Toothpaste on Root Caries Lesions in Elderly Disabled Nursing Home Residents</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Ekstrand, K.R. ; Poulsen, J.E. ; Hede, B. ; Twetman, S. ; Qvist, V. ; Ellwood, R.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ekstrand, K.R. ; Poulsen, J.E. ; Hede, B. ; Twetman, S. ; Qvist, V. ; Ellwood, R.P.</creatorcontrib><description>Root caries is prevalent in elderly disabled nursing home residents in Denmark. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of tooth brushing with 5,000 versus 1,450 ppm of fluoridated toothpaste (F-toothpaste) for controlling root caries in nursing home residents. The duration of the study was 8 months. Elderly disabled residents (n = 176) in 6 nursing homes in the Copenhagen area consented to take part in the study. They were randomly assigned to use one of the two toothpastes. Both groups had their teeth brushed twice a day by the nursing staff. A total of 125 residents completed the study. Baseline and follow-up clinical examinations were performed by one calibrated examiner. Texture, contour, location and colour of root caries lesions were used to evaluate lesion activity. No differences (p values &gt;0.16) were noted in the baseline examination with regards to age, mouth dryness, wearing of partial or full dentures in one of the jaws, occurrence of plaque and active (2.61 vs. 2.67; SD, 1.7 vs.1.8) or arrested lesions (0.62 vs. 0.63; SD, 1.7 vs. 1.7) between the 5,000 and the 1,450 ppm fluoride groups, respectively. Mean numbers of active root caries lesions at the follow-up examination were 1.05 (2.76) versus 2.55 (1.91) and mean numbers of arrested caries lesions were 2.13 (1.68) versus 0.61 (1.76) in the 5,000 and the 1,450 ppm fluoride groups, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). To conclude, 5,000 ppm F-toothpaste is significantly more effective for controlling root caries lesion progression and promoting remineralization compared to 1,450 ppm F-toothpaste.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-6568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-976X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000348581</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23594784</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CAREBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cariostatic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Dental Care for Aged ; Dental Care for Disabled ; Dental Plaque Index ; Dentistry ; Denture, Complete ; Denture, Partial ; Disabled Persons ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Fluorides - administration &amp; dosage ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nursing Homes ; Original Paper ; Root Caries - pathology ; Root Caries - prevention &amp; control ; Tooth Remineralization ; Toothbrushing - nursing ; Toothpastes - therapeutic use ; Xerostomia - classification</subject><ispartof>Caries research, 2013-01, Vol.47 (5), p.391-398</ispartof><rights>2013 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-11ce74d8c1f0ddb2ed74a5818f9203c179d2e79fbff72cc54ae39e24b2db96163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-11ce74d8c1f0ddb2ed74a5818f9203c179d2e79fbff72cc54ae39e24b2db96163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2423,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23594784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ekstrand, K.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulsen, J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hede, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twetman, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qvist, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellwood, R.P.</creatorcontrib><title>A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Anti-Caries Efficacy of 5,000 Compared to 1,450 ppm Fluoridated Toothpaste on Root Caries Lesions in Elderly Disabled Nursing Home Residents</title><title>Caries research</title><addtitle>Caries Res</addtitle><description>Root caries is prevalent in elderly disabled nursing home residents in Denmark. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of tooth brushing with 5,000 versus 1,450 ppm of fluoridated toothpaste (F-toothpaste) for controlling root caries in nursing home residents. The duration of the study was 8 months. Elderly disabled residents (n = 176) in 6 nursing homes in the Copenhagen area consented to take part in the study. They were randomly assigned to use one of the two toothpastes. Both groups had their teeth brushed twice a day by the nursing staff. A total of 125 residents completed the study. Baseline and follow-up clinical examinations were performed by one calibrated examiner. Texture, contour, location and colour of root caries lesions were used to evaluate lesion activity. No differences (p values &gt;0.16) were noted in the baseline examination with regards to age, mouth dryness, wearing of partial or full dentures in one of the jaws, occurrence of plaque and active (2.61 vs. 2.67; SD, 1.7 vs.1.8) or arrested lesions (0.62 vs. 0.63; SD, 1.7 vs. 1.7) between the 5,000 and the 1,450 ppm fluoride groups, respectively. Mean numbers of active root caries lesions at the follow-up examination were 1.05 (2.76) versus 2.55 (1.91) and mean numbers of arrested caries lesions were 2.13 (1.68) versus 0.61 (1.76) in the 5,000 and the 1,450 ppm fluoride groups, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). To conclude, 5,000 ppm F-toothpaste is significantly more effective for controlling root caries lesion progression and promoting remineralization compared to 1,450 ppm F-toothpaste.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cariostatic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Dental Care for Aged</subject><subject>Dental Care for Disabled</subject><subject>Dental Plaque Index</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Denture, Complete</subject><subject>Denture, Partial</subject><subject>Disabled Persons</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorides - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing Homes</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Root Caries - pathology</subject><subject>Root Caries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Tooth Remineralization</subject><subject>Toothbrushing - nursing</subject><subject>Toothpastes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Xerostomia - classification</subject><issn>0008-6568</issn><issn>1421-976X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0UFv0zAUB3ALgVgZHLgjZGkXkBawEyd2jlXoNqRqSFWRuEWO_bx5JHawk0P5UvuK89SuB8RhF1vO-71nxX-E3lPyhdKy_koIKZgoBX2BFpTlNKt59eslWqTvIqvKSpygNzHeEUJZVYnX6CQvyppxwRbofok30mk_2L-gcdNbZ5Xs8TbYtHqDp1vASzfZrJHBQsQrYxJQu8daeZ4uwI0fRhlS8-QxPWclweM44It-9sFqOaXC1vvpdpRxAuwd3qQTPkxbQ7TeRWwdXvUaQr_D32yUXZ-6rucQrbvBV34AvElQg5viW_TKyD7Cu8N-in5erLbNVbb-cfm9Wa4zxSo6ZZQq4EwLRQ3RustBcybTAwlT56RQlNc6B16bzhieK1UyCUUNOety3dUVrYpT9Gk_dwz-zwxxagcbFfS9dODn2FLGioJzQZ5DC8YZp7VI9Owfeufn4NKPtLQkrOQpHprU571SwccYwLRjsIMMu5aS9jHw9hh4sh8PE-duAH2UTwkn8GEPfstwA-EIjv1n_y03m9VetKM2xQNU-rkf</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Ekstrand, K.R.</creator><creator>Poulsen, J.E.</creator><creator>Hede, B.</creator><creator>Twetman, S.</creator><creator>Qvist, V.</creator><creator>Ellwood, R.P.</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Anti-Caries Efficacy of 5,000 Compared to 1,450 ppm Fluoridated Toothpaste on Root Caries Lesions in Elderly Disabled Nursing Home Residents</title><author>Ekstrand, K.R. ; Poulsen, J.E. ; Hede, B. ; Twetman, S. ; Qvist, V. ; Ellwood, R.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-11ce74d8c1f0ddb2ed74a5818f9203c179d2e79fbff72cc54ae39e24b2db96163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cariostatic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Dental Care for Aged</topic><topic>Dental Care for Disabled</topic><topic>Dental Plaque Index</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Denture, Complete</topic><topic>Denture, Partial</topic><topic>Disabled Persons</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorides - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing Homes</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Root Caries - pathology</topic><topic>Root Caries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Tooth Remineralization</topic><topic>Toothbrushing - nursing</topic><topic>Toothpastes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Xerostomia - classification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ekstrand, K.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulsen, J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hede, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twetman, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qvist, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellwood, R.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Caries research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ekstrand, K.R.</au><au>Poulsen, J.E.</au><au>Hede, B.</au><au>Twetman, S.</au><au>Qvist, V.</au><au>Ellwood, R.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Anti-Caries Efficacy of 5,000 Compared to 1,450 ppm Fluoridated Toothpaste on Root Caries Lesions in Elderly Disabled Nursing Home Residents</atitle><jtitle>Caries research</jtitle><addtitle>Caries Res</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>398</epage><pages>391-398</pages><issn>0008-6568</issn><eissn>1421-976X</eissn><coden>CAREBK</coden><abstract>Root caries is prevalent in elderly disabled nursing home residents in Denmark. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of tooth brushing with 5,000 versus 1,450 ppm of fluoridated toothpaste (F-toothpaste) for controlling root caries in nursing home residents. The duration of the study was 8 months. Elderly disabled residents (n = 176) in 6 nursing homes in the Copenhagen area consented to take part in the study. They were randomly assigned to use one of the two toothpastes. Both groups had their teeth brushed twice a day by the nursing staff. A total of 125 residents completed the study. Baseline and follow-up clinical examinations were performed by one calibrated examiner. Texture, contour, location and colour of root caries lesions were used to evaluate lesion activity. No differences (p values &gt;0.16) were noted in the baseline examination with regards to age, mouth dryness, wearing of partial or full dentures in one of the jaws, occurrence of plaque and active (2.61 vs. 2.67; SD, 1.7 vs.1.8) or arrested lesions (0.62 vs. 0.63; SD, 1.7 vs. 1.7) between the 5,000 and the 1,450 ppm fluoride groups, respectively. Mean numbers of active root caries lesions at the follow-up examination were 1.05 (2.76) versus 2.55 (1.91) and mean numbers of arrested caries lesions were 2.13 (1.68) versus 0.61 (1.76) in the 5,000 and the 1,450 ppm fluoride groups, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). To conclude, 5,000 ppm F-toothpaste is significantly more effective for controlling root caries lesion progression and promoting remineralization compared to 1,450 ppm F-toothpaste.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>23594784</pmid><doi>10.1159/000348581</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-6568
ispartof Caries research, 2013-01, Vol.47 (5), p.391-398
issn 0008-6568
1421-976X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000348581
source Karger Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cariostatic Agents - administration & dosage
Dental Care for Aged
Dental Care for Disabled
Dental Plaque Index
Dentistry
Denture, Complete
Denture, Partial
Disabled Persons
Disease Progression
Female
Fluorides - administration & dosage
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nursing Homes
Original Paper
Root Caries - pathology
Root Caries - prevention & control
Tooth Remineralization
Toothbrushing - nursing
Toothpastes - therapeutic use
Xerostomia - classification
title A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Anti-Caries Efficacy of 5,000 Compared to 1,450 ppm Fluoridated Toothpaste on Root Caries Lesions in Elderly Disabled Nursing Home Residents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A56%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial%20of%20the%20Anti-Caries%20Efficacy%20of%205,000%20Compared%20to%201,450%20ppm%20Fluoridated%20Toothpaste%20on%20Root%20Caries%20Lesions%20in%20Elderly%20Disabled%20Nursing%20Home%20Residents&rft.jtitle=Caries%20research&rft.au=Ekstrand,%20K.R.&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=398&rft.pages=391-398&rft.issn=0008-6568&rft.eissn=1421-976X&rft.coden=CAREBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000348581&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1443377806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504576681&rft_id=info:pmid/23594784&rfr_iscdi=true