Effects of Lower Frequency-to-Electrode Allocations on Speech and Pitch Perception with the Hybrid Short-Electrode Cochlear Implant

Because some users of a Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant (CI) lose their low-frequency residual hearing after receiving the CI, we tested whether increasing the CI speech processor frequency allocation range to include lower frequencies improves speech perception in these individuals. A secon...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Audiology & neurotology 2012-01, Vol.17 (6), p.357-372
Hauptverfasser: Reiss, Lina A.J., Perreau, Ann E., Turner, Christopher W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 372
container_issue 6
container_start_page 357
container_title Audiology & neurotology
container_volume 17
creator Reiss, Lina A.J.
Perreau, Ann E.
Turner, Christopher W.
description Because some users of a Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant (CI) lose their low-frequency residual hearing after receiving the CI, we tested whether increasing the CI speech processor frequency allocation range to include lower frequencies improves speech perception in these individuals. A secondary goal was to see if pitch perception changed after experience with the new CI frequency allocation. Three subjects who had lost all residual hearing in the implanted ear were recruited to use an experimental CI frequency allocation with a lower frequency cutoff than their current clinical frequency allocation. Speech and pitch perception results were collected at multiple time points throughout the study. In general, subjects showed little or no improvement for speech recognition with the experimental allocation when the CI was worn with a hearing aid in the contralateral ear. However, all 3 subjects showed changes in pitch perception that followed the changes in frequency allocations over time, consistent with previous studies showing that pitch perception changes upon provision of a CI.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000341165
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000341165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2859912801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-48bb39fa43e8eac3a75c6d9864b763bcadf841ca976f587683595fae52af55623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0t1rFDEQAPBFFPuhD76LBETQh9Vk87GbF6EcV1s4sFB9DrPZSXfr3uaa5Cz33H_cnHee1acMzI_JTCZF8YrRj4xJ_YlSygVjSj4pjpmoWKlrSp_-jmnJKadHxUmMt5lJKcXz4qiqNK2ZZMfFw9w5tCkS78jC32Mg5wHv1jjZTZl8OR9zMvgOydk4egtp8FO2E7leIdqewNSRqyHl6AqDxdU2T-6H1JPUI7nYtGHoyHXvQ3pUauZtPyIEcrlcjTClF8UzB2PEl_vztPh-Pv82uygXX79czs4WpRVSpFI0bcu1A8GxQbAcamlVpxsl2lrx1kLnGsEs6Fo52dSq4VJLBygrcFKqip8Wn3d1V-t2iZ3FKQUYzSoMSwgb42Ew_2amoTc3_qfhkmnNtwXe7wsEn98oJrMcosUxD4F-HQ2jmoumkbrO9O1_9Navw5THM6xSdd6MkiKrDztlg48xoDs0w6jZrtYcVpvtm8fdH-SfXWbwbg8gWhhdgMkO8a9Totr-i-xe79wPCDcYDmB_zy_8NrWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1267142654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Lower Frequency-to-Electrode Allocations on Speech and Pitch Perception with the Hybrid Short-Electrode Cochlear Implant</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Reiss, Lina A.J. ; Perreau, Ann E. ; Turner, Christopher W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reiss, Lina A.J. ; Perreau, Ann E. ; Turner, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><description>Because some users of a Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant (CI) lose their low-frequency residual hearing after receiving the CI, we tested whether increasing the CI speech processor frequency allocation range to include lower frequencies improves speech perception in these individuals. A secondary goal was to see if pitch perception changed after experience with the new CI frequency allocation. Three subjects who had lost all residual hearing in the implanted ear were recruited to use an experimental CI frequency allocation with a lower frequency cutoff than their current clinical frequency allocation. Speech and pitch perception results were collected at multiple time points throughout the study. In general, subjects showed little or no improvement for speech recognition with the experimental allocation when the CI was worn with a hearing aid in the contralateral ear. However, all 3 subjects showed changes in pitch perception that followed the changes in frequency allocations over time, consistent with previous studies showing that pitch perception changes upon provision of a CI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1420-3030</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-9700</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000341165</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22907151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: Karger</publisher><subject>Aged ; Audiometry ; Auditory Threshold ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation ; Cochlear Implantation - methods ; Cochlear Implants ; Ears &amp; hearing ; Electrodes, Implanted ; Female ; Hearing Loss - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Noise ; Original Paper ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Pitch Perception ; Sensory perception ; Speech ; Speech Perception ; Speech Reception Threshold Test</subject><ispartof>Audiology &amp; neurotology, 2012-01, Vol.17 (6), p.357-372</ispartof><rights>2012 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-48bb39fa43e8eac3a75c6d9864b763bcadf841ca976f587683595fae52af55623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-48bb39fa43e8eac3a75c6d9864b763bcadf841ca976f587683595fae52af55623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,2423,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26429700$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22907151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reiss, Lina A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perreau, Ann E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Lower Frequency-to-Electrode Allocations on Speech and Pitch Perception with the Hybrid Short-Electrode Cochlear Implant</title><title>Audiology &amp; neurotology</title><addtitle>Audiol Neurotol</addtitle><description>Because some users of a Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant (CI) lose their low-frequency residual hearing after receiving the CI, we tested whether increasing the CI speech processor frequency allocation range to include lower frequencies improves speech perception in these individuals. A secondary goal was to see if pitch perception changed after experience with the new CI frequency allocation. Three subjects who had lost all residual hearing in the implanted ear were recruited to use an experimental CI frequency allocation with a lower frequency cutoff than their current clinical frequency allocation. Speech and pitch perception results were collected at multiple time points throughout the study. In general, subjects showed little or no improvement for speech recognition with the experimental allocation when the CI was worn with a hearing aid in the contralateral ear. However, all 3 subjects showed changes in pitch perception that followed the changes in frequency allocations over time, consistent with previous studies showing that pitch perception changes upon provision of a CI.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Audiometry</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Ears &amp; hearing</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Pitch Perception</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Speech Reception Threshold Test</subject><issn>1420-3030</issn><issn>1421-9700</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0t1rFDEQAPBFFPuhD76LBETQh9Vk87GbF6EcV1s4sFB9DrPZSXfr3uaa5Cz33H_cnHee1acMzI_JTCZF8YrRj4xJ_YlSygVjSj4pjpmoWKlrSp_-jmnJKadHxUmMt5lJKcXz4qiqNK2ZZMfFw9w5tCkS78jC32Mg5wHv1jjZTZl8OR9zMvgOydk4egtp8FO2E7leIdqewNSRqyHl6AqDxdU2T-6H1JPUI7nYtGHoyHXvQ3pUauZtPyIEcrlcjTClF8UzB2PEl_vztPh-Pv82uygXX79czs4WpRVSpFI0bcu1A8GxQbAcamlVpxsl2lrx1kLnGsEs6Fo52dSq4VJLBygrcFKqip8Wn3d1V-t2iZ3FKQUYzSoMSwgb42Ew_2amoTc3_qfhkmnNtwXe7wsEn98oJrMcosUxD4F-HQ2jmoumkbrO9O1_9Navw5THM6xSdd6MkiKrDztlg48xoDs0w6jZrtYcVpvtm8fdH-SfXWbwbg8gWhhdgMkO8a9Totr-i-xe79wPCDcYDmB_zy_8NrWg</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Reiss, Lina A.J.</creator><creator>Perreau, Ann E.</creator><creator>Turner, Christopher W.</creator><general>Karger</general><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Effects of Lower Frequency-to-Electrode Allocations on Speech and Pitch Perception with the Hybrid Short-Electrode Cochlear Implant</title><author>Reiss, Lina A.J. ; Perreau, Ann E. ; Turner, Christopher W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-48bb39fa43e8eac3a75c6d9864b763bcadf841ca976f587683595fae52af55623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Audiometry</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Ears &amp; hearing</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Pitch Perception</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Speech Reception Threshold Test</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reiss, Lina A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perreau, Ann E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Audiology &amp; neurotology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reiss, Lina A.J.</au><au>Perreau, Ann E.</au><au>Turner, Christopher W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Lower Frequency-to-Electrode Allocations on Speech and Pitch Perception with the Hybrid Short-Electrode Cochlear Implant</atitle><jtitle>Audiology &amp; neurotology</jtitle><addtitle>Audiol Neurotol</addtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>357</spage><epage>372</epage><pages>357-372</pages><issn>1420-3030</issn><eissn>1421-9700</eissn><abstract>Because some users of a Hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant (CI) lose their low-frequency residual hearing after receiving the CI, we tested whether increasing the CI speech processor frequency allocation range to include lower frequencies improves speech perception in these individuals. A secondary goal was to see if pitch perception changed after experience with the new CI frequency allocation. Three subjects who had lost all residual hearing in the implanted ear were recruited to use an experimental CI frequency allocation with a lower frequency cutoff than their current clinical frequency allocation. Speech and pitch perception results were collected at multiple time points throughout the study. In general, subjects showed little or no improvement for speech recognition with the experimental allocation when the CI was worn with a hearing aid in the contralateral ear. However, all 3 subjects showed changes in pitch perception that followed the changes in frequency allocations over time, consistent with previous studies showing that pitch perception changes upon provision of a CI.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>Karger</pub><pmid>22907151</pmid><doi>10.1159/000341165</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1420-3030
ispartof Audiology & neurotology, 2012-01, Vol.17 (6), p.357-372
issn 1420-3030
1421-9700
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000341165
source Karger Journals; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Audiometry
Auditory Threshold
Biological and medical sciences
Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation
Cochlear Implantation - methods
Cochlear Implants
Ears & hearing
Electrodes, Implanted
Female
Hearing Loss - surgery
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Noise
Original Paper
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
Pitch Perception
Sensory perception
Speech
Speech Perception
Speech Reception Threshold Test
title Effects of Lower Frequency-to-Electrode Allocations on Speech and Pitch Perception with the Hybrid Short-Electrode Cochlear Implant
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T12%3A40%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Lower%20Frequency-to-Electrode%20Allocations%20on%20Speech%20and%20Pitch%20Perception%20with%20the%20Hybrid%20Short-Electrode%20Cochlear%20Implant&rft.jtitle=Audiology%20&%20neurotology&rft.au=Reiss,%20Lina%20A.J.&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=357&rft.epage=372&rft.pages=357-372&rft.issn=1420-3030&rft.eissn=1421-9700&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000341165&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2859912801%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1267142654&rft_id=info:pmid/22907151&rfr_iscdi=true