The Relation between 6-n-Propylthiouracil Sensitivity and Caries Activity in Schoolchildren
Caries activity tests are being used to assess caries risk in children. In recent years the purpose of most studies has been to develop practical, quick, reliable and economic tests. Clinical studies showed that the difference in sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) is a he...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Caries research 2011-12, Vol.45 (6), p.556-560 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 560 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 556 |
container_title | Caries research |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Oeter, B Ulukapi, I Ulukapi, H Topcuoglu, N Cildir, S |
description | Caries activity tests are being used to assess caries risk in children. In recent years the purpose of most studies has been to develop practical, quick, reliable and economic tests. Clinical studies showed that the difference in sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) is a heritable trait and may influence children’s nutritional habits and caries development. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between PROP sensitivity and caries activity in schoolchildren, in comparison with different caries activity tests. One hundred and twenty children aged between 7 and 12 years (mean age 9.97 ± 1.59) were investigated to determine socioeconomic status and oral hygiene habits, fluoride consumption, DMFT, DMFS, df, dfs, plaque indexes, and nutritional habits. Children were divided into three groups according to their caries risk status based on the Cariogram. The solution test and the PROP-impregnated filter paper test were used together to determine PROP sensitivity. After all associated factors had been controlled, stepwise regression analyses revealed that DMFT and dfs scores were important determinants of PROP. According to dfs, the sensitivity of the Cariogram and of PROP tests was 0.85 and 0.70, respectively, and specificity was 0.32 and 0.33, respectively. There was an inverse significant relationship between PROP sensitivity and DMFT, DMFS, and dfs results (p < 0.01). In conclusion, PROP nontasters were significantly more likely to have high caries risk than PROP tasters (p < 0.01). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000332432 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000332432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>912637982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-610d6ff4fba812c3f1040f493abc3b04c8f7bb0f9f15e0e30750f57ef830ade33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1LHEEQBuBGIrpZPXgPYcgleBit_pyeoyxJFBaUqCB4GHp6qt02sz1r94yy_z4ju-4hl5wKiqcKql5CTiicUSrLcwDgnAnO9siECkbzslAPn8hk7OtcSaUPyeeUngGoUEofkEPGQNBCiwl5vFtg9htb0_suZDX2b4ghU3nIb2K3Wrf9wndDNNa32S2G5Hv_6vt1ZkKTzUz0mLILu-35kN3aRde1duHbJmI4IvvOtAmPt3VK7n_-uJtd5vPrX1ezi3luuRJ9rig0yjnhaqMps9xREOBEyU1teQ3CalfUNbjSUYmAHAoJThboNAfTIOdT8n2zdxW7lwFTXy19sti2JmA3pKpkoEFyWvxfUqZ4UWo2ym__yOfxD2E8oyolaMlk-Y5ON8jGLqWIrlpFvzRxXVGo3pOpdsmM9ut24VAvsdnJjyhG8GUD_pj4hHEHtvN_AVjkkQc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>950852592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Relation between 6-n-Propylthiouracil Sensitivity and Caries Activity in Schoolchildren</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Oeter, B ; Ulukapi, I ; Ulukapi, H ; Topcuoglu, N ; Cildir, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Oeter, B ; Ulukapi, I ; Ulukapi, H ; Topcuoglu, N ; Cildir, S</creatorcontrib><description>Caries activity tests are being used to assess caries risk in children. In recent years the purpose of most studies has been to develop practical, quick, reliable and economic tests. Clinical studies showed that the difference in sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) is a heritable trait and may influence children’s nutritional habits and caries development. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between PROP sensitivity and caries activity in schoolchildren, in comparison with different caries activity tests. One hundred and twenty children aged between 7 and 12 years (mean age 9.97 ± 1.59) were investigated to determine socioeconomic status and oral hygiene habits, fluoride consumption, DMFT, DMFS, df, dfs, plaque indexes, and nutritional habits. Children were divided into three groups according to their caries risk status based on the Cariogram. The solution test and the PROP-impregnated filter paper test were used together to determine PROP sensitivity. After all associated factors had been controlled, stepwise regression analyses revealed that DMFT and dfs scores were important determinants of PROP. According to dfs, the sensitivity of the Cariogram and of PROP tests was 0.85 and 0.70, respectively, and specificity was 0.32 and 0.33, respectively. There was an inverse significant relationship between PROP sensitivity and DMFT, DMFS, and dfs results (p < 0.01). In conclusion, PROP nontasters were significantly more likely to have high caries risk than PROP tasters (p < 0.01).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-6568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-976X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000332432</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22041784</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CAREBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Child ; Dental Caries Activity Tests ; Dental Plaque Index ; Dentistry ; DMF Index ; Feeding Behavior ; Humans ; Oral Hygiene ; Original Paper ; Propylthiouracil ; Regression Analysis ; Risk Factors ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Social Class ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Taste</subject><ispartof>Caries research, 2011-12, Vol.45 (6), p.556-560</ispartof><rights>2011 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-610d6ff4fba812c3f1040f493abc3b04c8f7bb0f9f15e0e30750f57ef830ade33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-610d6ff4fba812c3f1040f493abc3b04c8f7bb0f9f15e0e30750f57ef830ade33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2423,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22041784$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oeter, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulukapi, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulukapi, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topcuoglu, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cildir, S</creatorcontrib><title>The Relation between 6-n-Propylthiouracil Sensitivity and Caries Activity in Schoolchildren</title><title>Caries research</title><addtitle>Caries Res</addtitle><description>Caries activity tests are being used to assess caries risk in children. In recent years the purpose of most studies has been to develop practical, quick, reliable and economic tests. Clinical studies showed that the difference in sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) is a heritable trait and may influence children’s nutritional habits and caries development. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between PROP sensitivity and caries activity in schoolchildren, in comparison with different caries activity tests. One hundred and twenty children aged between 7 and 12 years (mean age 9.97 ± 1.59) were investigated to determine socioeconomic status and oral hygiene habits, fluoride consumption, DMFT, DMFS, df, dfs, plaque indexes, and nutritional habits. Children were divided into three groups according to their caries risk status based on the Cariogram. The solution test and the PROP-impregnated filter paper test were used together to determine PROP sensitivity. After all associated factors had been controlled, stepwise regression analyses revealed that DMFT and dfs scores were important determinants of PROP. According to dfs, the sensitivity of the Cariogram and of PROP tests was 0.85 and 0.70, respectively, and specificity was 0.32 and 0.33, respectively. There was an inverse significant relationship between PROP sensitivity and DMFT, DMFS, and dfs results (p < 0.01). In conclusion, PROP nontasters were significantly more likely to have high caries risk than PROP tasters (p < 0.01).</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Dental Caries Activity Tests</subject><subject>Dental Plaque Index</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>DMF Index</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Oral Hygiene</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Propylthiouracil</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Taste</subject><issn>0008-6568</issn><issn>1421-976X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1LHEEQBuBGIrpZPXgPYcgleBit_pyeoyxJFBaUqCB4GHp6qt02sz1r94yy_z4ju-4hl5wKiqcKql5CTiicUSrLcwDgnAnO9siECkbzslAPn8hk7OtcSaUPyeeUngGoUEofkEPGQNBCiwl5vFtg9htb0_suZDX2b4ghU3nIb2K3Wrf9wndDNNa32S2G5Hv_6vt1ZkKTzUz0mLILu-35kN3aRde1duHbJmI4IvvOtAmPt3VK7n_-uJtd5vPrX1ezi3luuRJ9rig0yjnhaqMps9xREOBEyU1teQ3CalfUNbjSUYmAHAoJThboNAfTIOdT8n2zdxW7lwFTXy19sti2JmA3pKpkoEFyWvxfUqZ4UWo2ym__yOfxD2E8oyolaMlk-Y5ON8jGLqWIrlpFvzRxXVGo3pOpdsmM9ut24VAvsdnJjyhG8GUD_pj4hHEHtvN_AVjkkQc</recordid><startdate>201112</startdate><enddate>201112</enddate><creator>Oeter, B</creator><creator>Ulukapi, I</creator><creator>Ulukapi, H</creator><creator>Topcuoglu, N</creator><creator>Cildir, S</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201112</creationdate><title>The Relation between 6-n-Propylthiouracil Sensitivity and Caries Activity in Schoolchildren</title><author>Oeter, B ; Ulukapi, I ; Ulukapi, H ; Topcuoglu, N ; Cildir, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-610d6ff4fba812c3f1040f493abc3b04c8f7bb0f9f15e0e30750f57ef830ade33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Dental Caries Activity Tests</topic><topic>Dental Plaque Index</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>DMF Index</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Oral Hygiene</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Propylthiouracil</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Taste</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oeter, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulukapi, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulukapi, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topcuoglu, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cildir, S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Caries research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oeter, B</au><au>Ulukapi, I</au><au>Ulukapi, H</au><au>Topcuoglu, N</au><au>Cildir, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Relation between 6-n-Propylthiouracil Sensitivity and Caries Activity in Schoolchildren</atitle><jtitle>Caries research</jtitle><addtitle>Caries Res</addtitle><date>2011-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>556</spage><epage>560</epage><pages>556-560</pages><issn>0008-6568</issn><eissn>1421-976X</eissn><coden>CAREBK</coden><abstract>Caries activity tests are being used to assess caries risk in children. In recent years the purpose of most studies has been to develop practical, quick, reliable and economic tests. Clinical studies showed that the difference in sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) is a heritable trait and may influence children’s nutritional habits and caries development. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between PROP sensitivity and caries activity in schoolchildren, in comparison with different caries activity tests. One hundred and twenty children aged between 7 and 12 years (mean age 9.97 ± 1.59) were investigated to determine socioeconomic status and oral hygiene habits, fluoride consumption, DMFT, DMFS, df, dfs, plaque indexes, and nutritional habits. Children were divided into three groups according to their caries risk status based on the Cariogram. The solution test and the PROP-impregnated filter paper test were used together to determine PROP sensitivity. After all associated factors had been controlled, stepwise regression analyses revealed that DMFT and dfs scores were important determinants of PROP. According to dfs, the sensitivity of the Cariogram and of PROP tests was 0.85 and 0.70, respectively, and specificity was 0.32 and 0.33, respectively. There was an inverse significant relationship between PROP sensitivity and DMFT, DMFS, and dfs results (p < 0.01). In conclusion, PROP nontasters were significantly more likely to have high caries risk than PROP tasters (p < 0.01).</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>22041784</pmid><doi>10.1159/000332432</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-6568 |
ispartof | Caries research, 2011-12, Vol.45 (6), p.556-560 |
issn | 0008-6568 1421-976X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000332432 |
source | Karger Journals; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Child Dental Caries Activity Tests Dental Plaque Index Dentistry DMF Index Feeding Behavior Humans Oral Hygiene Original Paper Propylthiouracil Regression Analysis Risk Factors Sensitivity and Specificity Social Class Statistics, Nonparametric Taste |
title | The Relation between 6-n-Propylthiouracil Sensitivity and Caries Activity in Schoolchildren |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A22%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Relation%20between%206-n-Propylthiouracil%20Sensitivity%20and%20Caries%20Activity%20in%20Schoolchildren&rft.jtitle=Caries%20research&rft.au=Oeter,%20B&rft.date=2011-12&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=556&rft.epage=560&rft.pages=556-560&rft.issn=0008-6568&rft.eissn=1421-976X&rft.coden=CAREBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000332432&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E912637982%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=950852592&rft_id=info:pmid/22041784&rfr_iscdi=true |