Karyotype Reorganisation in the subtilis Group of Birch Mice (Rodentia, Dipodidae, Sicista): Unexpected Taxonomic Diversity within a Limited Distribution
Conventional cytogenetic studies of Sicista subtilis and S. severtzovi (Dipodidae, Sicistinae), both attributable to the subtilis group of birch mice, revealed extensive karyotype diversity with 2n = 16–26 and NFa values of 26–46 indicating the overwhelming non-Robertsonian nature of chromosomal reo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cytogenetic and genome research 2011-02, Vol.132 (4), p.271-288 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 288 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 271 |
container_title | Cytogenetic and genome research |
container_volume | 132 |
creator | Kovalskaya, Y.M. Aniskin, V.M. Bogomolov, P.L. Surov, A.V. Tikhonov, I.A. Tikhonova, G.N. Robinson, T.J. Volobouev, V.T. |
description | Conventional cytogenetic studies of Sicista subtilis and S. severtzovi (Dipodidae, Sicistinae), both attributable to the subtilis group of birch mice, revealed extensive karyotype diversity with 2n = 16–26 and NFa values of 26–46 indicating the overwhelming non-Robertsonian nature of chromosomal reorganization in these species. The numerical and structural chromosome variability was principally found in specimens located within a confined region of the East European (Russian) Plain. The approximately 135,000-km 2 area occurs in the vicinity of the Don River bend between 49°13’N/43°46’E and 51°32’N/36°16’E. The detection of cytotypes sharing similar 2n and NF values, but having morphologically distinct chromosomes, suggests that these may result from polymorphisms present both within recognized species and in cryptic taxa not hitherto described. We conducted a comprehensive, comparative chromosome banding analysis of 52 birch mice (21 localities) referable to the subtilis group and report the presence of 5 distinct karyotypes, each characterized by a combination of stable, variable, and partly overlapping 2n/NFa values. These karyotypes differed from each other by 10–29 structural chromosomal rearrangements (18.1 ± 6.3) that comprised Rb fusions/fissions (42.2%), pericentric inversions (31.1%), and tandem translocations (22.2%). The composition, and the high numbers of these chromosomal changes, is likely to provide an effective means of post-mating isolation, suggesting that taxonomic diversity within the subtilis group is larger than currently accepted. Additionally, we report the frequent fixation of tandem translocations in sample populations, one of which was found in a polymorphic state representing, as far as we are aware, the first case of an in statu nascendi tandem fusion in wild populations. Moreover, our data revealed that bi-armed chromosomes were involved in fusions detected in some of the subtilis taxa. In each instance, however, fusions were preceded by pericentric inversions that transform one or both bi-armed chromosomes into acrocentrics resulting in either centromere-telomere or Robertsonian translocations. Finally, a phylogenetic scenario inferred from a cladistic analysis of the chromosomal data suggests that the extensive karyotypic diversification within the subtilis group in the south-east region of the Russian Plain most likely results from fragmentation of a continuously distributed, ancestral population. It is thought that this o |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000322823 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000322823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>856788524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-11e8e364553154b5291c4e7d91d68690e40699c330a29ffd458618610962f71a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UFvFCEUB_CJ0dhaPXg3hnjRJl0FBhjwpq2txjUmtU28TVjmTffVnWEExnY_Sr9tmey6B08GEt7h9x6Qf1E8Z_QtY9K8o5SWnGtePij2meBipqX5-XBXa7ZXPInxmlKmhVSPiz3O8lKi2i_uvtqw9mk9ADkHH65sj9Em9D3BnqQlkDguEq4wkrPgx4H4lnzE4JbkGzogb859A31Ce0ROcPANNhaOyA90GJM9fE8ue7gdwCVoyIW99b3v0GX5B0LEtCY3mJb5Gkvm2OGETnJfwMU4PeBp8ai1qwjPtudBcXn66eL482z-_ezL8Yf5zJVKpBljoCFXUpZMioXkhjkBVWNYo7QyFARVxriypJabtm2E1IrlTY3ibcVseVC83swdgv89Qkx1h9HBamV78GOstVSV1pKL_5BMVFJWPMtX_8hrP4Y-f2NCihqhJ3S4QS74GAO09RCwy3HUjNZTrvUu12xfbgeOiw6anfwbZAYvNuCXDVcQdmDbfw9KEKVk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>851609482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Karyotype Reorganisation in the subtilis Group of Birch Mice (Rodentia, Dipodidae, Sicista): Unexpected Taxonomic Diversity within a Limited Distribution</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kovalskaya, Y.M. ; Aniskin, V.M. ; Bogomolov, P.L. ; Surov, A.V. ; Tikhonov, I.A. ; Tikhonova, G.N. ; Robinson, T.J. ; Volobouev, V.T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kovalskaya, Y.M. ; Aniskin, V.M. ; Bogomolov, P.L. ; Surov, A.V. ; Tikhonov, I.A. ; Tikhonova, G.N. ; Robinson, T.J. ; Volobouev, V.T.</creatorcontrib><description>Conventional cytogenetic studies of Sicista subtilis and S. severtzovi (Dipodidae, Sicistinae), both attributable to the subtilis group of birch mice, revealed extensive karyotype diversity with 2n = 16–26 and NFa values of 26–46 indicating the overwhelming non-Robertsonian nature of chromosomal reorganization in these species. The numerical and structural chromosome variability was principally found in specimens located within a confined region of the East European (Russian) Plain. The approximately 135,000-km 2 area occurs in the vicinity of the Don River bend between 49°13’N/43°46’E and 51°32’N/36°16’E. The detection of cytotypes sharing similar 2n and NF values, but having morphologically distinct chromosomes, suggests that these may result from polymorphisms present both within recognized species and in cryptic taxa not hitherto described. We conducted a comprehensive, comparative chromosome banding analysis of 52 birch mice (21 localities) referable to the subtilis group and report the presence of 5 distinct karyotypes, each characterized by a combination of stable, variable, and partly overlapping 2n/NFa values. These karyotypes differed from each other by 10–29 structural chromosomal rearrangements (18.1 ± 6.3) that comprised Rb fusions/fissions (42.2%), pericentric inversions (31.1%), and tandem translocations (22.2%). The composition, and the high numbers of these chromosomal changes, is likely to provide an effective means of post-mating isolation, suggesting that taxonomic diversity within the subtilis group is larger than currently accepted. Additionally, we report the frequent fixation of tandem translocations in sample populations, one of which was found in a polymorphic state representing, as far as we are aware, the first case of an in statu nascendi tandem fusion in wild populations. Moreover, our data revealed that bi-armed chromosomes were involved in fusions detected in some of the subtilis taxa. In each instance, however, fusions were preceded by pericentric inversions that transform one or both bi-armed chromosomes into acrocentrics resulting in either centromere-telomere or Robertsonian translocations. Finally, a phylogenetic scenario inferred from a cladistic analysis of the chromosomal data suggests that the extensive karyotypic diversification within the subtilis group in the south-east region of the Russian Plain most likely results from fragmentation of a continuously distributed, ancestral population. It is thought that this occurred at the last glacial maximum (18,000–14,000 years B.P.), and that the process of isolation has been exacerbated by increasing human activity in the region in modern times.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1424-8581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1424-859X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000322823</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21212647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Animals ; Centromere ; Chromosome Banding ; Chromosome Inversion - genetics ; Chromosomes, Mammalian - genetics ; Dipodidae ; Female ; Genetic Variation ; Karyotyping ; Male ; Original Article ; Phylogeny ; Rodentia ; Rodentia - classification ; Rodentia - genetics ; Russia ; Telomere ; Translocation, Genetic - genetics</subject><ispartof>Cytogenetic and genome research, 2011-02, Vol.132 (4), p.271-288</ispartof><rights>2011 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-11e8e364553154b5291c4e7d91d68690e40699c330a29ffd458618610962f71a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-11e8e364553154b5291c4e7d91d68690e40699c330a29ffd458618610962f71a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2423,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21212647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kovalskaya, Y.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aniskin, V.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogomolov, P.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surov, A.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tikhonov, I.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tikhonova, G.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, T.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volobouev, V.T.</creatorcontrib><title>Karyotype Reorganisation in the subtilis Group of Birch Mice (Rodentia, Dipodidae, Sicista): Unexpected Taxonomic Diversity within a Limited Distribution</title><title>Cytogenetic and genome research</title><addtitle>Cytogenet Genome Res</addtitle><description>Conventional cytogenetic studies of Sicista subtilis and S. severtzovi (Dipodidae, Sicistinae), both attributable to the subtilis group of birch mice, revealed extensive karyotype diversity with 2n = 16–26 and NFa values of 26–46 indicating the overwhelming non-Robertsonian nature of chromosomal reorganization in these species. The numerical and structural chromosome variability was principally found in specimens located within a confined region of the East European (Russian) Plain. The approximately 135,000-km 2 area occurs in the vicinity of the Don River bend between 49°13’N/43°46’E and 51°32’N/36°16’E. The detection of cytotypes sharing similar 2n and NF values, but having morphologically distinct chromosomes, suggests that these may result from polymorphisms present both within recognized species and in cryptic taxa not hitherto described. We conducted a comprehensive, comparative chromosome banding analysis of 52 birch mice (21 localities) referable to the subtilis group and report the presence of 5 distinct karyotypes, each characterized by a combination of stable, variable, and partly overlapping 2n/NFa values. These karyotypes differed from each other by 10–29 structural chromosomal rearrangements (18.1 ± 6.3) that comprised Rb fusions/fissions (42.2%), pericentric inversions (31.1%), and tandem translocations (22.2%). The composition, and the high numbers of these chromosomal changes, is likely to provide an effective means of post-mating isolation, suggesting that taxonomic diversity within the subtilis group is larger than currently accepted. Additionally, we report the frequent fixation of tandem translocations in sample populations, one of which was found in a polymorphic state representing, as far as we are aware, the first case of an in statu nascendi tandem fusion in wild populations. Moreover, our data revealed that bi-armed chromosomes were involved in fusions detected in some of the subtilis taxa. In each instance, however, fusions were preceded by pericentric inversions that transform one or both bi-armed chromosomes into acrocentrics resulting in either centromere-telomere or Robertsonian translocations. Finally, a phylogenetic scenario inferred from a cladistic analysis of the chromosomal data suggests that the extensive karyotypic diversification within the subtilis group in the south-east region of the Russian Plain most likely results from fragmentation of a continuously distributed, ancestral population. It is thought that this occurred at the last glacial maximum (18,000–14,000 years B.P.), and that the process of isolation has been exacerbated by increasing human activity in the region in modern times.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Centromere</subject><subject>Chromosome Banding</subject><subject>Chromosome Inversion - genetics</subject><subject>Chromosomes, Mammalian - genetics</subject><subject>Dipodidae</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Karyotyping</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Rodentia</subject><subject>Rodentia - classification</subject><subject>Rodentia - genetics</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>Telomere</subject><subject>Translocation, Genetic - genetics</subject><issn>1424-8581</issn><issn>1424-859X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0UFvFCEUB_CJ0dhaPXg3hnjRJl0FBhjwpq2txjUmtU28TVjmTffVnWEExnY_Sr9tmey6B08GEt7h9x6Qf1E8Z_QtY9K8o5SWnGtePij2meBipqX5-XBXa7ZXPInxmlKmhVSPiz3O8lKi2i_uvtqw9mk9ADkHH65sj9Em9D3BnqQlkDguEq4wkrPgx4H4lnzE4JbkGzogb859A31Ce0ROcPANNhaOyA90GJM9fE8ue7gdwCVoyIW99b3v0GX5B0LEtCY3mJb5Gkvm2OGETnJfwMU4PeBp8ai1qwjPtudBcXn66eL482z-_ezL8Yf5zJVKpBljoCFXUpZMioXkhjkBVWNYo7QyFARVxriypJabtm2E1IrlTY3ibcVseVC83swdgv89Qkx1h9HBamV78GOstVSV1pKL_5BMVFJWPMtX_8hrP4Y-f2NCihqhJ3S4QS74GAO09RCwy3HUjNZTrvUu12xfbgeOiw6anfwbZAYvNuCXDVcQdmDbfw9KEKVk</recordid><startdate>201102</startdate><enddate>201102</enddate><creator>Kovalskaya, Y.M.</creator><creator>Aniskin, V.M.</creator><creator>Bogomolov, P.L.</creator><creator>Surov, A.V.</creator><creator>Tikhonov, I.A.</creator><creator>Tikhonova, G.N.</creator><creator>Robinson, T.J.</creator><creator>Volobouev, V.T.</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201102</creationdate><title>Karyotype Reorganisation in the subtilis Group of Birch Mice (Rodentia, Dipodidae, Sicista): Unexpected Taxonomic Diversity within a Limited Distribution</title><author>Kovalskaya, Y.M. ; Aniskin, V.M. ; Bogomolov, P.L. ; Surov, A.V. ; Tikhonov, I.A. ; Tikhonova, G.N. ; Robinson, T.J. ; Volobouev, V.T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-11e8e364553154b5291c4e7d91d68690e40699c330a29ffd458618610962f71a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Centromere</topic><topic>Chromosome Banding</topic><topic>Chromosome Inversion - genetics</topic><topic>Chromosomes, Mammalian - genetics</topic><topic>Dipodidae</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Karyotyping</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Rodentia</topic><topic>Rodentia - classification</topic><topic>Rodentia - genetics</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>Telomere</topic><topic>Translocation, Genetic - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kovalskaya, Y.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aniskin, V.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogomolov, P.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surov, A.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tikhonov, I.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tikhonova, G.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, T.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volobouev, V.T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cytogenetic and genome research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kovalskaya, Y.M.</au><au>Aniskin, V.M.</au><au>Bogomolov, P.L.</au><au>Surov, A.V.</au><au>Tikhonov, I.A.</au><au>Tikhonova, G.N.</au><au>Robinson, T.J.</au><au>Volobouev, V.T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Karyotype Reorganisation in the subtilis Group of Birch Mice (Rodentia, Dipodidae, Sicista): Unexpected Taxonomic Diversity within a Limited Distribution</atitle><jtitle>Cytogenetic and genome research</jtitle><addtitle>Cytogenet Genome Res</addtitle><date>2011-02</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>271</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>271-288</pages><issn>1424-8581</issn><eissn>1424-859X</eissn><abstract>Conventional cytogenetic studies of Sicista subtilis and S. severtzovi (Dipodidae, Sicistinae), both attributable to the subtilis group of birch mice, revealed extensive karyotype diversity with 2n = 16–26 and NFa values of 26–46 indicating the overwhelming non-Robertsonian nature of chromosomal reorganization in these species. The numerical and structural chromosome variability was principally found in specimens located within a confined region of the East European (Russian) Plain. The approximately 135,000-km 2 area occurs in the vicinity of the Don River bend between 49°13’N/43°46’E and 51°32’N/36°16’E. The detection of cytotypes sharing similar 2n and NF values, but having morphologically distinct chromosomes, suggests that these may result from polymorphisms present both within recognized species and in cryptic taxa not hitherto described. We conducted a comprehensive, comparative chromosome banding analysis of 52 birch mice (21 localities) referable to the subtilis group and report the presence of 5 distinct karyotypes, each characterized by a combination of stable, variable, and partly overlapping 2n/NFa values. These karyotypes differed from each other by 10–29 structural chromosomal rearrangements (18.1 ± 6.3) that comprised Rb fusions/fissions (42.2%), pericentric inversions (31.1%), and tandem translocations (22.2%). The composition, and the high numbers of these chromosomal changes, is likely to provide an effective means of post-mating isolation, suggesting that taxonomic diversity within the subtilis group is larger than currently accepted. Additionally, we report the frequent fixation of tandem translocations in sample populations, one of which was found in a polymorphic state representing, as far as we are aware, the first case of an in statu nascendi tandem fusion in wild populations. Moreover, our data revealed that bi-armed chromosomes were involved in fusions detected in some of the subtilis taxa. In each instance, however, fusions were preceded by pericentric inversions that transform one or both bi-armed chromosomes into acrocentrics resulting in either centromere-telomere or Robertsonian translocations. Finally, a phylogenetic scenario inferred from a cladistic analysis of the chromosomal data suggests that the extensive karyotypic diversification within the subtilis group in the south-east region of the Russian Plain most likely results from fragmentation of a continuously distributed, ancestral population. It is thought that this occurred at the last glacial maximum (18,000–14,000 years B.P.), and that the process of isolation has been exacerbated by increasing human activity in the region in modern times.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>21212647</pmid><doi>10.1159/000322823</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1424-8581 |
ispartof | Cytogenetic and genome research, 2011-02, Vol.132 (4), p.271-288 |
issn | 1424-8581 1424-859X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000322823 |
source | Karger Journals; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Centromere Chromosome Banding Chromosome Inversion - genetics Chromosomes, Mammalian - genetics Dipodidae Female Genetic Variation Karyotyping Male Original Article Phylogeny Rodentia Rodentia - classification Rodentia - genetics Russia Telomere Translocation, Genetic - genetics |
title | Karyotype Reorganisation in the subtilis Group of Birch Mice (Rodentia, Dipodidae, Sicista): Unexpected Taxonomic Diversity within a Limited Distribution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T20%3A14%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Karyotype%20Reorganisation%20in%20the%20subtilis%20Group%20of%20Birch%20Mice%20(Rodentia,%20Dipodidae,%20Sicista):%20Unexpected%20Taxonomic%20Diversity%20within%20a%20Limited%20Distribution&rft.jtitle=Cytogenetic%20and%20genome%20research&rft.au=Kovalskaya,%20Y.M.&rft.date=2011-02&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=271&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=271-288&rft.issn=1424-8581&rft.eissn=1424-859X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000322823&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E856788524%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=851609482&rft_id=info:pmid/21212647&rfr_iscdi=true |