Docetaxel and Gemcitabine in the Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma – A Single-Center Experience
Introduction: Advanced stage/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has a poor prognosis especially after failure of the established first-line treatment. In patients with relapsed leiomyosarcoma, however, the combination of gemcitabine (G) and docetaxel (D) recently has emerged as a valuable salvage...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oncology research and treatment 2008-01, Vol.31 (1-2), p.11-16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 16 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 11 |
container_title | Oncology research and treatment |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Ebeling, Peter Eisele, Lewin Schuett, Philipp Bauer, Sebastian Schuette, Jochen Moritz, Thomas Seeber, Siegfried Flasshove, Michael |
description | Introduction: Advanced stage/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma
(STS) has a poor prognosis especially after failure
of the established first-line treatment. In patients with relapsed
leiomyosarcoma, however, the combination of
gemcitabine (G) and docetaxel (D) recently has emerged
as a valuable salvage therapy. Patients and Methods: A
retrospective analysis of G (900 mg/m2, days 1+8) and D
(100 mg/m2, day 8) was performed in 34 patients with
STS, and response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), time
to progression (TTP), and toxicities were evaluated. Results:
Analysis of these 34 patients revealed a RR of 15%
with no complete remission (CR) and 5 partial remissions
(PR). Of note, 4/5 PR were achieved in patients with
leiomyosarcoma. In 13 patients (38%) disease stabilization
(SD) could be achieved resulting in a clinical benefit
rate (CBR), defined as CR+PR+SD, of 53%. Median OS
was 12.5 and TTP was 2.4 months for the whole group
and 2.8 months for patients with leiomyosarcoma. A progression-
free rate at 3 months of 38% and 45%, respectively,
was observed in these 2 groups. Major side effects
were 47% hematological and 26% grade 3/4 nonhematological
toxicity. Conclusion: With regard to the observed
CBR further use of GD seems to be warranted even in
pretreated patients with STS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000111756 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>karger_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000111756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>111756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-7b560699ae40a9de025c98941c877e274b79c4e91f0ab6e22b591e54081338ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0L1OwzAUBWALgWhVOrAzeGUI-Drx31iVUpAqMbTMwXFviqFJKttIZeMdeEOehFZFZTpXOp_ucAi5BHYDIMwtYwwAlJAnpM-5kZngkp8eb8V6ZBjj255xIbQy56QHmkudm6JPXu46h8lucU1tu6RTbJxPtvItUt_S9Ip0EdCmBttEu5rOuzrRhY_xA-ncBtc1lv58fdMRnft2tcZsvIMY6GS7weCxdXhBzmq7jjj8ywF5vp8sxg_Z7Gn6OB7NMpeDTJmqhGTSGIsFs2aJjAtntCnAaaWQq6JSxhVooGa2ksh5JQygKJiGPNeI-YBcH_660MUYsC43wTc2fJbAyv1Q5XGonb062HcbVhj-5aH-BYXQYVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Docetaxel and Gemcitabine in the Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma – A Single-Center Experience</title><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Ebeling, Peter ; Eisele, Lewin ; Schuett, Philipp ; Bauer, Sebastian ; Schuette, Jochen ; Moritz, Thomas ; Seeber, Siegfried ; Flasshove, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Ebeling, Peter ; Eisele, Lewin ; Schuett, Philipp ; Bauer, Sebastian ; Schuette, Jochen ; Moritz, Thomas ; Seeber, Siegfried ; Flasshove, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Advanced stage/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma
(STS) has a poor prognosis especially after failure
of the established first-line treatment. In patients with relapsed
leiomyosarcoma, however, the combination of
gemcitabine (G) and docetaxel (D) recently has emerged
as a valuable salvage therapy. Patients and Methods: A
retrospective analysis of G (900 mg/m2, days 1+8) and D
(100 mg/m2, day 8) was performed in 34 patients with
STS, and response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), time
to progression (TTP), and toxicities were evaluated. Results:
Analysis of these 34 patients revealed a RR of 15%
with no complete remission (CR) and 5 partial remissions
(PR). Of note, 4/5 PR were achieved in patients with
leiomyosarcoma. In 13 patients (38%) disease stabilization
(SD) could be achieved resulting in a clinical benefit
rate (CBR), defined as CR+PR+SD, of 53%. Median OS
was 12.5 and TTP was 2.4 months for the whole group
and 2.8 months for patients with leiomyosarcoma. A progression-
free rate at 3 months of 38% and 45%, respectively,
was observed in these 2 groups. Major side effects
were 47% hematological and 26% grade 3/4 nonhematological
toxicity. Conclusion: With regard to the observed
CBR further use of GD seems to be warranted even in
pretreated patients with STS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2296-5270</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0378-584X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2296-5262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000111756</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18268394</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland</publisher><subject>Original Article · Originalarbeit</subject><ispartof>Oncology research and treatment, 2008-01, Vol.31 (1-2), p.11-16</ispartof><rights>2008 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-7b560699ae40a9de025c98941c877e274b79c4e91f0ab6e22b591e54081338ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-7b560699ae40a9de025c98941c877e274b79c4e91f0ab6e22b591e54081338ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ebeling, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisele, Lewin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuett, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuette, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moritz, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeber, Siegfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flasshove, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Docetaxel and Gemcitabine in the Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma – A Single-Center Experience</title><title>Oncology research and treatment</title><addtitle>Oncol Res Treat</addtitle><description>Introduction: Advanced stage/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma
(STS) has a poor prognosis especially after failure
of the established first-line treatment. In patients with relapsed
leiomyosarcoma, however, the combination of
gemcitabine (G) and docetaxel (D) recently has emerged
as a valuable salvage therapy. Patients and Methods: A
retrospective analysis of G (900 mg/m2, days 1+8) and D
(100 mg/m2, day 8) was performed in 34 patients with
STS, and response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), time
to progression (TTP), and toxicities were evaluated. Results:
Analysis of these 34 patients revealed a RR of 15%
with no complete remission (CR) and 5 partial remissions
(PR). Of note, 4/5 PR were achieved in patients with
leiomyosarcoma. In 13 patients (38%) disease stabilization
(SD) could be achieved resulting in a clinical benefit
rate (CBR), defined as CR+PR+SD, of 53%. Median OS
was 12.5 and TTP was 2.4 months for the whole group
and 2.8 months for patients with leiomyosarcoma. A progression-
free rate at 3 months of 38% and 45%, respectively,
was observed in these 2 groups. Major side effects
were 47% hematological and 26% grade 3/4 nonhematological
toxicity. Conclusion: With regard to the observed
CBR further use of GD seems to be warranted even in
pretreated patients with STS.</description><subject>Original Article · Originalarbeit</subject><issn>2296-5270</issn><issn>0378-584X</issn><issn>2296-5262</issn><issn>1423-0240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0L1OwzAUBWALgWhVOrAzeGUI-Drx31iVUpAqMbTMwXFviqFJKttIZeMdeEOehFZFZTpXOp_ucAi5BHYDIMwtYwwAlJAnpM-5kZngkp8eb8V6ZBjj255xIbQy56QHmkudm6JPXu46h8lucU1tu6RTbJxPtvItUt_S9Ip0EdCmBttEu5rOuzrRhY_xA-ncBtc1lv58fdMRnft2tcZsvIMY6GS7weCxdXhBzmq7jjj8ywF5vp8sxg_Z7Gn6OB7NMpeDTJmqhGTSGIsFs2aJjAtntCnAaaWQq6JSxhVooGa2ksh5JQygKJiGPNeI-YBcH_660MUYsC43wTc2fJbAyv1Q5XGonb062HcbVhj-5aH-BYXQYVw</recordid><startdate>20080101</startdate><enddate>20080101</enddate><creator>Ebeling, Peter</creator><creator>Eisele, Lewin</creator><creator>Schuett, Philipp</creator><creator>Bauer, Sebastian</creator><creator>Schuette, Jochen</creator><creator>Moritz, Thomas</creator><creator>Seeber, Siegfried</creator><creator>Flasshove, Michael</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080101</creationdate><title>Docetaxel and Gemcitabine in the Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma – A Single-Center Experience</title><author>Ebeling, Peter ; Eisele, Lewin ; Schuett, Philipp ; Bauer, Sebastian ; Schuette, Jochen ; Moritz, Thomas ; Seeber, Siegfried ; Flasshove, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-7b560699ae40a9de025c98941c877e274b79c4e91f0ab6e22b591e54081338ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Original Article · Originalarbeit</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ebeling, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisele, Lewin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuett, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuette, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moritz, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seeber, Siegfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flasshove, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Oncology research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ebeling, Peter</au><au>Eisele, Lewin</au><au>Schuett, Philipp</au><au>Bauer, Sebastian</au><au>Schuette, Jochen</au><au>Moritz, Thomas</au><au>Seeber, Siegfried</au><au>Flasshove, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Docetaxel and Gemcitabine in the Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma – A Single-Center Experience</atitle><jtitle>Oncology research and treatment</jtitle><addtitle>Oncol Res Treat</addtitle><date>2008-01-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>11-16</pages><issn>2296-5270</issn><issn>0378-584X</issn><eissn>2296-5262</eissn><eissn>1423-0240</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Advanced stage/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma
(STS) has a poor prognosis especially after failure
of the established first-line treatment. In patients with relapsed
leiomyosarcoma, however, the combination of
gemcitabine (G) and docetaxel (D) recently has emerged
as a valuable salvage therapy. Patients and Methods: A
retrospective analysis of G (900 mg/m2, days 1+8) and D
(100 mg/m2, day 8) was performed in 34 patients with
STS, and response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), time
to progression (TTP), and toxicities were evaluated. Results:
Analysis of these 34 patients revealed a RR of 15%
with no complete remission (CR) and 5 partial remissions
(PR). Of note, 4/5 PR were achieved in patients with
leiomyosarcoma. In 13 patients (38%) disease stabilization
(SD) could be achieved resulting in a clinical benefit
rate (CBR), defined as CR+PR+SD, of 53%. Median OS
was 12.5 and TTP was 2.4 months for the whole group
and 2.8 months for patients with leiomyosarcoma. A progression-
free rate at 3 months of 38% and 45%, respectively,
was observed in these 2 groups. Major side effects
were 47% hematological and 26% grade 3/4 nonhematological
toxicity. Conclusion: With regard to the observed
CBR further use of GD seems to be warranted even in
pretreated patients with STS.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pmid>18268394</pmid><doi>10.1159/000111756</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2296-5270 |
ispartof | Oncology research and treatment, 2008-01, Vol.31 (1-2), p.11-16 |
issn | 2296-5270 0378-584X 2296-5262 1423-0240 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000111756 |
source | Karger Journals |
subjects | Original Article · Originalarbeit |
title | Docetaxel and Gemcitabine in the Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma – A Single-Center Experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A28%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-karger_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Docetaxel%20and%20Gemcitabine%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Soft%20Tissue%20Sarcoma%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Single-Center%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Oncology%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Ebeling,%20Peter&rft.date=2008-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=11-16&rft.issn=2296-5270&rft.eissn=2296-5262&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000111756&rft_dat=%3Ckarger_cross%3E111756%3C/karger_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/18268394&rfr_iscdi=true |