Divergent Selection for Pentobarbital-Induced Sedation Times in Mice

Divergent selection for pentobarbital sedation-time response was practiced in mice for 9 generations. At the end of 9 generations of selection, the long-sedation-time line (LST) slept an average of 433 min; the short sedation time line (SST) slept an average of 29 min. The control line (C) slept an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pharmacology 1998-02, Vol.56 (2), p.92-100
Hauptverfasser: Stino, Farid K.R., Samaan, Saber S., Kolta, Malak G., Mizinga, Kemmy M., Soliman, Karam F.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 100
container_issue 2
container_start_page 92
container_title Pharmacology
container_volume 56
creator Stino, Farid K.R.
Samaan, Saber S.
Kolta, Malak G.
Mizinga, Kemmy M.
Soliman, Karam F.A.
description Divergent selection for pentobarbital sedation-time response was practiced in mice for 9 generations. At the end of 9 generations of selection, the long-sedation-time line (LST) slept an average of 433 min; the short sedation time line (SST) slept an average of 29 min. The control line (C) slept an average of 71 min. These differences represent an almost 15-fold increase in sedation time for the LST compared to the SST line and a 6-fold increase compared to the C line. The SST line slept about 40% less than the C line after 9 generations of selection (measured in tenth generation progeny). Analysis of selection differentials and realized heritabilities indicated that selection response did not diminish after 9 generations of selection. Realized heritabilities for sedation time ranged from 0.43 to 0.83 for the LST line and from 0.55 to 0.81 for the SST line. Realized heritabilities did not decrease in magnitude due to selection progress, indicating that more progress can still be achieved. Comparing corrected (for environmental factors) to uncorrected heritabilities showed the importance of including a control line in selection experiments. Crossing of lines to study gene action responsible for this trait revealed that this trait was controlled by a number of genes with additive gene action without dominance, overdominance, epistasis, or maternal effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000028186
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000028186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79715816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-1f61c4d656354c95cf56dbb9eae75f3d02fd436987b0e421764fd6545133c8733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0M1LwzAYBvAgypzTg2cRioLgoZo038exqRtMHDjPoc2HVLt2Jq3gf2_c5g5iLi_k-eUlPACcIniDEJW3MJ5MIMH2QB-RDKcQI7wP-jDOlEOUHYKjEN6iYhkXPdCTRBLIeB-Mx-Wn9a-2bpNnW1ndlk2duMYn83jVFLkvyjav0mltOm1NNCZfk0W5tCEp6-Sx1PYYHLi8CvZkOwfg5f5uMZqks6eH6Wg4SzWmtE2RY0gTwyjDlGhJtaPMFIW0ueXUYQMzZwhmUvACWpIhzoiLmlCEsRYc4wG42uxd-eajs6FVyzJoW1V5bZsuKC45ogKxCC__wLem83X8m0KZwAJJxmRU1xulfROCt06tfLnM_ZdCUP30qna9Rnu-3dgVS2t2cltkzM82-Xse2_S7_Pf1xb_pfDJcA7UyDn8DF9WEhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1283819669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Divergent Selection for Pentobarbital-Induced Sedation Times in Mice</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Stino, Farid K.R. ; Samaan, Saber S. ; Kolta, Malak G. ; Mizinga, Kemmy M. ; Soliman, Karam F.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stino, Farid K.R. ; Samaan, Saber S. ; Kolta, Malak G. ; Mizinga, Kemmy M. ; Soliman, Karam F.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Divergent selection for pentobarbital sedation-time response was practiced in mice for 9 generations. At the end of 9 generations of selection, the long-sedation-time line (LST) slept an average of 433 min; the short sedation time line (SST) slept an average of 29 min. The control line (C) slept an average of 71 min. These differences represent an almost 15-fold increase in sedation time for the LST compared to the SST line and a 6-fold increase compared to the C line. The SST line slept about 40% less than the C line after 9 generations of selection (measured in tenth generation progeny). Analysis of selection differentials and realized heritabilities indicated that selection response did not diminish after 9 generations of selection. Realized heritabilities for sedation time ranged from 0.43 to 0.83 for the LST line and from 0.55 to 0.81 for the SST line. Realized heritabilities did not decrease in magnitude due to selection progress, indicating that more progress can still be achieved. Comparing corrected (for environmental factors) to uncorrected heritabilities showed the importance of including a control line in selection experiments. Crossing of lines to study gene action responsible for this trait revealed that this trait was controlled by a number of genes with additive gene action without dominance, overdominance, epistasis, or maternal effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-7012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0313</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000028186</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9494067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Animals ; Drug Resistance - genetics ; Female ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacology ; Inbreeding ; Male ; Mice ; Original Paper ; Pentobarbital - pharmacology ; Selection, Genetic ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Pharmacology, 1998-02, Vol.56 (2), p.92-100</ispartof><rights>1998 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 1998 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-1f61c4d656354c95cf56dbb9eae75f3d02fd436987b0e421764fd6545133c8733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-1f61c4d656354c95cf56dbb9eae75f3d02fd436987b0e421764fd6545133c8733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,2423,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9494067$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stino, Farid K.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samaan, Saber S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolta, Malak G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizinga, Kemmy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soliman, Karam F.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Divergent Selection for Pentobarbital-Induced Sedation Times in Mice</title><title>Pharmacology</title><addtitle>Pharmacology</addtitle><description>Divergent selection for pentobarbital sedation-time response was practiced in mice for 9 generations. At the end of 9 generations of selection, the long-sedation-time line (LST) slept an average of 433 min; the short sedation time line (SST) slept an average of 29 min. The control line (C) slept an average of 71 min. These differences represent an almost 15-fold increase in sedation time for the LST compared to the SST line and a 6-fold increase compared to the C line. The SST line slept about 40% less than the C line after 9 generations of selection (measured in tenth generation progeny). Analysis of selection differentials and realized heritabilities indicated that selection response did not diminish after 9 generations of selection. Realized heritabilities for sedation time ranged from 0.43 to 0.83 for the LST line and from 0.55 to 0.81 for the SST line. Realized heritabilities did not decrease in magnitude due to selection progress, indicating that more progress can still be achieved. Comparing corrected (for environmental factors) to uncorrected heritabilities showed the importance of including a control line in selection experiments. Crossing of lines to study gene action responsible for this trait revealed that this trait was controlled by a number of genes with additive gene action without dominance, overdominance, epistasis, or maternal effects.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Drug Resistance - genetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacology</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pentobarbital - pharmacology</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0031-7012</issn><issn>1423-0313</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0M1LwzAYBvAgypzTg2cRioLgoZo038exqRtMHDjPoc2HVLt2Jq3gf2_c5g5iLi_k-eUlPACcIniDEJW3MJ5MIMH2QB-RDKcQI7wP-jDOlEOUHYKjEN6iYhkXPdCTRBLIeB-Mx-Wn9a-2bpNnW1ndlk2duMYn83jVFLkvyjav0mltOm1NNCZfk0W5tCEp6-Sx1PYYHLi8CvZkOwfg5f5uMZqks6eH6Wg4SzWmtE2RY0gTwyjDlGhJtaPMFIW0ueXUYQMzZwhmUvACWpIhzoiLmlCEsRYc4wG42uxd-eajs6FVyzJoW1V5bZsuKC45ogKxCC__wLem83X8m0KZwAJJxmRU1xulfROCt06tfLnM_ZdCUP30qna9Rnu-3dgVS2t2cltkzM82-Xse2_S7_Pf1xb_pfDJcA7UyDn8DF9WEhA</recordid><startdate>19980201</startdate><enddate>19980201</enddate><creator>Stino, Farid K.R.</creator><creator>Samaan, Saber S.</creator><creator>Kolta, Malak G.</creator><creator>Mizinga, Kemmy M.</creator><creator>Soliman, Karam F.A.</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980201</creationdate><title>Divergent Selection for Pentobarbital-Induced Sedation Times in Mice</title><author>Stino, Farid K.R. ; Samaan, Saber S. ; Kolta, Malak G. ; Mizinga, Kemmy M. ; Soliman, Karam F.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-1f61c4d656354c95cf56dbb9eae75f3d02fd436987b0e421764fd6545133c8733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Drug Resistance - genetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacology</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pentobarbital - pharmacology</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stino, Farid K.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samaan, Saber S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolta, Malak G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizinga, Kemmy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soliman, Karam F.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stino, Farid K.R.</au><au>Samaan, Saber S.</au><au>Kolta, Malak G.</au><au>Mizinga, Kemmy M.</au><au>Soliman, Karam F.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Divergent Selection for Pentobarbital-Induced Sedation Times in Mice</atitle><jtitle>Pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Pharmacology</addtitle><date>1998-02-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>92</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>92-100</pages><issn>0031-7012</issn><eissn>1423-0313</eissn><abstract>Divergent selection for pentobarbital sedation-time response was practiced in mice for 9 generations. At the end of 9 generations of selection, the long-sedation-time line (LST) slept an average of 433 min; the short sedation time line (SST) slept an average of 29 min. The control line (C) slept an average of 71 min. These differences represent an almost 15-fold increase in sedation time for the LST compared to the SST line and a 6-fold increase compared to the C line. The SST line slept about 40% less than the C line after 9 generations of selection (measured in tenth generation progeny). Analysis of selection differentials and realized heritabilities indicated that selection response did not diminish after 9 generations of selection. Realized heritabilities for sedation time ranged from 0.43 to 0.83 for the LST line and from 0.55 to 0.81 for the SST line. Realized heritabilities did not decrease in magnitude due to selection progress, indicating that more progress can still be achieved. Comparing corrected (for environmental factors) to uncorrected heritabilities showed the importance of including a control line in selection experiments. Crossing of lines to study gene action responsible for this trait revealed that this trait was controlled by a number of genes with additive gene action without dominance, overdominance, epistasis, or maternal effects.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>9494067</pmid><doi>10.1159/000028186</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-7012
ispartof Pharmacology, 1998-02, Vol.56 (2), p.92-100
issn 0031-7012
1423-0313
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1159_000028186
source Karger Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Animals
Drug Resistance - genetics
Female
Hypnotics and Sedatives - pharmacology
Inbreeding
Male
Mice
Original Paper
Pentobarbital - pharmacology
Selection, Genetic
Time Factors
title Divergent Selection for Pentobarbital-Induced Sedation Times in Mice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A36%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Divergent%20Selection%20for%20Pentobarbital-Induced%20Sedation%20Times%20in%20Mice&rft.jtitle=Pharmacology&rft.au=Stino,%20Farid%20K.R.&rft.date=1998-02-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=92-100&rft.issn=0031-7012&rft.eissn=1423-0313&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000028186&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79715816%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1283819669&rft_id=info:pmid/9494067&rfr_iscdi=true