Thoracoscopic Surgical Biatrial Ablation vs. Catheter Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Background. Limited randomized controlled studies showed that thoracoscopic surgical left atrial ablation was not superior to catheter ablation (CA) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). Right atrium might play an important role in triggering and maintaining atrial fibrillation (A...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cardiac surgery 2023-11, Vol.2023, p.1-9 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 9 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of cardiac surgery |
container_volume | 2023 |
creator | Yu, Chunyu Li, Haojie Yuan, Shuo Zheng, Lihui Wu, Lingmin Ding, Ligang Yao, Yan Zheng, Zhe |
description | Background. Limited randomized controlled studies showed that thoracoscopic surgical left atrial ablation was not superior to catheter ablation (CA) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). Right atrium might play an important role in triggering and maintaining atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with PerAF. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of thoracoscopic surgical biatrial ablation versus CA in patients with PerAF. Methods. Patients with PerAF underwent thoracoscopic surgical biatrial ablation or CA were included in this study. Propensity score matching (1 : 2) was applied to select patients in CA group and surgical ablation (SA) group. The primary endpoint was to compare the probability of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias between SA and CA. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was defined as any atrial tachyarrhythmias longer than 30 s documented by 24-hour Holter monitoring after the 3-month blanking period. Results. After propensity score matching, 51 patients in surgical biatrial ablation group and 102 patients in CA group were enrolled (mean left atrial diameter: 45.8 mm). The probability of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias on antiarrhythmia drugs was 62.7%, 60.6%, and 60.6% in SA group and 42.0%, 39.6%, and 36.7% in CA group at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (p = 0.011), and off antiarrhythmia drugs were 56.9%, 52.5%, and 52.5% in SA group and 36.0%, 31.4%, and 27.5% in CA group at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (p = 0.007). After adjustment of age, sex, left atrial diameter, and AF duration history, multivariable Cox regression analysis suggested that SA procedure was an independent factor to reduce the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (HR: 0.589, 95% CI 0.370–0.937, p = 0.025). Conclusion. Compared with CA, thoracoscopic surgical biatrial ablation might achieve superior effectiveness for patients with PerAF. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2023/9463793 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_hinda</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1155_2023_9463793</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1155_2023_9463793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-2693691fa97653b349a50ce5e5712af5d181c7e84f0e4659d664897e9ffc75813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEYRYMoWKs7HyB7nTb_kyxrsSoULFjXQ5omzifjTEmixbfvlCm4c3Uvl8NdHIRuKZlQKuWUEcanRiheGn6GRlQKUmhq6DkaEa1VQYQgl-gqpU9CGBOcjFC7rrtoXZdctwOH377jBzjb4AewOUJfZpvGZuha_JMmeG5z7bOPfyu0eNU33-aE95BrvPIxQcr9gGfDwwI2EZqBv0YXwTbJ35xyjN4Xj-v5c7F8fXqZz5aFY0rlginDlaHBmlJJvuHCWEmcl16WlNkgt1RTV3otAvFCSbNVSmhTehOCK6WmfIzuh18Xu5SiD9UuwpeNvxUl1dFVdXRVnVz1-N2A19Bu7R7-pw82O2ne</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thoracoscopic Surgical Biatrial Ablation vs. Catheter Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Yu, Chunyu ; Li, Haojie ; Yuan, Shuo ; Zheng, Lihui ; Wu, Lingmin ; Ding, Ligang ; Yao, Yan ; Zheng, Zhe</creator><contributor>Korun, Oktay</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yu, Chunyu ; Li, Haojie ; Yuan, Shuo ; Zheng, Lihui ; Wu, Lingmin ; Ding, Ligang ; Yao, Yan ; Zheng, Zhe ; Korun, Oktay</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Limited randomized controlled studies showed that thoracoscopic surgical left atrial ablation was not superior to catheter ablation (CA) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). Right atrium might play an important role in triggering and maintaining atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with PerAF. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of thoracoscopic surgical biatrial ablation versus CA in patients with PerAF. Methods. Patients with PerAF underwent thoracoscopic surgical biatrial ablation or CA were included in this study. Propensity score matching (1 : 2) was applied to select patients in CA group and surgical ablation (SA) group. The primary endpoint was to compare the probability of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias between SA and CA. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was defined as any atrial tachyarrhythmias longer than 30 s documented by 24-hour Holter monitoring after the 3-month blanking period. Results. After propensity score matching, 51 patients in surgical biatrial ablation group and 102 patients in CA group were enrolled (mean left atrial diameter: 45.8 mm). The probability of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias on antiarrhythmia drugs was 62.7%, 60.6%, and 60.6% in SA group and 42.0%, 39.6%, and 36.7% in CA group at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (p = 0.011), and off antiarrhythmia drugs were 56.9%, 52.5%, and 52.5% in SA group and 36.0%, 31.4%, and 27.5% in CA group at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (p = 0.007). After adjustment of age, sex, left atrial diameter, and AF duration history, multivariable Cox regression analysis suggested that SA procedure was an independent factor to reduce the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (HR: 0.589, 95% CI 0.370–0.937, p = 0.025). Conclusion. Compared with CA, thoracoscopic surgical biatrial ablation might achieve superior effectiveness for patients with PerAF.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-0440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8191</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2023/9463793</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hindawi</publisher><ispartof>Journal of cardiac surgery, 2023-11, Vol.2023, p.1-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Chunyu Yu et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-2693691fa97653b349a50ce5e5712af5d181c7e84f0e4659d664897e9ffc75813</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4003-4323 ; 0000-0002-9162-6492 ; 0000-0003-0712-536X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Korun, Oktay</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yu, Chunyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Haojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Shuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Lihui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Lingmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ligang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhe</creatorcontrib><title>Thoracoscopic Surgical Biatrial Ablation vs. Catheter Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation</title><title>Journal of cardiac surgery</title><description>Background. Limited randomized controlled studies showed that thoracoscopic surgical left atrial ablation was not superior to catheter ablation (CA) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). Right atrium might play an important role in triggering and maintaining atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with PerAF. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of thoracoscopic surgical biatrial ablation versus CA in patients with PerAF. Methods. Patients with PerAF underwent thoracoscopic surgical biatrial ablation or CA were included in this study. Propensity score matching (1 : 2) was applied to select patients in CA group and surgical ablation (SA) group. The primary endpoint was to compare the probability of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias between SA and CA. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was defined as any atrial tachyarrhythmias longer than 30 s documented by 24-hour Holter monitoring after the 3-month blanking period. Results. After propensity score matching, 51 patients in surgical biatrial ablation group and 102 patients in CA group were enrolled (mean left atrial diameter: 45.8 mm). The probability of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias on antiarrhythmia drugs was 62.7%, 60.6%, and 60.6% in SA group and 42.0%, 39.6%, and 36.7% in CA group at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (p = 0.011), and off antiarrhythmia drugs were 56.9%, 52.5%, and 52.5% in SA group and 36.0%, 31.4%, and 27.5% in CA group at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (p = 0.007). After adjustment of age, sex, left atrial diameter, and AF duration history, multivariable Cox regression analysis suggested that SA procedure was an independent factor to reduce the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (HR: 0.589, 95% CI 0.370–0.937, p = 0.025). Conclusion. Compared with CA, thoracoscopic surgical biatrial ablation might achieve superior effectiveness for patients with PerAF.</description><issn>0886-0440</issn><issn>1540-8191</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEYRYMoWKs7HyB7nTb_kyxrsSoULFjXQ5omzifjTEmixbfvlCm4c3Uvl8NdHIRuKZlQKuWUEcanRiheGn6GRlQKUmhq6DkaEa1VQYQgl-gqpU9CGBOcjFC7rrtoXZdctwOH377jBzjb4AewOUJfZpvGZuha_JMmeG5z7bOPfyu0eNU33-aE95BrvPIxQcr9gGfDwwI2EZqBv0YXwTbJ35xyjN4Xj-v5c7F8fXqZz5aFY0rlginDlaHBmlJJvuHCWEmcl16WlNkgt1RTV3otAvFCSbNVSmhTehOCK6WmfIzuh18Xu5SiD9UuwpeNvxUl1dFVdXRVnVz1-N2A19Bu7R7-pw82O2ne</recordid><startdate>20231116</startdate><enddate>20231116</enddate><creator>Yu, Chunyu</creator><creator>Li, Haojie</creator><creator>Yuan, Shuo</creator><creator>Zheng, Lihui</creator><creator>Wu, Lingmin</creator><creator>Ding, Ligang</creator><creator>Yao, Yan</creator><creator>Zheng, Zhe</creator><general>Hindawi</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4003-4323</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9162-6492</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0712-536X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231116</creationdate><title>Thoracoscopic Surgical Biatrial Ablation vs. Catheter Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation</title><author>Yu, Chunyu ; Li, Haojie ; Yuan, Shuo ; Zheng, Lihui ; Wu, Lingmin ; Ding, Ligang ; Yao, Yan ; Zheng, Zhe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-2693691fa97653b349a50ce5e5712af5d181c7e84f0e4659d664897e9ffc75813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Chunyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Haojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Shuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Lihui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Lingmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ligang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhe</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiac surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Chunyu</au><au>Li, Haojie</au><au>Yuan, Shuo</au><au>Zheng, Lihui</au><au>Wu, Lingmin</au><au>Ding, Ligang</au><au>Yao, Yan</au><au>Zheng, Zhe</au><au>Korun, Oktay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thoracoscopic Surgical Biatrial Ablation vs. Catheter Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiac surgery</jtitle><date>2023-11-16</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2023</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>0886-0440</issn><eissn>1540-8191</eissn><abstract>Background. Limited randomized controlled studies showed that thoracoscopic surgical left atrial ablation was not superior to catheter ablation (CA) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). Right atrium might play an important role in triggering and maintaining atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with PerAF. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of thoracoscopic surgical biatrial ablation versus CA in patients with PerAF. Methods. Patients with PerAF underwent thoracoscopic surgical biatrial ablation or CA were included in this study. Propensity score matching (1 : 2) was applied to select patients in CA group and surgical ablation (SA) group. The primary endpoint was to compare the probability of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias between SA and CA. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was defined as any atrial tachyarrhythmias longer than 30 s documented by 24-hour Holter monitoring after the 3-month blanking period. Results. After propensity score matching, 51 patients in surgical biatrial ablation group and 102 patients in CA group were enrolled (mean left atrial diameter: 45.8 mm). The probability of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias on antiarrhythmia drugs was 62.7%, 60.6%, and 60.6% in SA group and 42.0%, 39.6%, and 36.7% in CA group at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (p = 0.011), and off antiarrhythmia drugs were 56.9%, 52.5%, and 52.5% in SA group and 36.0%, 31.4%, and 27.5% in CA group at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (p = 0.007). After adjustment of age, sex, left atrial diameter, and AF duration history, multivariable Cox regression analysis suggested that SA procedure was an independent factor to reduce the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence (HR: 0.589, 95% CI 0.370–0.937, p = 0.025). Conclusion. Compared with CA, thoracoscopic surgical biatrial ablation might achieve superior effectiveness for patients with PerAF.</abstract><pub>Hindawi</pub><doi>10.1155/2023/9463793</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4003-4323</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9162-6492</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0712-536X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0886-0440 |
ispartof | Journal of cardiac surgery, 2023-11, Vol.2023, p.1-9 |
issn | 0886-0440 1540-8191 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1155_2023_9463793 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Thoracoscopic Surgical Biatrial Ablation vs. Catheter Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A40%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_hinda&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thoracoscopic%20Surgical%20Biatrial%20Ablation%20vs.%20Catheter%20Ablation%20in%20Patients%20with%20Persistent%20Atrial%20Fibrillation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiac%20surgery&rft.au=Yu,%20Chunyu&rft.date=2023-11-16&rft.volume=2023&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=0886-0440&rft.eissn=1540-8191&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2023/9463793&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_hinda%3E10_1155_2023_9463793%3C/crossref_hinda%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |