Flexor Tendon Injuries in the Hand: A UK Survey of Repair Techniques and Suture Materials—Are We Following the Evidence?

Introduction. Injuries to the hand are common, and poor functional outcomes can have significant long-term consequences affecting both work and social activities. Good outcomes following flexor tendon lacerations in the hand are dependent on a sound surgical repair allowing early active mobilisation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ISRN Plastic Surgery 2014-03, Vol.2014, p.1-4
Hauptverfasser: Rudge, W. B. J., James, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title ISRN Plastic Surgery
container_volume 2014
creator Rudge, W. B. J.
James, M.
description Introduction. Injuries to the hand are common, and poor functional outcomes can have significant long-term consequences affecting both work and social activities. Good outcomes following flexor tendon lacerations in the hand are dependent on a sound surgical repair allowing early active mobilisation. Materials and Methods. We reviewed the literature regarding the choice of suture material and repair technique. We then carried out a nationwide postal survey of plastic surgery hand units to assess the level of compliance with the evidence. Results. Fifty-four units were surveyed. The response rate was 72%, with the most popular core suture being Prolene (64%) and the most popular technique being the Kessler repair (36%). Discussion. Current evidence advocates a multistrand repair using Ethibond. We found that the majority of units are not following the evidence. We suggest the use of evidence-based departmental guidelines to improve the practice and outcomes following these common injuries.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2014/687128
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_hinda</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_687128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1155_2014_687128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1508-aa10610cef66afda4dc0f154d8b4ea1b009f80b00e3d121b4e2d40baf8bfcada3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OwkAQxjdGEwly8gX2rKnslrYsXgwhFIgYE4V4bKa7s7KkbnFLQTz5ED6hT-IiHjw5l_n3my-Zj5Bzzq44j-N2yHjUTkSXh-KINELWY4HoJuL4T31KWlW1ZD56PdERUYO8pwW-lY7O0KrS0old1s5gRY2l6wXSMVh1Tft0fksfa7fBHS01fcAVmP2JXFjzWnvaU36_rh3SO1ijM1BUXx-ffd8_IU3Loii3xj7_SA43RqGVeHNGTrTnsPWbm2SeDmeDcTC9H00G_WkgecxEAMBZwplEnSSgFURKMs3jSIk8QuC5_0UL5hN2FA-5H4YqYjlokWsJCjpNcnnQla6sKoc6WznzAm6XcZbtncv2zmUH5zx9caAXxirYmn_hb8Uibz8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flexor Tendon Injuries in the Hand: A UK Survey of Repair Techniques and Suture Materials—Are We Following the Evidence?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Rudge, W. B. J. ; James, M.</creator><contributor>Raposio, E. ; Siemers, F. ; Park, J. W.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rudge, W. B. J. ; James, M. ; Raposio, E. ; Siemers, F. ; Park, J. W.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction. Injuries to the hand are common, and poor functional outcomes can have significant long-term consequences affecting both work and social activities. Good outcomes following flexor tendon lacerations in the hand are dependent on a sound surgical repair allowing early active mobilisation. Materials and Methods. We reviewed the literature regarding the choice of suture material and repair technique. We then carried out a nationwide postal survey of plastic surgery hand units to assess the level of compliance with the evidence. Results. Fifty-four units were surveyed. The response rate was 72%, with the most popular core suture being Prolene (64%) and the most popular technique being the Kessler repair (36%). Discussion. Current evidence advocates a multistrand repair using Ethibond. We found that the majority of units are not following the evidence. We suggest the use of evidence-based departmental guidelines to improve the practice and outcomes following these common injuries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-8768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-8768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2014/687128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><ispartof>ISRN Plastic Surgery, 2014-03, Vol.2014, p.1-4</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 W. B. J. Rudge and M. James.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1508-aa10610cef66afda4dc0f154d8b4ea1b009f80b00e3d121b4e2d40baf8bfcada3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1508-aa10610cef66afda4dc0f154d8b4ea1b009f80b00e3d121b4e2d40baf8bfcada3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Raposio, E.</contributor><contributor>Siemers, F.</contributor><contributor>Park, J. W.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rudge, W. B. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Flexor Tendon Injuries in the Hand: A UK Survey of Repair Techniques and Suture Materials—Are We Following the Evidence?</title><title>ISRN Plastic Surgery</title><description>Introduction. Injuries to the hand are common, and poor functional outcomes can have significant long-term consequences affecting both work and social activities. Good outcomes following flexor tendon lacerations in the hand are dependent on a sound surgical repair allowing early active mobilisation. Materials and Methods. We reviewed the literature regarding the choice of suture material and repair technique. We then carried out a nationwide postal survey of plastic surgery hand units to assess the level of compliance with the evidence. Results. Fifty-four units were surveyed. The response rate was 72%, with the most popular core suture being Prolene (64%) and the most popular technique being the Kessler repair (36%). Discussion. Current evidence advocates a multistrand repair using Ethibond. We found that the majority of units are not following the evidence. We suggest the use of evidence-based departmental guidelines to improve the practice and outcomes following these common injuries.</description><issn>2090-8768</issn><issn>2090-8768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9OwkAQxjdGEwly8gX2rKnslrYsXgwhFIgYE4V4bKa7s7KkbnFLQTz5ED6hT-IiHjw5l_n3my-Zj5Bzzq44j-N2yHjUTkSXh-KINELWY4HoJuL4T31KWlW1ZD56PdERUYO8pwW-lY7O0KrS0old1s5gRY2l6wXSMVh1Tft0fksfa7fBHS01fcAVmP2JXFjzWnvaU36_rh3SO1ijM1BUXx-ffd8_IU3Loii3xj7_SA43RqGVeHNGTrTnsPWbm2SeDmeDcTC9H00G_WkgecxEAMBZwplEnSSgFURKMs3jSIk8QuC5_0UL5hN2FA-5H4YqYjlokWsJCjpNcnnQla6sKoc6WznzAm6XcZbtncv2zmUH5zx9caAXxirYmn_hb8Uibz8</recordid><startdate>20140318</startdate><enddate>20140318</enddate><creator>Rudge, W. B. J.</creator><creator>James, M.</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140318</creationdate><title>Flexor Tendon Injuries in the Hand: A UK Survey of Repair Techniques and Suture Materials—Are We Following the Evidence?</title><author>Rudge, W. B. J. ; James, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1508-aa10610cef66afda4dc0f154d8b4ea1b009f80b00e3d121b4e2d40baf8bfcada3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rudge, W. B. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ISRN Plastic Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rudge, W. B. J.</au><au>James, M.</au><au>Raposio, E.</au><au>Siemers, F.</au><au>Park, J. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flexor Tendon Injuries in the Hand: A UK Survey of Repair Techniques and Suture Materials—Are We Following the Evidence?</atitle><jtitle>ISRN Plastic Surgery</jtitle><date>2014-03-18</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>2014</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>4</epage><pages>1-4</pages><issn>2090-8768</issn><eissn>2090-8768</eissn><abstract>Introduction. Injuries to the hand are common, and poor functional outcomes can have significant long-term consequences affecting both work and social activities. Good outcomes following flexor tendon lacerations in the hand are dependent on a sound surgical repair allowing early active mobilisation. Materials and Methods. We reviewed the literature regarding the choice of suture material and repair technique. We then carried out a nationwide postal survey of plastic surgery hand units to assess the level of compliance with the evidence. Results. Fifty-four units were surveyed. The response rate was 72%, with the most popular core suture being Prolene (64%) and the most popular technique being the Kessler repair (36%). Discussion. Current evidence advocates a multistrand repair using Ethibond. We found that the majority of units are not following the evidence. We suggest the use of evidence-based departmental guidelines to improve the practice and outcomes following these common injuries.</abstract><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><doi>10.1155/2014/687128</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2090-8768
ispartof ISRN Plastic Surgery, 2014-03, Vol.2014, p.1-4
issn 2090-8768
2090-8768
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_687128
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Flexor Tendon Injuries in the Hand: A UK Survey of Repair Techniques and Suture Materials—Are We Following the Evidence?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A35%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_hinda&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flexor%20Tendon%20Injuries%20in%20the%20Hand:%20A%20UK%20Survey%20of%20Repair%20Techniques%20and%20Suture%20Materials%E2%80%94Are%20We%20Following%20the%20Evidence?&rft.jtitle=ISRN%20Plastic%20Surgery&rft.au=Rudge,%20W.%20B.%20J.&rft.date=2014-03-18&rft.volume=2014&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=4&rft.pages=1-4&rft.issn=2090-8768&rft.eissn=2090-8768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2014/687128&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_hinda%3E10_1155_2014_687128%3C/crossref_hinda%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true