Fine Structures of 8‐G‐1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 C ≡ CSe)C 10 H 6 (G = H, Cl, and Br) in Crystals and Solutions: Ethynyl Influence and Y‐ and G‐Dependences

Fine structures of 8‐G‐1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 C ≡ CSe)C 10 H 6 [ 1 (G = H) and 2 (G = Cl): Y = H ( a ), OMe ( b ), Me ( c ), F ( d ), Cl ( e ), CN ( f ), and NO 2 ( g )] are determined by the X‐ray analysis. Structures of 1 , 2 , and 3 (G = Br) are called A if each Se–C sp bond is perpendicular to the naph...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioinorganic chemistry and applications 2009-01, Vol.2009 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Hayashi, Satoko, Yamane, Kentaro, Nakanishi, Waro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Bioinorganic chemistry and applications
container_volume 2009
creator Hayashi, Satoko
Yamane, Kentaro
Nakanishi, Waro
description Fine structures of 8‐G‐1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 C ≡ CSe)C 10 H 6 [ 1 (G = H) and 2 (G = Cl): Y = H ( a ), OMe ( b ), Me ( c ), F ( d ), Cl ( e ), CN ( f ), and NO 2 ( g )] are determined by the X‐ray analysis. Structures of 1 , 2 , and 3 (G = Br) are called A if each Se–C sp bond is perpendicular to the naphthyl plane, whereas they are B when the bond is placed on the plane. Structures are observed as A for 1a – c bearing Y of nonacceptors, whereas they are B for 1e – g with Y of strong acceptors. The change in the structures of 1e – g versus those of 1a – c is called Y‐dependence in 1 . The Y‐dependence is very specific in 1 relative to 1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 Se)C 10 H 7 ( 4 ) due to the ethynyl group: the Y‐dependence in 1 is almost inverse to the case of 4 due to the ethynyl group. We call the specific effect “ Ethynyl Influence. ” Structures of 2 are observed as B : the A ‐type structure of 1b changes dramatically to B of 2b by G = Cl at the 8‐position, which is called G‐dependence. The structures of 2 and 3 are examined in solutions based on the NMR parameters.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2009/347359
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1155_2009_347359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1155_2009_347359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c789-78da472fdc025a256866c0eda704da656879f597f90a43f65931ab60d4e6a2f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUD1PwzAUjBBIlMLEH3hjKxrqxLEdIzGA6ZdUiaEd6BSZxBZBwansZMjGysY_QPy1_hLcluF09-493ZMuCK4jdBtFhIxjhPgYJwwTfhL0IpqyMGH85dRrQkmIKcbnwYVz7wglGBHSC36mpVGwamybN61VDmoN6e7ze-YReQxgC542AijMIQEBu69fECs1FBAhb1EYzOAe5iMQ1QikKeDRDqE0IGznGlm5g7eqq7Ypa-PuYNK8daarYGF01SqTq8PBxj85iP3jJ7VVptjv3GVwpn2IuvrnfrCeTtZiHi6fZwvxsAxzlvKQpYVMWKyLHMVExoSmlOZIFZKhpJDUz4xrwpnmSCZYU8JxJF8pKhJFZawZ7gc3x9jc1s5ZpbOtLT-k7bIIZftqs3212bFa_AeSvWwu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fine Structures of 8‐G‐1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 C ≡ CSe)C 10 H 6 (G = H, Cl, and Br) in Crystals and Solutions: Ethynyl Influence and Y‐ and G‐Dependences</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Hayashi, Satoko ; Yamane, Kentaro ; Nakanishi, Waro</creator><contributor>Mugesh, Govindasamy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Satoko ; Yamane, Kentaro ; Nakanishi, Waro ; Mugesh, Govindasamy</creatorcontrib><description>Fine structures of 8‐G‐1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 C ≡ CSe)C 10 H 6 [ 1 (G = H) and 2 (G = Cl): Y = H ( a ), OMe ( b ), Me ( c ), F ( d ), Cl ( e ), CN ( f ), and NO 2 ( g )] are determined by the X‐ray analysis. Structures of 1 , 2 , and 3 (G = Br) are called A if each Se–C sp bond is perpendicular to the naphthyl plane, whereas they are B when the bond is placed on the plane. Structures are observed as A for 1a – c bearing Y of nonacceptors, whereas they are B for 1e – g with Y of strong acceptors. The change in the structures of 1e – g versus those of 1a – c is called Y‐dependence in 1 . The Y‐dependence is very specific in 1 relative to 1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 Se)C 10 H 7 ( 4 ) due to the ethynyl group: the Y‐dependence in 1 is almost inverse to the case of 4 due to the ethynyl group. We call the specific effect “ Ethynyl Influence. ” Structures of 2 are observed as B : the A ‐type structure of 1b changes dramatically to B of 2b by G = Cl at the 8‐position, which is called G‐dependence. The structures of 2 and 3 are examined in solutions based on the NMR parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1565-3633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-479X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2009/347359</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Bioinorganic chemistry and applications, 2009-01, Vol.2009 (1)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c789-78da472fdc025a256866c0eda704da656879f597f90a43f65931ab60d4e6a2f73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c789-78da472fdc025a256866c0eda704da656879f597f90a43f65931ab60d4e6a2f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Mugesh, Govindasamy</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Satoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamane, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakanishi, Waro</creatorcontrib><title>Fine Structures of 8‐G‐1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 C ≡ CSe)C 10 H 6 (G = H, Cl, and Br) in Crystals and Solutions: Ethynyl Influence and Y‐ and G‐Dependences</title><title>Bioinorganic chemistry and applications</title><description>Fine structures of 8‐G‐1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 C ≡ CSe)C 10 H 6 [ 1 (G = H) and 2 (G = Cl): Y = H ( a ), OMe ( b ), Me ( c ), F ( d ), Cl ( e ), CN ( f ), and NO 2 ( g )] are determined by the X‐ray analysis. Structures of 1 , 2 , and 3 (G = Br) are called A if each Se–C sp bond is perpendicular to the naphthyl plane, whereas they are B when the bond is placed on the plane. Structures are observed as A for 1a – c bearing Y of nonacceptors, whereas they are B for 1e – g with Y of strong acceptors. The change in the structures of 1e – g versus those of 1a – c is called Y‐dependence in 1 . The Y‐dependence is very specific in 1 relative to 1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 Se)C 10 H 7 ( 4 ) due to the ethynyl group: the Y‐dependence in 1 is almost inverse to the case of 4 due to the ethynyl group. We call the specific effect “ Ethynyl Influence. ” Structures of 2 are observed as B : the A ‐type structure of 1b changes dramatically to B of 2b by G = Cl at the 8‐position, which is called G‐dependence. The structures of 2 and 3 are examined in solutions based on the NMR parameters.</description><issn>1565-3633</issn><issn>1687-479X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotUD1PwzAUjBBIlMLEH3hjKxrqxLEdIzGA6ZdUiaEd6BSZxBZBwansZMjGysY_QPy1_hLcluF09-493ZMuCK4jdBtFhIxjhPgYJwwTfhL0IpqyMGH85dRrQkmIKcbnwYVz7wglGBHSC36mpVGwamybN61VDmoN6e7ze-YReQxgC542AijMIQEBu69fECs1FBAhb1EYzOAe5iMQ1QikKeDRDqE0IGznGlm5g7eqq7Ypa-PuYNK8daarYGF01SqTq8PBxj85iP3jJ7VVptjv3GVwpn2IuvrnfrCeTtZiHi6fZwvxsAxzlvKQpYVMWKyLHMVExoSmlOZIFZKhpJDUz4xrwpnmSCZYU8JxJF8pKhJFZawZ7gc3x9jc1s5ZpbOtLT-k7bIIZftqs3212bFa_AeSvWwu</recordid><startdate>200901</startdate><enddate>200901</enddate><creator>Hayashi, Satoko</creator><creator>Yamane, Kentaro</creator><creator>Nakanishi, Waro</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200901</creationdate><title>Fine Structures of 8‐G‐1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 C ≡ CSe)C 10 H 6 (G = H, Cl, and Br) in Crystals and Solutions: Ethynyl Influence and Y‐ and G‐Dependences</title><author>Hayashi, Satoko ; Yamane, Kentaro ; Nakanishi, Waro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c789-78da472fdc025a256866c0eda704da656879f597f90a43f65931ab60d4e6a2f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Satoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamane, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakanishi, Waro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Bioinorganic chemistry and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hayashi, Satoko</au><au>Yamane, Kentaro</au><au>Nakanishi, Waro</au><au>Mugesh, Govindasamy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fine Structures of 8‐G‐1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 C ≡ CSe)C 10 H 6 (G = H, Cl, and Br) in Crystals and Solutions: Ethynyl Influence and Y‐ and G‐Dependences</atitle><jtitle>Bioinorganic chemistry and applications</jtitle><date>2009-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>2009</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1565-3633</issn><eissn>1687-479X</eissn><abstract>Fine structures of 8‐G‐1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 C ≡ CSe)C 10 H 6 [ 1 (G = H) and 2 (G = Cl): Y = H ( a ), OMe ( b ), Me ( c ), F ( d ), Cl ( e ), CN ( f ), and NO 2 ( g )] are determined by the X‐ray analysis. Structures of 1 , 2 , and 3 (G = Br) are called A if each Se–C sp bond is perpendicular to the naphthyl plane, whereas they are B when the bond is placed on the plane. Structures are observed as A for 1a – c bearing Y of nonacceptors, whereas they are B for 1e – g with Y of strong acceptors. The change in the structures of 1e – g versus those of 1a – c is called Y‐dependence in 1 . The Y‐dependence is very specific in 1 relative to 1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 Se)C 10 H 7 ( 4 ) due to the ethynyl group: the Y‐dependence in 1 is almost inverse to the case of 4 due to the ethynyl group. We call the specific effect “ Ethynyl Influence. ” Structures of 2 are observed as B : the A ‐type structure of 1b changes dramatically to B of 2b by G = Cl at the 8‐position, which is called G‐dependence. The structures of 2 and 3 are examined in solutions based on the NMR parameters.</abstract><doi>10.1155/2009/347359</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1565-3633
ispartof Bioinorganic chemistry and applications, 2009-01, Vol.2009 (1)
issn 1565-3633
1687-479X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1155_2009_347359
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
title Fine Structures of 8‐G‐1‐( p ‐YC 6 H 4 C ≡ CSe)C 10 H 6 (G = H, Cl, and Br) in Crystals and Solutions: Ethynyl Influence and Y‐ and G‐Dependences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T14%3A01%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fine%20Structures%20of%208%E2%80%90G%E2%80%901%E2%80%90(%20p%20%E2%80%90YC%206%20H%204%20C%20%E2%89%A1%20CSe)C%2010%20H%206%20(G%20=%20H,%20Cl,%20and%20Br)%20in%20Crystals%20and%20Solutions:%20Ethynyl%20Influence%20and%20Y%E2%80%90%20and%20G%E2%80%90Dependences&rft.jtitle=Bioinorganic%20chemistry%20and%20applications&rft.au=Hayashi,%20Satoko&rft.date=2009-01&rft.volume=2009&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1565-3633&rft.eissn=1687-479X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2009/347359&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1155_2009_347359%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true