Comparison of the Electrochemical and Degradation Behaviour of Ni-YSZ and Ni-GDC Electrodes Under Steam, Co- and CO 2 Electrolysis

Abstract The mixed ionic and electronic conductive property of Ni-GDC has ensured that the electrochemical reaction zones of the electrode extend beyond the triple phase boundary of Ni/GDC/fuel gas to the double phase boundary of the GDC and the fuel gas [1, 2]. In addition, ceria has shown good car...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society) 2023-08, Vol.MA2023-01 (54), p.219-219
Hauptverfasser: Unachukwu, Ifeanyichukwu Daniel, Vibhu, Vaibhav, Uecker, Jan, Vinke, Izaak C., Eichel, Rudiger-A, de Haart, L.G.J. (Bert)
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 219
container_issue 54
container_start_page 219
container_title Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society)
container_volume MA2023-01
creator Unachukwu, Ifeanyichukwu Daniel
Vibhu, Vaibhav
Uecker, Jan
Vinke, Izaak C.
Eichel, Rudiger-A
de Haart, L.G.J. (Bert)
description Abstract The mixed ionic and electronic conductive property of Ni-GDC has ensured that the electrochemical reaction zones of the electrode extend beyond the triple phase boundary of Ni/GDC/fuel gas to the double phase boundary of the GDC and the fuel gas [1, 2]. In addition, ceria has shown good carbon suppression properties when operated in carbon-containing fuels[3, 4]. For these reasons, Ni-GDC has emerged as a possible replacement for the conventional Ni-YSZ electrode. However, a direct comparison of the performance and long-term degradation of Ni-GDC with literature values of the Ni-YSZ would be ambiguous. On one hand, different reports utilize different fuel gas compositions, operating temperatures as well as current densities. On the other hand, the fabrication of fuel electrode-supported Ni-GDC is still a challenge due to the well-known inter-diffusion [5, 6] between the YSZ and the GDC oxide phase at a high sintering temperature (1400 °C) of YSZ electrolytes. Hence, most of the electrode fabrication has remained on electrolyte support. Thus, a direct comparison of electrolyte-supported Ni-GDC with the conventional fuel electrode-supported Ni-YSZ is ineffective due to different degradation behaviour. Therefore, this present study aims to investigate and compare the long-term stability of Ni-GDC and Ni-YSZ under three different electrolysis modes; steam-electrolysis, co-electrolysis and CO 2 -electrolysis. Firstly, electrolyte-supported single cells of Ni-GDC (NiO-GDC//8YSZ//GDC//LSCF) and Ni-YSZ (NiO-GDC//8YSZ//GDC//LSCF) were fabricated and investigated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) from 750-900 °C temperature range. Furthermore, the impedance data were also recorded under polarization (0.7 to 1.4V) as well as at OCV by varying the partial pressure of steam, CO 2 and oxygen (, p H 2 0, p CO 2 and p O 2 ). Finally, stability tests of the single cells were carried out under steam electrolysis (H 2 O: H 2 , 50:50) and co-electrolysis (H 2 O: CO 2 :H 2 , 40:40:20) conditions at 900 °C with 0.5 A/cm 2 current density for 500 h [7]. For the CO 2 -electrolysis (CO 2 :CO, 80:20), the stability test was performed up to 1000 h. The post-test characterization of the operated cells was carried out using both SEM-EDX as well as FIB-SEM. The results reveal that Ni-GDC exhibits higher current density than Ni-YSZ in all the electrolysis modes. In the post-test analysis, loss of GDC percolation was observed and the Ni particles were observed t
doi_str_mv 10.1149/MA2023-0154219mtgabs
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1149_MA2023_0154219mtgabs</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1149_MA2023_0154219mtgabs</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1149_MA2023_0154219mtgabs3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdj71OwzAURi0EEqXwBgx-AAz-SaR2BLfQBToUBlisS3LTGMVx5WuQuvLktIUisTJ933DOcBg7V_JSqWJ8dX-tpTZCqrLQahzyEl7pgA20KpXQ0pSHv78wx-yE6E1KMxppPWCfNoYVJE-x57HhuUU-7bDKKVYtBl9Bx6Gv-QSXCWrIfoPdYAsfPr6nrfDgxfPiZcds7t3E7vUaiT_1NSa-yAjhgtsodpidc72HujV5OmVHDXSEZz87ZMXt9NHORJUiUcLGrZIPkNZOSbftdd-97k-v-af2BVUqYP0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Electrochemical and Degradation Behaviour of Ni-YSZ and Ni-GDC Electrodes Under Steam, Co- and CO 2 Electrolysis</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Unachukwu, Ifeanyichukwu Daniel ; Vibhu, Vaibhav ; Uecker, Jan ; Vinke, Izaak C. ; Eichel, Rudiger-A ; de Haart, L.G.J. (Bert)</creator><creatorcontrib>Unachukwu, Ifeanyichukwu Daniel ; Vibhu, Vaibhav ; Uecker, Jan ; Vinke, Izaak C. ; Eichel, Rudiger-A ; de Haart, L.G.J. (Bert)</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The mixed ionic and electronic conductive property of Ni-GDC has ensured that the electrochemical reaction zones of the electrode extend beyond the triple phase boundary of Ni/GDC/fuel gas to the double phase boundary of the GDC and the fuel gas [1, 2]. In addition, ceria has shown good carbon suppression properties when operated in carbon-containing fuels[3, 4]. For these reasons, Ni-GDC has emerged as a possible replacement for the conventional Ni-YSZ electrode. However, a direct comparison of the performance and long-term degradation of Ni-GDC with literature values of the Ni-YSZ would be ambiguous. On one hand, different reports utilize different fuel gas compositions, operating temperatures as well as current densities. On the other hand, the fabrication of fuel electrode-supported Ni-GDC is still a challenge due to the well-known inter-diffusion [5, 6] between the YSZ and the GDC oxide phase at a high sintering temperature (1400 °C) of YSZ electrolytes. Hence, most of the electrode fabrication has remained on electrolyte support. Thus, a direct comparison of electrolyte-supported Ni-GDC with the conventional fuel electrode-supported Ni-YSZ is ineffective due to different degradation behaviour. Therefore, this present study aims to investigate and compare the long-term stability of Ni-GDC and Ni-YSZ under three different electrolysis modes; steam-electrolysis, co-electrolysis and CO 2 -electrolysis. Firstly, electrolyte-supported single cells of Ni-GDC (NiO-GDC//8YSZ//GDC//LSCF) and Ni-YSZ (NiO-GDC//8YSZ//GDC//LSCF) were fabricated and investigated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) from 750-900 °C temperature range. Furthermore, the impedance data were also recorded under polarization (0.7 to 1.4V) as well as at OCV by varying the partial pressure of steam, CO 2 and oxygen (, p H 2 0, p CO 2 and p O 2 ). Finally, stability tests of the single cells were carried out under steam electrolysis (H 2 O: H 2 , 50:50) and co-electrolysis (H 2 O: CO 2 :H 2 , 40:40:20) conditions at 900 °C with 0.5 A/cm 2 current density for 500 h [7]. For the CO 2 -electrolysis (CO 2 :CO, 80:20), the stability test was performed up to 1000 h. The post-test characterization of the operated cells was carried out using both SEM-EDX as well as FIB-SEM. The results reveal that Ni-GDC exhibits higher current density than Ni-YSZ in all the electrolysis modes. In the post-test analysis, loss of GDC percolation was observed and the Ni particles were observed to be covered by the GDC oxide phase. Furthermore, both electrodes demonstrate that Ni is migrating away from the electrolyte in all the electrolysis modes. The detailed electrochemical and microstructural properties of the operated cells will be presented and discussed. References [1] R. GREEN, et al, Solid State Ionics 2008 , 179 , 647–660. [2] D. Chen, et al, Nano Energy 2022 , 101 , 107564. [3] H. He, et al, MSF 2007 , 539-543 , 2822–2827. [4] H. He, et al, Hill, Applied Catalysis A: General 2007 , 317 , 284–292. [5] Y. J. Sohn et al, Inter. Conference on Solid State Ionics 2019 , SSI-22 [6] T. SHIMURA, et al, Solid State Ionics 2019 , 342 , 115058. [7] I. D. Unachukwu, et al, Journal of Power Sources 2023 , 556 , 232436.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-2043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-2035</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1149/MA2023-0154219mtgabs</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society), 2023-08, Vol.MA2023-01 (54), p.219-219</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-4261-4508 ; 0000-0001-9157-2722 ; 0000-0001-6908-1214 ; 0000-0002-0013-6325 ; 0000-0001-9849-2397 ; 0000-0002-1361-9983</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Unachukwu, Ifeanyichukwu Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vibhu, Vaibhav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uecker, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinke, Izaak C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichel, Rudiger-A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Haart, L.G.J. (Bert)</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Electrochemical and Degradation Behaviour of Ni-YSZ and Ni-GDC Electrodes Under Steam, Co- and CO 2 Electrolysis</title><title>Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society)</title><description>Abstract The mixed ionic and electronic conductive property of Ni-GDC has ensured that the electrochemical reaction zones of the electrode extend beyond the triple phase boundary of Ni/GDC/fuel gas to the double phase boundary of the GDC and the fuel gas [1, 2]. In addition, ceria has shown good carbon suppression properties when operated in carbon-containing fuels[3, 4]. For these reasons, Ni-GDC has emerged as a possible replacement for the conventional Ni-YSZ electrode. However, a direct comparison of the performance and long-term degradation of Ni-GDC with literature values of the Ni-YSZ would be ambiguous. On one hand, different reports utilize different fuel gas compositions, operating temperatures as well as current densities. On the other hand, the fabrication of fuel electrode-supported Ni-GDC is still a challenge due to the well-known inter-diffusion [5, 6] between the YSZ and the GDC oxide phase at a high sintering temperature (1400 °C) of YSZ electrolytes. Hence, most of the electrode fabrication has remained on electrolyte support. Thus, a direct comparison of electrolyte-supported Ni-GDC with the conventional fuel electrode-supported Ni-YSZ is ineffective due to different degradation behaviour. Therefore, this present study aims to investigate and compare the long-term stability of Ni-GDC and Ni-YSZ under three different electrolysis modes; steam-electrolysis, co-electrolysis and CO 2 -electrolysis. Firstly, electrolyte-supported single cells of Ni-GDC (NiO-GDC//8YSZ//GDC//LSCF) and Ni-YSZ (NiO-GDC//8YSZ//GDC//LSCF) were fabricated and investigated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) from 750-900 °C temperature range. Furthermore, the impedance data were also recorded under polarization (0.7 to 1.4V) as well as at OCV by varying the partial pressure of steam, CO 2 and oxygen (, p H 2 0, p CO 2 and p O 2 ). Finally, stability tests of the single cells were carried out under steam electrolysis (H 2 O: H 2 , 50:50) and co-electrolysis (H 2 O: CO 2 :H 2 , 40:40:20) conditions at 900 °C with 0.5 A/cm 2 current density for 500 h [7]. For the CO 2 -electrolysis (CO 2 :CO, 80:20), the stability test was performed up to 1000 h. The post-test characterization of the operated cells was carried out using both SEM-EDX as well as FIB-SEM. The results reveal that Ni-GDC exhibits higher current density than Ni-YSZ in all the electrolysis modes. In the post-test analysis, loss of GDC percolation was observed and the Ni particles were observed to be covered by the GDC oxide phase. Furthermore, both electrodes demonstrate that Ni is migrating away from the electrolyte in all the electrolysis modes. The detailed electrochemical and microstructural properties of the operated cells will be presented and discussed. References [1] R. GREEN, et al, Solid State Ionics 2008 , 179 , 647–660. [2] D. Chen, et al, Nano Energy 2022 , 101 , 107564. [3] H. He, et al, MSF 2007 , 539-543 , 2822–2827. [4] H. He, et al, Hill, Applied Catalysis A: General 2007 , 317 , 284–292. [5] Y. J. Sohn et al, Inter. Conference on Solid State Ionics 2019 , SSI-22 [6] T. SHIMURA, et al, Solid State Ionics 2019 , 342 , 115058. [7] I. D. Unachukwu, et al, Journal of Power Sources 2023 , 556 , 232436.</description><issn>2151-2043</issn><issn>2151-2035</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdj71OwzAURi0EEqXwBgx-AAz-SaR2BLfQBToUBlisS3LTGMVx5WuQuvLktIUisTJ933DOcBg7V_JSqWJ8dX-tpTZCqrLQahzyEl7pgA20KpXQ0pSHv78wx-yE6E1KMxppPWCfNoYVJE-x57HhuUU-7bDKKVYtBl9Bx6Gv-QSXCWrIfoPdYAsfPr6nrfDgxfPiZcds7t3E7vUaiT_1NSa-yAjhgtsodpidc72HujV5OmVHDXSEZz87ZMXt9NHORJUiUcLGrZIPkNZOSbftdd-97k-v-af2BVUqYP0</recordid><startdate>20230828</startdate><enddate>20230828</enddate><creator>Unachukwu, Ifeanyichukwu Daniel</creator><creator>Vibhu, Vaibhav</creator><creator>Uecker, Jan</creator><creator>Vinke, Izaak C.</creator><creator>Eichel, Rudiger-A</creator><creator>de Haart, L.G.J. (Bert)</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-4508</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9157-2722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-1214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0013-6325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9849-2397</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1361-9983</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230828</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Electrochemical and Degradation Behaviour of Ni-YSZ and Ni-GDC Electrodes Under Steam, Co- and CO 2 Electrolysis</title><author>Unachukwu, Ifeanyichukwu Daniel ; Vibhu, Vaibhav ; Uecker, Jan ; Vinke, Izaak C. ; Eichel, Rudiger-A ; de Haart, L.G.J. (Bert)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1149_MA2023_0154219mtgabs3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Unachukwu, Ifeanyichukwu Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vibhu, Vaibhav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uecker, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinke, Izaak C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichel, Rudiger-A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Haart, L.G.J. (Bert)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Unachukwu, Ifeanyichukwu Daniel</au><au>Vibhu, Vaibhav</au><au>Uecker, Jan</au><au>Vinke, Izaak C.</au><au>Eichel, Rudiger-A</au><au>de Haart, L.G.J. (Bert)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Electrochemical and Degradation Behaviour of Ni-YSZ and Ni-GDC Electrodes Under Steam, Co- and CO 2 Electrolysis</atitle><jtitle>Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society)</jtitle><date>2023-08-28</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>MA2023-01</volume><issue>54</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>219</epage><pages>219-219</pages><issn>2151-2043</issn><eissn>2151-2035</eissn><abstract>Abstract The mixed ionic and electronic conductive property of Ni-GDC has ensured that the electrochemical reaction zones of the electrode extend beyond the triple phase boundary of Ni/GDC/fuel gas to the double phase boundary of the GDC and the fuel gas [1, 2]. In addition, ceria has shown good carbon suppression properties when operated in carbon-containing fuels[3, 4]. For these reasons, Ni-GDC has emerged as a possible replacement for the conventional Ni-YSZ electrode. However, a direct comparison of the performance and long-term degradation of Ni-GDC with literature values of the Ni-YSZ would be ambiguous. On one hand, different reports utilize different fuel gas compositions, operating temperatures as well as current densities. On the other hand, the fabrication of fuel electrode-supported Ni-GDC is still a challenge due to the well-known inter-diffusion [5, 6] between the YSZ and the GDC oxide phase at a high sintering temperature (1400 °C) of YSZ electrolytes. Hence, most of the electrode fabrication has remained on electrolyte support. Thus, a direct comparison of electrolyte-supported Ni-GDC with the conventional fuel electrode-supported Ni-YSZ is ineffective due to different degradation behaviour. Therefore, this present study aims to investigate and compare the long-term stability of Ni-GDC and Ni-YSZ under three different electrolysis modes; steam-electrolysis, co-electrolysis and CO 2 -electrolysis. Firstly, electrolyte-supported single cells of Ni-GDC (NiO-GDC//8YSZ//GDC//LSCF) and Ni-YSZ (NiO-GDC//8YSZ//GDC//LSCF) were fabricated and investigated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) from 750-900 °C temperature range. Furthermore, the impedance data were also recorded under polarization (0.7 to 1.4V) as well as at OCV by varying the partial pressure of steam, CO 2 and oxygen (, p H 2 0, p CO 2 and p O 2 ). Finally, stability tests of the single cells were carried out under steam electrolysis (H 2 O: H 2 , 50:50) and co-electrolysis (H 2 O: CO 2 :H 2 , 40:40:20) conditions at 900 °C with 0.5 A/cm 2 current density for 500 h [7]. For the CO 2 -electrolysis (CO 2 :CO, 80:20), the stability test was performed up to 1000 h. The post-test characterization of the operated cells was carried out using both SEM-EDX as well as FIB-SEM. The results reveal that Ni-GDC exhibits higher current density than Ni-YSZ in all the electrolysis modes. In the post-test analysis, loss of GDC percolation was observed and the Ni particles were observed to be covered by the GDC oxide phase. Furthermore, both electrodes demonstrate that Ni is migrating away from the electrolyte in all the electrolysis modes. The detailed electrochemical and microstructural properties of the operated cells will be presented and discussed. References [1] R. GREEN, et al, Solid State Ionics 2008 , 179 , 647–660. [2] D. Chen, et al, Nano Energy 2022 , 101 , 107564. [3] H. He, et al, MSF 2007 , 539-543 , 2822–2827. [4] H. He, et al, Hill, Applied Catalysis A: General 2007 , 317 , 284–292. [5] Y. J. Sohn et al, Inter. Conference on Solid State Ionics 2019 , SSI-22 [6] T. SHIMURA, et al, Solid State Ionics 2019 , 342 , 115058. [7] I. D. Unachukwu, et al, Journal of Power Sources 2023 , 556 , 232436.</abstract><doi>10.1149/MA2023-0154219mtgabs</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-4508</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9157-2722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-1214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0013-6325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9849-2397</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1361-9983</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2151-2043
ispartof Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society), 2023-08, Vol.MA2023-01 (54), p.219-219
issn 2151-2043
2151-2035
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1149_MA2023_0154219mtgabs
source IOP Publishing Free Content; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
title Comparison of the Electrochemical and Degradation Behaviour of Ni-YSZ and Ni-GDC Electrodes Under Steam, Co- and CO 2 Electrolysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A48%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Electrochemical%20and%20Degradation%20Behaviour%20of%20Ni-YSZ%20and%20Ni-GDC%20Electrodes%20Under%20Steam,%20Co-%20and%20CO%202%20Electrolysis&rft.jtitle=Meeting%20abstracts%20(Electrochemical%20Society)&rft.au=Unachukwu,%20Ifeanyichukwu%20Daniel&rft.date=2023-08-28&rft.volume=MA2023-01&rft.issue=54&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=219&rft.pages=219-219&rft.issn=2151-2043&rft.eissn=2151-2035&rft_id=info:doi/10.1149/MA2023-0154219mtgabs&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1149_MA2023_0154219mtgabs%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true