Visualization of Micro Damage in SOFC Using Terahertz Waves

As SOFC commercialization progresses and mass production is realized, quality control during production will become extremely important. Currently, quality control is based on visual inspection and testing of single cells and stacks under operating conditions. This method, although reliable, is time...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society) 2023-08, Vol.MA2023-01 (54), p.199-199
Hauptverfasser: Sato, Kazuhisa, Tanaka, Junya, Hayashi, Naohiro, Fukui, Ken-Ichi, Kawada, Tatsuya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 199
container_issue 54
container_start_page 199
container_title Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society)
container_volume MA2023-01
creator Sato, Kazuhisa
Tanaka, Junya
Hayashi, Naohiro
Fukui, Ken-Ichi
Kawada, Tatsuya
description As SOFC commercialization progresses and mass production is realized, quality control during production will become extremely important. Currently, quality control is based on visual inspection and testing of single cells and stacks under operating conditions. This method, although reliable, is time-consuming, costly, and unsustainable. Therefore, the authors have been developing evaluation methods with the aim of developing a system that enables rapid, safe, nondestructive, automatic, and accurate quality assurance assessment. One of them is developing evaluation methods for internal microdefects using THz waves. Previously, the authors have been conducting nondestructive evaluation during SOFC operation using the acoustic emission (AE) method [1-5]; the AE method detects the sound (elastic waves) generated when cells, stacks, etc. are deformed or mechanically damaged, and is suitable for in-situ observation during operation. In this situation, we have also succeeded in classifying deformation and various damages of cells and stacks by machine learning of the obtained signals [6,7,8]. However, there are two main disadvantages of using SOFC as a quality assurance inspection method: First, it is passive. In other words, it cannot detect deformation or damage that has already occurred. The second is that it is dependent on the measurement environment, since AE signals are not physical quantities and therefore change depending on the measurement environment. In other words, the waveform shape, amplitude, and frequency components of the signals may change significantly by attaching a sensor to the waveguide. Therefore, signals that have been successfully classified may need to be readjusted or re-verified if the measurement conditions change. On the other hand, signals obtained from THz waves are often highly reproducible physical quantities. In addition, it is rapid and nondestructive because of the contactless and pulsed wave. However, THz waves have a long wavelength, which results in low resolution in multilayer thin-film structures. If it becomes possible to detect small defects in the layers and visualize the internal structure by utilizing machine learning, it will surely be a very effective evaluation method for SOFCs. In this paper, we report on the clustering and recent results of machine learning using fluctuations of THz reflected waves. Acknowledgements This research was conducted as part of the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Org
doi_str_mv 10.1149/MA2023-0154199mtgabs
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>iop_O3W</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1149_MA2023_0154199mtgabs</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c86s-79aff752232c011bfed7c7c19e95542fc28656ba62ddd4c34774c884c514f3343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j09LwzAAxYMoOKffwEO-QDV_mwRPY7opbOxg1WNI06RmrO1IOsF9eisVwYun9y6_x_sBcI3RDcZM3a5nBBGaIcwZVqrpa1OmEzAhmOOMIMpPfzuj5-AipS1CVEpCJuDuNaSD2YWj6UPXws7DdbCxg_emMbWDoYXPm8UcvqTQ1rBw0by72B_hm_lw6RKcebNL7uonp6BYPBTzx2y1WT7NZ6vMyjxlQhnvBSeEEoswLr2rhBUWK6c4Z8RbInOelyYnVVUxS5kQzErJLMfMU8roFLBxdviVUnRe72NoTPzUGOlvfz366z_-A4ZGLHR7ve0OsR0-_o98AaYhXfU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visualization of Micro Damage in SOFC Using Terahertz Waves</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><creator>Sato, Kazuhisa ; Tanaka, Junya ; Hayashi, Naohiro ; Fukui, Ken-Ichi ; Kawada, Tatsuya</creator><creatorcontrib>Sato, Kazuhisa ; Tanaka, Junya ; Hayashi, Naohiro ; Fukui, Ken-Ichi ; Kawada, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><description>As SOFC commercialization progresses and mass production is realized, quality control during production will become extremely important. Currently, quality control is based on visual inspection and testing of single cells and stacks under operating conditions. This method, although reliable, is time-consuming, costly, and unsustainable. Therefore, the authors have been developing evaluation methods with the aim of developing a system that enables rapid, safe, nondestructive, automatic, and accurate quality assurance assessment. One of them is developing evaluation methods for internal microdefects using THz waves. Previously, the authors have been conducting nondestructive evaluation during SOFC operation using the acoustic emission (AE) method [1-5]; the AE method detects the sound (elastic waves) generated when cells, stacks, etc. are deformed or mechanically damaged, and is suitable for in-situ observation during operation. In this situation, we have also succeeded in classifying deformation and various damages of cells and stacks by machine learning of the obtained signals [6,7,8]. However, there are two main disadvantages of using SOFC as a quality assurance inspection method: First, it is passive. In other words, it cannot detect deformation or damage that has already occurred. The second is that it is dependent on the measurement environment, since AE signals are not physical quantities and therefore change depending on the measurement environment. In other words, the waveform shape, amplitude, and frequency components of the signals may change significantly by attaching a sensor to the waveguide. Therefore, signals that have been successfully classified may need to be readjusted or re-verified if the measurement conditions change. On the other hand, signals obtained from THz waves are often highly reproducible physical quantities. In addition, it is rapid and nondestructive because of the contactless and pulsed wave. However, THz waves have a long wavelength, which results in low resolution in multilayer thin-film structures. If it becomes possible to detect small defects in the layers and visualize the internal structure by utilizing machine learning, it will surely be a very effective evaluation method for SOFCs. In this paper, we report on the clustering and recent results of machine learning using fluctuations of THz reflected waves. Acknowledgements This research was conducted as part of the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) (JPNP20003). In addition, it was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (22K18865) and (22H01353). [1] K. Sato et al et al., Journal of Testing and Evaluation 34, JTE12707 (2006). DOI: 10.1520/JTE12707 [2] K. Sato et al., Journal of Power Sources 195, 5481-5486 (2010). DOI : 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.077 [3] K. Sato et al.,ECS Trans., 7 (1) 455 (2007). DOI: 10.1149/1.2729123 [4] K. Kumada et al.,ECS Trans., 91 (1), 825 (2019). DOI: 10.1149/09101.0825ecst [5] T. Tsuchikura et al.,ECS Trans., 91 (1), 579 (2019). DOI: 10.1149/09101.0579ecst [6] D Inaba et al., Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 27 (3), 121-132 (2012). DOI: 10.1527/tjsai.27.121 [7] D. Inaba et al., Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7301 LNAI(PART 2), 49–60(2012). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30220-6_5 [8] K. Fukui et al.,ECS Trans., 57(1), 571–580 (2013). DOI: 10.1149/05701.0571ecst</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-2043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-2035</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1149/MA2023-0154199mtgabs</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Electrochemical Society, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society), 2023-08, Vol.MA2023-01 (54), p.199-199</ispartof><rights>2023 ECS - The Electrochemical Society</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/MA2023-0154199mtgabs/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,38867,53842</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/MA2023-0154199mtgabs$$EView_record_in_IOP_Publishing$$FView_record_in_$$GIOP_Publishing</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sato, Kazuhisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Junya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Naohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukui, Ken-Ichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawada, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><title>Visualization of Micro Damage in SOFC Using Terahertz Waves</title><title>Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society)</title><addtitle>Meet. Abstr</addtitle><description>As SOFC commercialization progresses and mass production is realized, quality control during production will become extremely important. Currently, quality control is based on visual inspection and testing of single cells and stacks under operating conditions. This method, although reliable, is time-consuming, costly, and unsustainable. Therefore, the authors have been developing evaluation methods with the aim of developing a system that enables rapid, safe, nondestructive, automatic, and accurate quality assurance assessment. One of them is developing evaluation methods for internal microdefects using THz waves. Previously, the authors have been conducting nondestructive evaluation during SOFC operation using the acoustic emission (AE) method [1-5]; the AE method detects the sound (elastic waves) generated when cells, stacks, etc. are deformed or mechanically damaged, and is suitable for in-situ observation during operation. In this situation, we have also succeeded in classifying deformation and various damages of cells and stacks by machine learning of the obtained signals [6,7,8]. However, there are two main disadvantages of using SOFC as a quality assurance inspection method: First, it is passive. In other words, it cannot detect deformation or damage that has already occurred. The second is that it is dependent on the measurement environment, since AE signals are not physical quantities and therefore change depending on the measurement environment. In other words, the waveform shape, amplitude, and frequency components of the signals may change significantly by attaching a sensor to the waveguide. Therefore, signals that have been successfully classified may need to be readjusted or re-verified if the measurement conditions change. On the other hand, signals obtained from THz waves are often highly reproducible physical quantities. In addition, it is rapid and nondestructive because of the contactless and pulsed wave. However, THz waves have a long wavelength, which results in low resolution in multilayer thin-film structures. If it becomes possible to detect small defects in the layers and visualize the internal structure by utilizing machine learning, it will surely be a very effective evaluation method for SOFCs. In this paper, we report on the clustering and recent results of machine learning using fluctuations of THz reflected waves. Acknowledgements This research was conducted as part of the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) (JPNP20003). In addition, it was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (22K18865) and (22H01353). [1] K. Sato et al et al., Journal of Testing and Evaluation 34, JTE12707 (2006). DOI: 10.1520/JTE12707 [2] K. Sato et al., Journal of Power Sources 195, 5481-5486 (2010). DOI : 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.077 [3] K. Sato et al.,ECS Trans., 7 (1) 455 (2007). DOI: 10.1149/1.2729123 [4] K. Kumada et al.,ECS Trans., 91 (1), 825 (2019). DOI: 10.1149/09101.0825ecst [5] T. Tsuchikura et al.,ECS Trans., 91 (1), 579 (2019). DOI: 10.1149/09101.0579ecst [6] D Inaba et al., Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 27 (3), 121-132 (2012). DOI: 10.1527/tjsai.27.121 [7] D. Inaba et al., Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7301 LNAI(PART 2), 49–60(2012). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30220-6_5 [8] K. Fukui et al.,ECS Trans., 57(1), 571–580 (2013). DOI: 10.1149/05701.0571ecst</description><issn>2151-2043</issn><issn>2151-2035</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j09LwzAAxYMoOKffwEO-QDV_mwRPY7opbOxg1WNI06RmrO1IOsF9eisVwYun9y6_x_sBcI3RDcZM3a5nBBGaIcwZVqrpa1OmEzAhmOOMIMpPfzuj5-AipS1CVEpCJuDuNaSD2YWj6UPXws7DdbCxg_emMbWDoYXPm8UcvqTQ1rBw0by72B_hm_lw6RKcebNL7uonp6BYPBTzx2y1WT7NZ6vMyjxlQhnvBSeEEoswLr2rhBUWK6c4Z8RbInOelyYnVVUxS5kQzErJLMfMU8roFLBxdviVUnRe72NoTPzUGOlvfz366z_-A4ZGLHR7ve0OsR0-_o98AaYhXfU</recordid><startdate>20230828</startdate><enddate>20230828</enddate><creator>Sato, Kazuhisa</creator><creator>Tanaka, Junya</creator><creator>Hayashi, Naohiro</creator><creator>Fukui, Ken-Ichi</creator><creator>Kawada, Tatsuya</creator><general>The Electrochemical Society, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230828</creationdate><title>Visualization of Micro Damage in SOFC Using Terahertz Waves</title><author>Sato, Kazuhisa ; Tanaka, Junya ; Hayashi, Naohiro ; Fukui, Ken-Ichi ; Kawada, Tatsuya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c86s-79aff752232c011bfed7c7c19e95542fc28656ba62ddd4c34774c884c514f3343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sato, Kazuhisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Junya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Naohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukui, Ken-Ichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawada, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sato, Kazuhisa</au><au>Tanaka, Junya</au><au>Hayashi, Naohiro</au><au>Fukui, Ken-Ichi</au><au>Kawada, Tatsuya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visualization of Micro Damage in SOFC Using Terahertz Waves</atitle><jtitle>Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society)</jtitle><addtitle>Meet. Abstr</addtitle><date>2023-08-28</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>MA2023-01</volume><issue>54</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>199</epage><pages>199-199</pages><issn>2151-2043</issn><eissn>2151-2035</eissn><abstract>As SOFC commercialization progresses and mass production is realized, quality control during production will become extremely important. Currently, quality control is based on visual inspection and testing of single cells and stacks under operating conditions. This method, although reliable, is time-consuming, costly, and unsustainable. Therefore, the authors have been developing evaluation methods with the aim of developing a system that enables rapid, safe, nondestructive, automatic, and accurate quality assurance assessment. One of them is developing evaluation methods for internal microdefects using THz waves. Previously, the authors have been conducting nondestructive evaluation during SOFC operation using the acoustic emission (AE) method [1-5]; the AE method detects the sound (elastic waves) generated when cells, stacks, etc. are deformed or mechanically damaged, and is suitable for in-situ observation during operation. In this situation, we have also succeeded in classifying deformation and various damages of cells and stacks by machine learning of the obtained signals [6,7,8]. However, there are two main disadvantages of using SOFC as a quality assurance inspection method: First, it is passive. In other words, it cannot detect deformation or damage that has already occurred. The second is that it is dependent on the measurement environment, since AE signals are not physical quantities and therefore change depending on the measurement environment. In other words, the waveform shape, amplitude, and frequency components of the signals may change significantly by attaching a sensor to the waveguide. Therefore, signals that have been successfully classified may need to be readjusted or re-verified if the measurement conditions change. On the other hand, signals obtained from THz waves are often highly reproducible physical quantities. In addition, it is rapid and nondestructive because of the contactless and pulsed wave. However, THz waves have a long wavelength, which results in low resolution in multilayer thin-film structures. If it becomes possible to detect small defects in the layers and visualize the internal structure by utilizing machine learning, it will surely be a very effective evaluation method for SOFCs. In this paper, we report on the clustering and recent results of machine learning using fluctuations of THz reflected waves. Acknowledgements This research was conducted as part of the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) (JPNP20003). In addition, it was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (22K18865) and (22H01353). [1] K. Sato et al et al., Journal of Testing and Evaluation 34, JTE12707 (2006). DOI: 10.1520/JTE12707 [2] K. Sato et al., Journal of Power Sources 195, 5481-5486 (2010). DOI : 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.077 [3] K. Sato et al.,ECS Trans., 7 (1) 455 (2007). DOI: 10.1149/1.2729123 [4] K. Kumada et al.,ECS Trans., 91 (1), 825 (2019). DOI: 10.1149/09101.0825ecst [5] T. Tsuchikura et al.,ECS Trans., 91 (1), 579 (2019). DOI: 10.1149/09101.0579ecst [6] D Inaba et al., Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 27 (3), 121-132 (2012). DOI: 10.1527/tjsai.27.121 [7] D. Inaba et al., Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7301 LNAI(PART 2), 49–60(2012). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30220-6_5 [8] K. Fukui et al.,ECS Trans., 57(1), 571–580 (2013). DOI: 10.1149/05701.0571ecst</abstract><pub>The Electrochemical Society, Inc</pub><doi>10.1149/MA2023-0154199mtgabs</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2151-2043
ispartof Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society), 2023-08, Vol.MA2023-01 (54), p.199-199
issn 2151-2043
2151-2035
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1149_MA2023_0154199mtgabs
source IOP Publishing Free Content
title Visualization of Micro Damage in SOFC Using Terahertz Waves
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A39%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-iop_O3W&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visualization%20of%20Micro%20Damage%20in%20SOFC%20Using%20Terahertz%20Waves&rft.jtitle=Meeting%20abstracts%20(Electrochemical%20Society)&rft.au=Sato,%20Kazuhisa&rft.date=2023-08-28&rft.volume=MA2023-01&rft.issue=54&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=199&rft.pages=199-199&rft.issn=2151-2043&rft.eissn=2151-2035&rft_id=info:doi/10.1149/MA2023-0154199mtgabs&rft_dat=%3Ciop_O3W%3E199%3C/iop_O3W%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true