A Structure and Durability Comparison of Membrane Electrode Assembly Fabrication Methods: Self-Assembled Versus Hot-Pressed

The most common means of fabricating membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) for polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) involves a hot-press step. The conditions used to perform the hot-press impacts the performance and durability of the fuel cell. However, the hot-press process is not essential for ac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Electrochemical Society 2018-01, Vol.165 (6), p.F3045-F3052
Hauptverfasser: Hack, Jennifer, Heenan, T. M. M., Iacoviello, F., Mansor, N., Meyer, Q., Shearing, P., Brandon, N., Brett, D. J. L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page F3052
container_issue 6
container_start_page F3045
container_title Journal of the Electrochemical Society
container_volume 165
creator Hack, Jennifer
Heenan, T. M. M.
Iacoviello, F.
Mansor, N.
Meyer, Q.
Shearing, P.
Brandon, N.
Brett, D. J. L.
description The most common means of fabricating membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) for polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) involves a hot-press step. The conditions used to perform the hot-press impacts the performance and durability of the fuel cell. However, the hot-press process is not essential for achieving operational MEAs and some practitioners dispense with the hot-press stage altogether by using a self-assembled approach. By performing the integration of the components in-situ during fuel cell assembly, there is the potential to lower the cost and time of manufacture. This study investigates the electrochemical performance and mechanical microstructure of MEAs that were either hot-pressed or self-assembled (non-hot-pressed) and compared at beginning-of-test (BOT) and end-of-test (EOT), following accelerated stress testing. Hot-pressed and self-assembled MEAs were found to show negligible difference in their performance and almost identical performance degradation. X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT) showed distinct differences in the microstructure of the electrodes. In addition to a crack network in the catalyst layer, the self-assembled samples exhibit indentations that were not present in the hot-pressed sample. It was concluded that in-situ assembly of MEAs could be a suitable means of fabricating PEFC MEAs.
doi_str_mv 10.1149/2.0051806jes
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>iop_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1149_2_0051806jes</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>0051806JES</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-8fcdfdc18bfb35840b68f83d202b62d1b9a1b68ed6b74a09ee2489a81e6eb6513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs3f0COHkzN7Fez3kptrdCiUPW6JJsJbtluSpI9LP55Iy148TTMw8PLzEvILfAJQFY-JBPOcxC82KE_IyMos5xNAeCcjDiHlGVFDpfkyvtdXEFk0xH5ntFtcH0deodUdpo-9U6qpm3CQOd2f5Cu8baj1tAN7pWTHdJFi3VwViOdeR9hO9ClVK6pZWiiusHwZbV_pFtsDTspqOknOt97urKBvTmMWF-TCyNbjzenOSYfy8X7fMXWr88v89ma1SkvAhOm1kbXIJRRaS4yrgphRKoTnqgi0aBKCRGhLtQ0k7xETDJRSgFYoIofp2Nyf8ytnfXeoakOrtlLN1TAq9_iqqT6Ky7qd0e9sYdqZ3vXxeP-V38AkutwGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Structure and Durability Comparison of Membrane Electrode Assembly Fabrication Methods: Self-Assembled Versus Hot-Pressed</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><creator>Hack, Jennifer ; Heenan, T. M. M. ; Iacoviello, F. ; Mansor, N. ; Meyer, Q. ; Shearing, P. ; Brandon, N. ; Brett, D. J. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hack, Jennifer ; Heenan, T. M. M. ; Iacoviello, F. ; Mansor, N. ; Meyer, Q. ; Shearing, P. ; Brandon, N. ; Brett, D. J. L.</creatorcontrib><description>The most common means of fabricating membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) for polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) involves a hot-press step. The conditions used to perform the hot-press impacts the performance and durability of the fuel cell. However, the hot-press process is not essential for achieving operational MEAs and some practitioners dispense with the hot-press stage altogether by using a self-assembled approach. By performing the integration of the components in-situ during fuel cell assembly, there is the potential to lower the cost and time of manufacture. This study investigates the electrochemical performance and mechanical microstructure of MEAs that were either hot-pressed or self-assembled (non-hot-pressed) and compared at beginning-of-test (BOT) and end-of-test (EOT), following accelerated stress testing. Hot-pressed and self-assembled MEAs were found to show negligible difference in their performance and almost identical performance degradation. X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT) showed distinct differences in the microstructure of the electrodes. In addition to a crack network in the catalyst layer, the self-assembled samples exhibit indentations that were not present in the hot-pressed sample. It was concluded that in-situ assembly of MEAs could be a suitable means of fabricating PEFC MEAs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-4651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7111</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1149/2.0051806jes</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Electrochemical Society</publisher><ispartof>Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2018-01, Vol.165 (6), p.F3045-F3052</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by ECS.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-8fcdfdc18bfb35840b68f83d202b62d1b9a1b68ed6b74a09ee2489a81e6eb6513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-8fcdfdc18bfb35840b68f83d202b62d1b9a1b68ed6b74a09ee2489a81e6eb6513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8545-3126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/2.0051806jes/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,53821</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hack, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heenan, T. M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iacoviello, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansor, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shearing, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandon, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brett, D. J. L.</creatorcontrib><title>A Structure and Durability Comparison of Membrane Electrode Assembly Fabrication Methods: Self-Assembled Versus Hot-Pressed</title><title>Journal of the Electrochemical Society</title><addtitle>J. Electrochem. Soc</addtitle><description>The most common means of fabricating membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) for polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) involves a hot-press step. The conditions used to perform the hot-press impacts the performance and durability of the fuel cell. However, the hot-press process is not essential for achieving operational MEAs and some practitioners dispense with the hot-press stage altogether by using a self-assembled approach. By performing the integration of the components in-situ during fuel cell assembly, there is the potential to lower the cost and time of manufacture. This study investigates the electrochemical performance and mechanical microstructure of MEAs that were either hot-pressed or self-assembled (non-hot-pressed) and compared at beginning-of-test (BOT) and end-of-test (EOT), following accelerated stress testing. Hot-pressed and self-assembled MEAs were found to show negligible difference in their performance and almost identical performance degradation. X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT) showed distinct differences in the microstructure of the electrodes. In addition to a crack network in the catalyst layer, the self-assembled samples exhibit indentations that were not present in the hot-pressed sample. It was concluded that in-situ assembly of MEAs could be a suitable means of fabricating PEFC MEAs.</description><issn>0013-4651</issn><issn>1945-7111</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs3f0COHkzN7Fez3kptrdCiUPW6JJsJbtluSpI9LP55Iy148TTMw8PLzEvILfAJQFY-JBPOcxC82KE_IyMos5xNAeCcjDiHlGVFDpfkyvtdXEFk0xH5ntFtcH0deodUdpo-9U6qpm3CQOd2f5Cu8baj1tAN7pWTHdJFi3VwViOdeR9hO9ClVK6pZWiiusHwZbV_pFtsDTspqOknOt97urKBvTmMWF-TCyNbjzenOSYfy8X7fMXWr88v89ma1SkvAhOm1kbXIJRRaS4yrgphRKoTnqgi0aBKCRGhLtQ0k7xETDJRSgFYoIofp2Nyf8ytnfXeoakOrtlLN1TAq9_iqqT6Ky7qd0e9sYdqZ3vXxeP-V38AkutwGQ</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Hack, Jennifer</creator><creator>Heenan, T. M. M.</creator><creator>Iacoviello, F.</creator><creator>Mansor, N.</creator><creator>Meyer, Q.</creator><creator>Shearing, P.</creator><creator>Brandon, N.</creator><creator>Brett, D. J. L.</creator><general>The Electrochemical Society</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8545-3126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>A Structure and Durability Comparison of Membrane Electrode Assembly Fabrication Methods: Self-Assembled Versus Hot-Pressed</title><author>Hack, Jennifer ; Heenan, T. M. M. ; Iacoviello, F. ; Mansor, N. ; Meyer, Q. ; Shearing, P. ; Brandon, N. ; Brett, D. J. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-8fcdfdc18bfb35840b68f83d202b62d1b9a1b68ed6b74a09ee2489a81e6eb6513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hack, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heenan, T. M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iacoviello, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansor, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shearing, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandon, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brett, D. J. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Electrochemical Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hack, Jennifer</au><au>Heenan, T. M. M.</au><au>Iacoviello, F.</au><au>Mansor, N.</au><au>Meyer, Q.</au><au>Shearing, P.</au><au>Brandon, N.</au><au>Brett, D. J. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Structure and Durability Comparison of Membrane Electrode Assembly Fabrication Methods: Self-Assembled Versus Hot-Pressed</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Electrochemical Society</jtitle><addtitle>J. Electrochem. Soc</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>F3045</spage><epage>F3052</epage><pages>F3045-F3052</pages><issn>0013-4651</issn><eissn>1945-7111</eissn><abstract>The most common means of fabricating membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) for polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) involves a hot-press step. The conditions used to perform the hot-press impacts the performance and durability of the fuel cell. However, the hot-press process is not essential for achieving operational MEAs and some practitioners dispense with the hot-press stage altogether by using a self-assembled approach. By performing the integration of the components in-situ during fuel cell assembly, there is the potential to lower the cost and time of manufacture. This study investigates the electrochemical performance and mechanical microstructure of MEAs that were either hot-pressed or self-assembled (non-hot-pressed) and compared at beginning-of-test (BOT) and end-of-test (EOT), following accelerated stress testing. Hot-pressed and self-assembled MEAs were found to show negligible difference in their performance and almost identical performance degradation. X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT) showed distinct differences in the microstructure of the electrodes. In addition to a crack network in the catalyst layer, the self-assembled samples exhibit indentations that were not present in the hot-pressed sample. It was concluded that in-situ assembly of MEAs could be a suitable means of fabricating PEFC MEAs.</abstract><pub>The Electrochemical Society</pub><doi>10.1149/2.0051806jes</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8545-3126</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-4651
ispartof Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2018-01, Vol.165 (6), p.F3045-F3052
issn 0013-4651
1945-7111
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1149_2_0051806jes
source IOP Publishing Journals
title A Structure and Durability Comparison of Membrane Electrode Assembly Fabrication Methods: Self-Assembled Versus Hot-Pressed
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T13%3A59%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-iop_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Structure%20and%20Durability%20Comparison%20of%20Membrane%20Electrode%20Assembly%20Fabrication%20Methods:%20Self-Assembled%20Versus%20Hot-Pressed&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Electrochemical%20Society&rft.au=Hack,%20Jennifer&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=F3045&rft.epage=F3052&rft.pages=F3045-F3052&rft.issn=0013-4651&rft.eissn=1945-7111&rft_id=info:doi/10.1149/2.0051806jes&rft_dat=%3Ciop_cross%3E0051806JES%3C/iop_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true