Volume Rendering versus Maximum Intensity Projection in CT Angiography: What Works Best, When, and Why

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Radiographics 2006-05, Vol.26 (3), p.905-922
Hauptverfasser:	Fishman, Elliot K., Ney, Derek R., Heath, David G., Corl, Frank M., Horton, Karen M., Johnson, Pamela T.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	922
container_issue	3
container_start_page	905
container_title	Radiographics
container_volume	26
creator	Fishman, Elliot K. Ney, Derek R. Heath, David G. Corl, Frank M. Horton, Karen M. Johnson, Pamela T.
description
doi_str_mv	10.1148/rg.263055186
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1148_rg_263055186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1148_rg_263055186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-690ddf080454431314a79fa8361d66bbcfb7881151d99b75288869ee83bc71a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kNFOgzAYRhujiXN65wP0AWD2p7QU7yZxumRGY6a7JIW2rHOUpQUjb--Mxqvz5Vx8FwehayAzgFTc-GaWcEoYA8FP0ARYksVAE3qKJiTJIGaU0nN0EcKOEEiZ4BNk3rv90Gr8qp3S3roGf2ofhoCf5JdthxYvXa9dsP2IX3y303VvO4etw8Uaz11ju8bLw3a8xZut7PGm8x8B3-nQR0ehXYSlU8c1XqIzI_dBX_1xit4W9-viMV49PyyL-SquE-B9zHOilCGCpCxNKVBIZZYbKSgHxXlV1abKhABgoPK8ylgihOC51oJWdQaS0ymKfn9r34XgtSkP3rbSjyWQ8qdR6ZvyvxH9BsFPWUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Volume Rendering versus Maximum Intensity Projection in CT Angiography: What Works Best, When, and Why</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Fishman, Elliot K. ; Ney, Derek R. ; Heath, David G. ; Corl, Frank M. ; Horton, Karen M. ; Johnson, Pamela T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fishman, Elliot K. ; Ney, Derek R. ; Heath, David G. ; Corl, Frank M. ; Horton, Karen M. ; Johnson, Pamela T.</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0271-5333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/rg.263055186</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Radiographics, 2006-05, Vol.26 (3), p.905-922</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-690ddf080454431314a79fa8361d66bbcfb7881151d99b75288869ee83bc71a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-690ddf080454431314a79fa8361d66bbcfb7881151d99b75288869ee83bc71a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fishman, Elliot K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ney, Derek R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heath, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corl, Frank M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horton, Karen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Pamela T.</creatorcontrib><title>Volume Rendering versus Maximum Intensity Projection in CT Angiography: What Works Best, When, and Why</title><title>Radiographics</title><issn>0271-5333</issn><issn>1527-1323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kNFOgzAYRhujiXN65wP0AWD2p7QU7yZxumRGY6a7JIW2rHOUpQUjb--Mxqvz5Vx8FwehayAzgFTc-GaWcEoYA8FP0ARYksVAE3qKJiTJIGaU0nN0EcKOEEiZ4BNk3rv90Gr8qp3S3roGf2ofhoCf5JdthxYvXa9dsP2IX3y303VvO4etw8Uaz11ju8bLw3a8xZut7PGm8x8B3-nQR0ehXYSlU8c1XqIzI_dBX_1xit4W9-viMV49PyyL-SquE-B9zHOilCGCpCxNKVBIZZYbKSgHxXlV1abKhABgoPK8ylgihOC51oJWdQaS0ymKfn9r34XgtSkP3rbSjyWQ8qdR6ZvyvxH9BsFPWUA</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Fishman, Elliot K.</creator><creator>Ney, Derek R.</creator><creator>Heath, David G.</creator><creator>Corl, Frank M.</creator><creator>Horton, Karen M.</creator><creator>Johnson, Pamela T.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>Volume Rendering versus Maximum Intensity Projection in CT Angiography: What Works Best, When, and Why</title><author>Fishman, Elliot K. ; Ney, Derek R. ; Heath, David G. ; Corl, Frank M. ; Horton, Karen M. ; Johnson, Pamela T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c216t-690ddf080454431314a79fa8361d66bbcfb7881151d99b75288869ee83bc71a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fishman, Elliot K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ney, Derek R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heath, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corl, Frank M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horton, Karen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Pamela T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiographics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fishman, Elliot K.</au><au>Ney, Derek R.</au><au>Heath, David G.</au><au>Corl, Frank M.</au><au>Horton, Karen M.</au><au>Johnson, Pamela T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Volume Rendering versus Maximum Intensity Projection in CT Angiography: What Works Best, When, and Why</atitle><jtitle>Radiographics</jtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>905</spage><epage>922</epage><pages>905-922</pages><issn>0271-5333</issn><eissn>1527-1323</eissn><doi>10.1148/rg.263055186</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0271-5333
ispartof	Radiographics, 2006-05, Vol.26 (3), p.905-922
issn	0271-5333 1527-1323
language	eng
recordid	cdi_crossref_primary_10_1148_rg_263055186
source	Alma/SFX Local Collection
title	Volume Rendering versus Maximum Intensity Projection in CT Angiography: What Works Best, When, and Why
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A50%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Volume%20Rendering%20versus%20Maximum%20Intensity%20Projection%20in%20CT%20Angiography:%20What%20Works%20Best,%20When,%20and%20Why&rft.jtitle=Radiographics&rft.au=Fishman,%20Elliot%20K.&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=905&rft.epage=922&rft.pages=905-922&rft.issn=0271-5333&rft.eissn=1527-1323&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/rg.263055186&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1148_rg_263055186%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true