Development and Use of Domain-specific Learning Theories, Models, and Instruments in Computing Education
Use of theory within a field of research provides the foundation for designing effective research programs and establishing a deeper understanding of the results obtained. This, together with the emergence of domain-specific theory, is often taken as an indicator of the maturity of any research area...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ACM Transactions on Computing Education 2023-03, Vol.23 (1), p.1-48, Article 6 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 48 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | ACM Transactions on Computing Education |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Malmi, Lauri Sheard, Judy Kinnunen, Päivi Simon Sinclair, Jane |
description | Use of theory within a field of research provides the foundation for designing effective research programs and establishing a deeper understanding of the results obtained. This, together with the emergence of domain-specific theory, is often taken as an indicator of the maturity of any research area. This article explores the development and subsequent usage of domain-specific theories and theoretical constructs (TCs) in computing education research (CER). All TCs found in 878 papers published in three major CER publication venues over the period 2005–2020 were identified and assessed to determine the nature and purpose of the constructs found. We focused more closely on areas related to learning, studying, and progression, where our analysis found 80 new TCs that had been developed, based on multiple epistemological perspectives. Several existing frameworks were used to categorize the areas of CER focus in which TCs were found, the methodology by which they were developed, and the nature and purpose of the TCs. A citation analysis was undertaken, with 1,727 citing papers accessed to determine to what extent and in what ways TCs had been used and developed to inform subsequent work, also considering whether these aspects vary according to different focus areas within computing education. We noted which TCs were used most often and least often, and we present several brief case studies that demonstrate progressive development of domain-specific theory. The exploration provides insights into trends in theory development and suggests areas in which further work might be called for. Our findings indicate a general interest in the development of TCs during the period studied, and we show examples of how different approaches to theory development have been used. We present a framework suggesting how strategies for developing new TCs in CER might be structured and discuss the nature of theory development in relation to the field of CER. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1145/3530221 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1145_3530221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1381308</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1381308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a196t-eef1bb91994fc15064bd9f765572e21ff27e2e5eb9d46086070ef8d752c0ffda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFLwzAYxYMoOKd4F4TcvFhN0iZtjrJNnUy8bOeSJl9cZE1K0gn-965sDk_vwfu9d3gIXVPyQGnBH3OeE8boCRpRWYhMMCZO__lzdJHSFyFC5KwYofUUvmETuhZ8j5U3eJUAB4unoVXOZ6kD7azTeAEqeuc_8XINITpI9_g9GNjsdGjNferjdhhJ2Hk8CW237Qd8ZrZa9S74S3Rm1SbB1UHHaPU8W05es8XHy3zytMgUlaLPACxtGkmlLKymnIiiMdKWgvOSAaPWshIYcGikKQSpBCkJ2MqUnGlirVH5GN3td3UMKUWwdRddq-JPTUk9HFQfDtqRt3sSotNHavZG84rmpNrlN_tc6fYY_5V_Aevzak4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Use of Domain-specific Learning Theories, Models, and Instruments in Computing Education</title><source>Access via ACM Digital Library</source><creator>Malmi, Lauri ; Sheard, Judy ; Kinnunen, Päivi ; Simon ; Sinclair, Jane</creator><creatorcontrib>Malmi, Lauri ; Sheard, Judy ; Kinnunen, Päivi ; Simon ; Sinclair, Jane</creatorcontrib><description>Use of theory within a field of research provides the foundation for designing effective research programs and establishing a deeper understanding of the results obtained. This, together with the emergence of domain-specific theory, is often taken as an indicator of the maturity of any research area. This article explores the development and subsequent usage of domain-specific theories and theoretical constructs (TCs) in computing education research (CER). All TCs found in 878 papers published in three major CER publication venues over the period 2005–2020 were identified and assessed to determine the nature and purpose of the constructs found. We focused more closely on areas related to learning, studying, and progression, where our analysis found 80 new TCs that had been developed, based on multiple epistemological perspectives. Several existing frameworks were used to categorize the areas of CER focus in which TCs were found, the methodology by which they were developed, and the nature and purpose of the TCs. A citation analysis was undertaken, with 1,727 citing papers accessed to determine to what extent and in what ways TCs had been used and developed to inform subsequent work, also considering whether these aspects vary according to different focus areas within computing education. We noted which TCs were used most often and least often, and we present several brief case studies that demonstrate progressive development of domain-specific theory. The exploration provides insights into trends in theory development and suggests areas in which further work might be called for. Our findings indicate a general interest in the development of TCs during the period studied, and we show examples of how different approaches to theory development have been used. We present a framework suggesting how strategies for developing new TCs in CER might be structured and discuss the nature of theory development in relation to the field of CER.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1946-6226</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1946-6226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1145/3530221</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: ACM</publisher><subject>Citation Analysis ; Computer Science Education ; Computing education ; Educational Research ; Educational Trends ; Epistemology ; Learning Processes ; Learning Theories ; Social and professional topics</subject><ispartof>ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2023-03, Vol.23 (1), p.1-48, Article 6</ispartof><rights>Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a196t-eef1bb91994fc15064bd9f765572e21ff27e2e5eb9d46086070ef8d752c0ffda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a196t-eef1bb91994fc15064bd9f765572e21ff27e2e5eb9d46086070ef8d752c0ffda3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1064-796X ; 0000-0003-2285-283X ; 0000-0002-8650-4925 ; 0000-0002-2260-6594 ; 0000-0002-4179-8149</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3530221$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacm$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2282,27924,27925,40196,76228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1381308$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malmi, Lauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheard, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinnunen, Päivi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Jane</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Use of Domain-specific Learning Theories, Models, and Instruments in Computing Education</title><title>ACM Transactions on Computing Education</title><addtitle>ACM TOCE</addtitle><description>Use of theory within a field of research provides the foundation for designing effective research programs and establishing a deeper understanding of the results obtained. This, together with the emergence of domain-specific theory, is often taken as an indicator of the maturity of any research area. This article explores the development and subsequent usage of domain-specific theories and theoretical constructs (TCs) in computing education research (CER). All TCs found in 878 papers published in three major CER publication venues over the period 2005–2020 were identified and assessed to determine the nature and purpose of the constructs found. We focused more closely on areas related to learning, studying, and progression, where our analysis found 80 new TCs that had been developed, based on multiple epistemological perspectives. Several existing frameworks were used to categorize the areas of CER focus in which TCs were found, the methodology by which they were developed, and the nature and purpose of the TCs. A citation analysis was undertaken, with 1,727 citing papers accessed to determine to what extent and in what ways TCs had been used and developed to inform subsequent work, also considering whether these aspects vary according to different focus areas within computing education. We noted which TCs were used most often and least often, and we present several brief case studies that demonstrate progressive development of domain-specific theory. The exploration provides insights into trends in theory development and suggests areas in which further work might be called for. Our findings indicate a general interest in the development of TCs during the period studied, and we show examples of how different approaches to theory development have been used. We present a framework suggesting how strategies for developing new TCs in CER might be structured and discuss the nature of theory development in relation to the field of CER.</description><subject>Citation Analysis</subject><subject>Computer Science Education</subject><subject>Computing education</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Trends</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Social and professional topics</subject><issn>1946-6226</issn><issn>1946-6226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkMFLwzAYxYMoOKd4F4TcvFhN0iZtjrJNnUy8bOeSJl9cZE1K0gn-965sDk_vwfu9d3gIXVPyQGnBH3OeE8boCRpRWYhMMCZO__lzdJHSFyFC5KwYofUUvmETuhZ8j5U3eJUAB4unoVXOZ6kD7azTeAEqeuc_8XINITpI9_g9GNjsdGjNferjdhhJ2Hk8CW237Qd8ZrZa9S74S3Rm1SbB1UHHaPU8W05es8XHy3zytMgUlaLPACxtGkmlLKymnIiiMdKWgvOSAaPWshIYcGikKQSpBCkJ2MqUnGlirVH5GN3td3UMKUWwdRddq-JPTUk9HFQfDtqRt3sSotNHavZG84rmpNrlN_tc6fYY_5V_Aevzak4</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Malmi, Lauri</creator><creator>Sheard, Judy</creator><creator>Kinnunen, Päivi</creator><creator>Simon</creator><creator>Sinclair, Jane</creator><general>ACM</general><general>Association for Computing Machinery</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1064-796X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2285-283X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-4925</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2260-6594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4179-8149</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Development and Use of Domain-specific Learning Theories, Models, and Instruments in Computing Education</title><author>Malmi, Lauri ; Sheard, Judy ; Kinnunen, Päivi ; Simon ; Sinclair, Jane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a196t-eef1bb91994fc15064bd9f765572e21ff27e2e5eb9d46086070ef8d752c0ffda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Citation Analysis</topic><topic>Computer Science Education</topic><topic>Computing education</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Trends</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Social and professional topics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malmi, Lauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheard, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinnunen, Päivi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, Jane</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ACM Transactions on Computing Education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malmi, Lauri</au><au>Sheard, Judy</au><au>Kinnunen, Päivi</au><au>Simon</au><au>Sinclair, Jane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1381308</ericid><atitle>Development and Use of Domain-specific Learning Theories, Models, and Instruments in Computing Education</atitle><jtitle>ACM Transactions on Computing Education</jtitle><stitle>ACM TOCE</stitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>1-48</pages><artnum>6</artnum><issn>1946-6226</issn><eissn>1946-6226</eissn><abstract>Use of theory within a field of research provides the foundation for designing effective research programs and establishing a deeper understanding of the results obtained. This, together with the emergence of domain-specific theory, is often taken as an indicator of the maturity of any research area. This article explores the development and subsequent usage of domain-specific theories and theoretical constructs (TCs) in computing education research (CER). All TCs found in 878 papers published in three major CER publication venues over the period 2005–2020 were identified and assessed to determine the nature and purpose of the constructs found. We focused more closely on areas related to learning, studying, and progression, where our analysis found 80 new TCs that had been developed, based on multiple epistemological perspectives. Several existing frameworks were used to categorize the areas of CER focus in which TCs were found, the methodology by which they were developed, and the nature and purpose of the TCs. A citation analysis was undertaken, with 1,727 citing papers accessed to determine to what extent and in what ways TCs had been used and developed to inform subsequent work, also considering whether these aspects vary according to different focus areas within computing education. We noted which TCs were used most often and least often, and we present several brief case studies that demonstrate progressive development of domain-specific theory. The exploration provides insights into trends in theory development and suggests areas in which further work might be called for. Our findings indicate a general interest in the development of TCs during the period studied, and we show examples of how different approaches to theory development have been used. We present a framework suggesting how strategies for developing new TCs in CER might be structured and discuss the nature of theory development in relation to the field of CER.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>ACM</pub><doi>10.1145/3530221</doi><tpages>48</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1064-796X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2285-283X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-4925</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2260-6594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4179-8149</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1946-6226 |
ispartof | ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2023-03, Vol.23 (1), p.1-48, Article 6 |
issn | 1946-6226 1946-6226 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1145_3530221 |
source | Access via ACM Digital Library |
subjects | Citation Analysis Computer Science Education Computing education Educational Research Educational Trends Epistemology Learning Processes Learning Theories Social and professional topics |
title | Development and Use of Domain-specific Learning Theories, Models, and Instruments in Computing Education |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A25%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Use%20of%20Domain-specific%20Learning%20Theories,%20Models,%20and%20Instruments%20in%20Computing%20Education&rft.jtitle=ACM%20Transactions%20on%20Computing%20Education&rft.au=Malmi,%20Lauri&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=1-48&rft.artnum=6&rft.issn=1946-6226&rft.eissn=1946-6226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1145/3530221&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1381308%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1381308&rfr_iscdi=true |