A Usability Study of Four Secure Email Tools Using Paired Participants

Secure email is increasingly being touted as usable by novice users, with a push for adoption based on recent concerns about government surveillance. To determine whether secure email is ready for grassroots adoption, we employ a laboratory user study that recruits pairs of novice users to install a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ACM transactions on privacy and security 2019-04, Vol.22 (2), p.1-33
Hauptverfasser: Ruoti, Scott, Andersen, Jeff, Dickinson, Luke, Heidbrink, Scott, Monson, Tyler, O'neill, Mark, Reese, Ken, Spendlove, Brad, Vaziripour, Elham, Wu, Justin, Zappala, Daniel, Seamons, Kent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 33
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1
container_title ACM transactions on privacy and security
container_volume 22
creator Ruoti, Scott
Andersen, Jeff
Dickinson, Luke
Heidbrink, Scott
Monson, Tyler
O'neill, Mark
Reese, Ken
Spendlove, Brad
Vaziripour, Elham
Wu, Justin
Zappala, Daniel
Seamons, Kent
description Secure email is increasingly being touted as usable by novice users, with a push for adoption based on recent concerns about government surveillance. To determine whether secure email is ready for grassroots adoption, we employ a laboratory user study that recruits pairs of novice users to install and use several of the latest systems to exchange secure messages. We present both quantitative and qualitative results from 28 pairs of novices as they use Private WebMail (Pwm), Tutanota, and Virtru and 10 pairs of novices as they use Mailvelope. Participants report being more at ease with this type of study and better able to cope with mistakes since both participants are “on the same page.” We find that users prefer integrated solutions over depot-based solutions and that tutorials are important in helping first-time users. Finally, our results demonstrate that Pretty Good Privacy using manual key management is still unusable for novice users, with 9 of 10 participant pairs failing to complete the study.
doi_str_mv 10.1145/3313761
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1145_3313761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1145_3313761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-1fc844fd927a4c93649b7e3b7aa8f20e5f1fcb18bc8a854ddabf2cf11ed50963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtKw0AYRgdRsNTiK8zOVXT-uWaWpTQqFBQa12GuMpI2ZSZZ5O2tWLo63-LwLQ5Cj0CeAbh4YQyYknCDFpQrqKhQ_Pa6pbxHq1J-CCEgteYcFqhZ469ibOrTOOP9OPkZDxE3w5TxPrgpB7w9mNTjdhj6clbT8Rt_mpSDPyOPyaWTOY7lAd1F05ewunCJ2mbbbt6q3cfr-2a9qxwV9VhBdDXn0WuqDHeaSa6tCswqY-pISRDxbFioratNLbj3xkbqIkDwgmjJlujp_9bloZQcYnfK6WDy3AHp_gJ0lwDsFxzXTMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Usability Study of Four Secure Email Tools Using Paired Participants</title><source>ACM Digital Library Complete</source><creator>Ruoti, Scott ; Andersen, Jeff ; Dickinson, Luke ; Heidbrink, Scott ; Monson, Tyler ; O'neill, Mark ; Reese, Ken ; Spendlove, Brad ; Vaziripour, Elham ; Wu, Justin ; Zappala, Daniel ; Seamons, Kent</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruoti, Scott ; Andersen, Jeff ; Dickinson, Luke ; Heidbrink, Scott ; Monson, Tyler ; O'neill, Mark ; Reese, Ken ; Spendlove, Brad ; Vaziripour, Elham ; Wu, Justin ; Zappala, Daniel ; Seamons, Kent</creatorcontrib><description>Secure email is increasingly being touted as usable by novice users, with a push for adoption based on recent concerns about government surveillance. To determine whether secure email is ready for grassroots adoption, we employ a laboratory user study that recruits pairs of novice users to install and use several of the latest systems to exchange secure messages. We present both quantitative and qualitative results from 28 pairs of novices as they use Private WebMail (Pwm), Tutanota, and Virtru and 10 pairs of novices as they use Mailvelope. Participants report being more at ease with this type of study and better able to cope with mistakes since both participants are “on the same page.” We find that users prefer integrated solutions over depot-based solutions and that tutorials are important in helping first-time users. Finally, our results demonstrate that Pretty Good Privacy using manual key management is still unusable for novice users, with 9 of 10 participant pairs failing to complete the study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2471-2566</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2471-2574</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1145/3313761</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>ACM transactions on privacy and security, 2019-04, Vol.22 (2), p.1-33</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-1fc844fd927a4c93649b7e3b7aa8f20e5f1fcb18bc8a854ddabf2cf11ed50963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-1fc844fd927a4c93649b7e3b7aa8f20e5f1fcb18bc8a854ddabf2cf11ed50963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruoti, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidbrink, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monson, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'neill, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reese, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spendlove, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaziripour, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zappala, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seamons, Kent</creatorcontrib><title>A Usability Study of Four Secure Email Tools Using Paired Participants</title><title>ACM transactions on privacy and security</title><description>Secure email is increasingly being touted as usable by novice users, with a push for adoption based on recent concerns about government surveillance. To determine whether secure email is ready for grassroots adoption, we employ a laboratory user study that recruits pairs of novice users to install and use several of the latest systems to exchange secure messages. We present both quantitative and qualitative results from 28 pairs of novices as they use Private WebMail (Pwm), Tutanota, and Virtru and 10 pairs of novices as they use Mailvelope. Participants report being more at ease with this type of study and better able to cope with mistakes since both participants are “on the same page.” We find that users prefer integrated solutions over depot-based solutions and that tutorials are important in helping first-time users. Finally, our results demonstrate that Pretty Good Privacy using manual key management is still unusable for novice users, with 9 of 10 participant pairs failing to complete the study.</description><issn>2471-2566</issn><issn>2471-2574</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMtKw0AYRgdRsNTiK8zOVXT-uWaWpTQqFBQa12GuMpI2ZSZZ5O2tWLo63-LwLQ5Cj0CeAbh4YQyYknCDFpQrqKhQ_Pa6pbxHq1J-CCEgteYcFqhZ469ibOrTOOP9OPkZDxE3w5TxPrgpB7w9mNTjdhj6clbT8Rt_mpSDPyOPyaWTOY7lAd1F05ewunCJ2mbbbt6q3cfr-2a9qxwV9VhBdDXn0WuqDHeaSa6tCswqY-pISRDxbFioratNLbj3xkbqIkDwgmjJlujp_9bloZQcYnfK6WDy3AHp_gJ0lwDsFxzXTMQ</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Ruoti, Scott</creator><creator>Andersen, Jeff</creator><creator>Dickinson, Luke</creator><creator>Heidbrink, Scott</creator><creator>Monson, Tyler</creator><creator>O'neill, Mark</creator><creator>Reese, Ken</creator><creator>Spendlove, Brad</creator><creator>Vaziripour, Elham</creator><creator>Wu, Justin</creator><creator>Zappala, Daniel</creator><creator>Seamons, Kent</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>A Usability Study of Four Secure Email Tools Using Paired Participants</title><author>Ruoti, Scott ; Andersen, Jeff ; Dickinson, Luke ; Heidbrink, Scott ; Monson, Tyler ; O'neill, Mark ; Reese, Ken ; Spendlove, Brad ; Vaziripour, Elham ; Wu, Justin ; Zappala, Daniel ; Seamons, Kent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-1fc844fd927a4c93649b7e3b7aa8f20e5f1fcb18bc8a854ddabf2cf11ed50963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruoti, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heidbrink, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monson, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'neill, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reese, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spendlove, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaziripour, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zappala, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seamons, Kent</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ACM transactions on privacy and security</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruoti, Scott</au><au>Andersen, Jeff</au><au>Dickinson, Luke</au><au>Heidbrink, Scott</au><au>Monson, Tyler</au><au>O'neill, Mark</au><au>Reese, Ken</au><au>Spendlove, Brad</au><au>Vaziripour, Elham</au><au>Wu, Justin</au><au>Zappala, Daniel</au><au>Seamons, Kent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Usability Study of Four Secure Email Tools Using Paired Participants</atitle><jtitle>ACM transactions on privacy and security</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>1-33</pages><issn>2471-2566</issn><eissn>2471-2574</eissn><abstract>Secure email is increasingly being touted as usable by novice users, with a push for adoption based on recent concerns about government surveillance. To determine whether secure email is ready for grassroots adoption, we employ a laboratory user study that recruits pairs of novice users to install and use several of the latest systems to exchange secure messages. We present both quantitative and qualitative results from 28 pairs of novices as they use Private WebMail (Pwm), Tutanota, and Virtru and 10 pairs of novices as they use Mailvelope. Participants report being more at ease with this type of study and better able to cope with mistakes since both participants are “on the same page.” We find that users prefer integrated solutions over depot-based solutions and that tutorials are important in helping first-time users. Finally, our results demonstrate that Pretty Good Privacy using manual key management is still unusable for novice users, with 9 of 10 participant pairs failing to complete the study.</abstract><doi>10.1145/3313761</doi><tpages>33</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2471-2566
ispartof ACM transactions on privacy and security, 2019-04, Vol.22 (2), p.1-33
issn 2471-2566
2471-2574
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1145_3313761
source ACM Digital Library Complete
title A Usability Study of Four Secure Email Tools Using Paired Participants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T08%3A01%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Usability%20Study%20of%20Four%20Secure%20Email%20Tools%20Using%20Paired%20Participants&rft.jtitle=ACM%20transactions%20on%20privacy%20and%20security&rft.au=Ruoti,%20Scott&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=1-33&rft.issn=2471-2566&rft.eissn=2471-2574&rft_id=info:doi/10.1145/3313761&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1145_3313761%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true