The Internet of What?: Understanding Differences in Perceptions and Adoption for the Internet of Things

This study explores people's perceptions of and attitudes towards Internet of Things (IoT) devices and their resulting (non)adoption behaviors. Based on 38 interviews (19 pairs each consisting of a Millennial and their parent), we found that few had a clear understanding of IoT, even among thos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies, 2018-12, Vol.2 (4), p.1-22
Hauptverfasser: Page, Xinru, Bahirat, Paritosh, Safi, Muhammad I., Knijnenburg, Bart P., Wisniewski, Pamela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 22
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1
container_title Proceedings of ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies
container_volume 2
creator Page, Xinru
Bahirat, Paritosh
Safi, Muhammad I.
Knijnenburg, Bart P.
Wisniewski, Pamela
description This study explores people's perceptions of and attitudes towards Internet of Things (IoT) devices and their resulting (non)adoption behaviors. Based on 38 interviews (19 pairs each consisting of a Millennial and their parent), we found that few had a clear understanding of IoT, even among those who had already adopted it. Rather, they relied on two distinct conceptual models of IoT that shaped their beliefs, concerns, and adoption decisions: Many approached IoT with an "user-centric" technology mentality, viewing IoT devices as tools to be controlled by the end-user, and focusing on their tangible aspects (e.g. breakability). Others drew on an "agentic" technology perspective, where IoT behaviors were device-driven and, at times, negotiated between the user, other people, and/or the IoT devices. Our study revealed that consumer-oriented IoT currently cater towards the agentic view and raise concerns for those coming from a user-centric perspective. We also found that generational differences in attitudes towards IoT were rather explained by these differing perspectives. Instead of following the trend towards greater automation and agentic modes of interaction, we advocate for a hybrid and personalized approach that supports a spectrum of agentic and user-centric perspectives and provide design recommendations to work towards this end.
doi_str_mv 10.1145/3287061
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1145_3287061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1145_3287061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1145_32870613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYOA3NNAzNDQx1Tc2sjA3MDNkYuA0MjE30bU0NTNnQWJzMPAWF2cZGBgYWhobWxiYczKIhmSkKnjmlaQW5aWWKOSnKYRnJJbY8zCwpiXmFKfyQmluBnU31xBnD93kovzi4qLUtPiCoszcxKLKeEODeJDF8VCLjYlXCQAC7C7v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Internet of What?: Understanding Differences in Perceptions and Adoption for the Internet of Things</title><source>ACM Digital Library Complete</source><creator>Page, Xinru ; Bahirat, Paritosh ; Safi, Muhammad I. ; Knijnenburg, Bart P. ; Wisniewski, Pamela</creator><creatorcontrib>Page, Xinru ; Bahirat, Paritosh ; Safi, Muhammad I. ; Knijnenburg, Bart P. ; Wisniewski, Pamela</creatorcontrib><description>This study explores people's perceptions of and attitudes towards Internet of Things (IoT) devices and their resulting (non)adoption behaviors. Based on 38 interviews (19 pairs each consisting of a Millennial and their parent), we found that few had a clear understanding of IoT, even among those who had already adopted it. Rather, they relied on two distinct conceptual models of IoT that shaped their beliefs, concerns, and adoption decisions: Many approached IoT with an "user-centric" technology mentality, viewing IoT devices as tools to be controlled by the end-user, and focusing on their tangible aspects (e.g. breakability). Others drew on an "agentic" technology perspective, where IoT behaviors were device-driven and, at times, negotiated between the user, other people, and/or the IoT devices. Our study revealed that consumer-oriented IoT currently cater towards the agentic view and raise concerns for those coming from a user-centric perspective. We also found that generational differences in attitudes towards IoT were rather explained by these differing perspectives. Instead of following the trend towards greater automation and agentic modes of interaction, we advocate for a hybrid and personalized approach that supports a spectrum of agentic and user-centric perspectives and provide design recommendations to work towards this end.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2474-9567</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2474-9567</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1145/3287061</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Proceedings of ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies, 2018-12, Vol.2 (4), p.1-22</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1145_32870613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Page, Xinru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahirat, Paritosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safi, Muhammad I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knijnenburg, Bart P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisniewski, Pamela</creatorcontrib><title>The Internet of What?: Understanding Differences in Perceptions and Adoption for the Internet of Things</title><title>Proceedings of ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies</title><description>This study explores people's perceptions of and attitudes towards Internet of Things (IoT) devices and their resulting (non)adoption behaviors. Based on 38 interviews (19 pairs each consisting of a Millennial and their parent), we found that few had a clear understanding of IoT, even among those who had already adopted it. Rather, they relied on two distinct conceptual models of IoT that shaped their beliefs, concerns, and adoption decisions: Many approached IoT with an "user-centric" technology mentality, viewing IoT devices as tools to be controlled by the end-user, and focusing on their tangible aspects (e.g. breakability). Others drew on an "agentic" technology perspective, where IoT behaviors were device-driven and, at times, negotiated between the user, other people, and/or the IoT devices. Our study revealed that consumer-oriented IoT currently cater towards the agentic view and raise concerns for those coming from a user-centric perspective. We also found that generational differences in attitudes towards IoT were rather explained by these differing perspectives. Instead of following the trend towards greater automation and agentic modes of interaction, we advocate for a hybrid and personalized approach that supports a spectrum of agentic and user-centric perspectives and provide design recommendations to work towards this end.</description><issn>2474-9567</issn><issn>2474-9567</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYOA3NNAzNDQx1Tc2sjA3MDNkYuA0MjE30bU0NTNnQWJzMPAWF2cZGBgYWhobWxiYczKIhmSkKnjmlaQW5aWWKOSnKYRnJJbY8zCwpiXmFKfyQmluBnU31xBnD93kovzi4qLUtPiCoszcxKLKeEODeJDF8VCLjYlXCQAC7C7v</recordid><startdate>20181227</startdate><enddate>20181227</enddate><creator>Page, Xinru</creator><creator>Bahirat, Paritosh</creator><creator>Safi, Muhammad I.</creator><creator>Knijnenburg, Bart P.</creator><creator>Wisniewski, Pamela</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181227</creationdate><title>The Internet of What?</title><author>Page, Xinru ; Bahirat, Paritosh ; Safi, Muhammad I. ; Knijnenburg, Bart P. ; Wisniewski, Pamela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1145_32870613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Page, Xinru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahirat, Paritosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safi, Muhammad I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knijnenburg, Bart P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisniewski, Pamela</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Page, Xinru</au><au>Bahirat, Paritosh</au><au>Safi, Muhammad I.</au><au>Knijnenburg, Bart P.</au><au>Wisniewski, Pamela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Internet of What?: Understanding Differences in Perceptions and Adoption for the Internet of Things</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies</jtitle><date>2018-12-27</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>1-22</pages><issn>2474-9567</issn><eissn>2474-9567</eissn><abstract>This study explores people's perceptions of and attitudes towards Internet of Things (IoT) devices and their resulting (non)adoption behaviors. Based on 38 interviews (19 pairs each consisting of a Millennial and their parent), we found that few had a clear understanding of IoT, even among those who had already adopted it. Rather, they relied on two distinct conceptual models of IoT that shaped their beliefs, concerns, and adoption decisions: Many approached IoT with an "user-centric" technology mentality, viewing IoT devices as tools to be controlled by the end-user, and focusing on their tangible aspects (e.g. breakability). Others drew on an "agentic" technology perspective, where IoT behaviors were device-driven and, at times, negotiated between the user, other people, and/or the IoT devices. Our study revealed that consumer-oriented IoT currently cater towards the agentic view and raise concerns for those coming from a user-centric perspective. We also found that generational differences in attitudes towards IoT were rather explained by these differing perspectives. Instead of following the trend towards greater automation and agentic modes of interaction, we advocate for a hybrid and personalized approach that supports a spectrum of agentic and user-centric perspectives and provide design recommendations to work towards this end.</abstract><doi>10.1145/3287061</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2474-9567
ispartof Proceedings of ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies, 2018-12, Vol.2 (4), p.1-22
issn 2474-9567
2474-9567
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1145_3287061
source ACM Digital Library Complete
title The Internet of What?: Understanding Differences in Perceptions and Adoption for the Internet of Things
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A49%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Internet%20of%20What?:%20Understanding%20Differences%20in%20Perceptions%20and%20Adoption%20for%20the%20Internet%20of%20Things&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20ACM%20on%20interactive,%20mobile,%20wearable%20and%20ubiquitous%20technologies&rft.au=Page,%20Xinru&rft.date=2018-12-27&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=1-22&rft.issn=2474-9567&rft.eissn=2474-9567&rft_id=info:doi/10.1145/3287061&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1145_3287061%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true