Repeated S–I–A-type granite trilogy in the Lachlan Orogen and geochemical contrasts with A-type granites in Nigeria: implications for petrogenesis and tectonic discrimination

The classical S–I–A-type granites from the Lachlan Orogen, SE Australia, formed as a tectonic end-member of the accretionary orogenic spectrum, the Paleozoic Tasmanides. The sequence of S- to I- to A-type granite is repeated at least three times. All the granites are syn-extensional, formed in a dom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geological Society special publication 2020-01, Vol.491 (1), p.53-76
Hauptverfasser: Collins, William J., Huang, Hui-Qing, Bowden, Peter, Kemp, A. I. S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 76
container_issue 1
container_start_page 53
container_title Geological Society special publication
container_volume 491
creator Collins, William J.
Huang, Hui-Qing
Bowden, Peter
Kemp, A. I. S.
description The classical S–I–A-type granites from the Lachlan Orogen, SE Australia, formed as a tectonic end-member of the accretionary orogenic spectrum, the Paleozoic Tasmanides. The sequence of S- to I- to A-type granite is repeated at least three times. All the granites are syn-extensional, formed in a dominantly back-arc setting behind a single, stepwise-retreating arc system between 530 and 230 Ma. Peralkaline granites are rare. Systematic S–I–A progressions indicate the progressive dilution of an old crustal component as magmatism evolved from arc (S-type) to proximal back-arc (I-type) to distal back-arc (A-type) magmatism. The alkaline and peralkaline A-type Younger granites of Nigeria were generally hotter and drier than the Lachlan A-type granites and were emplaced into an anhydrous Precambrian basement during intermittent intracontinental rifting. This geodynamic environment contrasts with the distal back-arc setting of the Lachlan A-type granites, where magmatism migrated rapidly across the orogen. Tectonic discrimination diagrams are inappropriate for the Lachlan granites, placing them in the wrong settings. Only the peralkaline Narraburra suite of the Lachlan Orogen fits the genuine ‘within-plate’ setting of the Nigerian A-type granites. Such discrimination diagrams require re-evaluation in the light of an improved modern understanding of tectonic processes, particularly the role of extensional tectonism and its geodynamic drivers.
doi_str_mv 10.1144/SP491-2018-159
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gsl_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1144_SP491_2018_159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>GSLSpecPub18-159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a294t-5825e8f3afe14f68ab674c9c96d8bd0c07d61d21375e3fa52ec8921be7a171e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kb9u2zAQh9k_AWo4XjtzyySXpEiRzGYYaWLAaIq6mQWaOslsZFIgCRTe8g55kzxSnqSy0yEZMhzugLvfhwM-hL5SMqeU82-bn1zTghGqCir0BzTTUlGpKka4JuIjmowDLbhm8tPrHVfVZzQhJRGFklR_QbOU_hBCmBAjVU7Q0y8YwGRo8Ob54XE11qLIhwFwF413GXCOrg_dATuP8w7w2thdbzy-jaEDj41vcAfB7mDvrOmxDT5Hk3LCf13e4besdIT8cB1EZy6x2w_9mMku-ITbEPEA-QSF5NIJnMHm4J3FjUs2ur3zp-tzdNaaPsHsf5-iu-9Xv5c3xfr2erVcrAvDNM-FUEyAakvTAuVtpcy2ktxqq6tGbRtiiWwq2jBaSgFlawQDqzSjW5CGSgqqnKL5C9fGkFKEth7GJ0w81JTURyn1SUp9lFKPUsbAxUugS329DeE-vXf5D8gIi_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repeated S–I–A-type granite trilogy in the Lachlan Orogen and geochemical contrasts with A-type granites in Nigeria: implications for petrogenesis and tectonic discrimination</title><source>Lyell Collection</source><creator>Collins, William J. ; Huang, Hui-Qing ; Bowden, Peter ; Kemp, A. I. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Collins, William J. ; Huang, Hui-Qing ; Bowden, Peter ; Kemp, A. I. S.</creatorcontrib><description>The classical S–I–A-type granites from the Lachlan Orogen, SE Australia, formed as a tectonic end-member of the accretionary orogenic spectrum, the Paleozoic Tasmanides. The sequence of S- to I- to A-type granite is repeated at least three times. All the granites are syn-extensional, formed in a dominantly back-arc setting behind a single, stepwise-retreating arc system between 530 and 230 Ma. Peralkaline granites are rare. Systematic S–I–A progressions indicate the progressive dilution of an old crustal component as magmatism evolved from arc (S-type) to proximal back-arc (I-type) to distal back-arc (A-type) magmatism. The alkaline and peralkaline A-type Younger granites of Nigeria were generally hotter and drier than the Lachlan A-type granites and were emplaced into an anhydrous Precambrian basement during intermittent intracontinental rifting. This geodynamic environment contrasts with the distal back-arc setting of the Lachlan A-type granites, where magmatism migrated rapidly across the orogen. Tectonic discrimination diagrams are inappropriate for the Lachlan granites, placing them in the wrong settings. Only the peralkaline Narraburra suite of the Lachlan Orogen fits the genuine ‘within-plate’ setting of the Nigerian A-type granites. Such discrimination diagrams require re-evaluation in the light of an improved modern understanding of tectonic processes, particularly the role of extensional tectonism and its geodynamic drivers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-8719</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781786204486</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1786204487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-4927</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781786204905</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1786204908</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1144/SP491-2018-159</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Geological Society of London</publisher><ispartof>Geological Society special publication, 2020-01, Vol.491 (1), p.53-76</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by The Geological Society of London. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a294t-5825e8f3afe14f68ab674c9c96d8bd0c07d61d21375e3fa52ec8921be7a171e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a294t-5825e8f3afe14f68ab674c9c96d8bd0c07d61d21375e3fa52ec8921be7a171e83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4334-8205 ; 0000-0002-0104-7201</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/pdf/10.1144/SP491-2018-159$$EPDF$$P50$$Ggsl$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/full/10.1144/SP491-2018-159$$EHTML$$P50$$Ggsl$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,775,776,780,789,4014,27901,27902,75444,75448,75533</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collins, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Hui-Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp, A. I. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Repeated S–I–A-type granite trilogy in the Lachlan Orogen and geochemical contrasts with A-type granites in Nigeria: implications for petrogenesis and tectonic discrimination</title><title>Geological Society special publication</title><description>The classical S–I–A-type granites from the Lachlan Orogen, SE Australia, formed as a tectonic end-member of the accretionary orogenic spectrum, the Paleozoic Tasmanides. The sequence of S- to I- to A-type granite is repeated at least three times. All the granites are syn-extensional, formed in a dominantly back-arc setting behind a single, stepwise-retreating arc system between 530 and 230 Ma. Peralkaline granites are rare. Systematic S–I–A progressions indicate the progressive dilution of an old crustal component as magmatism evolved from arc (S-type) to proximal back-arc (I-type) to distal back-arc (A-type) magmatism. The alkaline and peralkaline A-type Younger granites of Nigeria were generally hotter and drier than the Lachlan A-type granites and were emplaced into an anhydrous Precambrian basement during intermittent intracontinental rifting. This geodynamic environment contrasts with the distal back-arc setting of the Lachlan A-type granites, where magmatism migrated rapidly across the orogen. Tectonic discrimination diagrams are inappropriate for the Lachlan granites, placing them in the wrong settings. Only the peralkaline Narraburra suite of the Lachlan Orogen fits the genuine ‘within-plate’ setting of the Nigerian A-type granites. Such discrimination diagrams require re-evaluation in the light of an improved modern understanding of tectonic processes, particularly the role of extensional tectonism and its geodynamic drivers.</description><issn>0305-8719</issn><issn>2041-4927</issn><isbn>9781786204486</isbn><isbn>1786204487</isbn><isbn>9781786204905</isbn><isbn>1786204908</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kb9u2zAQh9k_AWo4XjtzyySXpEiRzGYYaWLAaIq6mQWaOslsZFIgCRTe8g55kzxSnqSy0yEZMhzugLvfhwM-hL5SMqeU82-bn1zTghGqCir0BzTTUlGpKka4JuIjmowDLbhm8tPrHVfVZzQhJRGFklR_QbOU_hBCmBAjVU7Q0y8YwGRo8Ob54XE11qLIhwFwF413GXCOrg_dATuP8w7w2thdbzy-jaEDj41vcAfB7mDvrOmxDT5Hk3LCf13e4besdIT8cB1EZy6x2w_9mMku-ITbEPEA-QSF5NIJnMHm4J3FjUs2ur3zp-tzdNaaPsHsf5-iu-9Xv5c3xfr2erVcrAvDNM-FUEyAakvTAuVtpcy2ktxqq6tGbRtiiWwq2jBaSgFlawQDqzSjW5CGSgqqnKL5C9fGkFKEth7GJ0w81JTURyn1SUp9lFKPUsbAxUugS329DeE-vXf5D8gIi_A</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Collins, William J.</creator><creator>Huang, Hui-Qing</creator><creator>Bowden, Peter</creator><creator>Kemp, A. I. S.</creator><general>The Geological Society of London</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4334-8205</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0104-7201</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Repeated S–I–A-type granite trilogy in the Lachlan Orogen and geochemical contrasts with A-type granites in Nigeria: implications for petrogenesis and tectonic discrimination</title><author>Collins, William J. ; Huang, Hui-Qing ; Bowden, Peter ; Kemp, A. I. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a294t-5825e8f3afe14f68ab674c9c96d8bd0c07d61d21375e3fa52ec8921be7a171e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collins, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Hui-Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowden, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp, A. I. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Geological Society special publication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collins, William J.</au><au>Huang, Hui-Qing</au><au>Bowden, Peter</au><au>Kemp, A. I. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repeated S–I–A-type granite trilogy in the Lachlan Orogen and geochemical contrasts with A-type granites in Nigeria: implications for petrogenesis and tectonic discrimination</atitle><jtitle>Geological Society special publication</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>491</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>53-76</pages><issn>0305-8719</issn><eissn>2041-4927</eissn><isbn>9781786204486</isbn><isbn>1786204487</isbn><eisbn>9781786204905</eisbn><eisbn>1786204908</eisbn><abstract>The classical S–I–A-type granites from the Lachlan Orogen, SE Australia, formed as a tectonic end-member of the accretionary orogenic spectrum, the Paleozoic Tasmanides. The sequence of S- to I- to A-type granite is repeated at least three times. All the granites are syn-extensional, formed in a dominantly back-arc setting behind a single, stepwise-retreating arc system between 530 and 230 Ma. Peralkaline granites are rare. Systematic S–I–A progressions indicate the progressive dilution of an old crustal component as magmatism evolved from arc (S-type) to proximal back-arc (I-type) to distal back-arc (A-type) magmatism. The alkaline and peralkaline A-type Younger granites of Nigeria were generally hotter and drier than the Lachlan A-type granites and were emplaced into an anhydrous Precambrian basement during intermittent intracontinental rifting. This geodynamic environment contrasts with the distal back-arc setting of the Lachlan A-type granites, where magmatism migrated rapidly across the orogen. Tectonic discrimination diagrams are inappropriate for the Lachlan granites, placing them in the wrong settings. Only the peralkaline Narraburra suite of the Lachlan Orogen fits the genuine ‘within-plate’ setting of the Nigerian A-type granites. Such discrimination diagrams require re-evaluation in the light of an improved modern understanding of tectonic processes, particularly the role of extensional tectonism and its geodynamic drivers.</abstract><pub>The Geological Society of London</pub><doi>10.1144/SP491-2018-159</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4334-8205</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0104-7201</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-8719
ispartof Geological Society special publication, 2020-01, Vol.491 (1), p.53-76
issn 0305-8719
2041-4927
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1144_SP491_2018_159
source Lyell Collection
title Repeated S–I–A-type granite trilogy in the Lachlan Orogen and geochemical contrasts with A-type granites in Nigeria: implications for petrogenesis and tectonic discrimination
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T11%3A27%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gsl_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repeated%20S%E2%80%93I%E2%80%93A-type%20granite%20trilogy%20in%20the%20Lachlan%20Orogen%20and%20geochemical%20contrasts%20with%20A-type%20granites%20in%20Nigeria:%20implications%20for%20petrogenesis%20and%20tectonic%20discrimination&rft.jtitle=Geological%20Society%20special%20publication&rft.au=Collins,%20William%20J.&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=491&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=53-76&rft.issn=0305-8719&rft.eissn=2041-4927&rft.isbn=9781786204486&rft.isbn_list=1786204487&rft_id=info:doi/10.1144/SP491-2018-159&rft_dat=%3Cgsl_cross%3EGSLSpecPub18-159%3C/gsl_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781786204905&rft.eisbn_list=1786204908&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true