Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up
Follow-up is an essential component of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) if the success of EIA in improving the sustainability of a project once implemented is to be determined. This paper aims to establish universally-applicable criteria for EIA follow-up to evaluate project performance once as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental assessment policy and management 2019-06, Vol.21 (2), p.1950008 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1950008 |
container_title | Journal of environmental assessment policy and management |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Pinto, Elise Morrison-Saunders, Angus Bond, Alan Pope, Jenny Retief, Francois |
description | Follow-up is an essential component of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) if the success of EIA in improving the sustainability of a project once implemented is to be determined. This paper aims to establish universally-applicable criteria for EIA follow-up to evaluate project performance once assessed and underway. A suite of 24 criteria is derived from EIA follow-up best practice principles published by the International Association for Impact Assessment. The criteria are categorized according to the five dimensions of EIA follow-up: monitoring, evaluation, management, communication and governance. Posed as questions, the criteria support qualitative assessments of EIA follow-up performance for a project. Through application of the criteria to a case study currently under construction (the Shell Cove Marina project in eastern Australia), we found they provided an effective basis for a document review process delivering a short but informative account of the follow-up performance of the case study. The more robust evaluation of some of the criteria, particularly in the governance category, would require supplementary techniques such as interviews. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1142/S146433321950008X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1142_S146433321950008X</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2268487810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338X-6afe5a5e21fe8bba5f27f99b5c8384cf71a19193bae9668e2b8e78471302d6813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE9LAzEQxYMoWGo_gLeA59VM_u_NWq0WCgpa6G3JpolE4u6abCn99m6peOlpZnjvNzM8hK6B3AJwevcOXHLGGIVSEEL0-gyNQAlVCEnE-dAPcnHQL9Ek51ATKCXjlNMRun8MuQ8xhuYTm2aDp10X94dhlkLvUjDYtwk_uNzjt2RsH6zDT4spnrcxtrti1V2hC29idpO_Okar-dPH7KVYvj4vZtNlYRnT60Ia74QRjoJ3uq6N8FT5sqyF1Uxz6xUYKKFktXGllNrRWjuluQJG6EZqYGN0c9zbpfZnO_xTfbXb1AwnK0ql5lppIIMLji6b2pyT81WXwrdJ-wpIdciqOslqYMiR2bUpbrINrumDD_YfPUV-AQA7abA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2268487810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Pinto, Elise ; Morrison-Saunders, Angus ; Bond, Alan ; Pope, Jenny ; Retief, Francois</creator><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Elise ; Morrison-Saunders, Angus ; Bond, Alan ; Pope, Jenny ; Retief, Francois</creatorcontrib><description>Follow-up is an essential component of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) if the success of EIA in improving the sustainability of a project once implemented is to be determined. This paper aims to establish universally-applicable criteria for EIA follow-up to evaluate project performance once assessed and underway. A suite of 24 criteria is derived from EIA follow-up best practice principles published by the International Association for Impact Assessment. The criteria are categorized according to the five dimensions of EIA follow-up: monitoring, evaluation, management, communication and governance. Posed as questions, the criteria support qualitative assessments of EIA follow-up performance for a project. Through application of the criteria to a case study currently under construction (the Shell Cove Marina project in eastern Australia), we found they provided an effective basis for a document review process delivering a short but informative account of the follow-up performance of the case study. The more robust evaluation of some of the criteria, particularly in the governance category, would require supplementary techniques such as interviews.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-3332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-5605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1142/S146433321950008X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Case studies ; Criteria ; Distillation ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental impact ; Environmental impact assessment ; Evaluation ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental assessment policy and management, 2019-06, Vol.21 (2), p.1950008</ispartof><rights>2019, World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd.</rights><rights>2019. World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338X-6afe5a5e21fe8bba5f27f99b5c8384cf71a19193bae9668e2b8e78471302d6813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338X-6afe5a5e21fe8bba5f27f99b5c8384cf71a19193bae9668e2b8e78471302d6813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Elise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison-Saunders, Angus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retief, Francois</creatorcontrib><title>Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up</title><title>Journal of environmental assessment policy and management</title><description>Follow-up is an essential component of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) if the success of EIA in improving the sustainability of a project once implemented is to be determined. This paper aims to establish universally-applicable criteria for EIA follow-up to evaluate project performance once assessed and underway. A suite of 24 criteria is derived from EIA follow-up best practice principles published by the International Association for Impact Assessment. The criteria are categorized according to the five dimensions of EIA follow-up: monitoring, evaluation, management, communication and governance. Posed as questions, the criteria support qualitative assessments of EIA follow-up performance for a project. Through application of the criteria to a case study currently under construction (the Shell Cove Marina project in eastern Australia), we found they provided an effective basis for a document review process delivering a short but informative account of the follow-up performance of the case study. The more robust evaluation of some of the criteria, particularly in the governance category, would require supplementary techniques such as interviews.</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Distillation</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental impact assessment</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>1464-3332</issn><issn>1757-5605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkE9LAzEQxYMoWGo_gLeA59VM_u_NWq0WCgpa6G3JpolE4u6abCn99m6peOlpZnjvNzM8hK6B3AJwevcOXHLGGIVSEEL0-gyNQAlVCEnE-dAPcnHQL9Ek51ATKCXjlNMRun8MuQ8xhuYTm2aDp10X94dhlkLvUjDYtwk_uNzjt2RsH6zDT4spnrcxtrti1V2hC29idpO_Okar-dPH7KVYvj4vZtNlYRnT60Ia74QRjoJ3uq6N8FT5sqyF1Uxz6xUYKKFktXGllNrRWjuluQJG6EZqYGN0c9zbpfZnO_xTfbXb1AwnK0ql5lppIIMLji6b2pyT81WXwrdJ-wpIdciqOslqYMiR2bUpbrINrumDD_YfPUV-AQA7abA</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Pinto, Elise</creator><creator>Morrison-Saunders, Angus</creator><creator>Bond, Alan</creator><creator>Pope, Jenny</creator><creator>Retief, Francois</creator><general>World Scientific Publishing Company</general><general>World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte., Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up</title><author>Pinto, Elise ; Morrison-Saunders, Angus ; Bond, Alan ; Pope, Jenny ; Retief, Francois</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338X-6afe5a5e21fe8bba5f27f99b5c8384cf71a19193bae9668e2b8e78471302d6813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Distillation</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental impact assessment</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Elise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison-Saunders, Angus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retief, Francois</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental assessment policy and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pinto, Elise</au><au>Morrison-Saunders, Angus</au><au>Bond, Alan</au><au>Pope, Jenny</au><au>Retief, Francois</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental assessment policy and management</jtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1950008</spage><pages>1950008-</pages><issn>1464-3332</issn><eissn>1757-5605</eissn><abstract>Follow-up is an essential component of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) if the success of EIA in improving the sustainability of a project once implemented is to be determined. This paper aims to establish universally-applicable criteria for EIA follow-up to evaluate project performance once assessed and underway. A suite of 24 criteria is derived from EIA follow-up best practice principles published by the International Association for Impact Assessment. The criteria are categorized according to the five dimensions of EIA follow-up: monitoring, evaluation, management, communication and governance. Posed as questions, the criteria support qualitative assessments of EIA follow-up performance for a project. Through application of the criteria to a case study currently under construction (the Shell Cove Marina project in eastern Australia), we found they provided an effective basis for a document review process delivering a short but informative account of the follow-up performance of the case study. The more robust evaluation of some of the criteria, particularly in the governance category, would require supplementary techniques such as interviews.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>World Scientific Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.1142/S146433321950008X</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1464-3332 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental assessment policy and management, 2019-06, Vol.21 (2), p.1950008 |
issn | 1464-3332 1757-5605 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1142_S146433321950008X |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Best practice Case studies Criteria Distillation Environmental assessment Environmental impact Environmental impact assessment Evaluation Sustainability |
title | Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A35%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distilling%20and%20Applying%20Criteria%20for%20Best%20Practice%20EIA%20Follow-Up&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20assessment%20policy%20and%20management&rft.au=Pinto,%20Elise&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1950008&rft.pages=1950008-&rft.issn=1464-3332&rft.eissn=1757-5605&rft_id=info:doi/10.1142/S146433321950008X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2268487810%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2268487810&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |