Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up

Follow-up is an essential component of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) if the success of EIA in improving the sustainability of a project once implemented is to be determined. This paper aims to establish universally-applicable criteria for EIA follow-up to evaluate project performance once as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental assessment policy and management 2019-06, Vol.21 (2), p.1950008
Hauptverfasser: Pinto, Elise, Morrison-Saunders, Angus, Bond, Alan, Pope, Jenny, Retief, Francois
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1950008
container_title Journal of environmental assessment policy and management
container_volume 21
creator Pinto, Elise
Morrison-Saunders, Angus
Bond, Alan
Pope, Jenny
Retief, Francois
description Follow-up is an essential component of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) if the success of EIA in improving the sustainability of a project once implemented is to be determined. This paper aims to establish universally-applicable criteria for EIA follow-up to evaluate project performance once assessed and underway. A suite of 24 criteria is derived from EIA follow-up best practice principles published by the International Association for Impact Assessment. The criteria are categorized according to the five dimensions of EIA follow-up: monitoring, evaluation, management, communication and governance. Posed as questions, the criteria support qualitative assessments of EIA follow-up performance for a project. Through application of the criteria to a case study currently under construction (the Shell Cove Marina project in eastern Australia), we found they provided an effective basis for a document review process delivering a short but informative account of the follow-up performance of the case study. The more robust evaluation of some of the criteria, particularly in the governance category, would require supplementary techniques such as interviews.
doi_str_mv 10.1142/S146433321950008X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1142_S146433321950008X</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2268487810</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338X-6afe5a5e21fe8bba5f27f99b5c8384cf71a19193bae9668e2b8e78471302d6813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE9LAzEQxYMoWGo_gLeA59VM_u_NWq0WCgpa6G3JpolE4u6abCn99m6peOlpZnjvNzM8hK6B3AJwevcOXHLGGIVSEEL0-gyNQAlVCEnE-dAPcnHQL9Ek51ATKCXjlNMRun8MuQ8xhuYTm2aDp10X94dhlkLvUjDYtwk_uNzjt2RsH6zDT4spnrcxtrti1V2hC29idpO_Okar-dPH7KVYvj4vZtNlYRnT60Ia74QRjoJ3uq6N8FT5sqyF1Uxz6xUYKKFktXGllNrRWjuluQJG6EZqYGN0c9zbpfZnO_xTfbXb1AwnK0ql5lppIIMLji6b2pyT81WXwrdJ-wpIdciqOslqYMiR2bUpbrINrumDD_YfPUV-AQA7abA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2268487810</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Pinto, Elise ; Morrison-Saunders, Angus ; Bond, Alan ; Pope, Jenny ; Retief, Francois</creator><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Elise ; Morrison-Saunders, Angus ; Bond, Alan ; Pope, Jenny ; Retief, Francois</creatorcontrib><description>Follow-up is an essential component of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) if the success of EIA in improving the sustainability of a project once implemented is to be determined. This paper aims to establish universally-applicable criteria for EIA follow-up to evaluate project performance once assessed and underway. A suite of 24 criteria is derived from EIA follow-up best practice principles published by the International Association for Impact Assessment. The criteria are categorized according to the five dimensions of EIA follow-up: monitoring, evaluation, management, communication and governance. Posed as questions, the criteria support qualitative assessments of EIA follow-up performance for a project. Through application of the criteria to a case study currently under construction (the Shell Cove Marina project in eastern Australia), we found they provided an effective basis for a document review process delivering a short but informative account of the follow-up performance of the case study. The more robust evaluation of some of the criteria, particularly in the governance category, would require supplementary techniques such as interviews.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-3332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-5605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1142/S146433321950008X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Best practice ; Case studies ; Criteria ; Distillation ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental impact ; Environmental impact assessment ; Evaluation ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental assessment policy and management, 2019-06, Vol.21 (2), p.1950008</ispartof><rights>2019, World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd.</rights><rights>2019. World Scientific Publishing Europe Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338X-6afe5a5e21fe8bba5f27f99b5c8384cf71a19193bae9668e2b8e78471302d6813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338X-6afe5a5e21fe8bba5f27f99b5c8384cf71a19193bae9668e2b8e78471302d6813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Elise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison-Saunders, Angus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retief, Francois</creatorcontrib><title>Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up</title><title>Journal of environmental assessment policy and management</title><description>Follow-up is an essential component of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) if the success of EIA in improving the sustainability of a project once implemented is to be determined. This paper aims to establish universally-applicable criteria for EIA follow-up to evaluate project performance once assessed and underway. A suite of 24 criteria is derived from EIA follow-up best practice principles published by the International Association for Impact Assessment. The criteria are categorized according to the five dimensions of EIA follow-up: monitoring, evaluation, management, communication and governance. Posed as questions, the criteria support qualitative assessments of EIA follow-up performance for a project. Through application of the criteria to a case study currently under construction (the Shell Cove Marina project in eastern Australia), we found they provided an effective basis for a document review process delivering a short but informative account of the follow-up performance of the case study. The more robust evaluation of some of the criteria, particularly in the governance category, would require supplementary techniques such as interviews.</description><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Distillation</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental impact assessment</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>1464-3332</issn><issn>1757-5605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkE9LAzEQxYMoWGo_gLeA59VM_u_NWq0WCgpa6G3JpolE4u6abCn99m6peOlpZnjvNzM8hK6B3AJwevcOXHLGGIVSEEL0-gyNQAlVCEnE-dAPcnHQL9Ek51ATKCXjlNMRun8MuQ8xhuYTm2aDp10X94dhlkLvUjDYtwk_uNzjt2RsH6zDT4spnrcxtrti1V2hC29idpO_Okar-dPH7KVYvj4vZtNlYRnT60Ia74QRjoJ3uq6N8FT5sqyF1Uxz6xUYKKFktXGllNrRWjuluQJG6EZqYGN0c9zbpfZnO_xTfbXb1AwnK0ql5lppIIMLji6b2pyT81WXwrdJ-wpIdciqOslqYMiR2bUpbrINrumDD_YfPUV-AQA7abA</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Pinto, Elise</creator><creator>Morrison-Saunders, Angus</creator><creator>Bond, Alan</creator><creator>Pope, Jenny</creator><creator>Retief, Francois</creator><general>World Scientific Publishing Company</general><general>World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte., Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up</title><author>Pinto, Elise ; Morrison-Saunders, Angus ; Bond, Alan ; Pope, Jenny ; Retief, Francois</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338X-6afe5a5e21fe8bba5f27f99b5c8384cf71a19193bae9668e2b8e78471302d6813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Distillation</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental impact assessment</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Elise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison-Saunders, Angus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retief, Francois</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental assessment policy and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pinto, Elise</au><au>Morrison-Saunders, Angus</au><au>Bond, Alan</au><au>Pope, Jenny</au><au>Retief, Francois</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental assessment policy and management</jtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1950008</spage><pages>1950008-</pages><issn>1464-3332</issn><eissn>1757-5605</eissn><abstract>Follow-up is an essential component of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) if the success of EIA in improving the sustainability of a project once implemented is to be determined. This paper aims to establish universally-applicable criteria for EIA follow-up to evaluate project performance once assessed and underway. A suite of 24 criteria is derived from EIA follow-up best practice principles published by the International Association for Impact Assessment. The criteria are categorized according to the five dimensions of EIA follow-up: monitoring, evaluation, management, communication and governance. Posed as questions, the criteria support qualitative assessments of EIA follow-up performance for a project. Through application of the criteria to a case study currently under construction (the Shell Cove Marina project in eastern Australia), we found they provided an effective basis for a document review process delivering a short but informative account of the follow-up performance of the case study. The more robust evaluation of some of the criteria, particularly in the governance category, would require supplementary techniques such as interviews.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>World Scientific Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.1142/S146433321950008X</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-3332
ispartof Journal of environmental assessment policy and management, 2019-06, Vol.21 (2), p.1950008
issn 1464-3332
1757-5605
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1142_S146433321950008X
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Best practice
Case studies
Criteria
Distillation
Environmental assessment
Environmental impact
Environmental impact assessment
Evaluation
Sustainability
title Distilling and Applying Criteria for Best Practice EIA Follow-Up
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A35%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distilling%20and%20Applying%20Criteria%20for%20Best%20Practice%20EIA%20Follow-Up&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20assessment%20policy%20and%20management&rft.au=Pinto,%20Elise&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1950008&rft.pages=1950008-&rft.issn=1464-3332&rft.eissn=1757-5605&rft_id=info:doi/10.1142/S146433321950008X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2268487810%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2268487810&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true