Response of small mammals to clear-cutting and precommercial thinning in mixed forests of southeastern Quebec
The impacts of forest management on habitat characteristics, species richness, and population dynamics of small mammals remain ambiguous. We studied the response of small-mammal populations, including snowshoe hares, to clear-cutting with protection of advanced regeneration and soils (CPRS) and prec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of forest research 2005-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2813-2822 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2822 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2813 |
container_title | Canadian journal of forest research |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Etcheverry, P Ouellet, J.P Crete, M |
description | The impacts of forest management on habitat characteristics, species richness, and population dynamics of small mammals remain ambiguous. We studied the response of small-mammal populations, including snowshoe hares, to clear-cutting with protection of advanced regeneration and soils (CPRS) and precommercial thinning (PCT). We compared stands recently treated by CPRS or PCT with established stands dominated by deciduous or coniferous trees in two large blocks of mixed forests. We measured habitat components and abundance of small mammals in the four stand types. Trees (DBH greater than or equal to 9 cm) became very rare in CPRS stands and remained at low density in PCT stands, which stimulated the growth of herbs and seedlings, resulting in increased lateral cover. Tree harvest also generated coarse woody debris in CPRS stands, which did not persist in PCT stands. Small mammals responded to these disturbances in a species-specific manner but, overall, relative abundance and species richness of small mammals were lower in PCT stands than in CPRS and closed stands. Our results suggest that forest managers should exclude some stands from PCT following CPRS or natural perturbations, to maintain ecosystem diversity at the landscape level. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1139/x05-208 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1139_x05_208</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1000443731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6e15556ed821eaf8f760835982aa1ec5c13c7cda92f8b1e454dbd9eb483b7aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V2L1TAQBuAiCh5X8ScYBFcQqpMmadLLZfELFkRdr8s0nezp0iQ1aWH99-Z4DgiCejUXeXgnM1NVTzm85lx0b-5A1Q2Ye9WOl1K3IPT9agcgVa2g1Q-rRznfAoBoBewq_4XyEkMmFh3LHueZefSlZrZGZmfCVNttXadwwzCMbElko_eU7IQzW_dTCIenKTA_3dHIXEyU1_wrLW7rnjCvlAL7vNFA9nH1wJVoenKqZ9X1u7fXlx_qq0_vP15eXNVWCrnWLXGlVEujaTihM063YITqTIPIySrLhdV2xK5xZuAklRyHsaNBGjFoRHFWnR9jlxS_b-U_vZ-ypXnGQHHLfQOay06o_0IudWu0OcDnf8DbuKVQZugbAUpykLygl0dkU8w5keuXNHlMP3oO_eE2fblNaW6KfHGKw2xxdgmDnfJvrpUoEzfFvTq6kGzZazmG3f8j9Pzv-IT6ZXQFPjtCh7HHm1Q6f_vaABfAQRllhPgJBnWz8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230541041</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of small mammals to clear-cutting and precommercial thinning in mixed forests of southeastern Quebec</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Etcheverry, P ; Ouellet, J.P ; Crete, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Etcheverry, P ; Ouellet, J.P ; Crete, M</creatorcontrib><description>The impacts of forest management on habitat characteristics, species richness, and population dynamics of small mammals remain ambiguous. We studied the response of small-mammal populations, including snowshoe hares, to clear-cutting with protection of advanced regeneration and soils (CPRS) and precommercial thinning (PCT). We compared stands recently treated by CPRS or PCT with established stands dominated by deciduous or coniferous trees in two large blocks of mixed forests. We measured habitat components and abundance of small mammals in the four stand types. Trees (DBH greater than or equal to 9 cm) became very rare in CPRS stands and remained at low density in PCT stands, which stimulated the growth of herbs and seedlings, resulting in increased lateral cover. Tree harvest also generated coarse woody debris in CPRS stands, which did not persist in PCT stands. Small mammals responded to these disturbances in a species-specific manner but, overall, relative abundance and species richness of small mammals were lower in PCT stands than in CPRS and closed stands. Our results suggest that forest managers should exclude some stands from PCT following CPRS or natural perturbations, to maintain ecosystem diversity at the landscape level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/x05-208</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJFRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; boreal forests ; Clearcutting ; Coniferous trees ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Deciduous trees ; Food supply ; forest ecology ; forest ecosystems ; Forest harvesting and working in forest ; Forest management ; forest thinning ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; habitat preferences ; Habitats ; Lagomorpha ; Mammalia ; Mammals ; Mixed forests ; Nature ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Relative abundance ; Seedlings ; silvicultural practices ; small mammals ; species diversity ; Species richness ; statistical analysis ; Thinning ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 2005-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2813-2822</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright National Research Council of Canada Dec 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6e15556ed821eaf8f760835982aa1ec5c13c7cda92f8b1e454dbd9eb483b7aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6e15556ed821eaf8f760835982aa1ec5c13c7cda92f8b1e454dbd9eb483b7aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17536082$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Etcheverry, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouellet, J.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crete, M</creatorcontrib><title>Response of small mammals to clear-cutting and precommercial thinning in mixed forests of southeastern Quebec</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><description>The impacts of forest management on habitat characteristics, species richness, and population dynamics of small mammals remain ambiguous. We studied the response of small-mammal populations, including snowshoe hares, to clear-cutting with protection of advanced regeneration and soils (CPRS) and precommercial thinning (PCT). We compared stands recently treated by CPRS or PCT with established stands dominated by deciduous or coniferous trees in two large blocks of mixed forests. We measured habitat components and abundance of small mammals in the four stand types. Trees (DBH greater than or equal to 9 cm) became very rare in CPRS stands and remained at low density in PCT stands, which stimulated the growth of herbs and seedlings, resulting in increased lateral cover. Tree harvest also generated coarse woody debris in CPRS stands, which did not persist in PCT stands. Small mammals responded to these disturbances in a species-specific manner but, overall, relative abundance and species richness of small mammals were lower in PCT stands than in CPRS and closed stands. Our results suggest that forest managers should exclude some stands from PCT following CPRS or natural perturbations, to maintain ecosystem diversity at the landscape level.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>boreal forests</subject><subject>Clearcutting</subject><subject>Coniferous trees</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Deciduous trees</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>forest ecology</subject><subject>forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forest harvesting and working in forest</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>forest thinning</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>habitat preferences</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Lagomorpha</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Mixed forests</subject><subject>Nature</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>silvicultural practices</subject><subject>small mammals</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>statistical analysis</subject><subject>Thinning</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V2L1TAQBuAiCh5X8ScYBFcQqpMmadLLZfELFkRdr8s0nezp0iQ1aWH99-Z4DgiCejUXeXgnM1NVTzm85lx0b-5A1Q2Ye9WOl1K3IPT9agcgVa2g1Q-rRznfAoBoBewq_4XyEkMmFh3LHueZefSlZrZGZmfCVNttXadwwzCMbElko_eU7IQzW_dTCIenKTA_3dHIXEyU1_wrLW7rnjCvlAL7vNFA9nH1wJVoenKqZ9X1u7fXlx_qq0_vP15eXNVWCrnWLXGlVEujaTihM063YITqTIPIySrLhdV2xK5xZuAklRyHsaNBGjFoRHFWnR9jlxS_b-U_vZ-ypXnGQHHLfQOay06o_0IudWu0OcDnf8DbuKVQZugbAUpykLygl0dkU8w5keuXNHlMP3oO_eE2fblNaW6KfHGKw2xxdgmDnfJvrpUoEzfFvTq6kGzZazmG3f8j9Pzv-IT6ZXQFPjtCh7HHm1Q6f_vaABfAQRllhPgJBnWz8A</recordid><startdate>20051201</startdate><enddate>20051201</enddate><creator>Etcheverry, P</creator><creator>Ouellet, J.P</creator><creator>Crete, M</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>National Research Council of Canada</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051201</creationdate><title>Response of small mammals to clear-cutting and precommercial thinning in mixed forests of southeastern Quebec</title><author>Etcheverry, P ; Ouellet, J.P ; Crete, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-6e15556ed821eaf8f760835982aa1ec5c13c7cda92f8b1e454dbd9eb483b7aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>boreal forests</topic><topic>Clearcutting</topic><topic>Coniferous trees</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Deciduous trees</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>forest ecology</topic><topic>forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forest harvesting and working in forest</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>forest thinning</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>habitat preferences</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Lagomorpha</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Mixed forests</topic><topic>Nature</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>silvicultural practices</topic><topic>small mammals</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>statistical analysis</topic><topic>Thinning</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Etcheverry, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouellet, J.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crete, M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Etcheverry, P</au><au>Ouellet, J.P</au><au>Crete, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of small mammals to clear-cutting and precommercial thinning in mixed forests of southeastern Quebec</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><addtitle>Revue canadienne de recherche forestière</addtitle><date>2005-12-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2813</spage><epage>2822</epage><pages>2813-2822</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><coden>CJFRAR</coden><abstract>The impacts of forest management on habitat characteristics, species richness, and population dynamics of small mammals remain ambiguous. We studied the response of small-mammal populations, including snowshoe hares, to clear-cutting with protection of advanced regeneration and soils (CPRS) and precommercial thinning (PCT). We compared stands recently treated by CPRS or PCT with established stands dominated by deciduous or coniferous trees in two large blocks of mixed forests. We measured habitat components and abundance of small mammals in the four stand types. Trees (DBH greater than or equal to 9 cm) became very rare in CPRS stands and remained at low density in PCT stands, which stimulated the growth of herbs and seedlings, resulting in increased lateral cover. Tree harvest also generated coarse woody debris in CPRS stands, which did not persist in PCT stands. Small mammals responded to these disturbances in a species-specific manner but, overall, relative abundance and species richness of small mammals were lower in PCT stands than in CPRS and closed stands. Our results suggest that forest managers should exclude some stands from PCT following CPRS or natural perturbations, to maintain ecosystem diversity at the landscape level.</abstract><cop>Ottawa, Canada</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/x05-208</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-5067 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of forest research, 2005-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2813-2822 |
issn | 0045-5067 1208-6037 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1139_x05_208 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animal populations Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology biodiversity Biological and medical sciences boreal forests Clearcutting Coniferous trees Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Deciduous trees Food supply forest ecology forest ecosystems Forest harvesting and working in forest Forest management forest thinning Forestry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology habitat preferences Habitats Lagomorpha Mammalia Mammals Mixed forests Nature Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking Relative abundance Seedlings silvicultural practices small mammals species diversity Species richness statistical analysis Thinning Trees |
title | Response of small mammals to clear-cutting and precommercial thinning in mixed forests of southeastern Quebec |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A42%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20small%20mammals%20to%20clear-cutting%20and%20precommercial%20thinning%20in%20mixed%20forests%20of%20southeastern%20Quebec&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Etcheverry,%20P&rft.date=2005-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2813&rft.epage=2822&rft.pages=2813-2822&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft.coden=CJFRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/x05-208&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1000443731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230541041&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |