Comparaison de divers adsorbants naturels pour la récupération du plomb lors de la décontamination de chaux usées d'incinérateur de déchets municipaux

The objective of this research was to compare the efficiency of different natural adsorbents for lead recovery from basic leachate produced during municipal incinerator used lime decontamination. Shake flasks adsorption tests have shown that cedar barks, pine barks, cocoa shells, and peat moss are e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental engineering and science 2002-07, Vol.1 (4), p.265-273
Hauptverfasser: Blais, J F, Salvano, E, Hammy, F, Mercier, Guy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 273
container_issue 4
container_start_page 265
container_title Journal of environmental engineering and science
container_volume 1
creator Blais, J F
Salvano, E
Hammy, F
Mercier, Guy
description The objective of this research was to compare the efficiency of different natural adsorbents for lead recovery from basic leachate produced during municipal incinerator used lime decontamination. Shake flasks adsorption tests have shown that cedar barks, pine barks, cocoa shells, and peat moss are efficient and cheap adsorbents for lead removal from this type of leachate. Peanut skins are less efficient than other tested natural materials. The use of a hot-acid treatment (H 2 SO 4 0.75 M) allows to slightly increase lead removal performance of the adsorbents. However, this gain does not justify, from an economical point of view, the utilization of the chemical treatment. Tests done with different cedar and pine bark concentrations (2–30 g/L) have revealed that heavily lead-contaminated (approximately 130–140 mg/L) used lime leachate can be efficiently treated by addition of a small adsorbent concentration (e.g. 2 g/L). Finally, elution tests (HCl 0.5 M) with reuse of adsorbents have demonstrated that some natural materials, like cedar barks and cocoa shells, can be used for many adsorption–elution cycles without loss of lead removal efficiency. Key words: lead, adsorption, used lime, leaching, peat, bark.[Journal translation]
doi_str_mv 10.1139/s02-017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1139_s02_017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1139_s02_017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1139_s02_0173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj01OwzAQhS0EEuVHXGF2XQXslrR0XYE4AIvuoqnjqkbxj2ZiBHfhAjlHLsYEVaxZzSy-7z09pe6MvjdmuXlgvai0WZ-pmXncrKpFvdqd__21uVRXzO9am3ptnmbqe5tCRkLPKULroPUfjhiw5UR7jD1DxL6Q6xhyKgQdAo2DLXkcCHs_SQVyl8IeuiSiRAjSCpJij8HHE-TAHrF8QuFxcILNfbQ-_oY4iZ2axTk6KQwleuuz0Dfq4oAdu9vTvVbzl-e37WtlKTGTOzSZfED6aoxupvGNjG9k_PL_5A_u5mdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparaison de divers adsorbants naturels pour la récupération du plomb lors de la décontamination de chaux usées d'incinérateur de déchets municipaux</title><source>ICE Virtual Library Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Blais, J F ; Salvano, E ; Hammy, F ; Mercier, Guy</creator><creatorcontrib>Blais, J F ; Salvano, E ; Hammy, F ; Mercier, Guy</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this research was to compare the efficiency of different natural adsorbents for lead recovery from basic leachate produced during municipal incinerator used lime decontamination. Shake flasks adsorption tests have shown that cedar barks, pine barks, cocoa shells, and peat moss are efficient and cheap adsorbents for lead removal from this type of leachate. Peanut skins are less efficient than other tested natural materials. The use of a hot-acid treatment (H 2 SO 4 0.75 M) allows to slightly increase lead removal performance of the adsorbents. However, this gain does not justify, from an economical point of view, the utilization of the chemical treatment. Tests done with different cedar and pine bark concentrations (2–30 g/L) have revealed that heavily lead-contaminated (approximately 130–140 mg/L) used lime leachate can be efficiently treated by addition of a small adsorbent concentration (e.g. 2 g/L). Finally, elution tests (HCl 0.5 M) with reuse of adsorbents have demonstrated that some natural materials, like cedar barks and cocoa shells, can be used for many adsorption–elution cycles without loss of lead removal efficiency. Key words: lead, adsorption, used lime, leaching, peat, bark.[Journal translation]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1496-2551</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1496-256X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/s02-017</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of environmental engineering and science, 2002-07, Vol.1 (4), p.265-273</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blais, J F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvano, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammy, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercier, Guy</creatorcontrib><title>Comparaison de divers adsorbants naturels pour la récupération du plomb lors de la décontamination de chaux usées d'incinérateur de déchets municipaux</title><title>Journal of environmental engineering and science</title><description>The objective of this research was to compare the efficiency of different natural adsorbents for lead recovery from basic leachate produced during municipal incinerator used lime decontamination. Shake flasks adsorption tests have shown that cedar barks, pine barks, cocoa shells, and peat moss are efficient and cheap adsorbents for lead removal from this type of leachate. Peanut skins are less efficient than other tested natural materials. The use of a hot-acid treatment (H 2 SO 4 0.75 M) allows to slightly increase lead removal performance of the adsorbents. However, this gain does not justify, from an economical point of view, the utilization of the chemical treatment. Tests done with different cedar and pine bark concentrations (2–30 g/L) have revealed that heavily lead-contaminated (approximately 130–140 mg/L) used lime leachate can be efficiently treated by addition of a small adsorbent concentration (e.g. 2 g/L). Finally, elution tests (HCl 0.5 M) with reuse of adsorbents have demonstrated that some natural materials, like cedar barks and cocoa shells, can be used for many adsorption–elution cycles without loss of lead removal efficiency. Key words: lead, adsorption, used lime, leaching, peat, bark.[Journal translation]</description><issn>1496-2551</issn><issn>1496-256X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNj01OwzAQhS0EEuVHXGF2XQXslrR0XYE4AIvuoqnjqkbxj2ZiBHfhAjlHLsYEVaxZzSy-7z09pe6MvjdmuXlgvai0WZ-pmXncrKpFvdqd__21uVRXzO9am3ptnmbqe5tCRkLPKULroPUfjhiw5UR7jD1DxL6Q6xhyKgQdAo2DLXkcCHs_SQVyl8IeuiSiRAjSCpJij8HHE-TAHrF8QuFxcILNfbQ-_oY4iZ2axTk6KQwleuuz0Dfq4oAdu9vTvVbzl-e37WtlKTGTOzSZfED6aoxupvGNjG9k_PL_5A_u5mdA</recordid><startdate>20020701</startdate><enddate>20020701</enddate><creator>Blais, J F</creator><creator>Salvano, E</creator><creator>Hammy, F</creator><creator>Mercier, Guy</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020701</creationdate><title>Comparaison de divers adsorbants naturels pour la récupération du plomb lors de la décontamination de chaux usées d'incinérateur de déchets municipaux</title><author>Blais, J F ; Salvano, E ; Hammy, F ; Mercier, Guy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1139_s02_0173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blais, J F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvano, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammy, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercier, Guy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental engineering and science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blais, J F</au><au>Salvano, E</au><au>Hammy, F</au><au>Mercier, Guy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparaison de divers adsorbants naturels pour la récupération du plomb lors de la décontamination de chaux usées d'incinérateur de déchets municipaux</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental engineering and science</jtitle><date>2002-07-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>265-273</pages><issn>1496-2551</issn><eissn>1496-256X</eissn><abstract>The objective of this research was to compare the efficiency of different natural adsorbents for lead recovery from basic leachate produced during municipal incinerator used lime decontamination. Shake flasks adsorption tests have shown that cedar barks, pine barks, cocoa shells, and peat moss are efficient and cheap adsorbents for lead removal from this type of leachate. Peanut skins are less efficient than other tested natural materials. The use of a hot-acid treatment (H 2 SO 4 0.75 M) allows to slightly increase lead removal performance of the adsorbents. However, this gain does not justify, from an economical point of view, the utilization of the chemical treatment. Tests done with different cedar and pine bark concentrations (2–30 g/L) have revealed that heavily lead-contaminated (approximately 130–140 mg/L) used lime leachate can be efficiently treated by addition of a small adsorbent concentration (e.g. 2 g/L). Finally, elution tests (HCl 0.5 M) with reuse of adsorbents have demonstrated that some natural materials, like cedar barks and cocoa shells, can be used for many adsorption–elution cycles without loss of lead removal efficiency. Key words: lead, adsorption, used lime, leaching, peat, bark.[Journal translation]</abstract><doi>10.1139/s02-017</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1496-2551
ispartof Journal of environmental engineering and science, 2002-07, Vol.1 (4), p.265-273
issn 1496-2551
1496-256X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1139_s02_017
source ICE Virtual Library Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Comparaison de divers adsorbants naturels pour la récupération du plomb lors de la décontamination de chaux usées d'incinérateur de déchets municipaux
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A08%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparaison%20de%20divers%20adsorbants%20naturels%20pour%20la%20r%C3%A9cup%C3%A9ration%20du%20plomb%20lors%20de%20la%20d%C3%A9contamination%20de%20chaux%20us%C3%A9es%20d'incin%C3%A9rateur%20de%20d%C3%A9chets%20municipaux&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20engineering%20and%20science&rft.au=Blais,%20J%20F&rft.date=2002-07-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=265-273&rft.issn=1496-2551&rft.eissn=1496-256X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/s02-017&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1139_s02_017%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true