Indoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-19

Ongoing disease surveillance is a critical tool to mitigate viral outbreaks, especially during a pandemic. Environmental monitoring has significant promise even following widespread vaccination among high-risk populations. The goal of this work is to demonstrate molecular severe acute respiratory sy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:mSystems 2021-04, Vol.6 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Renninger, Nicole, Nastasi, Nicholas, Bope, Ashleigh, Cochran, Samuel J, Haines, Sarah R, Balasubrahmaniam, Neeraja, Stuart, Katelyn, Bivins, Aaron, Bibby, Kyle, Hull, Natalie M, Dannemiller, Karen C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title mSystems
container_volume 6
creator Renninger, Nicole
Nastasi, Nicholas
Bope, Ashleigh
Cochran, Samuel J
Haines, Sarah R
Balasubrahmaniam, Neeraja
Stuart, Katelyn
Bivins, Aaron
Bibby, Kyle
Hull, Natalie M
Dannemiller, Karen C
description Ongoing disease surveillance is a critical tool to mitigate viral outbreaks, especially during a pandemic. Environmental monitoring has significant promise even following widespread vaccination among high-risk populations. The goal of this work is to demonstrate molecular severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) monitoring in bulk floor dust and related samples as a proof of concept of a noninvasive environmental surveillance methodology for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and potentially other viral diseases. Surface swab, passive sampler, and bulk floor dust samples were collected from the rooms of individuals positive for COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2 was measured with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) and two digital PCR (dPCR) methods. Bulk dust samples had a geometric mean concentration of 163 copies/mg of dust and ranged from nondetects to 23,049 copies/mg of dust detected using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). An average of 89% of bulk dust samples were positive for the virus by the detection methods compared to 55% of surface swabs and fewer on the passive sampler (19% carpet, 29% polystyrene). In bulk dust, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 76%, 93%, and 97% of samples measured by qPCR, chip-based dPCR, and droplet dPCR, respectively. Detectable viral RNA in the bulk vacuum bags did not measurably decay over 4 weeks, despite the application of a disinfectant before room cleaning. Future monitoring efforts should further evaluate RNA persistence and heterogeneity in dust. This study did not measure virus infectivity in dust or potential transmission associated with dust. Overall, this work demonstrates that bulk floor dust is a potentially useful matrix for long-term monitoring of viral disease in high-risk populations and buildings. Environmental surveillance to assess pathogen presence within a community is proving to be a critical tool to protect public health, and it is especially relevant during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, environmental surveillance tools also allow for the detection of asymptomatic disease carriers and for routine monitoring of a large number of people as has been shown for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater monitoring. However, additional monitoring techniques are needed to screen for outbreaks in high-risk settings such as congregate care facilities. Here, we demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in bulk floor dust collected from rooms housing infected individuals. This analysis suggests tha
doi_str_mv 10.1128/MSYSTEMS.01350-20
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1128_mSystems_01350_20</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_40ebeb5ae4634bf1a54c8d8156736640</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>33850045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a546t-c75b2e5ef945cfcc3d3aa39641e18cd811a0b14212dc90082c9132c903c2544f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1LwzAUhoMoOuZ-gDfSP9B5Tj76cSPI5sfAsYuq4FVI03R2tI0knei_t24qDkG8ScIJz3NO8hJygjBGpMnZPHvM7i7n2RiQCQgp7JEBZXEaCojj_R_nIzLyfgUAGLEYaXpIjhhLBAAXA8JnbWGtC6Zr3wXKByqYq85Vr0HZF7O1ezFVXatWm8CWwWTxMJuGmB6Tg1LV3ow-9yG5v7q8m9yEt4vr2eTiNlSCR12oY5FTI0yZcqFLrVnBlGJpxNFgoosEUUGOnCItdAqQUJ0i6xdgmgrOSzYks623sGoln13VKPcmrarkpmDdUirXVbo2koPJTS6U4RHjeYn9BDrpW4goZlHEoXedb13P67wxhTZt51S9I929aasnubQvMhE8BqS9ALcC7az3zpTfLIL8SEQ2_s13pvFyk4ik8B8m-82Mt4zyDZUru3Zt_8d_Aqc_X_bd4itk9g6fH6Yc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-19</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Renninger, Nicole ; Nastasi, Nicholas ; Bope, Ashleigh ; Cochran, Samuel J ; Haines, Sarah R ; Balasubrahmaniam, Neeraja ; Stuart, Katelyn ; Bivins, Aaron ; Bibby, Kyle ; Hull, Natalie M ; Dannemiller, Karen C</creator><contributor>Kent, Angela D ; Kent, Angela D.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Renninger, Nicole ; Nastasi, Nicholas ; Bope, Ashleigh ; Cochran, Samuel J ; Haines, Sarah R ; Balasubrahmaniam, Neeraja ; Stuart, Katelyn ; Bivins, Aaron ; Bibby, Kyle ; Hull, Natalie M ; Dannemiller, Karen C ; Kent, Angela D ; Kent, Angela D.</creatorcontrib><description>Ongoing disease surveillance is a critical tool to mitigate viral outbreaks, especially during a pandemic. Environmental monitoring has significant promise even following widespread vaccination among high-risk populations. The goal of this work is to demonstrate molecular severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) monitoring in bulk floor dust and related samples as a proof of concept of a noninvasive environmental surveillance methodology for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and potentially other viral diseases. Surface swab, passive sampler, and bulk floor dust samples were collected from the rooms of individuals positive for COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2 was measured with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) and two digital PCR (dPCR) methods. Bulk dust samples had a geometric mean concentration of 163 copies/mg of dust and ranged from nondetects to 23,049 copies/mg of dust detected using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). An average of 89% of bulk dust samples were positive for the virus by the detection methods compared to 55% of surface swabs and fewer on the passive sampler (19% carpet, 29% polystyrene). In bulk dust, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 76%, 93%, and 97% of samples measured by qPCR, chip-based dPCR, and droplet dPCR, respectively. Detectable viral RNA in the bulk vacuum bags did not measurably decay over 4 weeks, despite the application of a disinfectant before room cleaning. Future monitoring efforts should further evaluate RNA persistence and heterogeneity in dust. This study did not measure virus infectivity in dust or potential transmission associated with dust. Overall, this work demonstrates that bulk floor dust is a potentially useful matrix for long-term monitoring of viral disease in high-risk populations and buildings. Environmental surveillance to assess pathogen presence within a community is proving to be a critical tool to protect public health, and it is especially relevant during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, environmental surveillance tools also allow for the detection of asymptomatic disease carriers and for routine monitoring of a large number of people as has been shown for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater monitoring. However, additional monitoring techniques are needed to screen for outbreaks in high-risk settings such as congregate care facilities. Here, we demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in bulk floor dust collected from rooms housing infected individuals. This analysis suggests that dust may be a useful and efficient matrix for routine surveillance of viral disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2379-5077</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2379-5077</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/MSYSTEMS.01350-20</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33850045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; dust ; indoor environment ; Observation ; SARS-CoV-2 ; surveillance ; virus</subject><ispartof>mSystems, 2021-04, Vol.6 (2)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Renninger et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Renninger et al. 2021 Renninger et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a546t-c75b2e5ef945cfcc3d3aa39641e18cd811a0b14212dc90082c9132c903c2544f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a546t-c75b2e5ef945cfcc3d3aa39641e18cd811a0b14212dc90082c9132c903c2544f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3142-6090 ; 0000-0003-4754-6804</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/mSystems.01350-20$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasm2$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/mSystems.01350-20$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasm2$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,3188,27924,27925,52751,52752,52753,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33850045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kent, Angela D</contributor><contributor>Kent, Angela D.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Renninger, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nastasi, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bope, Ashleigh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Samuel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haines, Sarah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balasubrahmaniam, Neeraja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuart, Katelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bivins, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bibby, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, Natalie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dannemiller, Karen C</creatorcontrib><title>Indoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-19</title><title>mSystems</title><addtitle>mSystems</addtitle><addtitle>mSystems</addtitle><description>Ongoing disease surveillance is a critical tool to mitigate viral outbreaks, especially during a pandemic. Environmental monitoring has significant promise even following widespread vaccination among high-risk populations. The goal of this work is to demonstrate molecular severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) monitoring in bulk floor dust and related samples as a proof of concept of a noninvasive environmental surveillance methodology for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and potentially other viral diseases. Surface swab, passive sampler, and bulk floor dust samples were collected from the rooms of individuals positive for COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2 was measured with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) and two digital PCR (dPCR) methods. Bulk dust samples had a geometric mean concentration of 163 copies/mg of dust and ranged from nondetects to 23,049 copies/mg of dust detected using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). An average of 89% of bulk dust samples were positive for the virus by the detection methods compared to 55% of surface swabs and fewer on the passive sampler (19% carpet, 29% polystyrene). In bulk dust, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 76%, 93%, and 97% of samples measured by qPCR, chip-based dPCR, and droplet dPCR, respectively. Detectable viral RNA in the bulk vacuum bags did not measurably decay over 4 weeks, despite the application of a disinfectant before room cleaning. Future monitoring efforts should further evaluate RNA persistence and heterogeneity in dust. This study did not measure virus infectivity in dust or potential transmission associated with dust. Overall, this work demonstrates that bulk floor dust is a potentially useful matrix for long-term monitoring of viral disease in high-risk populations and buildings. Environmental surveillance to assess pathogen presence within a community is proving to be a critical tool to protect public health, and it is especially relevant during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, environmental surveillance tools also allow for the detection of asymptomatic disease carriers and for routine monitoring of a large number of people as has been shown for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater monitoring. However, additional monitoring techniques are needed to screen for outbreaks in high-risk settings such as congregate care facilities. Here, we demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in bulk floor dust collected from rooms housing infected individuals. This analysis suggests that dust may be a useful and efficient matrix for routine surveillance of viral disease.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>dust</subject><subject>indoor environment</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>surveillance</subject><subject>virus</subject><issn>2379-5077</issn><issn>2379-5077</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV1LwzAUhoMoOuZ-gDfSP9B5Tj76cSPI5sfAsYuq4FVI03R2tI0knei_t24qDkG8ScIJz3NO8hJygjBGpMnZPHvM7i7n2RiQCQgp7JEBZXEaCojj_R_nIzLyfgUAGLEYaXpIjhhLBAAXA8JnbWGtC6Zr3wXKByqYq85Vr0HZF7O1ezFVXatWm8CWwWTxMJuGmB6Tg1LV3ow-9yG5v7q8m9yEt4vr2eTiNlSCR12oY5FTI0yZcqFLrVnBlGJpxNFgoosEUUGOnCItdAqQUJ0i6xdgmgrOSzYks623sGoln13VKPcmrarkpmDdUirXVbo2koPJTS6U4RHjeYn9BDrpW4goZlHEoXedb13P67wxhTZt51S9I929aasnubQvMhE8BqS9ALcC7az3zpTfLIL8SEQ2_s13pvFyk4ik8B8m-82Mt4zyDZUru3Zt_8d_Aqc_X_bd4itk9g6fH6Yc</recordid><startdate>20210413</startdate><enddate>20210413</enddate><creator>Renninger, Nicole</creator><creator>Nastasi, Nicholas</creator><creator>Bope, Ashleigh</creator><creator>Cochran, Samuel J</creator><creator>Haines, Sarah R</creator><creator>Balasubrahmaniam, Neeraja</creator><creator>Stuart, Katelyn</creator><creator>Bivins, Aaron</creator><creator>Bibby, Kyle</creator><creator>Hull, Natalie M</creator><creator>Dannemiller, Karen C</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3142-6090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4754-6804</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210413</creationdate><title>Indoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-19</title><author>Renninger, Nicole ; Nastasi, Nicholas ; Bope, Ashleigh ; Cochran, Samuel J ; Haines, Sarah R ; Balasubrahmaniam, Neeraja ; Stuart, Katelyn ; Bivins, Aaron ; Bibby, Kyle ; Hull, Natalie M ; Dannemiller, Karen C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a546t-c75b2e5ef945cfcc3d3aa39641e18cd811a0b14212dc90082c9132c903c2544f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>dust</topic><topic>indoor environment</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>surveillance</topic><topic>virus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Renninger, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nastasi, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bope, Ashleigh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Samuel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haines, Sarah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balasubrahmaniam, Neeraja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuart, Katelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bivins, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bibby, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, Natalie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dannemiller, Karen C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>mSystems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Renninger, Nicole</au><au>Nastasi, Nicholas</au><au>Bope, Ashleigh</au><au>Cochran, Samuel J</au><au>Haines, Sarah R</au><au>Balasubrahmaniam, Neeraja</au><au>Stuart, Katelyn</au><au>Bivins, Aaron</au><au>Bibby, Kyle</au><au>Hull, Natalie M</au><au>Dannemiller, Karen C</au><au>Kent, Angela D</au><au>Kent, Angela D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-19</atitle><jtitle>mSystems</jtitle><stitle>mSystems</stitle><addtitle>mSystems</addtitle><date>2021-04-13</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>2379-5077</issn><eissn>2379-5077</eissn><abstract>Ongoing disease surveillance is a critical tool to mitigate viral outbreaks, especially during a pandemic. Environmental monitoring has significant promise even following widespread vaccination among high-risk populations. The goal of this work is to demonstrate molecular severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) monitoring in bulk floor dust and related samples as a proof of concept of a noninvasive environmental surveillance methodology for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and potentially other viral diseases. Surface swab, passive sampler, and bulk floor dust samples were collected from the rooms of individuals positive for COVID-19, and SARS-CoV-2 was measured with quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) and two digital PCR (dPCR) methods. Bulk dust samples had a geometric mean concentration of 163 copies/mg of dust and ranged from nondetects to 23,049 copies/mg of dust detected using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). An average of 89% of bulk dust samples were positive for the virus by the detection methods compared to 55% of surface swabs and fewer on the passive sampler (19% carpet, 29% polystyrene). In bulk dust, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 76%, 93%, and 97% of samples measured by qPCR, chip-based dPCR, and droplet dPCR, respectively. Detectable viral RNA in the bulk vacuum bags did not measurably decay over 4 weeks, despite the application of a disinfectant before room cleaning. Future monitoring efforts should further evaluate RNA persistence and heterogeneity in dust. This study did not measure virus infectivity in dust or potential transmission associated with dust. Overall, this work demonstrates that bulk floor dust is a potentially useful matrix for long-term monitoring of viral disease in high-risk populations and buildings. Environmental surveillance to assess pathogen presence within a community is proving to be a critical tool to protect public health, and it is especially relevant during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, environmental surveillance tools also allow for the detection of asymptomatic disease carriers and for routine monitoring of a large number of people as has been shown for SARS-CoV-2 wastewater monitoring. However, additional monitoring techniques are needed to screen for outbreaks in high-risk settings such as congregate care facilities. Here, we demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 can be detected in bulk floor dust collected from rooms housing infected individuals. This analysis suggests that dust may be a useful and efficient matrix for routine surveillance of viral disease.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>33850045</pmid><doi>10.1128/MSYSTEMS.01350-20</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3142-6090</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4754-6804</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2379-5077
ispartof mSystems, 2021-04, Vol.6 (2)
issn 2379-5077
2379-5077
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1128_mSystems_01350_20
source American Society for Microbiology; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects COVID-19
dust
indoor environment
Observation
SARS-CoV-2
surveillance
virus
title Indoor Dust as a Matrix for Surveillance of COVID-19
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T20%3A28%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indoor%20Dust%20as%20a%20Matrix%20for%20Surveillance%20of%20COVID-19&rft.jtitle=mSystems&rft.au=Renninger,%20Nicole&rft.date=2021-04-13&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=2379-5077&rft.eissn=2379-5077&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/MSYSTEMS.01350-20&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_doaj_%3E33850045%3C/pubmed_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33850045&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_40ebeb5ae4634bf1a54c8d8156736640&rfr_iscdi=true