Susceptibility to impulsive noise: A review of early studies
The maximum tolerable exposures returned by damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise are often designed to protect the population to the 5th percentile most susceptible exposed person. To protect human research volunteers, estimates of this location on the distribution must be estimated rather than...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2020-10, Vol.148 (4), p.2802-2802 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2802 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2802 |
container_title | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
container_volume | 148 |
creator | Flamme, Gregory Deiters, Kristy K. Tasko, Stephen M. |
description | The maximum tolerable exposures returned by damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise are often designed to protect the population to the 5th percentile most susceptible exposed person. To protect human research volunteers, estimates of this location on the distribution must be estimated rather than measured directly. In this presentation, we present threshold shift distributions from human studies of threshold shifts prior to about 1980. Sample sizes ranged in these studies ranged between 5 and 66 ears. The threshold shift distributions implied by these data are compared against assumptions made in more recent damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise. Implications for the development and/or improvement of damage-risk criteria will be discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1121/1.5147804 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>scitation_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_5147804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>jasa</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c694-d359001dc5ad2c9cb0b570925dddaf68da6388eb9dc4ac02dc448ac237074ca73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j11LwzAYhYMoWKcX_oPcKnQmadIm4s0Y8wMGXrj7kr5J4ZVuLUk66b-3sl179XDg4RwOIfecLTkX_IkvFZeVZvKCZFwJlmsl5CXJGGM8l6Ysr8lNjN9zVLowGXn5GiP4IWGDHaaJpp7ifhi7iEdPDz1G_0xXNPgj-h_at9Tb0E00ptGhj7fkqrVd9HdnLsjudbNbv-fbz7eP9WqbQ2lk7gpl5nUHyjoBBhrWqIoZoZxzti21s2WhtW-MA2mBiRlSWxBFxSoJtioW5OFUC6GPMfi2HgLubZhqzuq_1zWvz69n9_HkRsBkE_aHf-Rf1x1XPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Susceptibility to impulsive noise: A review of early studies</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Flamme, Gregory ; Deiters, Kristy K. ; Tasko, Stephen M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Flamme, Gregory ; Deiters, Kristy K. ; Tasko, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><description>The maximum tolerable exposures returned by damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise are often designed to protect the population to the 5th percentile most susceptible exposed person. To protect human research volunteers, estimates of this location on the distribution must be estimated rather than measured directly. In this presentation, we present threshold shift distributions from human studies of threshold shifts prior to about 1980. Sample sizes ranged in these studies ranged between 5 and 66 ears. The threshold shift distributions implied by these data are compared against assumptions made in more recent damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise. Implications for the development and/or improvement of damage-risk criteria will be discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.5147804</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020-10, Vol.148 (4), p.2802-2802</ispartof><rights>Acoustical Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jasa/article-lookup/doi/10.1121/1.5147804$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,780,784,794,1564,4510,27923,27924,76155</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flamme, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deiters, Kristy K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasko, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><title>Susceptibility to impulsive noise: A review of early studies</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>The maximum tolerable exposures returned by damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise are often designed to protect the population to the 5th percentile most susceptible exposed person. To protect human research volunteers, estimates of this location on the distribution must be estimated rather than measured directly. In this presentation, we present threshold shift distributions from human studies of threshold shifts prior to about 1980. Sample sizes ranged in these studies ranged between 5 and 66 ears. The threshold shift distributions implied by these data are compared against assumptions made in more recent damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise. Implications for the development and/or improvement of damage-risk criteria will be discussed.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j11LwzAYhYMoWKcX_oPcKnQmadIm4s0Y8wMGXrj7kr5J4ZVuLUk66b-3sl179XDg4RwOIfecLTkX_IkvFZeVZvKCZFwJlmsl5CXJGGM8l6Ysr8lNjN9zVLowGXn5GiP4IWGDHaaJpp7ifhi7iEdPDz1G_0xXNPgj-h_at9Tb0E00ptGhj7fkqrVd9HdnLsjudbNbv-fbz7eP9WqbQ2lk7gpl5nUHyjoBBhrWqIoZoZxzti21s2WhtW-MA2mBiRlSWxBFxSoJtioW5OFUC6GPMfi2HgLubZhqzuq_1zWvz69n9_HkRsBkE_aHf-Rf1x1XPg</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Flamme, Gregory</creator><creator>Deiters, Kristy K.</creator><creator>Tasko, Stephen M.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Susceptibility to impulsive noise: A review of early studies</title><author>Flamme, Gregory ; Deiters, Kristy K. ; Tasko, Stephen M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c694-d359001dc5ad2c9cb0b570925dddaf68da6388eb9dc4ac02dc448ac237074ca73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flamme, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deiters, Kristy K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasko, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flamme, Gregory</au><au>Deiters, Kristy K.</au><au>Tasko, Stephen M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Susceptibility to impulsive noise: A review of early studies</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>148</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2802</spage><epage>2802</epage><pages>2802-2802</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>The maximum tolerable exposures returned by damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise are often designed to protect the population to the 5th percentile most susceptible exposed person. To protect human research volunteers, estimates of this location on the distribution must be estimated rather than measured directly. In this presentation, we present threshold shift distributions from human studies of threshold shifts prior to about 1980. Sample sizes ranged in these studies ranged between 5 and 66 ears. The threshold shift distributions implied by these data are compared against assumptions made in more recent damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise. Implications for the development and/or improvement of damage-risk criteria will be discussed.</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.5147804</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-4966 |
ispartof | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020-10, Vol.148 (4), p.2802-2802 |
issn | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_5147804 |
source | AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America |
title | Susceptibility to impulsive noise: A review of early studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A54%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scitation_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Susceptibility%20to%20impulsive%20noise:%20A%20review%20of%20early%20studies&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Flamme,%20Gregory&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=148&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2802&rft.epage=2802&rft.pages=2802-2802&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.5147804&rft_dat=%3Cscitation_cross%3Ejasa%3C/scitation_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |