Susceptibility to impulsive noise: A review of early studies

The maximum tolerable exposures returned by damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise are often designed to protect the population to the 5th percentile most susceptible exposed person. To protect human research volunteers, estimates of this location on the distribution must be estimated rather than...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2020-10, Vol.148 (4), p.2802-2802
Hauptverfasser: Flamme, Gregory, Deiters, Kristy K., Tasko, Stephen M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2802
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2802
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 148
creator Flamme, Gregory
Deiters, Kristy K.
Tasko, Stephen M.
description The maximum tolerable exposures returned by damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise are often designed to protect the population to the 5th percentile most susceptible exposed person. To protect human research volunteers, estimates of this location on the distribution must be estimated rather than measured directly. In this presentation, we present threshold shift distributions from human studies of threshold shifts prior to about 1980. Sample sizes ranged in these studies ranged between 5 and 66 ears. The threshold shift distributions implied by these data are compared against assumptions made in more recent damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise. Implications for the development and/or improvement of damage-risk criteria will be discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.5147804
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scitation_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_5147804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>jasa</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c694-d359001dc5ad2c9cb0b570925dddaf68da6388eb9dc4ac02dc448ac237074ca73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j11LwzAYhYMoWKcX_oPcKnQmadIm4s0Y8wMGXrj7kr5J4ZVuLUk66b-3sl179XDg4RwOIfecLTkX_IkvFZeVZvKCZFwJlmsl5CXJGGM8l6Ysr8lNjN9zVLowGXn5GiP4IWGDHaaJpp7ifhi7iEdPDz1G_0xXNPgj-h_at9Tb0E00ptGhj7fkqrVd9HdnLsjudbNbv-fbz7eP9WqbQ2lk7gpl5nUHyjoBBhrWqIoZoZxzti21s2WhtW-MA2mBiRlSWxBFxSoJtioW5OFUC6GPMfi2HgLubZhqzuq_1zWvz69n9_HkRsBkE_aHf-Rf1x1XPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Susceptibility to impulsive noise: A review of early studies</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Flamme, Gregory ; Deiters, Kristy K. ; Tasko, Stephen M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Flamme, Gregory ; Deiters, Kristy K. ; Tasko, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><description>The maximum tolerable exposures returned by damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise are often designed to protect the population to the 5th percentile most susceptible exposed person. To protect human research volunteers, estimates of this location on the distribution must be estimated rather than measured directly. In this presentation, we present threshold shift distributions from human studies of threshold shifts prior to about 1980. Sample sizes ranged in these studies ranged between 5 and 66 ears. The threshold shift distributions implied by these data are compared against assumptions made in more recent damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise. Implications for the development and/or improvement of damage-risk criteria will be discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.5147804</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020-10, Vol.148 (4), p.2802-2802</ispartof><rights>Acoustical Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jasa/article-lookup/doi/10.1121/1.5147804$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,780,784,794,1564,4510,27923,27924,76155</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flamme, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deiters, Kristy K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasko, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><title>Susceptibility to impulsive noise: A review of early studies</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>The maximum tolerable exposures returned by damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise are often designed to protect the population to the 5th percentile most susceptible exposed person. To protect human research volunteers, estimates of this location on the distribution must be estimated rather than measured directly. In this presentation, we present threshold shift distributions from human studies of threshold shifts prior to about 1980. Sample sizes ranged in these studies ranged between 5 and 66 ears. The threshold shift distributions implied by these data are compared against assumptions made in more recent damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise. Implications for the development and/or improvement of damage-risk criteria will be discussed.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j11LwzAYhYMoWKcX_oPcKnQmadIm4s0Y8wMGXrj7kr5J4ZVuLUk66b-3sl179XDg4RwOIfecLTkX_IkvFZeVZvKCZFwJlmsl5CXJGGM8l6Ysr8lNjN9zVLowGXn5GiP4IWGDHaaJpp7ifhi7iEdPDz1G_0xXNPgj-h_at9Tb0E00ptGhj7fkqrVd9HdnLsjudbNbv-fbz7eP9WqbQ2lk7gpl5nUHyjoBBhrWqIoZoZxzti21s2WhtW-MA2mBiRlSWxBFxSoJtioW5OFUC6GPMfi2HgLubZhqzuq_1zWvz69n9_HkRsBkE_aHf-Rf1x1XPg</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Flamme, Gregory</creator><creator>Deiters, Kristy K.</creator><creator>Tasko, Stephen M.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Susceptibility to impulsive noise: A review of early studies</title><author>Flamme, Gregory ; Deiters, Kristy K. ; Tasko, Stephen M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c694-d359001dc5ad2c9cb0b570925dddaf68da6388eb9dc4ac02dc448ac237074ca73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flamme, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deiters, Kristy K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasko, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flamme, Gregory</au><au>Deiters, Kristy K.</au><au>Tasko, Stephen M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Susceptibility to impulsive noise: A review of early studies</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>148</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2802</spage><epage>2802</epage><pages>2802-2802</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>The maximum tolerable exposures returned by damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise are often designed to protect the population to the 5th percentile most susceptible exposed person. To protect human research volunteers, estimates of this location on the distribution must be estimated rather than measured directly. In this presentation, we present threshold shift distributions from human studies of threshold shifts prior to about 1980. Sample sizes ranged in these studies ranged between 5 and 66 ears. The threshold shift distributions implied by these data are compared against assumptions made in more recent damage-risk criteria for impulsive noise. Implications for the development and/or improvement of damage-risk criteria will be discussed.</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.5147804</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020-10, Vol.148 (4), p.2802-2802
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_5147804
source AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America
title Susceptibility to impulsive noise: A review of early studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A54%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scitation_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Susceptibility%20to%20impulsive%20noise:%20A%20review%20of%20early%20studies&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Flamme,%20Gregory&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=148&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2802&rft.epage=2802&rft.pages=2802-2802&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.5147804&rft_dat=%3Cscitation_cross%3Ejasa%3C/scitation_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true