Impact of noise and noise reduction on processing effort: A pupillometry study

Speech understanding in adverse listening conditions induces cognitive demands. Processing effort typically increases for acoustically degraded speech. Moreover, processing effort depends on listener-specific factors, such as cognitive abilities and hearing loss. While noise reduction schemes are ab...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2017-05, Vol.141 (5), p.4040-4040
Hauptverfasser: Wendt, Dorothea, Hietkamp, Renskje K, Lunner, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4040
container_issue 5
container_start_page 4040
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 141
creator Wendt, Dorothea
Hietkamp, Renskje K
Lunner, Thomas
description Speech understanding in adverse listening conditions induces cognitive demands. Processing effort typically increases for acoustically degraded speech. Moreover, processing effort depends on listener-specific factors, such as cognitive abilities and hearing loss. While noise reduction schemes are able to attenuate interfering noise, the impact on processing effort has not yet been clarified. The present study examined the benefit of noise reduction on processing effort allocated for speech recognition. The influence of noise reduction on processing effort was evaluated by measuring the Peak Pupil Dilation (PPD) of 24 hearing-impaired listeners while performing a speech recognition task. Speech recognition performances and PPDs were measured at two different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) corresponding to either the individual 50% correct (L50) or the 95% correct (L95) performance level with and without noise reduction. Processing effort increased at the L50 compared to the L95. Moreover, the benefit of the noise reduction was demonstrated for both the L50 and the L95, i.e., where speech recognition was at ceiling performance. The results emphasized the relevance of the PPD measure as an indicator of processing effort in situations where the traditional speech reception measures fail due to ceiling effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.4989330
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scitation_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4989330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>jasa</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1090-af7ac87f1bd8a9a9390e63b644bace0e0d4ed4d0cb89212b9fc743717a5451763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoWFcP_oNcFbrONGmbeFsWPxYWvei5pPmQStuUpD3039tlexYG3nnhYWAeQu4RtogZPuGWSyEZgwuSYJ5BKvKMX5IEADDlsiiuyU2Mv0vNBZMJ-Th0g9Ij9Y72vomWqt6sW7Bm0mPje7rMELy2MTb9D7XO-TA-0x0dpqFpW9_ZMcw0jpOZb8mVU220d2tuyPfry9f-PT1-vh32u2OqESSkypVKi9JhbYSSSjIJtmB1wXmttAULhlvDDehayAyzWjpdclZiqXKeY1mwDXk439XBxxisq4bQdCrMFUJ1ElFhtYpY2MczG3UzqtND_8B_kxZd2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of noise and noise reduction on processing effort: A pupillometry study</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Wendt, Dorothea ; Hietkamp, Renskje K ; Lunner, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Dorothea ; Hietkamp, Renskje K ; Lunner, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Speech understanding in adverse listening conditions induces cognitive demands. Processing effort typically increases for acoustically degraded speech. Moreover, processing effort depends on listener-specific factors, such as cognitive abilities and hearing loss. While noise reduction schemes are able to attenuate interfering noise, the impact on processing effort has not yet been clarified. The present study examined the benefit of noise reduction on processing effort allocated for speech recognition. The influence of noise reduction on processing effort was evaluated by measuring the Peak Pupil Dilation (PPD) of 24 hearing-impaired listeners while performing a speech recognition task. Speech recognition performances and PPDs were measured at two different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) corresponding to either the individual 50% correct (L50) or the 95% correct (L95) performance level with and without noise reduction. Processing effort increased at the L50 compared to the L95. Moreover, the benefit of the noise reduction was demonstrated for both the L50 and the L95, i.e., where speech recognition was at ceiling performance. The results emphasized the relevance of the PPD measure as an indicator of processing effort in situations where the traditional speech reception measures fail due to ceiling effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.4989330</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017-05, Vol.141 (5), p.4040-4040</ispartof><rights>Acoustical Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1090-af7ac87f1bd8a9a9390e63b644bace0e0d4ed4d0cb89212b9fc743717a5451763</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jasa/article-lookup/doi/10.1121/1.4989330$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,780,784,794,1565,4511,27923,27924,76255</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Dorothea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hietkamp, Renskje K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunner, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of noise and noise reduction on processing effort: A pupillometry study</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>Speech understanding in adverse listening conditions induces cognitive demands. Processing effort typically increases for acoustically degraded speech. Moreover, processing effort depends on listener-specific factors, such as cognitive abilities and hearing loss. While noise reduction schemes are able to attenuate interfering noise, the impact on processing effort has not yet been clarified. The present study examined the benefit of noise reduction on processing effort allocated for speech recognition. The influence of noise reduction on processing effort was evaluated by measuring the Peak Pupil Dilation (PPD) of 24 hearing-impaired listeners while performing a speech recognition task. Speech recognition performances and PPDs were measured at two different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) corresponding to either the individual 50% correct (L50) or the 95% correct (L95) performance level with and without noise reduction. Processing effort increased at the L50 compared to the L95. Moreover, the benefit of the noise reduction was demonstrated for both the L50 and the L95, i.e., where speech recognition was at ceiling performance. The results emphasized the relevance of the PPD measure as an indicator of processing effort in situations where the traditional speech reception measures fail due to ceiling effects.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMoWFcP_oNcFbrONGmbeFsWPxYWvei5pPmQStuUpD3039tlexYG3nnhYWAeQu4RtogZPuGWSyEZgwuSYJ5BKvKMX5IEADDlsiiuyU2Mv0vNBZMJ-Th0g9Ij9Y72vomWqt6sW7Bm0mPje7rMELy2MTb9D7XO-TA-0x0dpqFpW9_ZMcw0jpOZb8mVU220d2tuyPfry9f-PT1-vh32u2OqESSkypVKi9JhbYSSSjIJtmB1wXmttAULhlvDDehayAyzWjpdclZiqXKeY1mwDXk439XBxxisq4bQdCrMFUJ1ElFhtYpY2MczG3UzqtND_8B_kxZd2w</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Wendt, Dorothea</creator><creator>Hietkamp, Renskje K</creator><creator>Lunner, Thomas</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Impact of noise and noise reduction on processing effort: A pupillometry study</title><author>Wendt, Dorothea ; Hietkamp, Renskje K ; Lunner, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1090-af7ac87f1bd8a9a9390e63b644bace0e0d4ed4d0cb89212b9fc743717a5451763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Dorothea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hietkamp, Renskje K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunner, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wendt, Dorothea</au><au>Hietkamp, Renskje K</au><au>Lunner, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of noise and noise reduction on processing effort: A pupillometry study</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>141</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>4040</spage><epage>4040</epage><pages>4040-4040</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>Speech understanding in adverse listening conditions induces cognitive demands. Processing effort typically increases for acoustically degraded speech. Moreover, processing effort depends on listener-specific factors, such as cognitive abilities and hearing loss. While noise reduction schemes are able to attenuate interfering noise, the impact on processing effort has not yet been clarified. The present study examined the benefit of noise reduction on processing effort allocated for speech recognition. The influence of noise reduction on processing effort was evaluated by measuring the Peak Pupil Dilation (PPD) of 24 hearing-impaired listeners while performing a speech recognition task. Speech recognition performances and PPDs were measured at two different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) corresponding to either the individual 50% correct (L50) or the 95% correct (L95) performance level with and without noise reduction. Processing effort increased at the L50 compared to the L95. Moreover, the benefit of the noise reduction was demonstrated for both the L50 and the L95, i.e., where speech recognition was at ceiling performance. The results emphasized the relevance of the PPD measure as an indicator of processing effort in situations where the traditional speech reception measures fail due to ceiling effects.</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.4989330</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017-05, Vol.141 (5), p.4040-4040
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4989330
source AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America
title Impact of noise and noise reduction on processing effort: A pupillometry study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A46%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scitation_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20noise%20and%20noise%20reduction%20on%20processing%20effort:%20A%20pupillometry%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Wendt,%20Dorothea&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=141&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=4040&rft.epage=4040&rft.pages=4040-4040&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.4989330&rft_dat=%3Cscitation_cross%3Ejasa%3C/scitation_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true