Effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel identification

Differences in formant frequencies and fundamental frequencies (F0) are important cues for segregating and identifying two simultaneous vowels. This study assessed age- and hearing-loss-related changes in the use of these cues for recognition of one or both vowels in a pair and determined difference...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2016-12, Vol.140 (6), p.4142-4153
Hauptverfasser: Chintanpalli, Ananthakrishna, Ahlstrom, Jayne B., Dubno, Judy R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4153
container_issue 6
container_start_page 4142
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 140
creator Chintanpalli, Ananthakrishna
Ahlstrom, Jayne B.
Dubno, Judy R.
description Differences in formant frequencies and fundamental frequencies (F0) are important cues for segregating and identifying two simultaneous vowels. This study assessed age- and hearing-loss-related changes in the use of these cues for recognition of one or both vowels in a pair and determined differences related to vowel identity and specific vowel pairings. Younger adults with normal hearing, older adults with normal hearing, and older adults with hearing loss listened to different-vowel and identical-vowel pairs that varied in F0 differences. Identification of both vowels as a function of F0 difference revealed that increased age affects the use of F0 and formant difference cues for different-vowel pairs. Hearing loss further reduced the use of these cues, which was not attributable to lower vowel sensation levels. High scores for one vowel in the pair and no effect of F0 differences suggested that F0 cues are important only for identifying both vowels. In contrast to mean scores, widely varying differences in effects of F0 cues, age, and hearing loss were observed for particular vowels and vowel pairings. These variations in identification of vowel pairs were not explained by acoustical models based on the location and level of formants within the two vowels.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.4968781
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4968781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1854801623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-e6a08cd192f96b72220aa5664c418766e682d45e84ef6d4433bbc5e12df086d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAyEQhonR2Fo9-AfMHtVkK7BA2YuJNvUjMfGiZ8Ly0WK2S4XdGv-91NaqBz0Nwzx5Z_IAcIzgECGMLtCQlIyPONoBfUQxzDnFZBf0IYQoTyPWAwcxvqSW8qLcBz3MIYGw4H1wPbHWqDZm3mZyajLZ6GxmZHDNNKt9TP9NpnyjuhBM02ZL_2bqzOn0dtYp2TrfHII9K-tojjZ1AJ5vJk_ju_zh8fZ-fPWQK0JomxsmIVcaldiWrBphjKGUlDGiCOIjxgzjWBNqODGWaUKKoqoUNQhrCznTsBiAy3XuoqvmRqt0Q5C1WAQ3l-FdeOnE70njZmLql4JywjkrUsDpJiD4187EVsxdVKauZWN8FwXilHCIGF6hZ2tUhSQhGLtdg6BYORdIbJwn9uTnXVvyS3ICztdAVK79VPZv2p_w0odvUCy0LT4AuieYUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1854801623</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel identification</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Chintanpalli, Ananthakrishna ; Ahlstrom, Jayne B. ; Dubno, Judy R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chintanpalli, Ananthakrishna ; Ahlstrom, Jayne B. ; Dubno, Judy R.</creatorcontrib><description>Differences in formant frequencies and fundamental frequencies (F0) are important cues for segregating and identifying two simultaneous vowels. This study assessed age- and hearing-loss-related changes in the use of these cues for recognition of one or both vowels in a pair and determined differences related to vowel identity and specific vowel pairings. Younger adults with normal hearing, older adults with normal hearing, and older adults with hearing loss listened to different-vowel and identical-vowel pairs that varied in F0 differences. Identification of both vowels as a function of F0 difference revealed that increased age affects the use of F0 and formant difference cues for different-vowel pairs. Hearing loss further reduced the use of these cues, which was not attributable to lower vowel sensation levels. High scores for one vowel in the pair and no effect of F0 differences suggested that F0 cues are important only for identifying both vowels. In contrast to mean scores, widely varying differences in effects of F0 cues, age, and hearing loss were observed for particular vowels and vowel pairings. These variations in identification of vowel pairs were not explained by acoustical models based on the location and level of formants within the two vowels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.4968781</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28040038</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Acoustical Society of America</publisher><subject>Aging ; Cues ; Hearing Loss ; Humans ; Phonetics ; Psychological and Physiological Acoustics ; Speech Perception</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2016-12, Vol.140 (6), p.4142-4153</ispartof><rights>Acoustical Society of America</rights><rights>2016 Acoustical Society of America. 2016 Acoustical Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-e6a08cd192f96b72220aa5664c418766e682d45e84ef6d4433bbc5e12df086d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-e6a08cd192f96b72220aa5664c418766e682d45e84ef6d4433bbc5e12df086d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jasa/article-lookup/doi/10.1121/1.4968781$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>207,208,230,314,776,780,790,881,1559,4497,27903,27904,76130</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28040038$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chintanpalli, Ananthakrishna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahlstrom, Jayne B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubno, Judy R.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel identification</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Differences in formant frequencies and fundamental frequencies (F0) are important cues for segregating and identifying two simultaneous vowels. This study assessed age- and hearing-loss-related changes in the use of these cues for recognition of one or both vowels in a pair and determined differences related to vowel identity and specific vowel pairings. Younger adults with normal hearing, older adults with normal hearing, and older adults with hearing loss listened to different-vowel and identical-vowel pairs that varied in F0 differences. Identification of both vowels as a function of F0 difference revealed that increased age affects the use of F0 and formant difference cues for different-vowel pairs. Hearing loss further reduced the use of these cues, which was not attributable to lower vowel sensation levels. High scores for one vowel in the pair and no effect of F0 differences suggested that F0 cues are important only for identifying both vowels. In contrast to mean scores, widely varying differences in effects of F0 cues, age, and hearing loss were observed for particular vowels and vowel pairings. These variations in identification of vowel pairs were not explained by acoustical models based on the location and level of formants within the two vowels.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Hearing Loss</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Psychological and Physiological Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PAyEQhonR2Fo9-AfMHtVkK7BA2YuJNvUjMfGiZ8Ly0WK2S4XdGv-91NaqBz0Nwzx5Z_IAcIzgECGMLtCQlIyPONoBfUQxzDnFZBf0IYQoTyPWAwcxvqSW8qLcBz3MIYGw4H1wPbHWqDZm3mZyajLZ6GxmZHDNNKt9TP9NpnyjuhBM02ZL_2bqzOn0dtYp2TrfHII9K-tojjZ1AJ5vJk_ju_zh8fZ-fPWQK0JomxsmIVcaldiWrBphjKGUlDGiCOIjxgzjWBNqODGWaUKKoqoUNQhrCznTsBiAy3XuoqvmRqt0Q5C1WAQ3l-FdeOnE70njZmLql4JywjkrUsDpJiD4187EVsxdVKauZWN8FwXilHCIGF6hZ2tUhSQhGLtdg6BYORdIbJwn9uTnXVvyS3ICztdAVK79VPZv2p_w0odvUCy0LT4AuieYUQ</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Chintanpalli, Ananthakrishna</creator><creator>Ahlstrom, Jayne B.</creator><creator>Dubno, Judy R.</creator><general>Acoustical Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel identification</title><author>Chintanpalli, Ananthakrishna ; Ahlstrom, Jayne B. ; Dubno, Judy R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-e6a08cd192f96b72220aa5664c418766e682d45e84ef6d4433bbc5e12df086d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Hearing Loss</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Psychological and Physiological Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chintanpalli, Ananthakrishna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahlstrom, Jayne B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubno, Judy R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chintanpalli, Ananthakrishna</au><au>Ahlstrom, Jayne B.</au><au>Dubno, Judy R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel identification</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>140</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>4142</spage><epage>4153</epage><pages>4142-4153</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>Differences in formant frequencies and fundamental frequencies (F0) are important cues for segregating and identifying two simultaneous vowels. This study assessed age- and hearing-loss-related changes in the use of these cues for recognition of one or both vowels in a pair and determined differences related to vowel identity and specific vowel pairings. Younger adults with normal hearing, older adults with normal hearing, and older adults with hearing loss listened to different-vowel and identical-vowel pairs that varied in F0 differences. Identification of both vowels as a function of F0 difference revealed that increased age affects the use of F0 and formant difference cues for different-vowel pairs. Hearing loss further reduced the use of these cues, which was not attributable to lower vowel sensation levels. High scores for one vowel in the pair and no effect of F0 differences suggested that F0 cues are important only for identifying both vowels. In contrast to mean scores, widely varying differences in effects of F0 cues, age, and hearing loss were observed for particular vowels and vowel pairings. These variations in identification of vowel pairs were not explained by acoustical models based on the location and level of formants within the two vowels.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Acoustical Society of America</pub><pmid>28040038</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.4968781</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2016-12, Vol.140 (6), p.4142-4153
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4968781
source MEDLINE; AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America
subjects Aging
Cues
Hearing Loss
Humans
Phonetics
Psychological and Physiological Acoustics
Speech Perception
title Effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel identification
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T21%3A21%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20age%20and%20hearing%20loss%20on%20concurrent%20vowel%20identification&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Chintanpalli,%20Ananthakrishna&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=140&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=4142&rft.epage=4153&rft.pages=4142-4153&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.4968781&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1854801623%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1854801623&rft_id=info:pmid/28040038&rfr_iscdi=true