Acoustic comfort in closed rooms often means expectations of speech privacy

The design of privacy areas is very similar in offices, healthcare, and other building segments, but the focus is squarely on healthcare due to the HIPAA regulations involving personal medical information. Given the degree of enclosure provided by the walls, ceiling, doors, etc., common expectations...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2015-09, Vol.138 (3_Supplement), p.1899-1899
Hauptverfasser: Good, Kenneth W., Roy, Kenneth P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1899
container_issue 3_Supplement
container_start_page 1899
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 138
creator Good, Kenneth W.
Roy, Kenneth P.
description The design of privacy areas is very similar in offices, healthcare, and other building segments, but the focus is squarely on healthcare due to the HIPAA regulations involving personal medical information. Given the degree of enclosure provided by the walls, ceiling, doors, etc., common expectations by occupants of those closed spaces is for confidential speech privacy. So, how do we design and evaluate the speech privacy provided by medical offices, treatment rooms, conference rooms, etc. ASTM laboratory testing of components and systems including STC, CAC, and NRC are part of the answer. But the bottom line is in the field with actual performance testing of the systems as they are built and operated. Two questions to be answered are how do we make informed decisions about product and system choices, and how do we maximize speech privacy using those architectural choices.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.4933969
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4933969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1121_1_4933969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_1_49339693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjrtqw0AQRRcTgxXbhf9g2hRSdvRCW4aQEEibflnWIyxjacTO2kR_Hwn0A6kuh3uKo9QJdYaY4ytmpSkKU5uNSrDKddpUefmkEq01pqWp6516FrnOWDWFSdT3m-e7xM6D577lEKEbwN9Y6AyBuRfgNtIAPblBgH5H8tHFjoflABmJ_AXG0D2cnw5q27qb0HHdvXr5_Ph5_0p9YJFArZ3F3oXJorZLrUW71hb_cf8ASJxFIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acoustic comfort in closed rooms often means expectations of speech privacy</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Good, Kenneth W. ; Roy, Kenneth P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Good, Kenneth W. ; Roy, Kenneth P.</creatorcontrib><description>The design of privacy areas is very similar in offices, healthcare, and other building segments, but the focus is squarely on healthcare due to the HIPAA regulations involving personal medical information. Given the degree of enclosure provided by the walls, ceiling, doors, etc., common expectations by occupants of those closed spaces is for confidential speech privacy. So, how do we design and evaluate the speech privacy provided by medical offices, treatment rooms, conference rooms, etc. ASTM laboratory testing of components and systems including STC, CAC, and NRC are part of the answer. But the bottom line is in the field with actual performance testing of the systems as they are built and operated. Two questions to be answered are how do we make informed decisions about product and system choices, and how do we maximize speech privacy using those architectural choices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.4933969</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015-09, Vol.138 (3_Supplement), p.1899-1899</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Good, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Kenneth P.</creatorcontrib><title>Acoustic comfort in closed rooms often means expectations of speech privacy</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>The design of privacy areas is very similar in offices, healthcare, and other building segments, but the focus is squarely on healthcare due to the HIPAA regulations involving personal medical information. Given the degree of enclosure provided by the walls, ceiling, doors, etc., common expectations by occupants of those closed spaces is for confidential speech privacy. So, how do we design and evaluate the speech privacy provided by medical offices, treatment rooms, conference rooms, etc. ASTM laboratory testing of components and systems including STC, CAC, and NRC are part of the answer. But the bottom line is in the field with actual performance testing of the systems as they are built and operated. Two questions to be answered are how do we make informed decisions about product and system choices, and how do we maximize speech privacy using those architectural choices.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjrtqw0AQRRcTgxXbhf9g2hRSdvRCW4aQEEibflnWIyxjacTO2kR_Hwn0A6kuh3uKo9QJdYaY4ytmpSkKU5uNSrDKddpUefmkEq01pqWp6516FrnOWDWFSdT3m-e7xM6D577lEKEbwN9Y6AyBuRfgNtIAPblBgH5H8tHFjoflABmJ_AXG0D2cnw5q27qb0HHdvXr5_Ph5_0p9YJFArZ3F3oXJorZLrUW71hb_cf8ASJxFIg</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Good, Kenneth W.</creator><creator>Roy, Kenneth P.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Acoustic comfort in closed rooms often means expectations of speech privacy</title><author>Good, Kenneth W. ; Roy, Kenneth P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_1_49339693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Good, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Kenneth P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Good, Kenneth W.</au><au>Roy, Kenneth P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acoustic comfort in closed rooms often means expectations of speech privacy</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>3_Supplement</issue><spage>1899</spage><epage>1899</epage><pages>1899-1899</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>The design of privacy areas is very similar in offices, healthcare, and other building segments, but the focus is squarely on healthcare due to the HIPAA regulations involving personal medical information. Given the degree of enclosure provided by the walls, ceiling, doors, etc., common expectations by occupants of those closed spaces is for confidential speech privacy. So, how do we design and evaluate the speech privacy provided by medical offices, treatment rooms, conference rooms, etc. ASTM laboratory testing of components and systems including STC, CAC, and NRC are part of the answer. But the bottom line is in the field with actual performance testing of the systems as they are built and operated. Two questions to be answered are how do we make informed decisions about product and system choices, and how do we maximize speech privacy using those architectural choices.</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.4933969</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015-09, Vol.138 (3_Supplement), p.1899-1899
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_4933969
source AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America
title Acoustic comfort in closed rooms often means expectations of speech privacy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A16%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acoustic%20comfort%20in%20closed%20rooms%20often%20means%20expectations%20of%20speech%20privacy&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Good,%20Kenneth%20W.&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=3_Supplement&rft.spage=1899&rft.epage=1899&rft.pages=1899-1899&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.4933969&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1121_1_4933969%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true