Speech recognition thresholds in temporally complex backgrounds: Effects of hearing loss and noise masking

When listening to speech in a fluctuating background, subjects with normal hearing can operate at a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by taking advantage of momentary decreases in background level. Subjects with even a mild hearing loss are less able to do so. This was examined here in subjects wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1994-05, Vol.95 (5_Supplement), p.2993-2993
Hauptverfasser: Bacon, Sid P., Opie, Jane M., Montoya, Danielle Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2993
container_issue 5_Supplement
container_start_page 2993
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 95
creator Bacon, Sid P.
Opie, Jane M.
Montoya, Danielle Y.
description When listening to speech in a fluctuating background, subjects with normal hearing can operate at a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by taking advantage of momentary decreases in background level. Subjects with even a mild hearing loss are less able to do so. This was examined here in subjects with normal hearing, with sensorineural hearing loss, and with normal hearing whose pure-tone thresholds were elevated via masking to match those of the hearing-impaired subjects. Four backgrounds were used: speech-shaped nose (SS); speech-shaped noise modulated by the envelope of a single talker (ST); speech-shaped noise modulated by the envelope of a multi-talker babble (MT); and speech-shaped noise modulated by a 10-Hz square wave at a depth of 100% (SQ). The rms level of the background was 70 dB SPL. The level of the sentences was varied adaptively to obtain a recognition threshold SNR. For the normal-hearing subjects, the average SNRs in the ST and SQ backgrounds were 3 to 8 dB lower, respectively, than those for either the SS or MT backgrounds. There generally was less ‘‘masking release’’ for the hearing-impaired and noise-masked subjects. For some hearing-impaired subjects, the release was smaller than that in their noise-masked counterpart, suggesting the audibility alone may not always account for the reduced masking release observed in the hearing impaired. [Work supported by NIDCD.]
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.408907
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_408907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1121_1_408907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c727-b7229f8e8b38feb18878873651a0632ed678b6313d2c3615ef0effb1583097f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUEtrwzAY82GDdd1gP8HHXdL5sxs_dhule0Bhh_UeHOdzk9aJg53B-u-X0YFASAchiZAHYCsADk-wWjNtmLoiC8YYFGsj5Q25zfk4y1ILsyDHrxHRtTShi4ehm7o40KlNmNsYmky7WWE_xmRDOFMX-zHgD62tOx1S_B6a_Ey33qObMo2etmhTNxxoiDlTOzR0iF1G2tt8mu07cu1tyHj_z0uyf93uN-_F7vPtY_OyK5ziqqgV58Zr1LXQHmvQWs0QsgTLpODYSKVrKUA03AkJJXqG3tcwz2FGeSOW5PES69JcI6GvxtT1Np0rYNXfLRVUl1vELy6uV-Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Speech recognition thresholds in temporally complex backgrounds: Effects of hearing loss and noise masking</title><source>Acoustical Society of America (AIP)</source><creator>Bacon, Sid P. ; Opie, Jane M. ; Montoya, Danielle Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bacon, Sid P. ; Opie, Jane M. ; Montoya, Danielle Y.</creatorcontrib><description>When listening to speech in a fluctuating background, subjects with normal hearing can operate at a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by taking advantage of momentary decreases in background level. Subjects with even a mild hearing loss are less able to do so. This was examined here in subjects with normal hearing, with sensorineural hearing loss, and with normal hearing whose pure-tone thresholds were elevated via masking to match those of the hearing-impaired subjects. Four backgrounds were used: speech-shaped nose (SS); speech-shaped noise modulated by the envelope of a single talker (ST); speech-shaped noise modulated by the envelope of a multi-talker babble (MT); and speech-shaped noise modulated by a 10-Hz square wave at a depth of 100% (SQ). The rms level of the background was 70 dB SPL. The level of the sentences was varied adaptively to obtain a recognition threshold SNR. For the normal-hearing subjects, the average SNRs in the ST and SQ backgrounds were 3 to 8 dB lower, respectively, than those for either the SS or MT backgrounds. There generally was less ‘‘masking release’’ for the hearing-impaired and noise-masked subjects. For some hearing-impaired subjects, the release was smaller than that in their noise-masked counterpart, suggesting the audibility alone may not always account for the reduced masking release observed in the hearing impaired. [Work supported by NIDCD.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.408907</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1994-05, Vol.95 (5_Supplement), p.2993-2993</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c727-b7229f8e8b38feb18878873651a0632ed678b6313d2c3615ef0effb1583097f93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bacon, Sid P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opie, Jane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montoya, Danielle Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Speech recognition thresholds in temporally complex backgrounds: Effects of hearing loss and noise masking</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>When listening to speech in a fluctuating background, subjects with normal hearing can operate at a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by taking advantage of momentary decreases in background level. Subjects with even a mild hearing loss are less able to do so. This was examined here in subjects with normal hearing, with sensorineural hearing loss, and with normal hearing whose pure-tone thresholds were elevated via masking to match those of the hearing-impaired subjects. Four backgrounds were used: speech-shaped nose (SS); speech-shaped noise modulated by the envelope of a single talker (ST); speech-shaped noise modulated by the envelope of a multi-talker babble (MT); and speech-shaped noise modulated by a 10-Hz square wave at a depth of 100% (SQ). The rms level of the background was 70 dB SPL. The level of the sentences was varied adaptively to obtain a recognition threshold SNR. For the normal-hearing subjects, the average SNRs in the ST and SQ backgrounds were 3 to 8 dB lower, respectively, than those for either the SS or MT backgrounds. There generally was less ‘‘masking release’’ for the hearing-impaired and noise-masked subjects. For some hearing-impaired subjects, the release was smaller than that in their noise-masked counterpart, suggesting the audibility alone may not always account for the reduced masking release observed in the hearing impaired. [Work supported by NIDCD.]</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotUEtrwzAY82GDdd1gP8HHXdL5sxs_dhule0Bhh_UeHOdzk9aJg53B-u-X0YFASAchiZAHYCsADk-wWjNtmLoiC8YYFGsj5Q25zfk4y1ILsyDHrxHRtTShi4ehm7o40KlNmNsYmky7WWE_xmRDOFMX-zHgD62tOx1S_B6a_Ey33qObMo2etmhTNxxoiDlTOzR0iF1G2tt8mu07cu1tyHj_z0uyf93uN-_F7vPtY_OyK5ziqqgV58Zr1LXQHmvQWs0QsgTLpODYSKVrKUA03AkJJXqG3tcwz2FGeSOW5PES69JcI6GvxtT1Np0rYNXfLRVUl1vELy6uV-Y</recordid><startdate>19940501</startdate><enddate>19940501</enddate><creator>Bacon, Sid P.</creator><creator>Opie, Jane M.</creator><creator>Montoya, Danielle Y.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940501</creationdate><title>Speech recognition thresholds in temporally complex backgrounds: Effects of hearing loss and noise masking</title><author>Bacon, Sid P. ; Opie, Jane M. ; Montoya, Danielle Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c727-b7229f8e8b38feb18878873651a0632ed678b6313d2c3615ef0effb1583097f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bacon, Sid P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opie, Jane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montoya, Danielle Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bacon, Sid P.</au><au>Opie, Jane M.</au><au>Montoya, Danielle Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Speech recognition thresholds in temporally complex backgrounds: Effects of hearing loss and noise masking</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>1994-05-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>5_Supplement</issue><spage>2993</spage><epage>2993</epage><pages>2993-2993</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><abstract>When listening to speech in a fluctuating background, subjects with normal hearing can operate at a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by taking advantage of momentary decreases in background level. Subjects with even a mild hearing loss are less able to do so. This was examined here in subjects with normal hearing, with sensorineural hearing loss, and with normal hearing whose pure-tone thresholds were elevated via masking to match those of the hearing-impaired subjects. Four backgrounds were used: speech-shaped nose (SS); speech-shaped noise modulated by the envelope of a single talker (ST); speech-shaped noise modulated by the envelope of a multi-talker babble (MT); and speech-shaped noise modulated by a 10-Hz square wave at a depth of 100% (SQ). The rms level of the background was 70 dB SPL. The level of the sentences was varied adaptively to obtain a recognition threshold SNR. For the normal-hearing subjects, the average SNRs in the ST and SQ backgrounds were 3 to 8 dB lower, respectively, than those for either the SS or MT backgrounds. There generally was less ‘‘masking release’’ for the hearing-impaired and noise-masked subjects. For some hearing-impaired subjects, the release was smaller than that in their noise-masked counterpart, suggesting the audibility alone may not always account for the reduced masking release observed in the hearing impaired. [Work supported by NIDCD.]</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.408907</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1994-05, Vol.95 (5_Supplement), p.2993-2993
issn 0001-4966
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_408907
source Acoustical Society of America (AIP)
title Speech recognition thresholds in temporally complex backgrounds: Effects of hearing loss and noise masking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T17%3A19%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Speech%20recognition%20thresholds%20in%20temporally%20complex%20backgrounds:%20Effects%20of%20hearing%20loss%20and%20noise%20masking&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Bacon,%20Sid%20P.&rft.date=1994-05-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=5_Supplement&rft.spage=2993&rft.epage=2993&rft.pages=2993-2993&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.408907&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1121_1_408907%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true