Comodulation masking release : is comodulation sufficient ?

Common amplitude modulation across frequency facilitates comodulation masking release (CMR) and may also contribute to auditory grouping. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether there is an association between these two phenomena; that is, does the occurrence of CMR require...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1993-05, Vol.93 (5), p.2896-2902
Hauptverfasser: GROSE, J. H, HALL, J. W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2902
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2896
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 93
creator GROSE, J. H
HALL, J. W
description Common amplitude modulation across frequency facilitates comodulation masking release (CMR) and may also contribute to auditory grouping. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether there is an association between these two phenomena; that is, does the occurrence of CMR require that the comodulated noise bands making up the composite masker be grouped together? Three experiments were undertaken, each manipulating one variable designed to hinder the fusion of the comodulated noise bands. In experiment 1, the variable of onset/offset asynchrony was observed to have a marked effect: CMR could be completely abolished if the asynchrony between the on-signal band and the flanking bands was sufficiently great (> or = 50 ms). In experiment 2, an auditory streaming paradigm was employed and this was observed to disrupt CMR significantly. However, a substantial CMR remained. Experiment 3 attempted to hinder the fusion of the comodulated noise bands by drawing the various noise bands into separate harmonic series. However, the small effect observed did not appear to be due to a parsing of the fused image. Results from experiments 1 and 2 suggest that the CMR mechanism does not act in isolation from the processes that give rise to auditory object formation. In particular, the cue of onset/offset synchrony appears to be of paramount importance.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.405809
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_405809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>8315153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-60ae597c4b631bb6468324560a6f65658425ae4a4311171a0688aca5916e126f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj01LxDAQhoMo67oK_gEhBw9eumby1VQPixS_YMGLnss0m0i0H0vTHvz3VloWT8M778MwDyGXwNYAHG5hLZkyLDsiS1CcJUZxeUyWjDFIZKb1KTmL8WuMyohsQRZGgAIlluQ-b-t2N1TYh7ahNcbv0HzSzlUOo6N3NERq_xNx8D7Y4Jqebs7Jiccquot5rsjH0-N7_pJs355f84dtYgVL-0QzdCpLrSy1gLLUUhvBpRrX2mullZFcoZMoBQCkgEwbgxZVBtoB116syM1013ZtjJ3zxb4LNXY_BbDiT7-AYtIf0asJ3Q9l7XYHcPYd--u5x2ix8h02NsQDJlMzvszFLyfLXs8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comodulation masking release : is comodulation sufficient ?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>GROSE, J. H ; HALL, J. W</creator><creatorcontrib>GROSE, J. H ; HALL, J. W</creatorcontrib><description>Common amplitude modulation across frequency facilitates comodulation masking release (CMR) and may also contribute to auditory grouping. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether there is an association between these two phenomena; that is, does the occurrence of CMR require that the comodulated noise bands making up the composite masker be grouped together? Three experiments were undertaken, each manipulating one variable designed to hinder the fusion of the comodulated noise bands. In experiment 1, the variable of onset/offset asynchrony was observed to have a marked effect: CMR could be completely abolished if the asynchrony between the on-signal band and the flanking bands was sufficiently great (&gt; or = 50 ms). In experiment 2, an auditory streaming paradigm was employed and this was observed to disrupt CMR significantly. However, a substantial CMR remained. Experiment 3 attempted to hinder the fusion of the comodulated noise bands by drawing the various noise bands into separate harmonic series. However, the small effect observed did not appear to be due to a parsing of the fused image. Results from experiments 1 and 2 suggest that the CMR mechanism does not act in isolation from the processes that give rise to auditory object formation. In particular, the cue of onset/offset synchrony appears to be of paramount importance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.405809</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8315153</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Woodbury, NY: Acoustical Society of America</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adult ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Audition ; Auditory Perception ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Noise ; Perception ; Perceptual Masking ; Pitch Perception - physiology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1993-05, Vol.93 (5), p.2896-2902</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-60ae597c4b631bb6468324560a6f65658425ae4a4311171a0688aca5916e126f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4783072$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8315153$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GROSE, J. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALL, J. W</creatorcontrib><title>Comodulation masking release : is comodulation sufficient ?</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>Common amplitude modulation across frequency facilitates comodulation masking release (CMR) and may also contribute to auditory grouping. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether there is an association between these two phenomena; that is, does the occurrence of CMR require that the comodulated noise bands making up the composite masker be grouped together? Three experiments were undertaken, each manipulating one variable designed to hinder the fusion of the comodulated noise bands. In experiment 1, the variable of onset/offset asynchrony was observed to have a marked effect: CMR could be completely abolished if the asynchrony between the on-signal band and the flanking bands was sufficiently great (&gt; or = 50 ms). In experiment 2, an auditory streaming paradigm was employed and this was observed to disrupt CMR significantly. However, a substantial CMR remained. Experiment 3 attempted to hinder the fusion of the comodulated noise bands by drawing the various noise bands into separate harmonic series. However, the small effect observed did not appear to be due to a parsing of the fused image. Results from experiments 1 and 2 suggest that the CMR mechanism does not act in isolation from the processes that give rise to auditory object formation. In particular, the cue of onset/offset synchrony appears to be of paramount importance.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><subject>Pitch Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNj01LxDAQhoMo67oK_gEhBw9eumby1VQPixS_YMGLnss0m0i0H0vTHvz3VloWT8M778MwDyGXwNYAHG5hLZkyLDsiS1CcJUZxeUyWjDFIZKb1KTmL8WuMyohsQRZGgAIlluQ-b-t2N1TYh7ahNcbv0HzSzlUOo6N3NERq_xNx8D7Y4Jqebs7Jiccquot5rsjH0-N7_pJs355f84dtYgVL-0QzdCpLrSy1gLLUUhvBpRrX2mullZFcoZMoBQCkgEwbgxZVBtoB116syM1013ZtjJ3zxb4LNXY_BbDiT7-AYtIf0asJ3Q9l7XYHcPYd--u5x2ix8h02NsQDJlMzvszFLyfLXs8</recordid><startdate>19930501</startdate><enddate>19930501</enddate><creator>GROSE, J. H</creator><creator>HALL, J. W</creator><general>Acoustical Society of America</general><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930501</creationdate><title>Comodulation masking release : is comodulation sufficient ?</title><author>GROSE, J. H ; HALL, J. W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-60ae597c4b631bb6468324560a6f65658425ae4a4311171a0688aca5916e126f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><topic>Pitch Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GROSE, J. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALL, J. W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GROSE, J. H</au><au>HALL, J. W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comodulation masking release : is comodulation sufficient ?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>1993-05-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2896</spage><epage>2902</epage><pages>2896-2902</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>Common amplitude modulation across frequency facilitates comodulation masking release (CMR) and may also contribute to auditory grouping. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether there is an association between these two phenomena; that is, does the occurrence of CMR require that the comodulated noise bands making up the composite masker be grouped together? Three experiments were undertaken, each manipulating one variable designed to hinder the fusion of the comodulated noise bands. In experiment 1, the variable of onset/offset asynchrony was observed to have a marked effect: CMR could be completely abolished if the asynchrony between the on-signal band and the flanking bands was sufficiently great (&gt; or = 50 ms). In experiment 2, an auditory streaming paradigm was employed and this was observed to disrupt CMR significantly. However, a substantial CMR remained. Experiment 3 attempted to hinder the fusion of the comodulated noise bands by drawing the various noise bands into separate harmonic series. However, the small effect observed did not appear to be due to a parsing of the fused image. Results from experiments 1 and 2 suggest that the CMR mechanism does not act in isolation from the processes that give rise to auditory object formation. In particular, the cue of onset/offset synchrony appears to be of paramount importance.</abstract><cop>Woodbury, NY</cop><pub>Acoustical Society of America</pub><pmid>8315153</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.405809</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1993-05, Vol.93 (5), p.2896-2902
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_405809
source MEDLINE; AIP Acoustical Society of America
subjects Acoustic Stimulation
Adult
Audiometry, Pure-Tone
Audition
Auditory Perception
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Male
Noise
Perception
Perceptual Masking
Pitch Perception - physiology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
title Comodulation masking release : is comodulation sufficient ?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T17%3A15%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comodulation%20masking%20release%20:%20is%20comodulation%20sufficient%20?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=GROSE,%20J.%20H&rft.date=1993-05-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2896&rft.epage=2902&rft.pages=2896-2902&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.405809&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E8315153%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/8315153&rfr_iscdi=true