Relations among different frequency rating procedures for traffic noise

A series of calculations was performed to ascertain how well one frequency-weighted rating, such as weighted sound level, loudness level, or perceived noise level, may be predicted from another such rating. A total of 103 average sound level spectra, measured at several distances from different type...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1985-01, Vol.77 (4), p.1436-1446
Hauptverfasser: FLYNN, D. R, YANIV, S. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1446
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1436
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 77
creator FLYNN, D. R
YANIV, S. L
description A series of calculations was performed to ascertain how well one frequency-weighted rating, such as weighted sound level, loudness level, or perceived noise level, may be predicted from another such rating. A total of 103 average sound level spectra, measured at several distances from different types of highways, was used in these calculations. It was found that knowing a single noise rating, such as the A-weighted sound level, enables one to predict other outdoor ratings in this set of 103 spectra with a standard deviation of the order of 1–2 dB. If, in addition, traffic speed and mix and the distance to the highway are taken into account, these standard deviations can be reduced to 0.5–1 dB, depending upon the particular noise rating of interest. Equations are given for predicting one rating from another; the associated standard deviations are presented as a measure of how well any given rating can be predicted from a single measured, or otherwise known, noise rating. It is concluded that it is not critical which frequency-weighting procedure is used in conjunction with highway noise criteria since one descriptor can be predicted from another with small statistical uncertainty. Thus, if human response criteria, or stimulus-response relationships, have been developed in terms of one frequency-weighting procedure, these may be translated into equivalent criteria expressed in terms of a metric that is easier to measure or predict.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.392038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pascalfrancis_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_392038</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>8427281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-dc929f6c71c7bdbbe1dca8f25333c68459ed61c1d358b87818abe6daab724b143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LxDAURYMoWEfBn5CFCzcd8_LRpksZdBQGBNF1SV5epDLT1qSzmH9vZQZXl8s93MVh7BbEEkDCAyxVI4WyZ6wAI0VpjdTnrBBCQKmbqrpkVzl_z9VY1RRs_U5bN3VDn7nbDf0XD12MlKifeEz0s6ceDzzNxDyNaUAK-0SZxyHxKbkYO-T90GW6ZhfRbTPdnHLBPp-fPlYv5eZt_bp63JQojZ7KgI1sYoU1YO2D9wQBnY3SKKWwsto0FCpACMpYb2sL1nmqgnO-ltqDVgt2f_zFNOScKLZj6nYuHVoQ7Z-AFtqjgBm9O6Kjy-i2Mbkeu_zPWy1raUH9AqTNWwo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relations among different frequency rating procedures for traffic noise</title><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>FLYNN, D. R ; YANIV, S. L</creator><creatorcontrib>FLYNN, D. R ; YANIV, S. L</creatorcontrib><description>A series of calculations was performed to ascertain how well one frequency-weighted rating, such as weighted sound level, loudness level, or perceived noise level, may be predicted from another such rating. A total of 103 average sound level spectra, measured at several distances from different types of highways, was used in these calculations. It was found that knowing a single noise rating, such as the A-weighted sound level, enables one to predict other outdoor ratings in this set of 103 spectra with a standard deviation of the order of 1–2 dB. If, in addition, traffic speed and mix and the distance to the highway are taken into account, these standard deviations can be reduced to 0.5–1 dB, depending upon the particular noise rating of interest. Equations are given for predicting one rating from another; the associated standard deviations are presented as a measure of how well any given rating can be predicted from a single measured, or otherwise known, noise rating. It is concluded that it is not critical which frequency-weighting procedure is used in conjunction with highway noise criteria since one descriptor can be predicted from another with small statistical uncertainty. Thus, if human response criteria, or stimulus-response relationships, have been developed in terms of one frequency-weighting procedure, these may be translated into equivalent criteria expressed in terms of a metric that is easier to measure or predict.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.392038</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Woodbury, NY: Acoustical Society of America</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Noise: its effects and control ; Physics</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1985-01, Vol.77 (4), p.1436-1446</ispartof><rights>1986 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-dc929f6c71c7bdbbe1dca8f25333c68459ed61c1d358b87818abe6daab724b143</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=8427281$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FLYNN, D. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YANIV, S. L</creatorcontrib><title>Relations among different frequency rating procedures for traffic noise</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>A series of calculations was performed to ascertain how well one frequency-weighted rating, such as weighted sound level, loudness level, or perceived noise level, may be predicted from another such rating. A total of 103 average sound level spectra, measured at several distances from different types of highways, was used in these calculations. It was found that knowing a single noise rating, such as the A-weighted sound level, enables one to predict other outdoor ratings in this set of 103 spectra with a standard deviation of the order of 1–2 dB. If, in addition, traffic speed and mix and the distance to the highway are taken into account, these standard deviations can be reduced to 0.5–1 dB, depending upon the particular noise rating of interest. Equations are given for predicting one rating from another; the associated standard deviations are presented as a measure of how well any given rating can be predicted from a single measured, or otherwise known, noise rating. It is concluded that it is not critical which frequency-weighting procedure is used in conjunction with highway noise criteria since one descriptor can be predicted from another with small statistical uncertainty. Thus, if human response criteria, or stimulus-response relationships, have been developed in terms of one frequency-weighting procedure, these may be translated into equivalent criteria expressed in terms of a metric that is easier to measure or predict.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Noise: its effects and control</subject><subject>Physics</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1LxDAURYMoWEfBn5CFCzcd8_LRpksZdBQGBNF1SV5epDLT1qSzmH9vZQZXl8s93MVh7BbEEkDCAyxVI4WyZ6wAI0VpjdTnrBBCQKmbqrpkVzl_z9VY1RRs_U5bN3VDn7nbDf0XD12MlKifeEz0s6ceDzzNxDyNaUAK-0SZxyHxKbkYO-T90GW6ZhfRbTPdnHLBPp-fPlYv5eZt_bp63JQojZ7KgI1sYoU1YO2D9wQBnY3SKKWwsto0FCpACMpYb2sL1nmqgnO-ltqDVgt2f_zFNOScKLZj6nYuHVoQ7Z-AFtqjgBm9O6Kjy-i2Mbkeu_zPWy1raUH9AqTNWwo</recordid><startdate>19850101</startdate><enddate>19850101</enddate><creator>FLYNN, D. R</creator><creator>YANIV, S. L</creator><general>Acoustical Society of America</general><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850101</creationdate><title>Relations among different frequency rating procedures for traffic noise</title><author>FLYNN, D. R ; YANIV, S. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-dc929f6c71c7bdbbe1dca8f25333c68459ed61c1d358b87818abe6daab724b143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Noise: its effects and control</topic><topic>Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FLYNN, D. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YANIV, S. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FLYNN, D. R</au><au>YANIV, S. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relations among different frequency rating procedures for traffic noise</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>1985-01-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1436</spage><epage>1446</epage><pages>1436-1446</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>A series of calculations was performed to ascertain how well one frequency-weighted rating, such as weighted sound level, loudness level, or perceived noise level, may be predicted from another such rating. A total of 103 average sound level spectra, measured at several distances from different types of highways, was used in these calculations. It was found that knowing a single noise rating, such as the A-weighted sound level, enables one to predict other outdoor ratings in this set of 103 spectra with a standard deviation of the order of 1–2 dB. If, in addition, traffic speed and mix and the distance to the highway are taken into account, these standard deviations can be reduced to 0.5–1 dB, depending upon the particular noise rating of interest. Equations are given for predicting one rating from another; the associated standard deviations are presented as a measure of how well any given rating can be predicted from a single measured, or otherwise known, noise rating. It is concluded that it is not critical which frequency-weighting procedure is used in conjunction with highway noise criteria since one descriptor can be predicted from another with small statistical uncertainty. Thus, if human response criteria, or stimulus-response relationships, have been developed in terms of one frequency-weighting procedure, these may be translated into equivalent criteria expressed in terms of a metric that is easier to measure or predict.</abstract><cop>Woodbury, NY</cop><pub>Acoustical Society of America</pub><doi>10.1121/1.392038</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1985-01, Vol.77 (4), p.1436-1446
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_392038
source AIP Acoustical Society of America
subjects Acoustics
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Noise: its effects and control
Physics
title Relations among different frequency rating procedures for traffic noise
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A07%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pascalfrancis_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relations%20among%20different%20frequency%20rating%20procedures%20for%20traffic%20noise&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=FLYNN,%20D.%20R&rft.date=1985-01-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1436&rft.epage=1446&rft.pages=1436-1446&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.392038&rft_dat=%3Cpascalfrancis_cross%3E8427281%3C/pascalfrancis_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true