Nondestructive evaluation of ceramic preforms

In order to identify and eliminate flawed ceramic preforms prior to metal infiltration, several approaches for nondestructive evaluation were studied. The techniques chosen include immersion ultrasonics, scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM), and radiography. Undesirable irregularities in the preforms...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1990-05, Vol.87 (S1), p.S144-S145
Hauptverfasser: Goodlin, Drew L., Conway, J. C., Pangborn, R. N., Tittmann, B., Green, D. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S145
container_issue S1
container_start_page S144
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 87
creator Goodlin, Drew L.
Conway, J. C.
Pangborn, R. N.
Tittmann, B.
Green, D. J.
description In order to identify and eliminate flawed ceramic preforms prior to metal infiltration, several approaches for nondestructive evaluation were studied. The techniques chosen include immersion ultrasonics, scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM), and radiography. Undesirable irregularities in the preforms include cracks, voids, density gradients, and shot. The latter represents spherically shaped particles of alumina, with diameters that may exceed ten times that of the fibers, and that are incorporated into the porous fiber preform. It is generally thought that shot with sizes greater than 100 μm affects the mechanical properties of the resulting metal matrix composite. With the aid of SAM and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), shot in near-surface areas could be evaluated. Cracks and voids could also be located using SAM and SEM. On a larger scale, the ultrasonic immersion equipment was capable of detecting and quantifying density gradients, which were verified using radiographic techniques. Examples will be given to illustrate the sensitivity and resolution of the various techniques with regard to examination of the flawed preforms. [Work supported by Center for Advanced Materials, Pennsylvania State University.]
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.2028002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_2028002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1121_1_2028002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1092-60e3daf2feeb1b165404f896fe7d742a1f5cacc4fb2b4d057944326ef2a55f083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj81Kw0AURgdRMFYXvkG2Lqbee-cnyVKKWqHoRtdhMrkXIk1TZtKCb2_Frg7f5nwcpe4RloiEj7gkoBqALlSBjkDXjuylKgAAtW28v1Y3OX-fpqtNUyj9Pu16znM6xHk4csnHsD2EeZh25SRl5BTGIZb7xDKlMd-qKwnbzHdnLtTXy_Pnaq03H69vq6eNjggNaQ9s-iAkzB126J0FK3Xjhau-shRQXAwxWumosz24qrHWkGeh4JxAbRbq4d8b05Tz6bzdp2EM6adFaP86W2zPneYXGFxElw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nondestructive evaluation of ceramic preforms</title><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Goodlin, Drew L. ; Conway, J. C. ; Pangborn, R. N. ; Tittmann, B. ; Green, D. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goodlin, Drew L. ; Conway, J. C. ; Pangborn, R. N. ; Tittmann, B. ; Green, D. J.</creatorcontrib><description>In order to identify and eliminate flawed ceramic preforms prior to metal infiltration, several approaches for nondestructive evaluation were studied. The techniques chosen include immersion ultrasonics, scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM), and radiography. Undesirable irregularities in the preforms include cracks, voids, density gradients, and shot. The latter represents spherically shaped particles of alumina, with diameters that may exceed ten times that of the fibers, and that are incorporated into the porous fiber preform. It is generally thought that shot with sizes greater than 100 μm affects the mechanical properties of the resulting metal matrix composite. With the aid of SAM and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), shot in near-surface areas could be evaluated. Cracks and voids could also be located using SAM and SEM. On a larger scale, the ultrasonic immersion equipment was capable of detecting and quantifying density gradients, which were verified using radiographic techniques. Examples will be given to illustrate the sensitivity and resolution of the various techniques with regard to examination of the flawed preforms. [Work supported by Center for Advanced Materials, Pennsylvania State University.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.2028002</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990-05, Vol.87 (S1), p.S144-S145</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1092-60e3daf2feeb1b165404f896fe7d742a1f5cacc4fb2b4d057944326ef2a55f083</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goodlin, Drew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pangborn, R. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tittmann, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, D. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Nondestructive evaluation of ceramic preforms</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>In order to identify and eliminate flawed ceramic preforms prior to metal infiltration, several approaches for nondestructive evaluation were studied. The techniques chosen include immersion ultrasonics, scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM), and radiography. Undesirable irregularities in the preforms include cracks, voids, density gradients, and shot. The latter represents spherically shaped particles of alumina, with diameters that may exceed ten times that of the fibers, and that are incorporated into the porous fiber preform. It is generally thought that shot with sizes greater than 100 μm affects the mechanical properties of the resulting metal matrix composite. With the aid of SAM and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), shot in near-surface areas could be evaluated. Cracks and voids could also be located using SAM and SEM. On a larger scale, the ultrasonic immersion equipment was capable of detecting and quantifying density gradients, which were verified using radiographic techniques. Examples will be given to illustrate the sensitivity and resolution of the various techniques with regard to examination of the flawed preforms. [Work supported by Center for Advanced Materials, Pennsylvania State University.]</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj81Kw0AURgdRMFYXvkG2Lqbee-cnyVKKWqHoRtdhMrkXIk1TZtKCb2_Frg7f5nwcpe4RloiEj7gkoBqALlSBjkDXjuylKgAAtW28v1Y3OX-fpqtNUyj9Pu16znM6xHk4csnHsD2EeZh25SRl5BTGIZb7xDKlMd-qKwnbzHdnLtTXy_Pnaq03H69vq6eNjggNaQ9s-iAkzB126J0FK3Xjhau-shRQXAwxWumosz24qrHWkGeh4JxAbRbq4d8b05Tz6bzdp2EM6adFaP86W2zPneYXGFxElw</recordid><startdate>19900501</startdate><enddate>19900501</enddate><creator>Goodlin, Drew L.</creator><creator>Conway, J. C.</creator><creator>Pangborn, R. N.</creator><creator>Tittmann, B.</creator><creator>Green, D. J.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900501</creationdate><title>Nondestructive evaluation of ceramic preforms</title><author>Goodlin, Drew L. ; Conway, J. C. ; Pangborn, R. N. ; Tittmann, B. ; Green, D. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1092-60e3daf2feeb1b165404f896fe7d742a1f5cacc4fb2b4d057944326ef2a55f083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goodlin, Drew L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pangborn, R. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tittmann, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, D. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goodlin, Drew L.</au><au>Conway, J. C.</au><au>Pangborn, R. N.</au><au>Tittmann, B.</au><au>Green, D. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nondestructive evaluation of ceramic preforms</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>1990-05-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S144</spage><epage>S145</epage><pages>S144-S145</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>In order to identify and eliminate flawed ceramic preforms prior to metal infiltration, several approaches for nondestructive evaluation were studied. The techniques chosen include immersion ultrasonics, scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM), and radiography. Undesirable irregularities in the preforms include cracks, voids, density gradients, and shot. The latter represents spherically shaped particles of alumina, with diameters that may exceed ten times that of the fibers, and that are incorporated into the porous fiber preform. It is generally thought that shot with sizes greater than 100 μm affects the mechanical properties of the resulting metal matrix composite. With the aid of SAM and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), shot in near-surface areas could be evaluated. Cracks and voids could also be located using SAM and SEM. On a larger scale, the ultrasonic immersion equipment was capable of detecting and quantifying density gradients, which were verified using radiographic techniques. Examples will be given to illustrate the sensitivity and resolution of the various techniques with regard to examination of the flawed preforms. [Work supported by Center for Advanced Materials, Pennsylvania State University.]</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.2028002</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990-05, Vol.87 (S1), p.S144-S145
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_2028002
source AIP Acoustical Society of America
title Nondestructive evaluation of ceramic preforms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T17%3A15%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nondestructive%20evaluation%20of%20ceramic%20preforms&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Goodlin,%20Drew%20L.&rft.date=1990-05-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S144&rft.epage=S145&rft.pages=S144-S145&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.2028002&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1121_1_2028002%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true