When is a stop aspirated

A simple answer to the question is this: A stop is aspirated when a linguist/phonetician judges it to be so. This property, often referred to in descriptions of the stop consonants of English and many other languages, has been variously defined in physical terms, aerodynamically, articulatorily, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1990-05, Vol.87 (S1), p.S116-S116
1. Verfasser: Lisker, Leigh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S116
container_issue S1
container_start_page S116
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 87
creator Lisker, Leigh
description A simple answer to the question is this: A stop is aspirated when a linguist/phonetician judges it to be so. This property, often referred to in descriptions of the stop consonants of English and many other languages, has been variously defined in physical terms, aerodynamically, articulatorily, and acoustically. Linguists seem generally to agree that in English aspiration is a predictable, i.e., context determined, and hence a nondistinctive attribute of/p t k/in certain contexts. In some other languages, e.g., Hindi, aspiration is a distinctive feature of certain stop phonemes, so that [t] contrasts with [th]. Hindi-English bilinguals, however, when speaking English, regularly use Hindi /t/ and not/th/, where a “predictably” aspirated English/t/would be expected. For native English speakers, including linguists, this choice seems erroneous. Consistent with this choice by Hindi speakers, is the general opinion of many Hindi-speaking linguists that, contrary to the opinion of American linguists, English /p t k/are not aspirated. Labeling tests of edited naturally produced nonsense CV syllables yielded data showing that Indian and American linguists differ considerably in locating an inaspirate-aspirate boundary along the VOT dimension.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.2027860
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_2027860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1121_1_2027860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_1_20278603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYBA0NNAzNDQy1DfUMzIwMrcwM2Bi4DQ0NTLQtTA1MmFh4DQwMDDUNbE0M-Ng4CouzgJyTS2MLTkZJMIzUvMUMosVEhWKS_ILFBKLCzKLEktSU3gYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4Omm2uIs4duclF-cXFRalp8QVFmbmJRZbyhQTzI6njDeKjVxqSoBQBHTzED</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>When is a stop aspirated</title><source>Acoustical Society of America (AIP)</source><creator>Lisker, Leigh</creator><creatorcontrib>Lisker, Leigh</creatorcontrib><description>A simple answer to the question is this: A stop is aspirated when a linguist/phonetician judges it to be so. This property, often referred to in descriptions of the stop consonants of English and many other languages, has been variously defined in physical terms, aerodynamically, articulatorily, and acoustically. Linguists seem generally to agree that in English aspiration is a predictable, i.e., context determined, and hence a nondistinctive attribute of/p t k/in certain contexts. In some other languages, e.g., Hindi, aspiration is a distinctive feature of certain stop phonemes, so that [t] contrasts with [th]. Hindi-English bilinguals, however, when speaking English, regularly use Hindi /t/ and not/th/, where a “predictably” aspirated English/t/would be expected. For native English speakers, including linguists, this choice seems erroneous. Consistent with this choice by Hindi speakers, is the general opinion of many Hindi-speaking linguists that, contrary to the opinion of American linguists, English /p t k/are not aspirated. Labeling tests of edited naturally produced nonsense CV syllables yielded data showing that Indian and American linguists differ considerably in locating an inaspirate-aspirate boundary along the VOT dimension.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.2027860</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990-05, Vol.87 (S1), p.S116-S116</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lisker, Leigh</creatorcontrib><title>When is a stop aspirated</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>A simple answer to the question is this: A stop is aspirated when a linguist/phonetician judges it to be so. This property, often referred to in descriptions of the stop consonants of English and many other languages, has been variously defined in physical terms, aerodynamically, articulatorily, and acoustically. Linguists seem generally to agree that in English aspiration is a predictable, i.e., context determined, and hence a nondistinctive attribute of/p t k/in certain contexts. In some other languages, e.g., Hindi, aspiration is a distinctive feature of certain stop phonemes, so that [t] contrasts with [th]. Hindi-English bilinguals, however, when speaking English, regularly use Hindi /t/ and not/th/, where a “predictably” aspirated English/t/would be expected. For native English speakers, including linguists, this choice seems erroneous. Consistent with this choice by Hindi speakers, is the general opinion of many Hindi-speaking linguists that, contrary to the opinion of American linguists, English /p t k/are not aspirated. Labeling tests of edited naturally produced nonsense CV syllables yielded data showing that Indian and American linguists differ considerably in locating an inaspirate-aspirate boundary along the VOT dimension.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYBA0NNAzNDQy1DfUMzIwMrcwM2Bi4DQ0NTLQtTA1MmFh4DQwMDDUNbE0M-Ng4CouzgJyTS2MLTkZJMIzUvMUMosVEhWKS_ILFBKLCzKLEktSU3gYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4Omm2uIs4duclF-cXFRalp8QVFmbmJRZbyhQTzI6njDeKjVxqSoBQBHTzED</recordid><startdate>19900501</startdate><enddate>19900501</enddate><creator>Lisker, Leigh</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900501</creationdate><title>When is a stop aspirated</title><author>Lisker, Leigh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_1_20278603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lisker, Leigh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lisker, Leigh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When is a stop aspirated</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>1990-05-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S116</spage><epage>S116</epage><pages>S116-S116</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>A simple answer to the question is this: A stop is aspirated when a linguist/phonetician judges it to be so. This property, often referred to in descriptions of the stop consonants of English and many other languages, has been variously defined in physical terms, aerodynamically, articulatorily, and acoustically. Linguists seem generally to agree that in English aspiration is a predictable, i.e., context determined, and hence a nondistinctive attribute of/p t k/in certain contexts. In some other languages, e.g., Hindi, aspiration is a distinctive feature of certain stop phonemes, so that [t] contrasts with [th]. Hindi-English bilinguals, however, when speaking English, regularly use Hindi /t/ and not/th/, where a “predictably” aspirated English/t/would be expected. For native English speakers, including linguists, this choice seems erroneous. Consistent with this choice by Hindi speakers, is the general opinion of many Hindi-speaking linguists that, contrary to the opinion of American linguists, English /p t k/are not aspirated. Labeling tests of edited naturally produced nonsense CV syllables yielded data showing that Indian and American linguists differ considerably in locating an inaspirate-aspirate boundary along the VOT dimension.</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.2027860</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990-05, Vol.87 (S1), p.S116-S116
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_2027860
source Acoustical Society of America (AIP)
title When is a stop aspirated
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A48%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20is%20a%20stop%20aspirated&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Lisker,%20Leigh&rft.date=1990-05-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S116&rft.epage=S116&rft.pages=S116-S116&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.2027860&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1121_1_2027860%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true