Interactions between nearophysiology and speech distrimination

Psychophysical approaches have provided much information about the processing of speech sounds by humans and also by laboratory animals. These studies establish the essential functions of the auditory system that must be explained and define the limits over which they operate. However, processing me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1989-05, Vol.85 (S1), p.S14-S14
Hauptverfasser: Sinex, Donal G., McDonald, Lynn P., Mott, John B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S14
container_issue S1
container_start_page S14
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 85
creator Sinex, Donal G.
McDonald, Lynn P.
Mott, John B.
description Psychophysical approaches have provided much information about the processing of speech sounds by humans and also by laboratory animals. These studies establish the essential functions of the auditory system that must be explained and define the limits over which they operate. However, processing mechanisms cannot be discovered by psychophysical approaches. Details about mechanisms must come from neurophysiological studies. This view has guided this investigation of the processing of voice onset time (VOT), a complex acoustic cue that differentiates between consonants such as /d/ and /t/. The peripheral neural representation of VOT syllables was studied, asking which (if any) properties of the neural responses correlated with the results of psychophysical experiments conducted by Kuhl and Miller [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 905–917 (1978); 70, 340–349 (1981)]. The psychophysical findings provided a standard against which hypotheses about the representation of VOT information could be evaluated. As a result, it was possible to identify a neural mechanism in the auditory periphery that may contribute to the formation of phonetic categories based on voicing. [Work supported by NS23242 from NINCDS.]
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.2026807
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_2026807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1121_1_2026807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_1_20268073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjr0KwjAURoMoWH8G3yCrQ2tu-mO7uIiiu3uI7a2N1KTkFqRvr0JfwOnjg3PgMLYBEQFI2EEkhcxysZ-wAFIpwjyVyZQFQggIkyLL5mxB9PzeNI-LgB2utkevy944S_yO_RvRcovau64ZyLjWPQaubcWpQywbXhnqvXkZq3_Kis1q3RKux12y7fl0O17C0jsij7XqvrD2gwKhfoEK1BgY_8N-ANDAQNk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interactions between nearophysiology and speech distrimination</title><source>Acoustical Society of America (AIP)</source><creator>Sinex, Donal G. ; McDonald, Lynn P. ; Mott, John B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sinex, Donal G. ; McDonald, Lynn P. ; Mott, John B.</creatorcontrib><description>Psychophysical approaches have provided much information about the processing of speech sounds by humans and also by laboratory animals. These studies establish the essential functions of the auditory system that must be explained and define the limits over which they operate. However, processing mechanisms cannot be discovered by psychophysical approaches. Details about mechanisms must come from neurophysiological studies. This view has guided this investigation of the processing of voice onset time (VOT), a complex acoustic cue that differentiates between consonants such as /d/ and /t/. The peripheral neural representation of VOT syllables was studied, asking which (if any) properties of the neural responses correlated with the results of psychophysical experiments conducted by Kuhl and Miller [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 905–917 (1978); 70, 340–349 (1981)]. The psychophysical findings provided a standard against which hypotheses about the representation of VOT information could be evaluated. As a result, it was possible to identify a neural mechanism in the auditory periphery that may contribute to the formation of phonetic categories based on voicing. [Work supported by NS23242 from NINCDS.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.2026807</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1989-05, Vol.85 (S1), p.S14-S14</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sinex, Donal G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Lynn P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mott, John B.</creatorcontrib><title>Interactions between nearophysiology and speech distrimination</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>Psychophysical approaches have provided much information about the processing of speech sounds by humans and also by laboratory animals. These studies establish the essential functions of the auditory system that must be explained and define the limits over which they operate. However, processing mechanisms cannot be discovered by psychophysical approaches. Details about mechanisms must come from neurophysiological studies. This view has guided this investigation of the processing of voice onset time (VOT), a complex acoustic cue that differentiates between consonants such as /d/ and /t/. The peripheral neural representation of VOT syllables was studied, asking which (if any) properties of the neural responses correlated with the results of psychophysical experiments conducted by Kuhl and Miller [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 905–917 (1978); 70, 340–349 (1981)]. The psychophysical findings provided a standard against which hypotheses about the representation of VOT information could be evaluated. As a result, it was possible to identify a neural mechanism in the auditory periphery that may contribute to the formation of phonetic categories based on voicing. [Work supported by NS23242 from NINCDS.]</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjr0KwjAURoMoWH8G3yCrQ2tu-mO7uIiiu3uI7a2N1KTkFqRvr0JfwOnjg3PgMLYBEQFI2EEkhcxysZ-wAFIpwjyVyZQFQggIkyLL5mxB9PzeNI-LgB2utkevy944S_yO_RvRcovau64ZyLjWPQaubcWpQywbXhnqvXkZq3_Kis1q3RKux12y7fl0O17C0jsij7XqvrD2gwKhfoEK1BgY_8N-ANDAQNk</recordid><startdate>19890501</startdate><enddate>19890501</enddate><creator>Sinex, Donal G.</creator><creator>McDonald, Lynn P.</creator><creator>Mott, John B.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890501</creationdate><title>Interactions between nearophysiology and speech distrimination</title><author>Sinex, Donal G. ; McDonald, Lynn P. ; Mott, John B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_1_20268073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sinex, Donal G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Lynn P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mott, John B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sinex, Donal G.</au><au>McDonald, Lynn P.</au><au>Mott, John B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interactions between nearophysiology and speech distrimination</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>1989-05-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S14</spage><epage>S14</epage><pages>S14-S14</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Psychophysical approaches have provided much information about the processing of speech sounds by humans and also by laboratory animals. These studies establish the essential functions of the auditory system that must be explained and define the limits over which they operate. However, processing mechanisms cannot be discovered by psychophysical approaches. Details about mechanisms must come from neurophysiological studies. This view has guided this investigation of the processing of voice onset time (VOT), a complex acoustic cue that differentiates between consonants such as /d/ and /t/. The peripheral neural representation of VOT syllables was studied, asking which (if any) properties of the neural responses correlated with the results of psychophysical experiments conducted by Kuhl and Miller [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 905–917 (1978); 70, 340–349 (1981)]. The psychophysical findings provided a standard against which hypotheses about the representation of VOT information could be evaluated. As a result, it was possible to identify a neural mechanism in the auditory periphery that may contribute to the formation of phonetic categories based on voicing. [Work supported by NS23242 from NINCDS.]</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.2026807</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1989-05, Vol.85 (S1), p.S14-S14
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_2026807
source Acoustical Society of America (AIP)
title Interactions between nearophysiology and speech distrimination
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T20%3A37%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interactions%20between%20nearophysiology%20and%20speech%20distrimination&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Sinex,%20Donal%20G.&rft.date=1989-05-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S14&rft.epage=S14&rft.pages=S14-S14&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.2026807&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1121_1_2026807%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true