Meaningful and nonmeaningful noise: Effects and aftereffects

In recent experiments in our laboratory two effects of white noise have been found: (1) With the Norinder, an arithmetic task employed by Frankenhaueser and Lundberg, involving decisions as to whether additions or subtractions are to be performed, 95 dBA noise decreased number of problems attempted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1983-05, Vol.73 (S1), p.S105-S105
Hauptverfasser: Loeb, Michel, Holding, Dennis H., Baker, Mary Anne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S105
container_issue S1
container_start_page S105
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 73
creator Loeb, Michel
Holding, Dennis H.
Baker, Mary Anne
description In recent experiments in our laboratory two effects of white noise have been found: (1) With the Norinder, an arithmetic task employed by Frankenhaueser and Lundberg, involving decisions as to whether additions or subtractions are to be performed, 95 dBA noise decreased number of problems attempted for men in the morning but not for men in the afternoon or for women and (2) with COPE, a task involving a decision whether to attempt a more complex task with a greater probability of success or a less complex one with lower success probability, both noise and task-induced fatigue tended to produce choices of the less complex task, and the effects were additive. The present experiment employed two kinds of continuous noise of 95 dBA as well as a control or ambient noise condition (55 dBA), and a different arithmetic task, involving successive additions of columns of numbers, was employed. Preliminary analysis indicates that the effects of noise on this task are different from those on the Norinder. Effects on COPE were inconclusive, for reasons to be discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.2020223
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_2020223</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1121_1_2020223</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693-92e88c8bcf7842da590140c1ab51a8c8435a79b18929fdb9617f11639768ab5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFj81LAzEQxYMouLYe_A_26iE1k6_NiBcp9QMqvfQeZrOJrLRZ2dSD_72rLcgchvm9xzweYzcgFgAS7mAhxTRSnbEKjBTcGanPWSWEAK7R2kt2VcrHdBqnsGIPb5Fyn9_T166m3NV5yPt_koe-xPt6lVIMh_JnoHSIYzyCObtItCvx-rRnbPu02i5f-Hrz_Lp8XPNgUXGU0bng2pAap2VHBgVoEYBaAzQJWhlqsAWHElPXooUmAViFjXWTh9SM3R7fhnEoZQr3n2O_p_Hbg_C_rT34U2v1AxwiSGo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meaningful and nonmeaningful noise: Effects and aftereffects</title><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Loeb, Michel ; Holding, Dennis H. ; Baker, Mary Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Loeb, Michel ; Holding, Dennis H. ; Baker, Mary Anne</creatorcontrib><description>In recent experiments in our laboratory two effects of white noise have been found: (1) With the Norinder, an arithmetic task employed by Frankenhaueser and Lundberg, involving decisions as to whether additions or subtractions are to be performed, 95 dBA noise decreased number of problems attempted for men in the morning but not for men in the afternoon or for women and (2) with COPE, a task involving a decision whether to attempt a more complex task with a greater probability of success or a less complex one with lower success probability, both noise and task-induced fatigue tended to produce choices of the less complex task, and the effects were additive. The present experiment employed two kinds of continuous noise of 95 dBA as well as a control or ambient noise condition (55 dBA), and a different arithmetic task, involving successive additions of columns of numbers, was employed. Preliminary analysis indicates that the effects of noise on this task are different from those on the Norinder. Effects on COPE were inconclusive, for reasons to be discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.2020223</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1983-05, Vol.73 (S1), p.S105-S105</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loeb, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holding, Dennis H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Mary Anne</creatorcontrib><title>Meaningful and nonmeaningful noise: Effects and aftereffects</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>In recent experiments in our laboratory two effects of white noise have been found: (1) With the Norinder, an arithmetic task employed by Frankenhaueser and Lundberg, involving decisions as to whether additions or subtractions are to be performed, 95 dBA noise decreased number of problems attempted for men in the morning but not for men in the afternoon or for women and (2) with COPE, a task involving a decision whether to attempt a more complex task with a greater probability of success or a less complex one with lower success probability, both noise and task-induced fatigue tended to produce choices of the less complex task, and the effects were additive. The present experiment employed two kinds of continuous noise of 95 dBA as well as a control or ambient noise condition (55 dBA), and a different arithmetic task, involving successive additions of columns of numbers, was employed. Preliminary analysis indicates that the effects of noise on this task are different from those on the Norinder. Effects on COPE were inconclusive, for reasons to be discussed.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFj81LAzEQxYMouLYe_A_26iE1k6_NiBcp9QMqvfQeZrOJrLRZ2dSD_72rLcgchvm9xzweYzcgFgAS7mAhxTRSnbEKjBTcGanPWSWEAK7R2kt2VcrHdBqnsGIPb5Fyn9_T166m3NV5yPt_koe-xPt6lVIMh_JnoHSIYzyCObtItCvx-rRnbPu02i5f-Hrz_Lp8XPNgUXGU0bng2pAap2VHBgVoEYBaAzQJWhlqsAWHElPXooUmAViFjXWTh9SM3R7fhnEoZQr3n2O_p_Hbg_C_rT34U2v1AxwiSGo</recordid><startdate>19830501</startdate><enddate>19830501</enddate><creator>Loeb, Michel</creator><creator>Holding, Dennis H.</creator><creator>Baker, Mary Anne</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19830501</creationdate><title>Meaningful and nonmeaningful noise: Effects and aftereffects</title><author>Loeb, Michel ; Holding, Dennis H. ; Baker, Mary Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693-92e88c8bcf7842da590140c1ab51a8c8435a79b18929fdb9617f11639768ab5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loeb, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holding, Dennis H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Mary Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loeb, Michel</au><au>Holding, Dennis H.</au><au>Baker, Mary Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meaningful and nonmeaningful noise: Effects and aftereffects</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>1983-05-01</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>S105</spage><epage>S105</epage><pages>S105-S105</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>In recent experiments in our laboratory two effects of white noise have been found: (1) With the Norinder, an arithmetic task employed by Frankenhaueser and Lundberg, involving decisions as to whether additions or subtractions are to be performed, 95 dBA noise decreased number of problems attempted for men in the morning but not for men in the afternoon or for women and (2) with COPE, a task involving a decision whether to attempt a more complex task with a greater probability of success or a less complex one with lower success probability, both noise and task-induced fatigue tended to produce choices of the less complex task, and the effects were additive. The present experiment employed two kinds of continuous noise of 95 dBA as well as a control or ambient noise condition (55 dBA), and a different arithmetic task, involving successive additions of columns of numbers, was employed. Preliminary analysis indicates that the effects of noise on this task are different from those on the Norinder. Effects on COPE were inconclusive, for reasons to be discussed.</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.2020223</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1983-05, Vol.73 (S1), p.S105-S105
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_2020223
source AIP Acoustical Society of America
title Meaningful and nonmeaningful noise: Effects and aftereffects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T07%3A45%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meaningful%20and%20nonmeaningful%20noise:%20Effects%20and%20aftereffects&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Loeb,%20Michel&rft.date=1983-05-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=S105&rft.epage=S105&rft.pages=S105-S105&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.2020223&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1121_1_2020223%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true