Temporally Segmented Speech

Alternated and interrupted speech both show a minimum of intelligibility when the bursts of speech reaching the listener last about 150 msec. A similar effect occurs with “temporally segmented” speech, which is made by splicing silent intervals into a recording of continuous speech, thus dividing it...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1972-07, Vol.52 (1A_Supplement), p.176-176
1. Verfasser: Huggins, A. W. F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 176
container_issue 1A_Supplement
container_start_page 176
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 52
creator Huggins, A. W. F.
description Alternated and interrupted speech both show a minimum of intelligibility when the bursts of speech reaching the listener last about 150 msec. A similar effect occurs with “temporally segmented” speech, which is made by splicing silent intervals into a recording of continuous speech, thus dividing it up into “speech intervals” separated from each other by “silent intervals.” The advantage of this material is that the durations of speech and silent intervals can be independently varied, without discarding any of the speech. An earlier experiment [see MIT Res. Lab. Electron., Quart. Progr. Rep., No. 103 (1971), p. 126.] suggested that the dip in intelligibility is actually due to two separate effects: (1) the probability that a speech interval will be recognized decreases as its duration decreases and (2) the probability that signal parameters can be followed from one speech interval to the next decreases as the duration of the intervening silent interval increases. Experimental support for this view has been obtained using temporally segmented speech (1) by varying the duration of speech intervals with silent intervals held constant and (2) by varying the duration of silient intervals, with speech intervals held constant. [This research was supported by NIH Grant No. NSO4332.]
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.1982105
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_1982105</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1121_1_1982105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c695-da1dd2082e319a68b3ad05cf2c62f15d1768dd34ec84a6658d9da1a4630361213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjztPAzEQhC0EEkegoKZJS-Gw68dilyiCgBSJItefjHePh-7IyabJv-dQ0BSjKWY0n1LXCCtEg3e4whgMgj9RDXoDOnjjTlUDAKhdJDpXF7V-zdEHGxt108o47UsahsNyJ--jfP8IL3eTSP64VGd9Gqpc_ftCtU-P7fpZb183L-uHrc4UveaEzAaCEYsxUXizicHn3mQyPXrGewrM1kkOLhH5wHGuJEcWLM2X7ULdHmdz2ddapO-m8jmmcugQuj-obtYRyv4CugA8VQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporally Segmented Speech</title><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Huggins, A. W. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huggins, A. W. F.</creatorcontrib><description>Alternated and interrupted speech both show a minimum of intelligibility when the bursts of speech reaching the listener last about 150 msec. A similar effect occurs with “temporally segmented” speech, which is made by splicing silent intervals into a recording of continuous speech, thus dividing it up into “speech intervals” separated from each other by “silent intervals.” The advantage of this material is that the durations of speech and silent intervals can be independently varied, without discarding any of the speech. An earlier experiment [see MIT Res. Lab. Electron., Quart. Progr. Rep., No. 103 (1971), p. 126.] suggested that the dip in intelligibility is actually due to two separate effects: (1) the probability that a speech interval will be recognized decreases as its duration decreases and (2) the probability that signal parameters can be followed from one speech interval to the next decreases as the duration of the intervening silent interval increases. Experimental support for this view has been obtained using temporally segmented speech (1) by varying the duration of speech intervals with silent intervals held constant and (2) by varying the duration of silient intervals, with speech intervals held constant. [This research was supported by NIH Grant No. NSO4332.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.1982105</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972-07, Vol.52 (1A_Supplement), p.176-176</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huggins, A. W. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Temporally Segmented Speech</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>Alternated and interrupted speech both show a minimum of intelligibility when the bursts of speech reaching the listener last about 150 msec. A similar effect occurs with “temporally segmented” speech, which is made by splicing silent intervals into a recording of continuous speech, thus dividing it up into “speech intervals” separated from each other by “silent intervals.” The advantage of this material is that the durations of speech and silent intervals can be independently varied, without discarding any of the speech. An earlier experiment [see MIT Res. Lab. Electron., Quart. Progr. Rep., No. 103 (1971), p. 126.] suggested that the dip in intelligibility is actually due to two separate effects: (1) the probability that a speech interval will be recognized decreases as its duration decreases and (2) the probability that signal parameters can be followed from one speech interval to the next decreases as the duration of the intervening silent interval increases. Experimental support for this view has been obtained using temporally segmented speech (1) by varying the duration of speech intervals with silent intervals held constant and (2) by varying the duration of silient intervals, with speech intervals held constant. [This research was supported by NIH Grant No. NSO4332.]</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1972</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjztPAzEQhC0EEkegoKZJS-Gw68dilyiCgBSJItefjHePh-7IyabJv-dQ0BSjKWY0n1LXCCtEg3e4whgMgj9RDXoDOnjjTlUDAKhdJDpXF7V-zdEHGxt108o47UsahsNyJ--jfP8IL3eTSP64VGd9Gqpc_ftCtU-P7fpZb183L-uHrc4UveaEzAaCEYsxUXizicHn3mQyPXrGewrM1kkOLhH5wHGuJEcWLM2X7ULdHmdz2ddapO-m8jmmcugQuj-obtYRyv4CugA8VQ</recordid><startdate>19720701</startdate><enddate>19720701</enddate><creator>Huggins, A. W. F.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19720701</creationdate><title>Temporally Segmented Speech</title><author>Huggins, A. W. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c695-da1dd2082e319a68b3ad05cf2c62f15d1768dd34ec84a6658d9da1a4630361213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1972</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huggins, A. W. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huggins, A. W. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporally Segmented Speech</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>1972-07-01</date><risdate>1972</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1A_Supplement</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>176-176</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>Alternated and interrupted speech both show a minimum of intelligibility when the bursts of speech reaching the listener last about 150 msec. A similar effect occurs with “temporally segmented” speech, which is made by splicing silent intervals into a recording of continuous speech, thus dividing it up into “speech intervals” separated from each other by “silent intervals.” The advantage of this material is that the durations of speech and silent intervals can be independently varied, without discarding any of the speech. An earlier experiment [see MIT Res. Lab. Electron., Quart. Progr. Rep., No. 103 (1971), p. 126.] suggested that the dip in intelligibility is actually due to two separate effects: (1) the probability that a speech interval will be recognized decreases as its duration decreases and (2) the probability that signal parameters can be followed from one speech interval to the next decreases as the duration of the intervening silent interval increases. Experimental support for this view has been obtained using temporally segmented speech (1) by varying the duration of speech intervals with silent intervals held constant and (2) by varying the duration of silient intervals, with speech intervals held constant. [This research was supported by NIH Grant No. NSO4332.]</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.1982105</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972-07, Vol.52 (1A_Supplement), p.176-176
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_1982105
source AIP Acoustical Society of America
title Temporally Segmented Speech
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T15%3A03%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporally%20Segmented%20Speech&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Huggins,%20A.%20W.%20F.&rft.date=1972-07-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1A_Supplement&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=176-176&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.1982105&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1121_1_1982105%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true