Click-intensity discrimination with and without a background masking noise

Click-intensity discrimination with and without a background masking noise

A study of intensity discrimination employing click stimuli revealed three unusual effects. First, clicks are difficult to differentiate with respect to intensity. Second, the Weber function differs from those usually obtained with stimuli of longer duration. Third, click-intensity discrimination is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1969-10, Vol.46 (4), p.965-968
Hauptverfasser: Raab, D H, Taub, H B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Auditory Perception
Discrimination (Psychology)
Female
Humans
Male
Noise
Psychological Tests
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 968
container_issue 4
container_start_page 965
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 46
creator Raab, D H
Taub, H B
description A study of intensity discrimination employing click stimuli revealed three unusual effects. First, clicks are difficult to differentiate with respect to intensity. Second, the Weber function differs from those usually obtained with stimuli of longer duration. Third, click-intensity discrimination is, improved by the addition of a continuous background noise. Since click stimuli have virtually no energy variations, these results cannot be explained by stimulus-oriented theories of detection and discrimination.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.1911816
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_1911816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>5824039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-e9599c92a7f1d0976506b24cd2109732eb037a95de5e7499244d52121a4d569d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBCohMKBD0DKlUOK17GT7BFVPFWJC5wjx3aKSeNUsSPUv8eQCu1hdlaj1cwQcg10BcDgDlaAABUUJyQBwWhWCcZPSUIphYxjUZyTC--_IhVVjguyEBXjNMeEvK53VnWZdcE4b8Mh1dar0fbWyWAHl37b8JlKp_-WYQqpTBupuu04TPHYS99Zt03dYL25JGet3HlzdcQl-Xh8eF8_Z5u3p5f1_SZTrKIhMygQFTJZtqAploWgRcO40gwiy5lpaF5KFNoIU3JExrkWLKaUEQvU-ZLczn_VOHg_mrbeR8NyPNRA69866jhzHVF7M2v3U9Mb_a885s9_AANWWUs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Click-intensity discrimination with and without a background masking noise</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Raab, D H ; Taub, H B</creator><creatorcontrib>Raab, D H ; Taub, H B</creatorcontrib><description>A study of intensity discrimination employing click stimuli revealed three unusual effects. First, clicks are difficult to differentiate with respect to intensity. Second, the Weber function differs from those usually obtained with stimuli of longer duration. Third, click-intensity discrimination is, improved by the addition of a continuous background noise. Since click stimuli have virtually no energy variations, these results cannot be explained by stimulus-oriented theories of detection and discrimination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.1911816</identifier><identifier>PMID: 5824039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Auditory Perception ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Noise ; Psychological Tests</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1969-10, Vol.46 (4), p.965-968</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-e9599c92a7f1d0976506b24cd2109732eb037a95de5e7499244d52121a4d569d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5824039$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raab, D H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taub, H B</creatorcontrib><title>Click-intensity discrimination with and without a background masking noise</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>A study of intensity discrimination employing click stimuli revealed three unusual effects. First, clicks are difficult to differentiate with respect to intensity. Second, the Weber function differs from those usually obtained with stimuli of longer duration. Third, click-intensity discrimination is, improved by the addition of a continuous background noise. Since click stimuli have virtually no energy variations, these results cannot be explained by stimulus-oriented theories of detection and discrimination.</description><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1969</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBCohMKBD0DKlUOK17GT7BFVPFWJC5wjx3aKSeNUsSPUv8eQCu1hdlaj1cwQcg10BcDgDlaAABUUJyQBwWhWCcZPSUIphYxjUZyTC--_IhVVjguyEBXjNMeEvK53VnWZdcE4b8Mh1dar0fbWyWAHl37b8JlKp_-WYQqpTBupuu04TPHYS99Zt03dYL25JGet3HlzdcQl-Xh8eF8_Z5u3p5f1_SZTrKIhMygQFTJZtqAploWgRcO40gwiy5lpaF5KFNoIU3JExrkWLKaUEQvU-ZLczn_VOHg_mrbeR8NyPNRA69866jhzHVF7M2v3U9Mb_a885s9_AANWWUs</recordid><startdate>196910</startdate><enddate>196910</enddate><creator>Raab, D H</creator><creator>Taub, H B</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196910</creationdate><title>Click-intensity discrimination with and without a background masking noise</title><author>Raab, D H ; Taub, H B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c280t-e9599c92a7f1d0976506b24cd2109732eb037a95de5e7499244d52121a4d569d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1969</creationdate><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raab, D H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taub, H B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raab, D H</au><au>Taub, H B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Click-intensity discrimination with and without a background masking noise</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>1969-10</date><risdate>1969</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>965</spage><epage>968</epage><pages>965-968</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>A study of intensity discrimination employing click stimuli revealed three unusual effects. First, clicks are difficult to differentiate with respect to intensity. Second, the Weber function differs from those usually obtained with stimuli of longer duration. Third, click-intensity discrimination is, improved by the addition of a continuous background noise. Since click stimuli have virtually no energy variations, these results cannot be explained by stimulus-oriented theories of detection and discrimination.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>5824039</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.1911816</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1969-10, Vol.46 (4), p.965-968
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_1_1911816
source MEDLINE; AIP Acoustical Society of America
subjects Auditory Perception
Discrimination (Psychology)
Female
Humans
Male
Noise
Psychological Tests
title Click-intensity discrimination with and without a background masking noise
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A02%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Click-intensity%20discrimination%20with%20and%20without%20a%20background%20masking%20noise&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Raab,%20D%20H&rft.date=1969-10&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=965&rft.epage=968&rft.pages=965-968&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.1911816&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E5824039%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/5824039&rfr_iscdi=true