The perception of (trans)masculine speech: Effects of stimulus acoustics and rater identity

A large body of work has examined the acoustic characteristics of cisgender, heterosexual (cishet) men and women’s speech, and the acoustic features that predict listeners’ judgments of binary gender through speech. Considerably less work has examined the diverse ways that non-cishet men, non-cishet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2024-03, Vol.155 (3_Supplement), p.A270-A270
Hauptverfasser: Munson, Benjamin, Dolquist, Devin V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A270
container_issue 3_Supplement
container_start_page A270
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 155
creator Munson, Benjamin
Dolquist, Devin V.
description A large body of work has examined the acoustic characteristics of cisgender, heterosexual (cishet) men and women’s speech, and the acoustic features that predict listeners’ judgments of binary gender through speech. Considerably less work has examined the diverse ways that non-cishet men, non-cishet women, and people whose gender is neither exclusively male nor exclusively female express gender through speech. Moreover, there is relatively little work on how gender-diverse listener groups perceive gender through speech. This poster presents the results of a perception experiment designed to fill those gaps. Stimuli were multiple sentence productions of 20 masculine-presenting individuals, including cisgender men, transgender men, and transmasculine nonbinary people. These are described and analyzed acoustically in Dolquist (2023). Listeners were 88 cishet men, 62 cishet women, and 50 gender and sexuality diverse (GSD) individuals. Listeners identified gender identity, gender orientation (i.e., cisgender or transgender), and a variety of attributes for each stimulus. GSD listeners were more likely than cishet men and cishet women to identify voices as transgender or nonbinary, and were more likely to evaluate those voices favorably. Moreover, cishet men and women’s judgments of gender were more strongly predicted by sex-dimorphic acoustic characteristics like f0 than were GSD listeners’ judgments.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/10.0027462
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0027462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1121_10_0027462</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_10_00274623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjksKwjAURYMoWD8TV5ChCtUk_dg6FcUFOHNQQnyhkTYteemgu7eFbsDRuRfO4BCy4-zEueDngYyJS5yKGQl4IliYJSKek4AxxsM4T9MlWSF-h5tkUR6Q96sE2oJT0HrTWNpouvdOWjzUElVXGQsUWwBVXulda1AeRwe9qbuqQypV0w1HDct-qJMeHDUfsN74fkMWWlYI24lrcnzcX7dnqFyD6EAXrTO1dH3BWTHmj5zyo7_kH73OSxo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The perception of (trans)masculine speech: Effects of stimulus acoustics and rater identity</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Munson, Benjamin ; Dolquist, Devin V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Munson, Benjamin ; Dolquist, Devin V.</creatorcontrib><description>A large body of work has examined the acoustic characteristics of cisgender, heterosexual (cishet) men and women’s speech, and the acoustic features that predict listeners’ judgments of binary gender through speech. Considerably less work has examined the diverse ways that non-cishet men, non-cishet women, and people whose gender is neither exclusively male nor exclusively female express gender through speech. Moreover, there is relatively little work on how gender-diverse listener groups perceive gender through speech. This poster presents the results of a perception experiment designed to fill those gaps. Stimuli were multiple sentence productions of 20 masculine-presenting individuals, including cisgender men, transgender men, and transmasculine nonbinary people. These are described and analyzed acoustically in Dolquist (2023). Listeners were 88 cishet men, 62 cishet women, and 50 gender and sexuality diverse (GSD) individuals. Listeners identified gender identity, gender orientation (i.e., cisgender or transgender), and a variety of attributes for each stimulus. GSD listeners were more likely than cishet men and cishet women to identify voices as transgender or nonbinary, and were more likely to evaluate those voices favorably. Moreover, cishet men and women’s judgments of gender were more strongly predicted by sex-dimorphic acoustic characteristics like f0 than were GSD listeners’ judgments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/10.0027462</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024-03, Vol.155 (3_Supplement), p.A270-A270</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munson, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolquist, Devin V.</creatorcontrib><title>The perception of (trans)masculine speech: Effects of stimulus acoustics and rater identity</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>A large body of work has examined the acoustic characteristics of cisgender, heterosexual (cishet) men and women’s speech, and the acoustic features that predict listeners’ judgments of binary gender through speech. Considerably less work has examined the diverse ways that non-cishet men, non-cishet women, and people whose gender is neither exclusively male nor exclusively female express gender through speech. Moreover, there is relatively little work on how gender-diverse listener groups perceive gender through speech. This poster presents the results of a perception experiment designed to fill those gaps. Stimuli were multiple sentence productions of 20 masculine-presenting individuals, including cisgender men, transgender men, and transmasculine nonbinary people. These are described and analyzed acoustically in Dolquist (2023). Listeners were 88 cishet men, 62 cishet women, and 50 gender and sexuality diverse (GSD) individuals. Listeners identified gender identity, gender orientation (i.e., cisgender or transgender), and a variety of attributes for each stimulus. GSD listeners were more likely than cishet men and cishet women to identify voices as transgender or nonbinary, and were more likely to evaluate those voices favorably. Moreover, cishet men and women’s judgments of gender were more strongly predicted by sex-dimorphic acoustic characteristics like f0 than were GSD listeners’ judgments.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjksKwjAURYMoWD8TV5ChCtUk_dg6FcUFOHNQQnyhkTYteemgu7eFbsDRuRfO4BCy4-zEueDngYyJS5yKGQl4IliYJSKek4AxxsM4T9MlWSF-h5tkUR6Q96sE2oJT0HrTWNpouvdOWjzUElVXGQsUWwBVXulda1AeRwe9qbuqQypV0w1HDct-qJMeHDUfsN74fkMWWlYI24lrcnzcX7dnqFyD6EAXrTO1dH3BWTHmj5zyo7_kH73OSxo</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Munson, Benjamin</creator><creator>Dolquist, Devin V.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>The perception of (trans)masculine speech: Effects of stimulus acoustics and rater identity</title><author>Munson, Benjamin ; Dolquist, Devin V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_10_00274623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munson, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolquist, Devin V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munson, Benjamin</au><au>Dolquist, Devin V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The perception of (trans)masculine speech: Effects of stimulus acoustics and rater identity</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>155</volume><issue>3_Supplement</issue><spage>A270</spage><epage>A270</epage><pages>A270-A270</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>A large body of work has examined the acoustic characteristics of cisgender, heterosexual (cishet) men and women’s speech, and the acoustic features that predict listeners’ judgments of binary gender through speech. Considerably less work has examined the diverse ways that non-cishet men, non-cishet women, and people whose gender is neither exclusively male nor exclusively female express gender through speech. Moreover, there is relatively little work on how gender-diverse listener groups perceive gender through speech. This poster presents the results of a perception experiment designed to fill those gaps. Stimuli were multiple sentence productions of 20 masculine-presenting individuals, including cisgender men, transgender men, and transmasculine nonbinary people. These are described and analyzed acoustically in Dolquist (2023). Listeners were 88 cishet men, 62 cishet women, and 50 gender and sexuality diverse (GSD) individuals. Listeners identified gender identity, gender orientation (i.e., cisgender or transgender), and a variety of attributes for each stimulus. GSD listeners were more likely than cishet men and cishet women to identify voices as transgender or nonbinary, and were more likely to evaluate those voices favorably. Moreover, cishet men and women’s judgments of gender were more strongly predicted by sex-dimorphic acoustic characteristics like f0 than were GSD listeners’ judgments.</abstract><doi>10.1121/10.0027462</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024-03, Vol.155 (3_Supplement), p.A270-A270
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0027462
source AIP Journals Complete; AIP Acoustical Society of America
title The perception of (trans)masculine speech: Effects of stimulus acoustics and rater identity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T19%3A51%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20perception%20of%20(trans)masculine%20speech:%20Effects%20of%20stimulus%20acoustics%20and%20rater%20identity&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Munson,%20Benjamin&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=155&rft.issue=3_Supplement&rft.spage=A270&rft.epage=A270&rft.pages=A270-A270&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/10.0027462&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1121_10_0027462%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true