Acoustic analysis of video conferencing platforms: Evaluating communication effectiveness for individuals with hearing loss

AIM: This research investigates the impact of video conferencing platforms on the transmitted sound to evaluate their effectiveness in facilitating communication for individuals with hearing loss. The preliminary analysis includes comparing the transmitted sound deviations from source recordings in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2023-10, Vol.154 (4_supplement), p.A159-A159
Hauptverfasser: Sebastian, Arun, Zhang, Vicky, Kitterick, Pádraig
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A159
container_issue 4_supplement
container_start_page A159
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 154
creator Sebastian, Arun
Zhang, Vicky
Kitterick, Pádraig
description AIM: This research investigates the impact of video conferencing platforms on the transmitted sound to evaluate their effectiveness in facilitating communication for individuals with hearing loss. The preliminary analysis includes comparing the transmitted sound deviations from source recordings in Teams, Zoom, and Google Meet and exploring differences in audio quality across different settings within each platform (not focused on DSP limitations or audio transmission fidelity). METHODS: In this study, we employed babble noise, BKB speech, and a combination of babble noise and BKB speech (SNR: 9dB) as stimuli. We compared different acoustic features of the received signal, including automatic audio gain adjustments, frequency range, and frequency response, with the source sound. RESULTS: Zoom applies a smooth high-frequency roll-off for speech in a noisy signal, beginning at approximately 14.5 kHz and removing all frequency content above 18 kHz. The roll-off for Teams begins at a relatively low frequency around 7 kHz. Although Google Meet starts the roll-off around 20 kHz, the gain was inconsistent and had a sharp roll-off. CONCLUSION: Each platform exhibited distinct characteristics and introduced noticeable modifications to the stimuli. Results indicated that Zoom with optional audio settings enabled demonstrates the highest fidelity to dynamic range and frequency spectrum.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/10.0023120
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0023120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1121_10_0023120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_10_00231203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj81KBDEQhIMoOP5cfII-C6OdzM6y601kxQfwPoRsx23JJEs6M7L48mZgX8DTR3VVNZRSDxqftDb6uRLRdNrghWp0b7Dd9GZ1qRpE1O1qu15fqxuR7yr7Tbdt1O-rS5MUdmCjDSdhgeRh5j0lcCl6yhQdxy84Blt8yqO8wG62YbJlubo0jlNkV1WKQN6TKzxTJBGoaeC45_psskHgh8sBDmTzUgxJ5E5d-WrQ_Zm36vF99_n20bpc3Ux-OGYebT4NGodl3sLzvO5f4T_xhFhQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acoustic analysis of video conferencing platforms: Evaluating communication effectiveness for individuals with hearing loss</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Acoustical Society of America (AIP)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sebastian, Arun ; Zhang, Vicky ; Kitterick, Pádraig</creator><creatorcontrib>Sebastian, Arun ; Zhang, Vicky ; Kitterick, Pádraig</creatorcontrib><description>AIM: This research investigates the impact of video conferencing platforms on the transmitted sound to evaluate their effectiveness in facilitating communication for individuals with hearing loss. The preliminary analysis includes comparing the transmitted sound deviations from source recordings in Teams, Zoom, and Google Meet and exploring differences in audio quality across different settings within each platform (not focused on DSP limitations or audio transmission fidelity). METHODS: In this study, we employed babble noise, BKB speech, and a combination of babble noise and BKB speech (SNR: 9dB) as stimuli. We compared different acoustic features of the received signal, including automatic audio gain adjustments, frequency range, and frequency response, with the source sound. RESULTS: Zoom applies a smooth high-frequency roll-off for speech in a noisy signal, beginning at approximately 14.5 kHz and removing all frequency content above 18 kHz. The roll-off for Teams begins at a relatively low frequency around 7 kHz. Although Google Meet starts the roll-off around 20 kHz, the gain was inconsistent and had a sharp roll-off. CONCLUSION: Each platform exhibited distinct characteristics and introduced noticeable modifications to the stimuli. Results indicated that Zoom with optional audio settings enabled demonstrates the highest fidelity to dynamic range and frequency spectrum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/10.0023120</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-10, Vol.154 (4_supplement), p.A159-A159</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sebastian, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Vicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitterick, Pádraig</creatorcontrib><title>Acoustic analysis of video conferencing platforms: Evaluating communication effectiveness for individuals with hearing loss</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>AIM: This research investigates the impact of video conferencing platforms on the transmitted sound to evaluate their effectiveness in facilitating communication for individuals with hearing loss. The preliminary analysis includes comparing the transmitted sound deviations from source recordings in Teams, Zoom, and Google Meet and exploring differences in audio quality across different settings within each platform (not focused on DSP limitations or audio transmission fidelity). METHODS: In this study, we employed babble noise, BKB speech, and a combination of babble noise and BKB speech (SNR: 9dB) as stimuli. We compared different acoustic features of the received signal, including automatic audio gain adjustments, frequency range, and frequency response, with the source sound. RESULTS: Zoom applies a smooth high-frequency roll-off for speech in a noisy signal, beginning at approximately 14.5 kHz and removing all frequency content above 18 kHz. The roll-off for Teams begins at a relatively low frequency around 7 kHz. Although Google Meet starts the roll-off around 20 kHz, the gain was inconsistent and had a sharp roll-off. CONCLUSION: Each platform exhibited distinct characteristics and introduced noticeable modifications to the stimuli. Results indicated that Zoom with optional audio settings enabled demonstrates the highest fidelity to dynamic range and frequency spectrum.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVj81KBDEQhIMoOP5cfII-C6OdzM6y601kxQfwPoRsx23JJEs6M7L48mZgX8DTR3VVNZRSDxqftDb6uRLRdNrghWp0b7Dd9GZ1qRpE1O1qu15fqxuR7yr7Tbdt1O-rS5MUdmCjDSdhgeRh5j0lcCl6yhQdxy84Blt8yqO8wG62YbJlubo0jlNkV1WKQN6TKzxTJBGoaeC45_psskHgh8sBDmTzUgxJ5E5d-WrQ_Zm36vF99_n20bpc3Ux-OGYebT4NGodl3sLzvO5f4T_xhFhQ</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Sebastian, Arun</creator><creator>Zhang, Vicky</creator><creator>Kitterick, Pádraig</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Acoustic analysis of video conferencing platforms: Evaluating communication effectiveness for individuals with hearing loss</title><author>Sebastian, Arun ; Zhang, Vicky ; Kitterick, Pádraig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1121_10_00231203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sebastian, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Vicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitterick, Pádraig</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sebastian, Arun</au><au>Zhang, Vicky</au><au>Kitterick, Pádraig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acoustic analysis of video conferencing platforms: Evaluating communication effectiveness for individuals with hearing loss</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>154</volume><issue>4_supplement</issue><spage>A159</spage><epage>A159</epage><pages>A159-A159</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><abstract>AIM: This research investigates the impact of video conferencing platforms on the transmitted sound to evaluate their effectiveness in facilitating communication for individuals with hearing loss. The preliminary analysis includes comparing the transmitted sound deviations from source recordings in Teams, Zoom, and Google Meet and exploring differences in audio quality across different settings within each platform (not focused on DSP limitations or audio transmission fidelity). METHODS: In this study, we employed babble noise, BKB speech, and a combination of babble noise and BKB speech (SNR: 9dB) as stimuli. We compared different acoustic features of the received signal, including automatic audio gain adjustments, frequency range, and frequency response, with the source sound. RESULTS: Zoom applies a smooth high-frequency roll-off for speech in a noisy signal, beginning at approximately 14.5 kHz and removing all frequency content above 18 kHz. The roll-off for Teams begins at a relatively low frequency around 7 kHz. Although Google Meet starts the roll-off around 20 kHz, the gain was inconsistent and had a sharp roll-off. CONCLUSION: Each platform exhibited distinct characteristics and introduced noticeable modifications to the stimuli. Results indicated that Zoom with optional audio settings enabled demonstrates the highest fidelity to dynamic range and frequency spectrum.</abstract><doi>10.1121/10.0023120</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023-10, Vol.154 (4_supplement), p.A159-A159
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0023120
source AIP Journals Complete; Acoustical Society of America (AIP); Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Acoustic analysis of video conferencing platforms: Evaluating communication effectiveness for individuals with hearing loss
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A25%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acoustic%20analysis%20of%20video%20conferencing%20platforms:%20Evaluating%20communication%20effectiveness%20for%20individuals%20with%20hearing%20loss&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Sebastian,%20Arun&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=154&rft.issue=4_supplement&rft.spage=A159&rft.epage=A159&rft.pages=A159-A159&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/10.0023120&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1121_10_0023120%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true