Methods for validation of electromechanical evaluation of hearing protection

Preventing hearing injury while maintaining situational awareness is of critical importance while using hearing protection devices (HPDs). Determining the optimal HPD for such varied conditions as operating machinery, riding in aircraft, and using firearms is a non-trivial task. Currently, the Noise...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2022-04, Vol.151 (4), p.A216-A216
Hauptverfasser: Argo, Theodore F., Brown, Andrew D., Audet, David J., Greene, Nathaniel, McCallick, Caylin R., Sammeth, Carol A., Anderson, David A., Rule, Gregory T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A216
container_issue 4
container_start_page A216
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 151
creator Argo, Theodore F.
Brown, Andrew D.
Audet, David J.
Greene, Nathaniel
McCallick, Caylin R.
Sammeth, Carol A.
Anderson, David A.
Rule, Gregory T.
description Preventing hearing injury while maintaining situational awareness is of critical importance while using hearing protection devices (HPDs). Determining the optimal HPD for such varied conditions as operating machinery, riding in aircraft, and using firearms is a non-trivial task. Currently, the Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) is the only required HPD specification; other important characteristics of advanced HPDs are not reported in a standardized manner despite the availability of relevant test standards. Barriers to standardized performance reporting are the use of human subjects and the range of performance capabilities of commercially available HPDs. To complement existing test standards and support standardization of performance reporting across a broader range of performance capabilities, a suite of quantitative, sensor-based tests is being developed to quickly, inexpensively, and comprehensively evaluate candidate HPDs. The five-test battery evaluates signal quality, sound localization, level-dependent frequency response, electronic self-noise, and impulse noise response. In parallel, a set of human subject tests is being developed to validate the electromechanical metrics. Here, we will present (1) preliminary results comparing human performance with complementary electromechanical data and (2) a software tool under development incorporating the electromechanical tests to optimize HPD selection for application-specific hearing protection.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/10.0011097
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scitation_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0011097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>jasa</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c717-739dfbf3c59ef0a873d5b60313a8095da41b7967ff2d1b65caeb00da2066b53e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AU5K9VJ0yTNURZdhYqXvZd82ki3WZIq-O_NuotHTw_zzsMwvAhdE7gjpCb3hQCEgBQnaEFYDVXL6uYULaDEVSM5P0cXOX-UkbVULlD36uYh2ox9TPhLjcGqOcQJR4_d6Myc4taZQU3BqBG7Inz-7QenUpje8S7FuZglvURnXo3ZXR25RJunx83quere1i-rh64ygohKUGm99tQw6TyoVlDLNAdKqGpBMqsaooXkwvvaEs2ZUU4DWFUD55pRR5fo5nDWpJhzcr7fpbBV6bsn0O9r2PNYQ5FvD3I2Yf79_T_7B8JTXec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methods for validation of electromechanical evaluation of hearing protection</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Argo, Theodore F. ; Brown, Andrew D. ; Audet, David J. ; Greene, Nathaniel ; McCallick, Caylin R. ; Sammeth, Carol A. ; Anderson, David A. ; Rule, Gregory T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Argo, Theodore F. ; Brown, Andrew D. ; Audet, David J. ; Greene, Nathaniel ; McCallick, Caylin R. ; Sammeth, Carol A. ; Anderson, David A. ; Rule, Gregory T.</creatorcontrib><description>Preventing hearing injury while maintaining situational awareness is of critical importance while using hearing protection devices (HPDs). Determining the optimal HPD for such varied conditions as operating machinery, riding in aircraft, and using firearms is a non-trivial task. Currently, the Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) is the only required HPD specification; other important characteristics of advanced HPDs are not reported in a standardized manner despite the availability of relevant test standards. Barriers to standardized performance reporting are the use of human subjects and the range of performance capabilities of commercially available HPDs. To complement existing test standards and support standardization of performance reporting across a broader range of performance capabilities, a suite of quantitative, sensor-based tests is being developed to quickly, inexpensively, and comprehensively evaluate candidate HPDs. The five-test battery evaluates signal quality, sound localization, level-dependent frequency response, electronic self-noise, and impulse noise response. In parallel, a set of human subject tests is being developed to validate the electromechanical metrics. Here, we will present (1) preliminary results comparing human performance with complementary electromechanical data and (2) a software tool under development incorporating the electromechanical tests to optimize HPD selection for application-specific hearing protection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/10.0011097</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022-04, Vol.151 (4), p.A216-A216</ispartof><rights>Acoustical Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jasa/article-lookup/doi/10.1121/10.0011097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,780,784,794,1565,4512,27924,27925,76384</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Argo, Theodore F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Audet, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCallick, Caylin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sammeth, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rule, Gregory T.</creatorcontrib><title>Methods for validation of electromechanical evaluation of hearing protection</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>Preventing hearing injury while maintaining situational awareness is of critical importance while using hearing protection devices (HPDs). Determining the optimal HPD for such varied conditions as operating machinery, riding in aircraft, and using firearms is a non-trivial task. Currently, the Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) is the only required HPD specification; other important characteristics of advanced HPDs are not reported in a standardized manner despite the availability of relevant test standards. Barriers to standardized performance reporting are the use of human subjects and the range of performance capabilities of commercially available HPDs. To complement existing test standards and support standardization of performance reporting across a broader range of performance capabilities, a suite of quantitative, sensor-based tests is being developed to quickly, inexpensively, and comprehensively evaluate candidate HPDs. The five-test battery evaluates signal quality, sound localization, level-dependent frequency response, electronic self-noise, and impulse noise response. In parallel, a set of human subject tests is being developed to validate the electromechanical metrics. Here, we will present (1) preliminary results comparing human performance with complementary electromechanical data and (2) a software tool under development incorporating the electromechanical tests to optimize HPD selection for application-specific hearing protection.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AU5K9VJ0yTNURZdhYqXvZd82ki3WZIq-O_NuotHTw_zzsMwvAhdE7gjpCb3hQCEgBQnaEFYDVXL6uYULaDEVSM5P0cXOX-UkbVULlD36uYh2ox9TPhLjcGqOcQJR4_d6Myc4taZQU3BqBG7Inz-7QenUpje8S7FuZglvURnXo3ZXR25RJunx83quere1i-rh64ygohKUGm99tQw6TyoVlDLNAdKqGpBMqsaooXkwvvaEs2ZUU4DWFUD55pRR5fo5nDWpJhzcr7fpbBV6bsn0O9r2PNYQ5FvD3I2Yf79_T_7B8JTXec</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Argo, Theodore F.</creator><creator>Brown, Andrew D.</creator><creator>Audet, David J.</creator><creator>Greene, Nathaniel</creator><creator>McCallick, Caylin R.</creator><creator>Sammeth, Carol A.</creator><creator>Anderson, David A.</creator><creator>Rule, Gregory T.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Methods for validation of electromechanical evaluation of hearing protection</title><author>Argo, Theodore F. ; Brown, Andrew D. ; Audet, David J. ; Greene, Nathaniel ; McCallick, Caylin R. ; Sammeth, Carol A. ; Anderson, David A. ; Rule, Gregory T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c717-739dfbf3c59ef0a873d5b60313a8095da41b7967ff2d1b65caeb00da2066b53e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Argo, Theodore F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Audet, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greene, Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCallick, Caylin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sammeth, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rule, Gregory T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Argo, Theodore F.</au><au>Brown, Andrew D.</au><au>Audet, David J.</au><au>Greene, Nathaniel</au><au>McCallick, Caylin R.</au><au>Sammeth, Carol A.</au><au>Anderson, David A.</au><au>Rule, Gregory T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methods for validation of electromechanical evaluation of hearing protection</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>A216</spage><epage>A216</epage><pages>A216-A216</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>Preventing hearing injury while maintaining situational awareness is of critical importance while using hearing protection devices (HPDs). Determining the optimal HPD for such varied conditions as operating machinery, riding in aircraft, and using firearms is a non-trivial task. Currently, the Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) is the only required HPD specification; other important characteristics of advanced HPDs are not reported in a standardized manner despite the availability of relevant test standards. Barriers to standardized performance reporting are the use of human subjects and the range of performance capabilities of commercially available HPDs. To complement existing test standards and support standardization of performance reporting across a broader range of performance capabilities, a suite of quantitative, sensor-based tests is being developed to quickly, inexpensively, and comprehensively evaluate candidate HPDs. The five-test battery evaluates signal quality, sound localization, level-dependent frequency response, electronic self-noise, and impulse noise response. In parallel, a set of human subject tests is being developed to validate the electromechanical metrics. Here, we will present (1) preliminary results comparing human performance with complementary electromechanical data and (2) a software tool under development incorporating the electromechanical tests to optimize HPD selection for application-specific hearing protection.</abstract><doi>10.1121/10.0011097</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022-04, Vol.151 (4), p.A216-A216
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0011097
source AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America
title Methods for validation of electromechanical evaluation of hearing protection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A08%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scitation_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methods%20for%20validation%20of%20electromechanical%20evaluation%20of%20hearing%20protection&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Argo,%20Theodore%20F.&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=A216&rft.epage=A216&rft.pages=A216-A216&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/10.0011097&rft_dat=%3Cscitation_cross%3Ejasa%3C/scitation_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true