Horseshoe bats use not changes in echo delay but Doppler shift to perceive approaching objects

Echolocating bats use echo delay for target ranging and Doppler shift information for relative velocity recognition. However, how they perceive moving objects remains unclear. To investigate this question, we played back echolocation pulses in real-time as virtual echoes to Japanese horseshoe bats (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2022-04, Vol.151 (4), p.A146-A146
Hauptverfasser: Yoshida, Soshi, Hase, Kazuma, Heim, Olga, Kobayasi, Kohta I., Hiryu, Shizuko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A146
container_issue 4
container_start_page A146
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 151
creator Yoshida, Soshi
Hase, Kazuma
Heim, Olga
Kobayasi, Kohta I.
Hiryu, Shizuko
description Echolocating bats use echo delay for target ranging and Doppler shift information for relative velocity recognition. However, how they perceive moving objects remains unclear. To investigate this question, we played back echolocation pulses in real-time as virtual echoes to Japanese horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) on a perch in a flight room. Since echoes coming back from an approaching object are theoretically characterized by both changes in echo delay and the presence of Doppler shift, we reproduced an artificial approaching object by encoding these two acoustic parameters in the virtual echoes. As a result, only Doppler shift evoked bats flight reaction, showing that they use only Doppler shift and not change in echo delay to perceive approaching objects. Also, we played back only constant frequency (CF) component and confirmed that they use the CF component to detect Doppler shift. Furthermore, as a response to the Doppler shift in the perceived echo, bats increased the bandwidth of the terminal component of their pulse. Surprisingly, this response occurred in the very first pulse after Doppler shift, which indicates bats can adapt their echolocation pulse characteristics to changing situations within a pulse. [This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. 18H03786 and 16H06542.]
doi_str_mv 10.1121/10.0010922
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scitation_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0010922</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>jasa</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c712-4f02ab9e3e760418b87298daad9d9d9bd1cfbdc657609d963b50a7e34ab3b6283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf8GcldUk-32U-lGh4KVnl0l2tptSN0smFfrv3dKeZQ4P78zDHF4h7pV8Ukqr54lSKllrfSFmKtcyqXKdXYqZnNZJVhfFtbhh3k4xr9J6Jr6XPjBx7wkMRoY9Eww-gu1x2BCDG4Bs76GlHR7A7CO8-nHcUQDuXRchehgpWHK_BDiOwaPt3bABb7ZkI9-Kqw53THdnzsX6_W29WCarr4_PxcsqsaXSSdZJjaamlMpCZqoyVanrqkVs6-OYVtnOtLbIp_OUi9TkEktKMzSpKXSVzsXD6a0NnjlQ14zB_WA4NEo2x2KOPBczyY8nma2LGJ0f_rP_AAGNY8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Horseshoe bats use not changes in echo delay but Doppler shift to perceive approaching objects</title><source>American Institute of Physics (AIP) Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Yoshida, Soshi ; Hase, Kazuma ; Heim, Olga ; Kobayasi, Kohta I. ; Hiryu, Shizuko</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Soshi ; Hase, Kazuma ; Heim, Olga ; Kobayasi, Kohta I. ; Hiryu, Shizuko</creatorcontrib><description>Echolocating bats use echo delay for target ranging and Doppler shift information for relative velocity recognition. However, how they perceive moving objects remains unclear. To investigate this question, we played back echolocation pulses in real-time as virtual echoes to Japanese horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) on a perch in a flight room. Since echoes coming back from an approaching object are theoretically characterized by both changes in echo delay and the presence of Doppler shift, we reproduced an artificial approaching object by encoding these two acoustic parameters in the virtual echoes. As a result, only Doppler shift evoked bats flight reaction, showing that they use only Doppler shift and not change in echo delay to perceive approaching objects. Also, we played back only constant frequency (CF) component and confirmed that they use the CF component to detect Doppler shift. Furthermore, as a response to the Doppler shift in the perceived echo, bats increased the bandwidth of the terminal component of their pulse. Surprisingly, this response occurred in the very first pulse after Doppler shift, which indicates bats can adapt their echolocation pulse characteristics to changing situations within a pulse. [This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. 18H03786 and 16H06542.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/10.0010922</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022-04, Vol.151 (4), p.A146-A146</ispartof><rights>Acoustical Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jasa/article-lookup/doi/10.1121/10.0010922$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,780,784,794,1565,4512,27924,27925,76384</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Soshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hase, Kazuma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heim, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayasi, Kohta I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiryu, Shizuko</creatorcontrib><title>Horseshoe bats use not changes in echo delay but Doppler shift to perceive approaching objects</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>Echolocating bats use echo delay for target ranging and Doppler shift information for relative velocity recognition. However, how they perceive moving objects remains unclear. To investigate this question, we played back echolocation pulses in real-time as virtual echoes to Japanese horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) on a perch in a flight room. Since echoes coming back from an approaching object are theoretically characterized by both changes in echo delay and the presence of Doppler shift, we reproduced an artificial approaching object by encoding these two acoustic parameters in the virtual echoes. As a result, only Doppler shift evoked bats flight reaction, showing that they use only Doppler shift and not change in echo delay to perceive approaching objects. Also, we played back only constant frequency (CF) component and confirmed that they use the CF component to detect Doppler shift. Furthermore, as a response to the Doppler shift in the perceived echo, bats increased the bandwidth of the terminal component of their pulse. Surprisingly, this response occurred in the very first pulse after Doppler shift, which indicates bats can adapt their echolocation pulse characteristics to changing situations within a pulse. [This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. 18H03786 and 16H06542.]</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf8GcldUk-32U-lGh4KVnl0l2tptSN0smFfrv3dKeZQ4P78zDHF4h7pV8Ukqr54lSKllrfSFmKtcyqXKdXYqZnNZJVhfFtbhh3k4xr9J6Jr6XPjBx7wkMRoY9Eww-gu1x2BCDG4Bs76GlHR7A7CO8-nHcUQDuXRchehgpWHK_BDiOwaPt3bABb7ZkI9-Kqw53THdnzsX6_W29WCarr4_PxcsqsaXSSdZJjaamlMpCZqoyVanrqkVs6-OYVtnOtLbIp_OUi9TkEktKMzSpKXSVzsXD6a0NnjlQ14zB_WA4NEo2x2KOPBczyY8nma2LGJ0f_rP_AAGNY8A</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Yoshida, Soshi</creator><creator>Hase, Kazuma</creator><creator>Heim, Olga</creator><creator>Kobayasi, Kohta I.</creator><creator>Hiryu, Shizuko</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Horseshoe bats use not changes in echo delay but Doppler shift to perceive approaching objects</title><author>Yoshida, Soshi ; Hase, Kazuma ; Heim, Olga ; Kobayasi, Kohta I. ; Hiryu, Shizuko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c712-4f02ab9e3e760418b87298daad9d9d9bd1cfbdc657609d963b50a7e34ab3b6283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Soshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hase, Kazuma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heim, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayasi, Kohta I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiryu, Shizuko</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoshida, Soshi</au><au>Hase, Kazuma</au><au>Heim, Olga</au><au>Kobayasi, Kohta I.</au><au>Hiryu, Shizuko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Horseshoe bats use not changes in echo delay but Doppler shift to perceive approaching objects</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>A146</spage><epage>A146</epage><pages>A146-A146</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>Echolocating bats use echo delay for target ranging and Doppler shift information for relative velocity recognition. However, how they perceive moving objects remains unclear. To investigate this question, we played back echolocation pulses in real-time as virtual echoes to Japanese horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) on a perch in a flight room. Since echoes coming back from an approaching object are theoretically characterized by both changes in echo delay and the presence of Doppler shift, we reproduced an artificial approaching object by encoding these two acoustic parameters in the virtual echoes. As a result, only Doppler shift evoked bats flight reaction, showing that they use only Doppler shift and not change in echo delay to perceive approaching objects. Also, we played back only constant frequency (CF) component and confirmed that they use the CF component to detect Doppler shift. Furthermore, as a response to the Doppler shift in the perceived echo, bats increased the bandwidth of the terminal component of their pulse. Surprisingly, this response occurred in the very first pulse after Doppler shift, which indicates bats can adapt their echolocation pulse characteristics to changing situations within a pulse. [This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Nos. 18H03786 and 16H06542.]</abstract><doi>10.1121/10.0010922</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022-04, Vol.151 (4), p.A146-A146
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0010922
source American Institute of Physics (AIP) Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America
title Horseshoe bats use not changes in echo delay but Doppler shift to perceive approaching objects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A50%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scitation_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Horseshoe%20bats%20use%20not%20changes%20in%20echo%20delay%20but%20Doppler%20shift%20to%20perceive%20approaching%20objects&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Yoshida,%20Soshi&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=A146&rft.epage=A146&rft.pages=A146-A146&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/10.0010922&rft_dat=%3Cscitation_cross%3Ejasa%3C/scitation_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true