Target localization in range and depth from a passive linear towed array

Stealthily estimating the range and depth of a sound source from a submarine passive sonar is of capital tactical importance: it allows to adopt the appropriate escape or attack strategy towards the threat. The main difficulty in passive localization is that the transmitted waveform is unknown. Neve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2021-10, Vol.150 (4), p.A278-A278
Hauptverfasser: Roche, Thibault, Bennaceur, Iannis, Cristol, Xavier, Gaonach, Gilles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page A278
container_issue 4
container_start_page A278
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 150
creator Roche, Thibault
Bennaceur, Iannis
Cristol, Xavier
Gaonach, Gilles
description Stealthily estimating the range and depth of a sound source from a submarine passive sonar is of capital tactical importance: it allows to adopt the appropriate escape or attack strategy towards the threat. The main difficulty in passive localization is that the transmitted waveform is unknown. Nevertheless, array processing can reveal some features of the acoustic field allowing localization, such as the arrival angles of the multiple paths, and the time delays between them. In this paper, we have compared two methods. The first one is a direct method, which simulates the field features from a set of possible source locations, and compares them to the measured features. The second one, an indirect method, uses the measured features to backpropagate the acoustic field. The former method has already been tested on simulated and real data in (Bennaceur et al., in OCEANS’18 MTS/IEEE, Charleston) and (Bennaceur et al., in OCEANS 2021, Singapore-U.S. Gulf Coast). Here, both methods are applied on real signals from a linear towed array, using bearings only and both bearings and time delays. The main advantage of these methods is that they are automatic in the sense that no sonar operator is required to estimate the source location.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/10.0008287
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>scitation_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0008287</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>jasa</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c717-a9ee37f24e5a75d514c5dc2d280f0384f495d634378d743001f871116afd9d153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRMFYv_oI9K9Gd_chujlKqFQpecg_DftSVNAm7Qam_vqnt2dPDDA8vMy8h98CeADg8z2SMGW70BSlAcVYaxeUlKeYtlLKuqmtyk_PXPCoj6oKsG0xbP9FusNjFX5zi0NPY04T91lPsHXV-nD5pSMOOIh0x5_jtaRd7j4lOw493FFPC_S25Cthlf3fmgjSvq2a5Ljcfb-_Ll01pNegSa--FDlx6hVo5BdIqZ7njhgUmjAyyVq4SUmjjtBTz0cFoAKgwuNqBEgvycIq1acg5-dCOKe4w7Vtg7bGCI88VzPLjSc42Tn-v_WcfAMCZWnI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Target localization in range and depth from a passive linear towed array</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>AIP Acoustical Society of America</source><creator>Roche, Thibault ; Bennaceur, Iannis ; Cristol, Xavier ; Gaonach, Gilles</creator><creatorcontrib>Roche, Thibault ; Bennaceur, Iannis ; Cristol, Xavier ; Gaonach, Gilles</creatorcontrib><description>Stealthily estimating the range and depth of a sound source from a submarine passive sonar is of capital tactical importance: it allows to adopt the appropriate escape or attack strategy towards the threat. The main difficulty in passive localization is that the transmitted waveform is unknown. Nevertheless, array processing can reveal some features of the acoustic field allowing localization, such as the arrival angles of the multiple paths, and the time delays between them. In this paper, we have compared two methods. The first one is a direct method, which simulates the field features from a set of possible source locations, and compares them to the measured features. The second one, an indirect method, uses the measured features to backpropagate the acoustic field. The former method has already been tested on simulated and real data in (Bennaceur et al., in OCEANS’18 MTS/IEEE, Charleston) and (Bennaceur et al., in OCEANS 2021, Singapore-U.S. Gulf Coast). Here, both methods are applied on real signals from a linear towed array, using bearings only and both bearings and time delays. The main advantage of these methods is that they are automatic in the sense that no sonar operator is required to estimate the source location.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/10.0008287</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021-10, Vol.150 (4), p.A278-A278</ispartof><rights>Acoustical Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/jasa/article-lookup/doi/10.1121/10.0008287$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>207,208,314,776,780,790,1559,4498,27901,27902,76127</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roche, Thibault</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennaceur, Iannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristol, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaonach, Gilles</creatorcontrib><title>Target localization in range and depth from a passive linear towed array</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>Stealthily estimating the range and depth of a sound source from a submarine passive sonar is of capital tactical importance: it allows to adopt the appropriate escape or attack strategy towards the threat. The main difficulty in passive localization is that the transmitted waveform is unknown. Nevertheless, array processing can reveal some features of the acoustic field allowing localization, such as the arrival angles of the multiple paths, and the time delays between them. In this paper, we have compared two methods. The first one is a direct method, which simulates the field features from a set of possible source locations, and compares them to the measured features. The second one, an indirect method, uses the measured features to backpropagate the acoustic field. The former method has already been tested on simulated and real data in (Bennaceur et al., in OCEANS’18 MTS/IEEE, Charleston) and (Bennaceur et al., in OCEANS 2021, Singapore-U.S. Gulf Coast). Here, both methods are applied on real signals from a linear towed array, using bearings only and both bearings and time delays. The main advantage of these methods is that they are automatic in the sense that no sonar operator is required to estimate the source location.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRMFYv_oI9K9Gd_chujlKqFQpecg_DftSVNAm7Qam_vqnt2dPDDA8vMy8h98CeADg8z2SMGW70BSlAcVYaxeUlKeYtlLKuqmtyk_PXPCoj6oKsG0xbP9FusNjFX5zi0NPY04T91lPsHXV-nD5pSMOOIh0x5_jtaRd7j4lOw493FFPC_S25Cthlf3fmgjSvq2a5Ljcfb-_Ll01pNegSa--FDlx6hVo5BdIqZ7njhgUmjAyyVq4SUmjjtBTz0cFoAKgwuNqBEgvycIq1acg5-dCOKe4w7Vtg7bGCI88VzPLjSc42Tn-v_WcfAMCZWnI</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Roche, Thibault</creator><creator>Bennaceur, Iannis</creator><creator>Cristol, Xavier</creator><creator>Gaonach, Gilles</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Target localization in range and depth from a passive linear towed array</title><author>Roche, Thibault ; Bennaceur, Iannis ; Cristol, Xavier ; Gaonach, Gilles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c717-a9ee37f24e5a75d514c5dc2d280f0384f495d634378d743001f871116afd9d153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roche, Thibault</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennaceur, Iannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristol, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaonach, Gilles</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roche, Thibault</au><au>Bennaceur, Iannis</au><au>Cristol, Xavier</au><au>Gaonach, Gilles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Target localization in range and depth from a passive linear towed array</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>A278</spage><epage>A278</epage><pages>A278-A278</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>Stealthily estimating the range and depth of a sound source from a submarine passive sonar is of capital tactical importance: it allows to adopt the appropriate escape or attack strategy towards the threat. The main difficulty in passive localization is that the transmitted waveform is unknown. Nevertheless, array processing can reveal some features of the acoustic field allowing localization, such as the arrival angles of the multiple paths, and the time delays between them. In this paper, we have compared two methods. The first one is a direct method, which simulates the field features from a set of possible source locations, and compares them to the measured features. The second one, an indirect method, uses the measured features to backpropagate the acoustic field. The former method has already been tested on simulated and real data in (Bennaceur et al., in OCEANS’18 MTS/IEEE, Charleston) and (Bennaceur et al., in OCEANS 2021, Singapore-U.S. Gulf Coast). Here, both methods are applied on real signals from a linear towed array, using bearings only and both bearings and time delays. The main advantage of these methods is that they are automatic in the sense that no sonar operator is required to estimate the source location.</abstract><doi>10.1121/10.0008287</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021-10, Vol.150 (4), p.A278-A278
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1121_10_0008287
source AIP Journals Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; AIP Acoustical Society of America
title Target localization in range and depth from a passive linear towed array
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T21%3A52%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-scitation_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Target%20localization%20in%20range%20and%20depth%20from%20a%20passive%20linear%20towed%20array&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Roche,%20Thibault&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=A278&rft.epage=A278&rft.pages=A278-A278&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/10.0008287&rft_dat=%3Cscitation_cross%3Ejasa%3C/scitation_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true