Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine, through a subcommittee (formerly Task Group 3) of the Radiation Therapy Committee, has accredited five laboratories to perform calibrations of instruments used to calibrate therapeutic radiation beams. The role of the accredited dosimetry calibrati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 1997-08, Vol.24 (8), p.1249-1254
Hauptverfasser: Ibbott, G. S., Attix, F. H., Slowey, T. W., Fontenla, D. P., Rozenfeld, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1254
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1249
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 24
creator Ibbott, G. S.
Attix, F. H.
Slowey, T. W.
Fontenla, D. P.
Rozenfeld, M.
description The American Association of Physicists in Medicine, through a subcommittee (formerly Task Group 3) of the Radiation Therapy Committee, has accredited five laboratories to perform calibrations of instruments used to calibrate therapeutic radiation beams. The role of the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories (ADCLs) is to transfer a calibration factor from an instrument calibrated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to a customer’s instrument. It is of importance to the subcommittee, to physicists using the services of the ADCLs, and to the ADCLs themselves, to know the uncertainty of instrument calibrations. The calibration uncertainty has been analyzed by asking the laboratories to provide information about their calibration procedures. Estimates of uncertainty by two procedures were requested: Type A are uncertainties derived as the standard deviations of repeated measurements, while type B are estimates of uncertainties obtained by other methods, again expressed as standard deviations. Data have been received describing the uncertainty of each parameter involved in calibrations, including those associated with measurements of charge, exposure time, and air density, among others. These figures were combined with the uncertainty of NIST calibrations, to arrive at an overall uncertainty which is expressed at the two-standard deviation level. For cable-connected instruments in gamma-ray and x-ray beams of HVL >1 mm Al, the figure has an upper bound of approximately 1.2%.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.598146
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_598146</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79255005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-90f6b3a9696437e07a2d2a7ad0fb0f88a07ca6bf2ee9ceba588102f45c28d9f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVbBPyDsSRTcOslmd5OjFL-gYg_2vGSzE4xsm5qkSv-91S1VED3NwPvMy_AQckxhSCkVl3SYS0F5sUP6jJdZyhnIXdIHkDxlHPJ9chDCCwAUWQ490pNMcMZFn0ymc40-KjuPq8SZRKvW1l5F6-YhUTGJz5gorT02NmKTNC7YGUa_-gkmrardenXeYjgke0a1AY82c0CmN9dPo7t0_Hh7P7oapzoTWZFKMEWdKVnIgmclQqlYw1SpGjA1GCEUlFoVtWGIUmOtciEoMMNzzUQjDcsG5LTrXXj3usQQq5kNGttWzdEtQ1VKlucA-Ro860DtXQgeTbXwdqb8qqJQfcqraNXJW6Mnm85lPcNmC25srfOLLn-3La7-7KkeJpu68w4P2sYvU9uTN-e_8UVj_mN_vfkBDA2TwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79255005</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ibbott, G. S. ; Attix, F. H. ; Slowey, T. W. ; Fontenla, D. P. ; Rozenfeld, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ibbott, G. S. ; Attix, F. H. ; Slowey, T. W. ; Fontenla, D. P. ; Rozenfeld, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The American Association of Physicists in Medicine, through a subcommittee (formerly Task Group 3) of the Radiation Therapy Committee, has accredited five laboratories to perform calibrations of instruments used to calibrate therapeutic radiation beams. The role of the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories (ADCLs) is to transfer a calibration factor from an instrument calibrated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to a customer’s instrument. It is of importance to the subcommittee, to physicists using the services of the ADCLs, and to the ADCLs themselves, to know the uncertainty of instrument calibrations. The calibration uncertainty has been analyzed by asking the laboratories to provide information about their calibration procedures. Estimates of uncertainty by two procedures were requested: Type A are uncertainties derived as the standard deviations of repeated measurements, while type B are estimates of uncertainties obtained by other methods, again expressed as standard deviations. Data have been received describing the uncertainty of each parameter involved in calibrations, including those associated with measurements of charge, exposure time, and air density, among others. These figures were combined with the uncertainty of NIST calibrations, to arrive at an overall uncertainty which is expressed at the two-standard deviation level. For cable-connected instruments in gamma-ray and x-ray beams of HVL &gt;1 mm Al, the figure has an upper bound of approximately 1.2%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.598146</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9284248</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>87.54.03 ; Biophysical Phenomena ; Biophysics ; calibration ; dosimetry ; Dosimetry/exposure assessment ; Electric measurements ; Error analysis ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Gamma rays ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Measurement and error theory ; measurement errors ; Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Physicists ; Quality assurance equipment ; radiation therapy ; Radiation therapy equipment ; Radiometry - instrumentation ; Radiometry - standards ; Radiometry - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Societies, Scientific ; Therapeutics ; United States ; X‐ray instruments</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 1997-08, Vol.24 (8), p.1249-1254</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>1997 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-90f6b3a9696437e07a2d2a7ad0fb0f88a07ca6bf2ee9ceba588102f45c28d9f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-90f6b3a9696437e07a2d2a7ad0fb0f88a07ca6bf2ee9ceba588102f45c28d9f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.598146$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.598146$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9284248$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ibbott, G. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attix, F. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slowey, T. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontenla, D. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozenfeld, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>The American Association of Physicists in Medicine, through a subcommittee (formerly Task Group 3) of the Radiation Therapy Committee, has accredited five laboratories to perform calibrations of instruments used to calibrate therapeutic radiation beams. The role of the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories (ADCLs) is to transfer a calibration factor from an instrument calibrated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to a customer’s instrument. It is of importance to the subcommittee, to physicists using the services of the ADCLs, and to the ADCLs themselves, to know the uncertainty of instrument calibrations. The calibration uncertainty has been analyzed by asking the laboratories to provide information about their calibration procedures. Estimates of uncertainty by two procedures were requested: Type A are uncertainties derived as the standard deviations of repeated measurements, while type B are estimates of uncertainties obtained by other methods, again expressed as standard deviations. Data have been received describing the uncertainty of each parameter involved in calibrations, including those associated with measurements of charge, exposure time, and air density, among others. These figures were combined with the uncertainty of NIST calibrations, to arrive at an overall uncertainty which is expressed at the two-standard deviation level. For cable-connected instruments in gamma-ray and x-ray beams of HVL &gt;1 mm Al, the figure has an upper bound of approximately 1.2%.</description><subject>87.54.03</subject><subject>Biophysical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>calibration</subject><subject>dosimetry</subject><subject>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</subject><subject>Electric measurements</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Gamma rays</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Measurement and error theory</subject><subject>measurement errors</subject><subject>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Physicists</subject><subject>Quality assurance equipment</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiation therapy equipment</subject><subject>Radiometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiometry - standards</subject><subject>Radiometry - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Societies, Scientific</subject><subject>Therapeutics</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>X‐ray instruments</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVbBPyDsSRTcOslmd5OjFL-gYg_2vGSzE4xsm5qkSv-91S1VED3NwPvMy_AQckxhSCkVl3SYS0F5sUP6jJdZyhnIXdIHkDxlHPJ9chDCCwAUWQ490pNMcMZFn0ymc40-KjuPq8SZRKvW1l5F6-YhUTGJz5gorT02NmKTNC7YGUa_-gkmrardenXeYjgke0a1AY82c0CmN9dPo7t0_Hh7P7oapzoTWZFKMEWdKVnIgmclQqlYw1SpGjA1GCEUlFoVtWGIUmOtciEoMMNzzUQjDcsG5LTrXXj3usQQq5kNGttWzdEtQ1VKlucA-Ro860DtXQgeTbXwdqb8qqJQfcqraNXJW6Mnm85lPcNmC25srfOLLn-3La7-7KkeJpu68w4P2sYvU9uTN-e_8UVj_mN_vfkBDA2TwQ</recordid><startdate>199708</startdate><enddate>199708</enddate><creator>Ibbott, G. S.</creator><creator>Attix, F. H.</creator><creator>Slowey, T. W.</creator><creator>Fontenla, D. P.</creator><creator>Rozenfeld, M.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199708</creationdate><title>Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories</title><author>Ibbott, G. S. ; Attix, F. H. ; Slowey, T. W. ; Fontenla, D. P. ; Rozenfeld, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-90f6b3a9696437e07a2d2a7ad0fb0f88a07ca6bf2ee9ceba588102f45c28d9f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>87.54.03</topic><topic>Biophysical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>calibration</topic><topic>dosimetry</topic><topic>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</topic><topic>Electric measurements</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Gamma rays</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Measurement and error theory</topic><topic>measurement errors</topic><topic>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Physicists</topic><topic>Quality assurance equipment</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiation therapy equipment</topic><topic>Radiometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiometry - standards</topic><topic>Radiometry - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Societies, Scientific</topic><topic>Therapeutics</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>X‐ray instruments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ibbott, G. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attix, F. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slowey, T. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontenla, D. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozenfeld, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ibbott, G. S.</au><au>Attix, F. H.</au><au>Slowey, T. W.</au><au>Fontenla, D. P.</au><au>Rozenfeld, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>1997-08</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1249</spage><epage>1254</epage><pages>1249-1254</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>The American Association of Physicists in Medicine, through a subcommittee (formerly Task Group 3) of the Radiation Therapy Committee, has accredited five laboratories to perform calibrations of instruments used to calibrate therapeutic radiation beams. The role of the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories (ADCLs) is to transfer a calibration factor from an instrument calibrated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to a customer’s instrument. It is of importance to the subcommittee, to physicists using the services of the ADCLs, and to the ADCLs themselves, to know the uncertainty of instrument calibrations. The calibration uncertainty has been analyzed by asking the laboratories to provide information about their calibration procedures. Estimates of uncertainty by two procedures were requested: Type A are uncertainties derived as the standard deviations of repeated measurements, while type B are estimates of uncertainties obtained by other methods, again expressed as standard deviations. Data have been received describing the uncertainty of each parameter involved in calibrations, including those associated with measurements of charge, exposure time, and air density, among others. These figures were combined with the uncertainty of NIST calibrations, to arrive at an overall uncertainty which is expressed at the two-standard deviation level. For cable-connected instruments in gamma-ray and x-ray beams of HVL &gt;1 mm Al, the figure has an upper bound of approximately 1.2%.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>9284248</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.598146</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 1997-08, Vol.24 (8), p.1249-1254
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_598146
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects 87.54.03
Biophysical Phenomena
Biophysics
calibration
dosimetry
Dosimetry/exposure assessment
Electric measurements
Error analysis
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Gamma rays
Humans
Laboratories
Measurement and error theory
measurement errors
Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Physicists
Quality assurance equipment
radiation therapy
Radiation therapy equipment
Radiometry - instrumentation
Radiometry - standards
Radiometry - statistics & numerical data
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data
Societies, Scientific
Therapeutics
United States
X‐ray instruments
title Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A12%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uncertainty%20of%20calibrations%20at%20the%20accredited%20dosimetry%20calibration%20laboratories&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Ibbott,%20G.%20S.&rft.date=1997-08&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1249&rft.epage=1254&rft.pages=1249-1254&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.598146&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79255005%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79255005&rft_id=info:pmid/9284248&rfr_iscdi=true