Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories
The American Association of Physicists in Medicine, through a subcommittee (formerly Task Group 3) of the Radiation Therapy Committee, has accredited five laboratories to perform calibrations of instruments used to calibrate therapeutic radiation beams. The role of the accredited dosimetry calibrati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 1997-08, Vol.24 (8), p.1249-1254 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1254 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1249 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Ibbott, G. S. Attix, F. H. Slowey, T. W. Fontenla, D. P. Rozenfeld, M. |
description | The American Association of Physicists in Medicine, through a subcommittee (formerly Task Group 3) of the Radiation Therapy Committee, has accredited five laboratories to perform calibrations of instruments used to calibrate therapeutic radiation beams. The role of the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories (ADCLs) is to transfer a calibration factor from an instrument calibrated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to a customer’s instrument. It is of importance to the subcommittee, to physicists using the services of the ADCLs, and to the ADCLs themselves, to know the uncertainty of instrument calibrations. The calibration uncertainty has been analyzed by asking the laboratories to provide information about their calibration procedures. Estimates of uncertainty by two procedures were requested: Type A are uncertainties derived as the standard deviations of repeated measurements, while type B are estimates of uncertainties obtained by other methods, again expressed as standard deviations. Data have been received describing the uncertainty of each parameter involved in calibrations, including those associated with measurements of charge, exposure time, and air density, among others. These figures were combined with the uncertainty of NIST calibrations, to arrive at an overall uncertainty which is expressed at the two-standard deviation level. For cable-connected instruments in gamma-ray and x-ray beams of HVL >1 mm Al, the figure has an upper bound of approximately 1.2%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.598146 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_598146</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79255005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-90f6b3a9696437e07a2d2a7ad0fb0f88a07ca6bf2ee9ceba588102f45c28d9f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVbBPyDsSRTcOslmd5OjFL-gYg_2vGSzE4xsm5qkSv-91S1VED3NwPvMy_AQckxhSCkVl3SYS0F5sUP6jJdZyhnIXdIHkDxlHPJ9chDCCwAUWQ490pNMcMZFn0ymc40-KjuPq8SZRKvW1l5F6-YhUTGJz5gorT02NmKTNC7YGUa_-gkmrardenXeYjgke0a1AY82c0CmN9dPo7t0_Hh7P7oapzoTWZFKMEWdKVnIgmclQqlYw1SpGjA1GCEUlFoVtWGIUmOtciEoMMNzzUQjDcsG5LTrXXj3usQQq5kNGttWzdEtQ1VKlucA-Ro860DtXQgeTbXwdqb8qqJQfcqraNXJW6Mnm85lPcNmC25srfOLLn-3La7-7KkeJpu68w4P2sYvU9uTN-e_8UVj_mN_vfkBDA2TwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79255005</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ibbott, G. S. ; Attix, F. H. ; Slowey, T. W. ; Fontenla, D. P. ; Rozenfeld, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ibbott, G. S. ; Attix, F. H. ; Slowey, T. W. ; Fontenla, D. P. ; Rozenfeld, M.</creatorcontrib><description>The American Association of Physicists in Medicine, through a subcommittee (formerly Task Group 3) of the Radiation Therapy Committee, has accredited five laboratories to perform calibrations of instruments used to calibrate therapeutic radiation beams. The role of the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories (ADCLs) is to transfer a calibration factor from an instrument calibrated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to a customer’s instrument. It is of importance to the subcommittee, to physicists using the services of the ADCLs, and to the ADCLs themselves, to know the uncertainty of instrument calibrations. The calibration uncertainty has been analyzed by asking the laboratories to provide information about their calibration procedures. Estimates of uncertainty by two procedures were requested: Type A are uncertainties derived as the standard deviations of repeated measurements, while type B are estimates of uncertainties obtained by other methods, again expressed as standard deviations. Data have been received describing the uncertainty of each parameter involved in calibrations, including those associated with measurements of charge, exposure time, and air density, among others. These figures were combined with the uncertainty of NIST calibrations, to arrive at an overall uncertainty which is expressed at the two-standard deviation level. For cable-connected instruments in gamma-ray and x-ray beams of HVL >1 mm Al, the figure has an upper bound of approximately 1.2%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.598146</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9284248</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>87.54.03 ; Biophysical Phenomena ; Biophysics ; calibration ; dosimetry ; Dosimetry/exposure assessment ; Electric measurements ; Error analysis ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Gamma rays ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Measurement and error theory ; measurement errors ; Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Physicists ; Quality assurance equipment ; radiation therapy ; Radiation therapy equipment ; Radiometry - instrumentation ; Radiometry - standards ; Radiometry - statistics & numerical data ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data ; Societies, Scientific ; Therapeutics ; United States ; X‐ray instruments</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 1997-08, Vol.24 (8), p.1249-1254</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>1997 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-90f6b3a9696437e07a2d2a7ad0fb0f88a07ca6bf2ee9ceba588102f45c28d9f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-90f6b3a9696437e07a2d2a7ad0fb0f88a07ca6bf2ee9ceba588102f45c28d9f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.598146$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.598146$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9284248$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ibbott, G. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attix, F. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slowey, T. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontenla, D. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozenfeld, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>The American Association of Physicists in Medicine, through a subcommittee (formerly Task Group 3) of the Radiation Therapy Committee, has accredited five laboratories to perform calibrations of instruments used to calibrate therapeutic radiation beams. The role of the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories (ADCLs) is to transfer a calibration factor from an instrument calibrated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to a customer’s instrument. It is of importance to the subcommittee, to physicists using the services of the ADCLs, and to the ADCLs themselves, to know the uncertainty of instrument calibrations. The calibration uncertainty has been analyzed by asking the laboratories to provide information about their calibration procedures. Estimates of uncertainty by two procedures were requested: Type A are uncertainties derived as the standard deviations of repeated measurements, while type B are estimates of uncertainties obtained by other methods, again expressed as standard deviations. Data have been received describing the uncertainty of each parameter involved in calibrations, including those associated with measurements of charge, exposure time, and air density, among others. These figures were combined with the uncertainty of NIST calibrations, to arrive at an overall uncertainty which is expressed at the two-standard deviation level. For cable-connected instruments in gamma-ray and x-ray beams of HVL >1 mm Al, the figure has an upper bound of approximately 1.2%.</description><subject>87.54.03</subject><subject>Biophysical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>calibration</subject><subject>dosimetry</subject><subject>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</subject><subject>Electric measurements</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Gamma rays</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Measurement and error theory</subject><subject>measurement errors</subject><subject>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Physicists</subject><subject>Quality assurance equipment</subject><subject>radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiation therapy equipment</subject><subject>Radiometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiometry - standards</subject><subject>Radiometry - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Societies, Scientific</subject><subject>Therapeutics</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>X‐ray instruments</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVbBPyDsSRTcOslmd5OjFL-gYg_2vGSzE4xsm5qkSv-91S1VED3NwPvMy_AQckxhSCkVl3SYS0F5sUP6jJdZyhnIXdIHkDxlHPJ9chDCCwAUWQ490pNMcMZFn0ymc40-KjuPq8SZRKvW1l5F6-YhUTGJz5gorT02NmKTNC7YGUa_-gkmrardenXeYjgke0a1AY82c0CmN9dPo7t0_Hh7P7oapzoTWZFKMEWdKVnIgmclQqlYw1SpGjA1GCEUlFoVtWGIUmOtciEoMMNzzUQjDcsG5LTrXXj3usQQq5kNGttWzdEtQ1VKlucA-Ro860DtXQgeTbXwdqb8qqJQfcqraNXJW6Mnm85lPcNmC25srfOLLn-3La7-7KkeJpu68w4P2sYvU9uTN-e_8UVj_mN_vfkBDA2TwQ</recordid><startdate>199708</startdate><enddate>199708</enddate><creator>Ibbott, G. S.</creator><creator>Attix, F. H.</creator><creator>Slowey, T. W.</creator><creator>Fontenla, D. P.</creator><creator>Rozenfeld, M.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199708</creationdate><title>Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories</title><author>Ibbott, G. S. ; Attix, F. H. ; Slowey, T. W. ; Fontenla, D. P. ; Rozenfeld, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3836-90f6b3a9696437e07a2d2a7ad0fb0f88a07ca6bf2ee9ceba588102f45c28d9f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>87.54.03</topic><topic>Biophysical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>calibration</topic><topic>dosimetry</topic><topic>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</topic><topic>Electric measurements</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Gamma rays</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Measurement and error theory</topic><topic>measurement errors</topic><topic>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Physicists</topic><topic>Quality assurance equipment</topic><topic>radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiation therapy equipment</topic><topic>Radiometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiometry - standards</topic><topic>Radiometry - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Societies, Scientific</topic><topic>Therapeutics</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>X‐ray instruments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ibbott, G. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attix, F. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slowey, T. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontenla, D. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozenfeld, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ibbott, G. S.</au><au>Attix, F. H.</au><au>Slowey, T. W.</au><au>Fontenla, D. P.</au><au>Rozenfeld, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>1997-08</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1249</spage><epage>1254</epage><pages>1249-1254</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>The American Association of Physicists in Medicine, through a subcommittee (formerly Task Group 3) of the Radiation Therapy Committee, has accredited five laboratories to perform calibrations of instruments used to calibrate therapeutic radiation beams. The role of the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories (ADCLs) is to transfer a calibration factor from an instrument calibrated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to a customer’s instrument. It is of importance to the subcommittee, to physicists using the services of the ADCLs, and to the ADCLs themselves, to know the uncertainty of instrument calibrations. The calibration uncertainty has been analyzed by asking the laboratories to provide information about their calibration procedures. Estimates of uncertainty by two procedures were requested: Type A are uncertainties derived as the standard deviations of repeated measurements, while type B are estimates of uncertainties obtained by other methods, again expressed as standard deviations. Data have been received describing the uncertainty of each parameter involved in calibrations, including those associated with measurements of charge, exposure time, and air density, among others. These figures were combined with the uncertainty of NIST calibrations, to arrive at an overall uncertainty which is expressed at the two-standard deviation level. For cable-connected instruments in gamma-ray and x-ray beams of HVL >1 mm Al, the figure has an upper bound of approximately 1.2%.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>9284248</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.598146</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 1997-08, Vol.24 (8), p.1249-1254 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_598146 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | 87.54.03 Biophysical Phenomena Biophysics calibration dosimetry Dosimetry/exposure assessment Electric measurements Error analysis Evaluation Studies as Topic Gamma rays Humans Laboratories Measurement and error theory measurement errors Neoplasms - radiotherapy Physicists Quality assurance equipment radiation therapy Radiation therapy equipment Radiometry - instrumentation Radiometry - standards Radiometry - statistics & numerical data Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - statistics & numerical data Societies, Scientific Therapeutics United States X‐ray instruments |
title | Uncertainty of calibrations at the accredited dosimetry calibration laboratories |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A12%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uncertainty%20of%20calibrations%20at%20the%20accredited%20dosimetry%20calibration%20laboratories&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Ibbott,%20G.%20S.&rft.date=1997-08&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1249&rft.epage=1254&rft.pages=1249-1254&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.598146&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79255005%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79255005&rft_id=info:pmid/9284248&rfr_iscdi=true |