Sci-Fri AM: MRI and Diagnostic Imaging - 03: The influence of sampling percentage in deformable registration on kinetic model analysis results in DCE-MRI of the breast
Purpose: Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI is applied extensively for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. However, patient motion can introduce artificial variation in the signal enhancement curves. Non-rigid registration can improve the curves but computation time can be long. Re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical physics (Lancaster) 2016-08, Vol.43 (8), p.4951-4951 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4951 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 4951 |
container_title | Medical physics (Lancaster) |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Mouawad, Matthew Biernaski, Heather Brackstone, Muriel Klassen, Martyn Lock, Michael Prato, Frank S. Thompson, R. Terry Gaede, Stewart Gelman, Neil |
description | Purpose:
Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI is applied extensively for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. However, patient motion can introduce artificial variation in the signal enhancement curves. Non-rigid registration can improve the curves but computation time can be long. Reducing the percentage of the image sampled (PS) can reduce time at the theoretical cost of registration accuracy. This work investigates the influence of PS on kinetic model analysis results and goodness-of-fit.
Methods:
DCE images were acquired using a 3T Siemens Biograph mMR. Deformable registration was performed on one patient dataset with 3Dslicer using PS values of 5, 20, and 100%. For three regions of interest within the tumor, tissue contrast agent concentration values versus time were generated and analyzed using the TOFTS pharmacokinetic model. Model parameters, their 95% confidence intervals and the coefficients of variation (CV), which served as a measure of goodness of fit, were recorded.
Results:
Computation time was approximately 16, 8, and 4 minutes/image for 100, 20, and 5 PS. The CV decreased following registration and there was a trend of decreasing CV with increasing PS. However, no differences in parameter values obtained with 100% PS and parameters values obtained with lower PS were observed. Substantial differences were found between parameter values obtained with versus without registration
Conclusions:
Increasing PS led to improved goodness-of-fit for the kinetic model analysis, at the expense of substantially increased computation time. However, this improved fit did not appear to influence parameter values for this patient. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1118/1.4961834 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4961834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP1834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1074-4d875de67935600c3864b4086b43b89402b1cacb777c73126986069b695877a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQh4MoWKsH3yBXhehkk02yvZXaaqFF0XpestnsGt0_JVmRPpGv6a7tVWFgDvPNN8MPoUsKN5RSdUtveCKoYvwIjSIuGeERJMdoBJBwEnGIT9FZCO8AIFgMI_T9YhxZeIen6wlePy-xbnJ853TZtKFzBi9rXbqmxAQDm-DNm8WuKapP2xiL2wIHXW-rYb613tim0-UA4NwWra91VlnsbelC53Xn2gb39eEaO4jrNrdVf01Xu-BCj4XPqgvD8t1sToZPen3X38u81aE7RyeFroK9OPQxel3MN7MHsnq8X86mK2IoSE54rmScWyETFgsAw5TgGQclMs4ylXCIMmq0yaSURjIaiUQJEEkmklhJqSUbo6u91_g2BG-LdOtdrf0upZAOCac0PSTcs2TPfrnK7v4G0_XTgb_e88G47jeQf-Q_NBeHXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sci-Fri AM: MRI and Diagnostic Imaging - 03: The influence of sampling percentage in deformable registration on kinetic model analysis results in DCE-MRI of the breast</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mouawad, Matthew ; Biernaski, Heather ; Brackstone, Muriel ; Klassen, Martyn ; Lock, Michael ; Prato, Frank S. ; Thompson, R. Terry ; Gaede, Stewart ; Gelman, Neil</creator><creatorcontrib>Mouawad, Matthew ; Biernaski, Heather ; Brackstone, Muriel ; Klassen, Martyn ; Lock, Michael ; Prato, Frank S. ; Thompson, R. Terry ; Gaede, Stewart ; Gelman, Neil</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI is applied extensively for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. However, patient motion can introduce artificial variation in the signal enhancement curves. Non-rigid registration can improve the curves but computation time can be long. Reducing the percentage of the image sampled (PS) can reduce time at the theoretical cost of registration accuracy. This work investigates the influence of PS on kinetic model analysis results and goodness-of-fit.
Methods:
DCE images were acquired using a 3T Siemens Biograph mMR. Deformable registration was performed on one patient dataset with 3Dslicer using PS values of 5, 20, and 100%. For three regions of interest within the tumor, tissue contrast agent concentration values versus time were generated and analyzed using the TOFTS pharmacokinetic model. Model parameters, their 95% confidence intervals and the coefficients of variation (CV), which served as a measure of goodness of fit, were recorded.
Results:
Computation time was approximately 16, 8, and 4 minutes/image for 100, 20, and 5 PS. The CV decreased following registration and there was a trend of decreasing CV with increasing PS. However, no differences in parameter values obtained with 100% PS and parameters values obtained with lower PS were observed. Substantial differences were found between parameter values obtained with versus without registration
Conclusions:
Increasing PS led to improved goodness-of-fit for the kinetic model analysis, at the expense of substantially increased computation time. However, this improved fit did not appear to influence parameter values for this patient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4961834</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Agent based models ; Biomedical modeling ; Cancer ; Contrast sensitivity ; Image analysis ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical image contrast ; Tissues</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-08, Vol.43 (8), p.4951-4951</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4961834$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mouawad, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biernaski, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brackstone, Muriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Martyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lock, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prato, Frank S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, R. Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaede, Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelman, Neil</creatorcontrib><title>Sci-Fri AM: MRI and Diagnostic Imaging - 03: The influence of sampling percentage in deformable registration on kinetic model analysis results in DCE-MRI of the breast</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><description>Purpose:
Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI is applied extensively for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. However, patient motion can introduce artificial variation in the signal enhancement curves. Non-rigid registration can improve the curves but computation time can be long. Reducing the percentage of the image sampled (PS) can reduce time at the theoretical cost of registration accuracy. This work investigates the influence of PS on kinetic model analysis results and goodness-of-fit.
Methods:
DCE images were acquired using a 3T Siemens Biograph mMR. Deformable registration was performed on one patient dataset with 3Dslicer using PS values of 5, 20, and 100%. For three regions of interest within the tumor, tissue contrast agent concentration values versus time were generated and analyzed using the TOFTS pharmacokinetic model. Model parameters, their 95% confidence intervals and the coefficients of variation (CV), which served as a measure of goodness of fit, were recorded.
Results:
Computation time was approximately 16, 8, and 4 minutes/image for 100, 20, and 5 PS. The CV decreased following registration and there was a trend of decreasing CV with increasing PS. However, no differences in parameter values obtained with 100% PS and parameters values obtained with lower PS were observed. Substantial differences were found between parameter values obtained with versus without registration
Conclusions:
Increasing PS led to improved goodness-of-fit for the kinetic model analysis, at the expense of substantially increased computation time. However, this improved fit did not appear to influence parameter values for this patient.</description><subject>Agent based models</subject><subject>Biomedical modeling</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Contrast sensitivity</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical image contrast</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQh4MoWKsH3yBXhehkk02yvZXaaqFF0XpestnsGt0_JVmRPpGv6a7tVWFgDvPNN8MPoUsKN5RSdUtveCKoYvwIjSIuGeERJMdoBJBwEnGIT9FZCO8AIFgMI_T9YhxZeIen6wlePy-xbnJ853TZtKFzBi9rXbqmxAQDm-DNm8WuKapP2xiL2wIHXW-rYb613tim0-UA4NwWra91VlnsbelC53Xn2gb39eEaO4jrNrdVf01Xu-BCj4XPqgvD8t1sToZPen3X38u81aE7RyeFroK9OPQxel3MN7MHsnq8X86mK2IoSE54rmScWyETFgsAw5TgGQclMs4ylXCIMmq0yaSURjIaiUQJEEkmklhJqSUbo6u91_g2BG-LdOtdrf0upZAOCac0PSTcs2TPfrnK7v4G0_XTgb_e88G47jeQf-Q_NBeHXA</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Mouawad, Matthew</creator><creator>Biernaski, Heather</creator><creator>Brackstone, Muriel</creator><creator>Klassen, Martyn</creator><creator>Lock, Michael</creator><creator>Prato, Frank S.</creator><creator>Thompson, R. Terry</creator><creator>Gaede, Stewart</creator><creator>Gelman, Neil</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Sci-Fri AM: MRI and Diagnostic Imaging - 03: The influence of sampling percentage in deformable registration on kinetic model analysis results in DCE-MRI of the breast</title><author>Mouawad, Matthew ; Biernaski, Heather ; Brackstone, Muriel ; Klassen, Martyn ; Lock, Michael ; Prato, Frank S. ; Thompson, R. Terry ; Gaede, Stewart ; Gelman, Neil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1074-4d875de67935600c3864b4086b43b89402b1cacb777c73126986069b695877a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agent based models</topic><topic>Biomedical modeling</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Contrast sensitivity</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical image contrast</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mouawad, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biernaski, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brackstone, Muriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Martyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lock, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prato, Frank S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, R. Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaede, Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelman, Neil</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mouawad, Matthew</au><au>Biernaski, Heather</au><au>Brackstone, Muriel</au><au>Klassen, Martyn</au><au>Lock, Michael</au><au>Prato, Frank S.</au><au>Thompson, R. Terry</au><au>Gaede, Stewart</au><au>Gelman, Neil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sci-Fri AM: MRI and Diagnostic Imaging - 03: The influence of sampling percentage in deformable registration on kinetic model analysis results in DCE-MRI of the breast</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>4951</spage><epage>4951</epage><pages>4951-4951</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose:
Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI is applied extensively for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. However, patient motion can introduce artificial variation in the signal enhancement curves. Non-rigid registration can improve the curves but computation time can be long. Reducing the percentage of the image sampled (PS) can reduce time at the theoretical cost of registration accuracy. This work investigates the influence of PS on kinetic model analysis results and goodness-of-fit.
Methods:
DCE images were acquired using a 3T Siemens Biograph mMR. Deformable registration was performed on one patient dataset with 3Dslicer using PS values of 5, 20, and 100%. For three regions of interest within the tumor, tissue contrast agent concentration values versus time were generated and analyzed using the TOFTS pharmacokinetic model. Model parameters, their 95% confidence intervals and the coefficients of variation (CV), which served as a measure of goodness of fit, were recorded.
Results:
Computation time was approximately 16, 8, and 4 minutes/image for 100, 20, and 5 PS. The CV decreased following registration and there was a trend of decreasing CV with increasing PS. However, no differences in parameter values obtained with 100% PS and parameters values obtained with lower PS were observed. Substantial differences were found between parameter values obtained with versus without registration
Conclusions:
Increasing PS led to improved goodness-of-fit for the kinetic model analysis, at the expense of substantially increased computation time. However, this improved fit did not appear to influence parameter values for this patient.</abstract><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.4961834</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-2405 |
ispartof | Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-08, Vol.43 (8), p.4951-4951 |
issn | 0094-2405 2473-4209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4961834 |
source | Wiley Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agent based models Biomedical modeling Cancer Contrast sensitivity Image analysis Magnetic resonance imaging Medical image contrast Tissues |
title | Sci-Fri AM: MRI and Diagnostic Imaging - 03: The influence of sampling percentage in deformable registration on kinetic model analysis results in DCE-MRI of the breast |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A59%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sci-Fri%20AM:%20MRI%20and%20Diagnostic%20Imaging%20-%2003:%20The%20influence%20of%20sampling%20percentage%20in%20deformable%20registration%20on%20kinetic%20model%20analysis%20results%20in%20DCE-MRI%20of%20the%20breast&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Mouawad,%20Matthew&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4951&rft.epage=4951&rft.pages=4951-4951&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4961834&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EMP1834%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |