Sci-Fri AM: MRI and Diagnostic Imaging - 03: The influence of sampling percentage in deformable registration on kinetic model analysis results in DCE-MRI of the breast

Purpose: Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI is applied extensively for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. However, patient motion can introduce artificial variation in the signal enhancement curves. Non-rigid registration can improve the curves but computation time can be long. Re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2016-08, Vol.43 (8), p.4951-4951
Hauptverfasser: Mouawad, Matthew, Biernaski, Heather, Brackstone, Muriel, Klassen, Martyn, Lock, Michael, Prato, Frank S., Thompson, R. Terry, Gaede, Stewart, Gelman, Neil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4951
container_issue 8
container_start_page 4951
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 43
creator Mouawad, Matthew
Biernaski, Heather
Brackstone, Muriel
Klassen, Martyn
Lock, Michael
Prato, Frank S.
Thompson, R. Terry
Gaede, Stewart
Gelman, Neil
description Purpose: Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI is applied extensively for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. However, patient motion can introduce artificial variation in the signal enhancement curves. Non-rigid registration can improve the curves but computation time can be long. Reducing the percentage of the image sampled (PS) can reduce time at the theoretical cost of registration accuracy. This work investigates the influence of PS on kinetic model analysis results and goodness-of-fit. Methods: DCE images were acquired using a 3T Siemens Biograph mMR. Deformable registration was performed on one patient dataset with 3Dslicer using PS values of 5, 20, and 100%. For three regions of interest within the tumor, tissue contrast agent concentration values versus time were generated and analyzed using the TOFTS pharmacokinetic model. Model parameters, their 95% confidence intervals and the coefficients of variation (CV), which served as a measure of goodness of fit, were recorded. Results: Computation time was approximately 16, 8, and 4 minutes/image for 100, 20, and 5 PS. The CV decreased following registration and there was a trend of decreasing CV with increasing PS. However, no differences in parameter values obtained with 100% PS and parameters values obtained with lower PS were observed. Substantial differences were found between parameter values obtained with versus without registration Conclusions: Increasing PS led to improved goodness-of-fit for the kinetic model analysis, at the expense of substantially increased computation time. However, this improved fit did not appear to influence parameter values for this patient.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4961834
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4961834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP1834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1074-4d875de67935600c3864b4086b43b89402b1cacb777c73126986069b695877a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQh4MoWKsH3yBXhehkk02yvZXaaqFF0XpestnsGt0_JVmRPpGv6a7tVWFgDvPNN8MPoUsKN5RSdUtveCKoYvwIjSIuGeERJMdoBJBwEnGIT9FZCO8AIFgMI_T9YhxZeIen6wlePy-xbnJ853TZtKFzBi9rXbqmxAQDm-DNm8WuKapP2xiL2wIHXW-rYb613tim0-UA4NwWra91VlnsbelC53Xn2gb39eEaO4jrNrdVf01Xu-BCj4XPqgvD8t1sToZPen3X38u81aE7RyeFroK9OPQxel3MN7MHsnq8X86mK2IoSE54rmScWyETFgsAw5TgGQclMs4ylXCIMmq0yaSURjIaiUQJEEkmklhJqSUbo6u91_g2BG-LdOtdrf0upZAOCac0PSTcs2TPfrnK7v4G0_XTgb_e88G47jeQf-Q_NBeHXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sci-Fri AM: MRI and Diagnostic Imaging - 03: The influence of sampling percentage in deformable registration on kinetic model analysis results in DCE-MRI of the breast</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mouawad, Matthew ; Biernaski, Heather ; Brackstone, Muriel ; Klassen, Martyn ; Lock, Michael ; Prato, Frank S. ; Thompson, R. Terry ; Gaede, Stewart ; Gelman, Neil</creator><creatorcontrib>Mouawad, Matthew ; Biernaski, Heather ; Brackstone, Muriel ; Klassen, Martyn ; Lock, Michael ; Prato, Frank S. ; Thompson, R. Terry ; Gaede, Stewart ; Gelman, Neil</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI is applied extensively for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. However, patient motion can introduce artificial variation in the signal enhancement curves. Non-rigid registration can improve the curves but computation time can be long. Reducing the percentage of the image sampled (PS) can reduce time at the theoretical cost of registration accuracy. This work investigates the influence of PS on kinetic model analysis results and goodness-of-fit. Methods: DCE images were acquired using a 3T Siemens Biograph mMR. Deformable registration was performed on one patient dataset with 3Dslicer using PS values of 5, 20, and 100%. For three regions of interest within the tumor, tissue contrast agent concentration values versus time were generated and analyzed using the TOFTS pharmacokinetic model. Model parameters, their 95% confidence intervals and the coefficients of variation (CV), which served as a measure of goodness of fit, were recorded. Results: Computation time was approximately 16, 8, and 4 minutes/image for 100, 20, and 5 PS. The CV decreased following registration and there was a trend of decreasing CV with increasing PS. However, no differences in parameter values obtained with 100% PS and parameters values obtained with lower PS were observed. Substantial differences were found between parameter values obtained with versus without registration Conclusions: Increasing PS led to improved goodness-of-fit for the kinetic model analysis, at the expense of substantially increased computation time. However, this improved fit did not appear to influence parameter values for this patient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4961834</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>Agent based models ; Biomedical modeling ; Cancer ; Contrast sensitivity ; Image analysis ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical image contrast ; Tissues</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-08, Vol.43 (8), p.4951-4951</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4961834$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mouawad, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biernaski, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brackstone, Muriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Martyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lock, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prato, Frank S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, R. Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaede, Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelman, Neil</creatorcontrib><title>Sci-Fri AM: MRI and Diagnostic Imaging - 03: The influence of sampling percentage in deformable registration on kinetic model analysis results in DCE-MRI of the breast</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><description>Purpose: Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI is applied extensively for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. However, patient motion can introduce artificial variation in the signal enhancement curves. Non-rigid registration can improve the curves but computation time can be long. Reducing the percentage of the image sampled (PS) can reduce time at the theoretical cost of registration accuracy. This work investigates the influence of PS on kinetic model analysis results and goodness-of-fit. Methods: DCE images were acquired using a 3T Siemens Biograph mMR. Deformable registration was performed on one patient dataset with 3Dslicer using PS values of 5, 20, and 100%. For three regions of interest within the tumor, tissue contrast agent concentration values versus time were generated and analyzed using the TOFTS pharmacokinetic model. Model parameters, their 95% confidence intervals and the coefficients of variation (CV), which served as a measure of goodness of fit, were recorded. Results: Computation time was approximately 16, 8, and 4 minutes/image for 100, 20, and 5 PS. The CV decreased following registration and there was a trend of decreasing CV with increasing PS. However, no differences in parameter values obtained with 100% PS and parameters values obtained with lower PS were observed. Substantial differences were found between parameter values obtained with versus without registration Conclusions: Increasing PS led to improved goodness-of-fit for the kinetic model analysis, at the expense of substantially increased computation time. However, this improved fit did not appear to influence parameter values for this patient.</description><subject>Agent based models</subject><subject>Biomedical modeling</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Contrast sensitivity</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical image contrast</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQh4MoWKsH3yBXhehkk02yvZXaaqFF0XpestnsGt0_JVmRPpGv6a7tVWFgDvPNN8MPoUsKN5RSdUtveCKoYvwIjSIuGeERJMdoBJBwEnGIT9FZCO8AIFgMI_T9YhxZeIen6wlePy-xbnJ853TZtKFzBi9rXbqmxAQDm-DNm8WuKapP2xiL2wIHXW-rYb613tim0-UA4NwWra91VlnsbelC53Xn2gb39eEaO4jrNrdVf01Xu-BCj4XPqgvD8t1sToZPen3X38u81aE7RyeFroK9OPQxel3MN7MHsnq8X86mK2IoSE54rmScWyETFgsAw5TgGQclMs4ylXCIMmq0yaSURjIaiUQJEEkmklhJqSUbo6u91_g2BG-LdOtdrf0upZAOCac0PSTcs2TPfrnK7v4G0_XTgb_e88G47jeQf-Q_NBeHXA</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Mouawad, Matthew</creator><creator>Biernaski, Heather</creator><creator>Brackstone, Muriel</creator><creator>Klassen, Martyn</creator><creator>Lock, Michael</creator><creator>Prato, Frank S.</creator><creator>Thompson, R. Terry</creator><creator>Gaede, Stewart</creator><creator>Gelman, Neil</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Sci-Fri AM: MRI and Diagnostic Imaging - 03: The influence of sampling percentage in deformable registration on kinetic model analysis results in DCE-MRI of the breast</title><author>Mouawad, Matthew ; Biernaski, Heather ; Brackstone, Muriel ; Klassen, Martyn ; Lock, Michael ; Prato, Frank S. ; Thompson, R. Terry ; Gaede, Stewart ; Gelman, Neil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1074-4d875de67935600c3864b4086b43b89402b1cacb777c73126986069b695877a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agent based models</topic><topic>Biomedical modeling</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Contrast sensitivity</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical image contrast</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mouawad, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biernaski, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brackstone, Muriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Martyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lock, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prato, Frank S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, R. Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaede, Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelman, Neil</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mouawad, Matthew</au><au>Biernaski, Heather</au><au>Brackstone, Muriel</au><au>Klassen, Martyn</au><au>Lock, Michael</au><au>Prato, Frank S.</au><au>Thompson, R. Terry</au><au>Gaede, Stewart</au><au>Gelman, Neil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sci-Fri AM: MRI and Diagnostic Imaging - 03: The influence of sampling percentage in deformable registration on kinetic model analysis results in DCE-MRI of the breast</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>4951</spage><epage>4951</epage><pages>4951-4951</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI is applied extensively for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of breast cancer. However, patient motion can introduce artificial variation in the signal enhancement curves. Non-rigid registration can improve the curves but computation time can be long. Reducing the percentage of the image sampled (PS) can reduce time at the theoretical cost of registration accuracy. This work investigates the influence of PS on kinetic model analysis results and goodness-of-fit. Methods: DCE images were acquired using a 3T Siemens Biograph mMR. Deformable registration was performed on one patient dataset with 3Dslicer using PS values of 5, 20, and 100%. For three regions of interest within the tumor, tissue contrast agent concentration values versus time were generated and analyzed using the TOFTS pharmacokinetic model. Model parameters, their 95% confidence intervals and the coefficients of variation (CV), which served as a measure of goodness of fit, were recorded. Results: Computation time was approximately 16, 8, and 4 minutes/image for 100, 20, and 5 PS. The CV decreased following registration and there was a trend of decreasing CV with increasing PS. However, no differences in parameter values obtained with 100% PS and parameters values obtained with lower PS were observed. Substantial differences were found between parameter values obtained with versus without registration Conclusions: Increasing PS led to improved goodness-of-fit for the kinetic model analysis, at the expense of substantially increased computation time. However, this improved fit did not appear to influence parameter values for this patient.</abstract><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.4961834</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2016-08, Vol.43 (8), p.4951-4951
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4961834
source Wiley Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agent based models
Biomedical modeling
Cancer
Contrast sensitivity
Image analysis
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical image contrast
Tissues
title Sci-Fri AM: MRI and Diagnostic Imaging - 03: The influence of sampling percentage in deformable registration on kinetic model analysis results in DCE-MRI of the breast
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A59%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sci-Fri%20AM:%20MRI%20and%20Diagnostic%20Imaging%20-%2003:%20The%20influence%20of%20sampling%20percentage%20in%20deformable%20registration%20on%20kinetic%20model%20analysis%20results%20in%20DCE-MRI%20of%20the%20breast&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Mouawad,%20Matthew&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4951&rft.epage=4951&rft.pages=4951-4951&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4961834&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EMP1834%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true